https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/24.10.23 should
hopefully fix this once it has migrated and a new daily has been built.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081185
Title:
I've uploaded the jammy and focal versions too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105
Title:
cloud-images do not produce sboms
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
I've uploaded the noble branch to the queue after some messing about and
force pushing to make the upload history and git history align.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105
Title:
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077603
Title:
debsum of /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon failed
To manage
I've uploaded to the SRU review queue now:
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading live-build_3.0~a57-1ubuntu49.1.dsc: done.
Uploading live-build_3.0~a57-1ubuntu49.1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading live-build_3.0~a57-1ubuntu49.1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading live
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2077603 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077603
Is this the same issue as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/2077603 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
They are passing again now. Noone did anything to fix them! But I guess
we should close this now...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080759
Title:
pristine-tar autopkgtests fail agains
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0ubuntu1.orig.tar.xz: done.
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0
FWIW it seems the tests only fail with PRISTINE_ALL_XDELTA=xdelta, not
the default PRISTINE_ALL_XDELTA=xdelta3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080759
Title:
pristine-tar autopkgtests
I think the main difference is that some files are not stripped, in
particular /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/cc1 and
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/lto1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
I've sponsored the fix into oracular. Hopefully we can check it fixes
the issue there before SRUing it to noble.
** Also affects: live-build (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug n
-installer builds continue to be broken in some way.
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson)
Status: In Progress
** Also
I built a livefs
(https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/test/+build/667772)
and it built fine. I made it into an ISO and that revealed that we need
some subiquity changes in the ubuntu/noble branch as well but that's not
a problem with the livecd-rootfs changes.
I also built a deskt
** Description changed:
I added code in oracular to build an installer for UC24. We would like
to (slightly) productionize this installer and so building on a noble
base would be better.
[test plan]
We should build a livefs with a command like:
- $ start-livefs-build --livefs=~mwhu
** Summary changed:
- backport ubnutu-core-installer code to noble
+ backport ubuntu-core-installer code to noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076307
Title:
backport ubuntu-core-i
I don't think it's necessary to block this until the build for newly
added subarch support succeeds, it's enough to be confident that it
doesn't regress any current builds I think? (speaking somewhat biasedly
as someone wanting to get a change that is on top of this one into
noble-updates)
--
You
Public bug reported:
I added code in oracular to build an installer for UC24. We would like
to (slightly) productionize this installer and so building on a noble
base would be better.
[test plan]
We should build a livefs with a command like:
$ start-livefs-build --livefs=~mwhudson/+livefs/ubuntu
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Changed in: systemd-hwe (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069383
Title:
ftbfs in oracular and noble
To manage notifications abo
My fix migrated (I forgot to reference this bug in the changelog)
** Changed in: mescc-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072472
Title:
After remembering about gdb's starti command to start debugging at the
very first instruction, I think this is an upstream bug in the test and
filed https://github.com/oriansj/mescc-tools/issues/47 and will upload a
simple fix.
** Bug watch added: github.com/oriansj/mescc-tools/issues #47
https
Public bug reported:
The build in both noble and oracular fails with
FAIL: test_no_duplicates (__main__.RedundancyCheckTest.test_no_duplicates)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/<>/./tests/hwdb-redundancy", line 80,
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded p
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Succe
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uplo
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading diffoscope_270ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading diffoscope_270ubuntu1.tar.xz: done.
Uploading diffoscope_270ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading diffoscope_270ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading yt_4.3.0-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading yt_4.3.0-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading yt_4.3.0-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading yt_4.3.0-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.
--
You recei
This is alleged to be fixed in the version of perl currently in
oracular-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059172
Title:
autopkgtest failure with perl/5.38.2-3.2
To manage not
This still seems to be a real issue. It probably requires some debugging
on an armhf instance.
** Changed in: libgit2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ruby-rugged (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
zhsj fixed this in Debian before release.
** Changed in: gopacket (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059260
Title:
Test failure on armhf with
Public bug reported:
This package has a t64 transition in proposed which has not migrated...
the reason it has not migrated is that the only interesting binary
package this source builds (android-platform-frameworks-native-headers)
has long since been taken over by a different source package (andr
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading bpfcc_0.29.1+ds-1ubuntu7.dsc: done.
Uploading bpfcc_0.29.1+ds-1ubuntu7.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading bpfcc_0.29.1+ds-1ubuntu7_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading bpfcc_0.29.1+ds-1ubuntu7_source.changes: done.
Successfully uplo
FWIW, as the foundations team member trying to tie up the loose ends of
the time64 transition, I support this work -- the alternative is doing
the t64 transition for ceph, which is more effort.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Public bug reported:
This package build depends on 'slib' which was removed from noble on
2024-03-27
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slib/+publishinghistory)
mwhudson@orcrist:~/tmp/bootstrap$ reverse-depends src:gauche
mwhudson@orcrist:~/tmp/bootstrap$ reverse-depends -b src:gauche
No rever
FWIW there is some discussion upstream in these two issues:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/folks/-/issues/140
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3316
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues #3316
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3316
--
You received thi
Public bug reported:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/starlette/noble/arm64 ->
https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-
noble/noble/armhf/s/starlette/20240326_094833_58e76@/log.gz ->
304s > assert ctxvar.get() == "se
Public bug reported:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/pylint/noble/armhf ->
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
noble/noble/armhf/p/pylint/20240326_095003_d135e@/log.gz ->
432s === short test summary info
432s FAILED tes
Public bug reported:
See https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/pydantic/noble/armhf, e.g.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
noble/noble/armhf/p/pydantic/20240326_094721_eb3d5@/log.gz where we see
292s E assert [{'loc': ('a'...rtion_error'}] == [{'loc':
('a'...rtion_erro
no, RAOF triggered me into fixing the build instead
** Changed in: threadscope (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058878
Title:
please remove th
Public bug reported:
This package build-depends on libghc-ghc-events-dev << 0.18 but 0.19.0.1
is now in the archive so this is going to need a sourceful change to fix
and it's been removed from testing.
mwhudson@orcrist:~/tmp/bootstrap/indicator-datetime-15.10+21.04.20210304$
reverse-depends -b
Public bug reported:
It hasn't had a real upload since 2015 and now ftbfs because it uses
debhelper compat 5 and has been removed from testing in Debian.
** Affects: curlftpfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
It's in Jira as well, fwiw.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038906
Title:
Ubuntu desktop ISOs are around 700MB larger than legacy desktop ISOs
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
I xfailed a whole stack of the "conform" tests on armhf, which
presumably fail because of the change in default size of time_t (and
off_t). We should work out what is going on here before release -- maybe
leaving them xfail is appropriate but I'm not confident to say that at
t
Nothing has changed here. I do have a branch in review that should help
but it broke other vmtests in obscure ways. Now Jenkins is usable again,
I guess I/someone should take a look at it again...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
It's deliberately but sometimes unfortunately hard to map an error
report back to who submitted it, so I can't be sure whether the reports
I'm looking at are from you.
If you do try again and hit a similar failure, the crash file will be
present in /var/crash in the live session. If you can upload
Sigh, I thought we'd fixed this. Can you attach a crash log? They should
have been saved to the USB stick you were using for the install.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975391
Title:
Verified that the new version does not generated bogus lines on bionic:
root@lp-1892825-bionic:~# cp /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale
root@lp-1892825-bionic:~# update-locale --locale-file /tmp/locale LANG = C.UTF-8
root@lp-1892825-bionic:~# diff -u /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale
--- /etc/default/l
Verified that libc6 2.27-3ubuntu1.6 can be installed fine in a bionic
docker container an Amazon Linux 2 system with the problematic kernel
version:
root@eef8e8932f4b:/# apt install libc6
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested pack
All packages in Ubuntu have extra png compression applied by
pkgbinarymangler. We can add NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE=1 to the rules file to
turn this off I think.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Public bug reported:
We have a bunch of bug reports about cloud-init not completing within 10
minutes when the installer media is mounted as a virtual ISO/image and
adding 'fsck.mode=skip' the command line usually helps.
We could instrument casper-md5check to monitor how long it is taking or
just
Public bug reported:
Given it no longer runs from the initrd.
I guess it's not harmful, but it doesn't do anything now and it clutters
the code.
** Affects: casper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Marking verification done. I have tested upgrades in containers and vms,
I have tested upgrades on several architectures, I have tested upgrades
specifically on arm64 around lib6-lse and I have tested a core20 snap
with glibc from proposed on amd64, ppc64el and arm64, including a
graphical snap on
Verified on an AL2 instance:
root@19bea50a89e2:/# uname -r
4.14.275-207.503.amzn2.x86_64
root@19bea50a89e2:/# apt install --reinstall libc6=2.31-0ubuntu9.7
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled,
I made a core20 snap with libc6 & libc-bin 2.31-0ubuntu9.9 in it and
uploaded it to
https://people.canonical.com/~mwh/core20_glibc_proposed.snap so
especially brave people could test this if they wanted to.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Hello, could someone affected by this bug test the version of glibc in
focal-proposed? We had to rebuild the package for unrelated reasons.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962225
Title:
Verified:
root@146e5ef6a792:/# dpkg -l libc6
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Architecture Description
+++-=
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951032
Title:
AArch64: Backport
Oops, this is my fault, in
https://github.com/canonical/probert/commit/5a37f8821bf6ad1af19babc862a17e148da5ae25
I accidentally changed to code so that it would think that partitions of
an existing RAID are RAID devices.
** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed
https://github.com/canonical/probert/pull/115
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970116
Title:
Ubuntu 22.04 not installing on md partition
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I verified that arm64 systems with and without libc6-lse installed
upgrade to the new version of glibc in proposed smoothly.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification bec
** No longer affects: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cross-toolchain-base (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Milestone: None => focal-updates
** Also affects: cross-toolchain-base (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cross-toolchain-base (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
I installed debootstrap from impish-proposed and was able to build a
kinetic chroot with mk-sbuild.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-impish
** Tags added: verification-done-impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
I verified part 3 of the test case, that (an appropriately configured)
unattended-upgrades upgrades an arm64 with libc6-lse without complaints:
new_user@ip-172-31-25-59:~/bench$ sudo unattended-upgrade -v
Could not figure out development release: Distribution data outdated. Please
check for an
I ran the tests on a graviton2 instance and saw the improvement as
expected/desired:
length | before (MiB/s) | after (MiB/s) |delta
--|||--
32768 | 233.19 | 247.61 |6.18%
65536 | 443.44 | 468.68 |
verified:
root@focal-vm:~# dpkg -l libc6-dbg | grep ^ii
ii libc6-dbg:amd64 2.31-0ubuntu9.7 amd64GNU C Library: detached
debugging symbols
root@focal-vm:~# gdb -q /bin/date
Reading symbols from /bin/date...
(No debugging symbols found in /bin/date)
(gdb) starti
Starting program: /usr/bin/
(I removed some test cases around handling upgrades from 2.31-0ubuntu9.3
as that version got superseded by a security update)
** Description changed:
[impact]
It is time to update glibc in Focal. This bug is a placeholder for the
overall process and a place to link the individual bugs that a
Verified:
root@focal-vm:~# dpkg -l locales | grep ^ii
ii locales2.31-0ubuntu9.7 all GNU C Library: National
Language (locale) data [support]
root@focal-vm:~# cp /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale
root@focal-vm:~# update-locale --locale-file /tmp/locale LANGUAGE = en_US.UTF-8
root@f
I've verified this fix, the test case hung fairly quickly (~5 mins) in a
4 core VM and after installing the libc packages from proposed has been
running for so long I no longer have access to the scrollback to paste
here.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added
Thanks for checking!
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968952
Title:
subiquity crash when install ubuntu server 22.
This looks like a bug we fixed just hours before release. Can you try
again with the final ISO?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968952
Title:
subiquity crash when install ubuntu serve
This could be https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1968161 perhaps.
Does this happen every time?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968772
Title:
Installation stuck on Hyper-V 2019
Ugh that sounds bad! Can you extract the files from /var/log/installer
somehow?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968772
Title:
Installation stuck on Hyper-V 2019
To manage notificatio
I guess subiquity's expectation is still that the installation media is
read-only. I wonder how we can detect that this is OK to allow...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968156
Title:
Oops. This definitely used to work! The cancellation can take a while
but rebooting while it's still happening is certainly not intended! The
state machine around cancellation is a bit complicated, I guess some
refactoring broke it :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
At this point I expect jammy glibc to use the clone3 syscall. The only
application I've had complaints about is rstudio and they have a plan
(which is roughly speaking "start using Election").
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Ah yes that would do it. I wonder how that symlink got there -- I'm
pretty sure it was not created by any official part of Ubuntu. (A bit of
googling finds people doing things like this
https://github.com/remap/ndnfs-port/issues/8 but it's not clear to me
where they got the idea from).
We might be
The crash on timeout is fixed in main fwiw and I'm just doing the
necessary stuff to make sure it's fixed in jammy. Did anyone try adding
toram to the kernel command line?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958148
Title:
mkinitramfs is too slow
To manage notifications about this bug go
I think given that verification is going to be slightly fiddly and the
update is already badly overdue, I will not attempt to fix this bug in
the next focal update. But also I do not want to leave it so long again
until the next update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
So the package still fails autopkgtests because there is a test that
downloads the test.pfx file from upstream git and does operations on
that. So I'll disable that I think...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
So for SRU we ideally want a nice, self-contained, ubuntu-based test
case. Is that possible here? It reads to me as if it's a bit non-
deterministic, is that true?
@kjtsanaktsidis, do you think you can write up reproduction
instructions? If not, would you be able to test the proposed glibc in
your
** Description changed:
[impact]
A simple typo using the update-locale script can render a system inoperable
without booting into single user mode or similar:
$ sudo update-locale LANGUAGE = en_US.UTF-8
$ sudo -s
sudo: pam_open_session: Bad item passed to pam_*_item()
sudo: policy
Dave, if you have time to test 2.31-0ubuntu9.8~ppa4 vs focal-update that
would be interesting -- I think given Dann's results though they will be
pretty neutral though so I wouldn't worry over much about it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
I saw an autopkgtest on ppc64el that failed with a similar complaint
too: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
jammy/jammy/ppc64el/f/faiss/20220306_103918_ed101@/log.gz
I have no idea what is going on though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942113
Title:
systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)
To manage notificat
It was pointed out to me that my compare.py script printed the times the
wrong way around, so I fixed that and also changed it to print output in
MiB/s -- always easier to reason about a benchmark when "bigger is
better"!
** Description changed:
[impact]
glibc 2.32 contained a number of impro
Didier merged a better version of the fix I uploaded so presumably he'll
upload that soon and we can see where things fall.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962170
Title:
DEP8 failure
This got fixed in https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5310-1
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Description changed:
[impact]
glibc 2.32 contained a number of improvements to the memcpy routines for
server-grade AArch64 implementations (in particular, graviton2 & graviton3).
They should be backported to focal, as the LTS releases are by far the most
used on servers.
[test case
Yes indeed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926918
Title:
cannot install libc6-dev, requires old libc6 version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
> So I would propose to add imgui to the lto-disabled-list and
> recompile open3d afterwards. What do you think?
Sounds plausible. I'll try it in my PPA first though!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
We need to do a better job of surfacing "your mirror is broken" errors to
the user.
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022, 13:50 MercSniper, <1963...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Seems to be it. I've been fighting this all day. Can't believe the
> mirror hadn't synced in the last 6+ hours.
>
> --
> You received thi
Sponsored, thanks. Could you look into sending this to Debian as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963582
Title:
SystemError: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN macro must be defined for '#' format
I spent a bit too long on this and I think this valgrind error is the
core of the issue:
==62437== Invalid write of size 4
==62437==at 0x685A6C0: stbrp_pack_rects (stb_rect_pack.h:548)
==62437==by 0x522A2D9: ImFontAtlasBuildWithStbTruetype(ImFontAtlas*) (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOp
This is the traceback of how it's crashing:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x76f5779f in unlink_chunk (p=p@entry=0x55d7b380,
av=0x770cac80 ) at ./malloc/malloc.c:1628
#1 0x76f5a6ab in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x770cac80 ,
bytes=bytes@entry=4584) at ./malloc/malloc.c:4307
#2 0x7ff
** No longer affects: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963556
Title:
Open3D segfaults when compiled with LTO
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Turns out open3d is already in lto-disabled-list so something else is
going on.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963556
Title:
Open3D segfaults when compiled with LTO
To manage notifi
** Also affects: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: lto
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963556
Title:
Open3D segfaults when compile
Can you post the error report that is generated? It is not impossible
for the install to run out of disk or memory at this point but I can't
tell from what you have posted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
1 - 100 of 2163 matches
Mail list logo
