[Bug 1326775] Re: Wrong apache configuration for openstack-dashboard

2014-11-10 Thread Matthias Runge
This is something, I heard on the past OpenStack Summit a few times. ** Changed in: openstack-dashboard (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1326775

[Bug 1379761] Re: Asset compression does not happen unless debug mode is enabled

2014-10-14 Thread Matthias Runge
odd, I can not reproduce this at all, using Fedora packages e.g. from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7862410 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379761

[Bug 1379761] Re: Asset compression does not happen unless debug mode is enabled

2014-10-14 Thread Matthias Runge
odd, I can not reproduce this at all, using Fedora packages e.g. from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7862410 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379761 Title: Asset

[Bug 1288245] Re: mox is needed in requirements

2014-03-18 Thread Matthias Runge
** Changed in: horizon Milestone: None = next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288245 Title: mox is needed in requirements To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1288245] Re: mox is needed in requirements

2014-03-18 Thread Matthias Runge
** Changed in: horizon Milestone: None = next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288245 Title: mox is needed in requirements To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1242766] Re: python manage.py compress: bin/sh: 1: lesscpy: not found

2013-10-22 Thread Matthias Runge
I'd like to add, when using COMPRESS_OFFLINE = True, you don't need a compressor at runtime. Especially this was a concern, when we used nodejs and less.js to compress, and nobody wants both permanently on a server for a task to be only run once. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1242766] Re: python manage.py compress: bin/sh: 1: lesscpy: not found

2013-10-22 Thread Matthias Runge
@Daniel Speichert, it depends; if COMPRESS_OFFLINE is set, python- lesscpy does NOT necessarily need to be installed at all. As other example, you don't install all test requirements on a server machine as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 1242766] Re: python manage.py compress: bin/sh: 1: lesscpy: not found

2013-10-22 Thread Matthias Runge
Yes exactly. And the same is true for run_tests.sh, where you need various other packages, or you accept, they will be fetched via internet, which might be allowed/disallowed by (firewall policy) or ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 1242766] Re: python manage.py compress: bin/sh: 1: lesscpy: not found

2013-10-22 Thread Matthias Runge
I'd like to add, when using COMPRESS_OFFLINE = True, you don't need a compressor at runtime. Especially this was a concern, when we used nodejs and less.js to compress, and nobody wants both permanently on a server for a task to be only run once. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1242766] Re: python manage.py compress: bin/sh: 1: lesscpy: not found

2013-10-22 Thread Matthias Runge
@Daniel Speichert, it depends; if COMPRESS_OFFLINE is set, python- lesscpy does NOT necessarily need to be installed at all. As other example, you don't install all test requirements on a server machine as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1242766] Re: python manage.py compress: bin/sh: 1: lesscpy: not found

2013-10-22 Thread Matthias Runge
Yes exactly. And the same is true for run_tests.sh, where you need various other packages, or you accept, they will be fetched via internet, which might be allowed/disallowed by (firewall policy) or ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1221906] Re: Havana-3 Dependency missing: python-troveclient

2013-09-18 Thread Matthias Runge
** Changed in: horizon Milestone: None = havana-rc1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221906 Title: Havana-3 Dependency missing: python-troveclient To manage

[Bug 1221906] Re: Havana-3 Dependency missing: python-troveclient

2013-09-18 Thread Matthias Runge
** Changed in: horizon Milestone: None = havana-rc1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221906 Title: Havana-3 Dependency missing: python-troveclient To manage notifications about

[Bug 420953] Re: Exits on Close instead of Iconifying

2010-06-02 Thread Matthias Runge
Sounds great! -- Exits on Close instead of Iconifying https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 420953] Re: Exits on Close instead of Iconifying

2010-05-19 Thread Matthias Runge
I'm using gwibber on fedora. Fedora does not use ubuntus message-menu. (Sic, there is a world outside ubuntu). Running gwibber as service is pretty useless, because notifications will not be displayed. In prior versions of gwibber messages were displayed, while iconified. As I understand right,

[Bug 567135] Re: Feature request: iconify (again)

2010-04-20 Thread Matthias Runge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 420953 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420953 I don't think it's a duplicate. If you look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/420953/comments/16 the user says, gwibber service is still running. It's not true for this (current)