[Bug 584249] [NEW] pam_env does not evaluate ~/.pam_environment

2010-05-22 Thread Martin OConnor
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 10.04, any environment variables assigned in ~/.pam_environment do not seem to be applied. for example if I have a ~/.pam_environment as follows MY_VARIABLE=SOMETHING after restarting and starting a shell I would expect echo $MY_VARIABLE to respond with

[Bug 217435] Re: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on libpam0g

2008-04-15 Thread Martin OConnor
This happening for me too -- Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on libpam0g https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken

2008-01-13 Thread Martin OConnor
squid 2.6.1-3ubuntu1.6 from edgy-proposed works as required as a transparent proxy ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- squid transparent proxy is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken

2008-01-10 Thread Martin OConnor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I can confirm that this now works. I have installed the version in edgy-proposed and the transparent option now works. Martin Pitt wrote: | Can someone please test this? Martin OConnor? | | This SRU is very old, and if it does not get verified I'll

[Bug 153635] Re: [vmware] nm-applet No Network Devices Have Been Found error

2007-10-20 Thread Martin OConnor
No, This worked fine in the Gutsy beta release iso. It broke on update from there. -- [vmware] nm-applet No Network Devices Have Been Found error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 153635] Re: [vmware] nm-applet No Network Devices Have Been Found error

2007-10-19 Thread Martin OConnor
As a workaround until the bug is fixed, you can disable roaming mode on the VMware wired adapter and specify dhcp configuration. That should at least keep you online until a fix released. -- [vmware] nm-applet No Network Devices Have Been Found error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153635 You

[Bug 152994] Re: [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-16 Thread Martin OConnor
The following output was produced: Oct 16 12:23:11 defiant NetworkManager: WARN nm_signal_handler(): Caught signal 15, shutting down normally. Oct 16 12:23:11 defiant NetworkManager: info Caught terminiation signal Oct 16 12:23:11 defiant NetworkManager: debug [1192533791.612324]

Re: [Bug 152994] Re: [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
The bug occurs in Feisty. Alexander Sack wrote: Gutsy or feisty? ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 152994] Re: [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
Requested information supplied. If further information is required, please do not hesitate to comment. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152994 You received this bug

[Bug 152994] Re: [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
I'll have to apologise, the release was in fact Gutsy, guess I've been used to using the Feisty codename for so long eh ;) I have attached the required files, and included output from ifconfig -a also. On 15/10/2007, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: please attach your /etc/lsb-release

[Bug 152994] Re: [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
/etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.10 /etc/network/interfaces DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.10 -- [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

[Bug 152994] Re: [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
/etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet dhcp auto eth0 -- [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 152994] Re: [Gutsy] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
That's the problem, Doing so causes the network not to be detected according to the nm-applet I'm using the non-roaming mode as a workaround to get network access. Alexander Sack wrote: well ... that setup doesn't capture roaming mode. Please either remove the iface eth0 file from

[Bug 152994] Re: upgread breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
This bug occurs in Feisty. -- [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 152994] upgread breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Applying the latest updates since the Release Candidate ISO was released causes nm-applet to show that no networks are detected. Workaround: Disable roaming mode and configure network interface manually Installed in VMWare 6, with

[Bug 152994] Re: [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode

2007-10-15 Thread Martin OConnor
** Summary changed: - upgread breaks network in roaming mode + [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode -- [Feisty] upgrade breaks network in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

Re: [Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken

2007-05-22 Thread Martin OConnor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Setting the following in squid.conf before starting squid will reproduce this bug. httpd_accel_host virtual httpd_accel_port 80 httpd_accel_with_proxy on httpd_accel_uses_host_header on -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

[Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken

2007-03-18 Thread Martin OConnor
Remember this is an upstream bug that was broken and has also been fixed upstream. Ideally, the upstream version of squid this package uses should be updated to a more recent version where the fix has been applied. -- squid transparent proxy is broken https://launchpad.net/bugs/68818 --

[Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken

2006-11-12 Thread Martin OConnor
Using always_direct allow all, in most cases defeats the purpose of using a proxy. I have pinned to dapper for squid until this is fixed. -- squid transparent proxy is broken https://launchpad.net/bugs/68818 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken

2006-11-01 Thread Martin OConnor
** Bug watch added: Squid Bugzilla #1650 http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1650 ** Also affects: squid (upstream) via http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1650 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- squid transparent proxy is broken

[Bug 68818] squid transparent proxy is broken

2006-10-28 Thread Martin OConnor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid In package 2.6.1-3ubuntu1 , the transparent option in squid.conf is broken in Squid upstream version 2.6.RELEASE1. This has been fixed in 2.6.RELEASE2. Recommend 2.6.RELEASE2 be added to edgy-backports. ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu)

[Bug 53856] Re: ClamAV-Daemon Out of date

2006-07-27 Thread Martin OConnor
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- ClamAV-Daemon Out of date https://launchpad.net/bugs/53856 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 50622] Debconf does not set administrator password

2006-06-21 Thread Martin OConnor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mantis A)Install mantis B)The debconf utility will eventually ask you to supply a password for the administrator C)The supplied password is completly ignored and the default username and password of administrator and root are used. ** Affects: mantis

[Bug 50622] Re: Debconf does not set mantis administrator password

2006-06-21 Thread Martin OConnor
** Summary changed: - Debconf does not set administrator password + Debconf does not set mantis administrator password -- Debconf does not set mantis administrator password https://launchpad.net/bugs/50622 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com