> With the patch applied, on the General tab of Xfce Power Manager,
there should be a "Brightness step count" field and an "Exponential"
checkbox next to it.
Weird, I'm not seeing those. But don't let that worry you, I'm sure the
next proper release will have those setting show up.
> I believe th
Thank you, Timothy Lee. This was long needed. I've applied attachment
8653 from comment 25 on top of xfce4-power-manager-1.6.5. I couldn't
apply the newer patches due to the aforementioned code style changes.
Where are the settings to be found? I can't find anything new in the
Power Manager's sett
(In reply to Simon Steinbeiss from comment #29)
> Created attachment 9037 [details]
> Always set parent-relative background
>
> I'm not sure it's helpful to not set a parent-relative background when
> compositing is disabled, so I went for always enabling it.
> This fixes the problem for me.
>
>
Additionally, when new elements are created, they always end up on the
leftmost output, instead of the output they were created on. See
https://www.reddit.com/r/xfce/comments/b6341f/new_icons_appear_on_the_wrong_monitor/ejhm472/
4.13.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
(In reply to Michael Shigorin from comment #32)
> (In reply to main.haarp from comment #31)
> > Do you happen to have a more recent patch?
>
> 1.19.3:
> http://git.altlinux.org/gears/x/xorg-server.git?p=xorg-server.git;
> a=commitdiff;h=c5b77a90d7e0d6a1874fcb545969f355d1ed0293
Applies well. Thank
(In reply to Michael Shigorin from comment #30)
> FWIW we've patched xorg-server in the distribution.
> Shame on those breaking base functionality instead of fixing their crap!
Do you happen to have a more recent patch? The ones posted here are very
outdated.
--
You received this bug notificatio
(In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #16)
> Adam: I'm really hesitant to put it into libinput because I'm not sure the
> problem scope is well understood (at least by me) and what the actual point
> of it is. So far it's been a "would be nice" but - at least these days :) -
> we require a bit m
(In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #20)
> (In reply to main.haarp from comment #17)
> If the document is long enough
> that scrolling acceleration is needed, the application (or toolkit) should
> honor that and provide the appropriate methods - that may include
> acceleration.
> libinput sits
(In reply to Yan Pas from comment #185)
> I agree with comment #184. I face an app being frozen in event loop. Do we
> need to open a new bug?
Yes, please do and let us know the bug number.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Could we please keep the support and packaging stuff to a minimum here?
I appreciate the work people do on getting these critical fixes
packaged, but this isn't a support forum. This section is for the bug
itself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
(In reply to slumbergod from comment #101)
> Nothing can proceed forwards until we get some feedback from the main xfce
> developers.
>
> I'm not even sure if anyone is in charge of the thunar project and my
> attempts in the past to ask what the status of the project is with regard to
> fixing t
(In reply to slumbergod from comment #99)
> Offering a bounty is a nice idea but I still think this requires something
> bigger. We really need to crowdfund to hire a software engineer to re-write
> a significant chunk of code rather than just work out a single fix.
>
> It might even lead to some
At this point it almost seems less work to strip everything remotely
related to renaming and rewrite it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120
Title:
[SRU] thunar crashes on file ren
I too would like Xorg to not blatantly lie.
The proposed patch from 2011 does not apply anymore to recent versions,
is there an updated one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485
Title
(In reply to Harald Judt from comment #10)
> The patch from some duplicate doesn't seem to work for me?
Hmm, weird. It works very well for me.
I just discovered a case that's not covered by this patch however. The "Image"
tab in file properties of pictures is shown only for local files, even wi
My bet is that since GTK3 applications use smooth scrolling
(http://who-t.blogspot.de/2011/09/whats-new-in-xi-21-smooth-
scrolling.html), they listen to different scroll events than the
(correctly-inverted) GTK2-based ones.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
(In reply to Jérôme Guelfucci from comment #4)
> Patch proposed in a duplicate:
> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=3482&action=diff
I can confirm this patch as working.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #6)
> FTR, Firefox 36.0.1 has restored the -remote option as it broke many use
> cases without any real benefit. We could possibly revert commit 8022a52 in
> exo, though I can't think of an upside to using -remote in this context.
Seeing as -remote seems
Confirming that the patch fixed this bug for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421621
Title:
pavucontrol's window width depends on stream names, may get very wide
To manage notifica
19 matches
Mail list logo
