[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2021-08-05 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Hi, thanks for reporting and for fixing this! Unfortunately, I'm on Ubuntu 21.04 where the fix hasn't arrived yet as we're still on 2.33-0ubuntu5 [1], and I was wondering if it could be possible to release at least the update to 2.33-0ubuntu6 in there as well, so that we can have sane stack traces

[Bug 1875015] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 and Displaylink is extremely slow

2020-05-04 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Same problem here, with a DisplayLink dock station and a Thinkpad P1 (1st gen) with the NVIDIA (Quadro P2000) card disabled, running only on the iGPU that comes with my Xeon E-2176M CPU. It's so unusable that I basically had to move back to using an NVIDIA- only mode and plug the screen directly o

[Bug 1775065] Re: No brightness controls and /sys/class/backlight empty after upgrade to Bionic on laptop with GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (kernel parameter acpi_osi= is a workaround)

2018-10-23 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
I can confirm this very same problem in my laptop, which is a Thinkpad P1 with a Xeon E-2176M and hybrid Intel / NVIDIA card working in "Discreet" mode (that is, only the NVIDIA card is enabled) using the proprietary NVIDIA driver installed via the nvidia-driver-390 package (390.87-0ubuntu1). The

[Bug 1776912] Re: chromium-browser package does NOT install an AppData file

2018-08-14 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Hi Olivier, sorry for the late reply but I'm in the middle of an overseas relocation (UK > Spain) + holidays and I'm a bit off the grid these days... Thanks for your comment, and sorry for reporting it against the wrong branch. Hopefully this will help having a better chromium package for future r

[Bug 1776912] Re: chromium-browser package does NOT install an AppData file

2018-06-14 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Note that the Fedora package is installing this file into the deprecated path /usr/share/appdata, instead of using the one specified by AppStream since a while ago: /usr/share/metainfo. I've filed a bug for Fedora in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591306, but I'm commenting this expl

[Bug 1776912] [NEW] chromium-browser package does NOT install an AppData file

2018-06-14 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Public bug reported: In order for Chromium Browser to integrate properly with software centers (e.g. GNOME Software), an additional XML file with metadata needs to be installed under /usr/share/metainfo, in the form of an "AppData file", containing the relevant bits according to the AppStream spec

[Bug 1742653] Re: chromium-browser 63+ packages 50+ MB of binaries only needed at build time

2018-01-11 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
No problem, happy to see the report and the patch are useful. After all, shaving 50MB out of 260MB is quite something! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742653 Title: chromium-brows

[Bug 934291] Re: Deleting or stopping print jobs does not work

2018-01-11 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Sorry for dropping the ball on this one, for some reason I completely missed all notifications and I only happened to find this bug today almost by chance :-) Anyway, if you don't mind me asking... I understand that my workaround of passing --with-system-groups='lpadmin root' to configure when bui

[Bug 1742653] Re: chromium-browser 63+ packages 51+ MB of binaries only needed at build time

2018-01-11 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
** Summary changed: - chromium-browser 63+ package includes a 44MB binary only needed at build time + chromium-browser 63+ packages 51+ MB of binaries only needed at build time ** Summary changed: - chromium-browser 63+ packages 51+ MB of binaries only needed at build time + chromium-browser 63+

[Bug 1742653] Re: chromium-browser 63+ package includes a 44MB binary only needed at build time

2018-01-11 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
I believe all it's needed is to patch the debian/rules file to add `v8_context_snapshot_generator` to the TRASH list of files: ``` --- a/debian/rules 2017-12-07 08:40:06.0 + +++ b/debian/rules 2018-01-11 10:59:39.168190995 + @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ override_dh_install-arch:

[Bug 1742653] [NEW] chromium-browser 63+ package includes a 44MB binary only needed at build time

2018-01-11 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Public bug reported: As mentioned in [1], it seems like the chromium-browser package might be, since Chromium 63, packaging a new and pretty big (44MB) binary that is not needed at run time, just at build time. This binary is `/usr/lib/chromium-browser/v8_context_snapshot_generator`, which is at

[Bug 1253638] Re: dynamic linker does not use DT_RUNPATH for transitive dependencies

2017-07-14 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
> I don't know if this is expected behavior, but it's certainly annoying behavior. I'm writing an app that depends on libtcodxx.so, which in turn depends on libtcod.so. I want to ship them both in the lib directory next to my app. With RUNPATH as "$ORIGIN/lib", it finds the direct dependency (libtc

[Bug 1066529] Re: All jobs stopped, epson_inkjet_printer_filter failed

2016-02-19 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
This looks to me as a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/840998 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066529 Title: All jobs stopped, epson_inkjet_printer_filte

[Bug 1272001] Re: Evolution black background in mail display

2016-01-20 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
I found this bug today in our downstream platform that is still using evolution 3.10.1, and thought it would be relevant to mention that this has been fixed usptream for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731872, and also that the patch from there applied cleanly on top of my 3.10.1, fi

[Bug 934291] Re: Deleting or stopping print jobs does not work

2015-04-20 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
I've been investigating this issue recently and can confirm that, while this is not an issue in my Fedora machine with the very same version of cups, cups-pk-helper and gnome-control-center installed, it is still present in Ubuntu, due to what I believe it might be a bug in the way CUPS is being pa

[Bug 718080] Re: TypeError: value is of the wrong type for this column

2011-04-12 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
At the moment I'm not using ubuntu in this machine but Fedora 14, so I'd say versions of the dependencies would be pretty much the same (or quite similar) than in ubuntu maverick. In more detail: glib2-2.26.0 gtk2-2.22 pygobject2-2.21.5 pygtk2-2.17 pygtk2-libglade-2.17 python-2.7-8 I now it