Thanks for the update Daniel.
I cannot confirm the fix in 12.04/10 because I stopped using Unity
because of this bug. I guess if nobody else confirms/denies you can just
close it. If I switch back to Unity and still have issues I'll open
another issue.
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Since upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10, I've noticed incredibly poor
performance with Compiz and progress bars. For example, I just attempted
a network copy of a directory of files (10's of them). My computer
ground to a halt while the copy went, but as soon as I minimized the
** Attachment added: lsof of compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387/+attachment/2580646/+files/lsof
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387
Title:
Compiz is absurdly heavy on
Here is the strace of compiz when the copy-progress-bar is minimized.
** Attachment added: strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is minimized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+attachment/2580681/+files/minimized
--
You received this bug notification
Here is the strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is maximized.
** Attachment added: strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is maximized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+attachment/2580682/+files/maximized
--
You received this bug notification
To be clear, I can reproduce this with any progress bar. The easiest is
a file copy:
1) Start file copy of a reasonable (10's to 100's) of files which will last a
few minutes
2) Peek at `top`, notice compiz is using 15%+ CPU and system has become
extremely laggy
3) Minimize progress bar, notice
I too am affected by this bug. Touching the file resolved the issue for me.
I am on i686 and its a 10.10-upgraded install of Natty (Unity).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776261
Title:
FWIW, this setting is configurable under 'Window Management' - 'Static
Application Switcher', under the 'Behaviour' tab. And yes, 0.2 makes no
sense so much so I came looking to file a bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Evolution's Exchange plugin is broken for Exchange 2007+, so there
really is no reason to use Evolution anymore.
I'm using DavMail + Thunderbird + Lightning to talk to Exchange at work,
and (IMO) it's a much happier experience than using Outlook on Windows.
The only piece of the puzzle missing is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnomebaker
*** glibc detected *** gnomebaker: free(): invalid pointer: 0x094cdcd8 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x6c95ff1]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x6c976f2]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6d)[0x6c9a79d]
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36509056/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36509057/XsessionErrors.txt
--
gnomebaker exits unexpectedly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493314
You received this bug
Summary:
* Boot up
* Start workflow (open IRC, browse Internet).. all is peachy
* Random amount of time later: no new connections can be made (IRC stays
connected, but can't browse Internet and so forth)
* Rebooting only fixes this after a cooloff period
* Problem does not present on Windows
--
Public bug reported:
$ irb
irb(main):001:0 require 'Qt4'
= true
irb(main):002:0 Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable()
(irb):2: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i486-linux]
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Oct 18 13:38:38 2009
DistroRelease:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33874367/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33874368/XsessionErrors.txt
--
Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597
What is the C++ behaviour if no QApplication is made? Surely it doesn't
segfault as well?
--
Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebindings
Thanks. That sounds reasonable to me.
--
Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebindings in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
16 matches
Mail list logo
