[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Heldebrant
snmp commands do work with: mheldebr@server:/$ snmpwalk -v2c -c REDACTED localhost 'NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1' NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1 = STRING: 11486 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Heldebrant
snmp commands do work with: mheldebr@server:/$ snmpwalk -v2c -c REDACTED localhost 'NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1' NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutLine.svncommits.1 = STRING: 11486 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1015819] Re: sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I can't use GSSAPI via sasl to receive data from the ldap server if SSL or TLS is used as I get illegal packet length errors as reported. Non encrypted ldap is working with no issues using GSSAPI authentication. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 1015819] Re: sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I can't use GSSAPI via sasl to receive data from the ldap server if SSL or TLS is used as I get illegal packet length errors as reported. Non encrypted ldap is working with no issues using GSSAPI authentication. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1015819] [NEW] sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Public bug reported: Not sure if this is a problem with openldap or cyrus-sasl2 at this point. Using sasl binding only works with ldapsearch when not using ssl or tls. If either ssl or tls is used I see this ouput from -d 1 from ldapsearch: sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet

[Bug 1015819] [NEW] sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet length when using ldapsearch and sasl with ssl or tls

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Public bug reported: Not sure if this is a problem with openldap or cyrus-sasl2 at this point. Using sasl binding only works with ldapsearch when not using ssl or tls. If either ssl or tls is used I see this ouput from -d 1 from ldapsearch: sb_sasl_generic_pkt_length: received illegal packet

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-13 Thread Michael Heldebrant
It seems then that neither exec not extend let me anchor the oid where I want like I could before. Either way will give I just had to go digging for the numeric OID to poll with cacti with snmpwalk. mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ sudo grep extend /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf extend svncommits /bin/sh

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-13 Thread Michael Heldebrant
It seems then that neither exec not extend let me anchor the oid where I want like I could before. Either way will give I just had to go digging for the numeric OID to poll with cacti with snmpwalk. mheldebr@server:/svn-hotcopy$ sudo grep extend /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf extend svncommits /bin/sh

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-05-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Documentation of the issue seems like a reasonable way forwards, assuming the crc32c module is also pre-installed into the installer initrd and left as a choice for the sysadmin to add it manually. The first reboot post install would still be affected until adding the module into the the

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Script essentially is giving me a counter to watch the rate of commits on a subversion repository: mheldebr@server:~$ /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest 10386 I tried both exec (works on RHEL5 configured like this) and extend which both fail: Snippet of snmpd.conf file with exec style: exec

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Script essentially is giving me a counter to watch the rate of commits on a subversion repository: mheldebr@server:~$ /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest 10386 I tried both exec (works on RHEL5 configured like this) and extend which both fail: Snippet of snmpd.conf file with exec style: exec

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I can confirm that adding crc32c as a manual entry in the /etc /initramfs-tools/modules and rebuilding the initramfs with update- initramfs -u does work to fix the problem on Ubuntu 10.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-04 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Lucid is still affected with this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922 Title: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules To manage

[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-05-04 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Lucid is still affected with this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922 Title: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules To manage notifications about this

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-04-06 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I'll try adding the crc32c module in as well for the next reboot. It won't be until May that I can test this on the server during scheduled maintenance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I added libcrc32a to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules (module is libcrc32a and not libcrc32) and this time during boot I saw an unlogged to the boot or syslog message about a missing symbol in that module and then the same long pause behavior for trying to load the network driver on boot. -- You

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Make that libcrc32c for the module name. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353 Title: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x To manage

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-03-08 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I see a delay of about 3-4 minutes on boot as the blade tries the 8 ethernet interfaces and times out on the missing libcrc32 module on all of them. The server is booted from a local disk. I can attempt to add libcrc32 to the module list next scheduled reboot. -- You received this bug

[Bug 415353] Re: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network hardware with bnx2x

2012-02-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
This also affects my HP blade server on boot with the Lucid 10.04 2.6.32-38 kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415353 Title: karmic/lucid installation slow on detecting network

[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
SSL regression appears to be when used for ldap communication to active directory servers, not for serving http. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390 Title:

[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Heldebrant
SSL regression appears to be when used for ldap communication to active directory servers, not for serving http. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390 Title: Apache+Kerberos not

[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-31 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I'm also seeing intermittent LDAP failures to bind for users with this version of the apache2 package. I think a regression in ssl support for ldap has occured with this version of apache2. I've put one of my two misbehaving servers back to 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 to see if the problems go away. A

[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-31 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I'm also seeing intermittent LDAP failures to bind for users with this version of the apache2 package. I think a regression in ssl support for ldap has occured with this version of apache2. I've put one of my two misbehaving servers back to 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 to see if the problems go away. A

[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I've worked around this bug at this time by adding: LDAPVerifyServerCert off to the server config to get around the problem at this time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Heldebrant
I've worked around this bug at this time by adding: LDAPVerifyServerCert off to the server config to get around the problem at this time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 691726] [NEW] ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: e2fsprogs Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 e2fsprogs: Installed: 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1 Candidate: 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1 Version table: *** 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1 0 500 http://hivemind.epicsys.com/aptmirror/ubuntu/

[Bug 691726] Re: ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691726 Title: ext4 not able to online resize -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 691726] Re: ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Apparently it has something to do with this filesystem as I can resize a freshly created one mounted or not: r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# lvcreate -L1G -n lvtest vg Logical volume lvtest created r...@server:/usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs# mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg/lvtest mke2fs 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)

[Bug 691726] Re: ext4 not able to online resize

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Apparently this was a SAN issue that didn't force a ro on this filesystem. I noted the issues later and remounted this filesystem and then it was able to resize online. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 335363] Re: e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Apparently this was a SAN issue that didn't force a ro on this filesystem. I noted the issues later and remounted this filesystem and then it was able to resize online. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 335363] Re: e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing

2010-12-17 Thread Michael Heldebrant
Wrong bug, ignore comment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335363 Title: e2fsprogs corrupts ext4 partitions when resizing -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com