Upstream Gnome 46 made a lot of changes recently to improve performance
and input lag in Gnome-Terminal. Those changes are separate from this
bug. I don't know whether those changes were backported to Ubuntu 22.04,
which ships Gnome 42. That's a question for Daniel or someone else at
Canonical.
Se
Dropped all the `savoury1` PPAs from my system and will keep an eye on
this to see if I can find a way to reproduce it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059847
Title:
Input lag or free
Hi Daniel,
No, not multi-GPU. It's an AMD system with no integrated graphics and
only one Nvidia card. One monitor plugged in, one TV plugged in to that
card via HDMI. But the TV is usually turned off, and disabled in
Settings | Displays. Running Xorg, not Wayland.
This doesn't look like bug 187
threadbareobserve, the nvidia driver can be downgraded to 535 without
too much work. I'd make sure all the related packages are removed before
installing 535.
Might help the developers to know what version of Ubuntu you're running.
I'm running a 22.04 desktop with a 4070 card, and the PPA does *n
Everyone's been discussing bug 2007742 as something that causes only log
spam, no other issues. My system is still failing to update the screen
after keypresses in gnome-terminal. So maybe those log messages aren't
relevant, but it looks like this bug 2059847 is not fully & correctly
fixed.
--
Yo
The fix in the PPA is not working for me on Jammy: the lag may be gone,
but some rendering is intermittently missed.
Some info:
linux-image-6.5.0-27-generic 6.5.0-27.28~22.04.1
nvidia-driver-550 550.67-0ubuntu1.22.04.1
Maybe related in journalctl:
Apr 06 09:47:33 alphasite gnome-shell[2505]: Ca
Speaking of the -server drivers, I'm not sure why they're not listed by
ubuntu-drivers for my hardware, which is an RTX 3060 Ti LHR:
nbryant@alphasite:~/git/webapp$ ubuntu-drivers list
nvidia-driver-460, (kernel modules provided by
linux-modules-nvidia-460-generic-hwe-20.04)
nvidia-driver-465, (k
I was able to get my hands on a card to upgrade from a GTX 1070 to an
RTX 3060 Ti LHR (Low Hash Rate). Assuming this driver version to be
necessary for the new LHR cards but I did not test the previous version,
so that might not be correct.
The basic GNOME desktop and Chromium browser seem to work
Are the supported products correct?
https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/175875/en-us (460.84)
shows the addition of support for the 3070 Ti. I think this was earlier
omitted from https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/175539
/en-us (465.31) but the site has now been updat
I don't know if it's relevant; it may very well not be, because after
this kernel message (described below) things sometimes succeed, or
sometimes fail.
But I noticed that there's a new feature in drm-tip (but not in mainline
5.8), for HDMI silent stream audio. I turned it on. It seems to work
wel
** Attachment added: "success-powerup-dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1879401/+attachment/5399008/+files/success-powerup-dmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Sure. pactl list cards output is identical on success and failure:
$ md5sum pactl-list-cards-*
1b3e54a38e363e16115a0428901f71ed pactl-list-cards-fail.txt
1b3e54a38e363e16115a0428901f71ed pactl-list-cards-success.txt
** Attachment added: "pactl-list-cards.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
Now attaching failed dmesg.
** Attachment added: "failed-sound-dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1879401/+attachment/5394330/+files/failed-sound-dmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Last night I built a kernel from drm-tip. CONFIG_BPFILTER is disabled
because of regressions, otherwise config is the same as used in
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-tip/current/
I was eventually able to reproduce the problem but it seemed like I need
to reboot in order to do so
Hi @kaihengfeng, I'm happy to do that but it'll have to wait a few days
for the 5.8-rc6 rebase. The bpfilter regression in rc5 is blocking for
me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
@kaihengfeng,
Sure. I'm attaching the "dmesg -H" output from a run that worked.
My odds of success lately have been a bit better than "rarely works",
but I still often need a few retries to get it working. A "retry" could
mean unplugging and re-plugging the hub or HDMI cable, or simply
suspending
More generally, it would be nice to somehow get the a52 plugin moved
from universe to mainline; the A52/AC3 patents are expired since 2017.
A52 is required for surround output over S/PDIF *and* to certain HDMI
devices that only accept 2-channel PCM.
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Notice the versions, 1.2.2 is current and libasound2-plugins-extra is
build from 1.1.0 sources:
ii libasound2-plugins:amd64 1.2.2-1ubuntu1 amd64ALSA library
additional plugins
ii libasound2-plugins-extra:amd64 1.1.0-1ubuntu2 amd64ALSA library
additio
This may not be an ASPM issue after all. I just booted 5.6.0-1011-oem a
few times with various settings, and had a few failures with
pcie_aspm=off or pcie_aspm.policy=performance.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
I have another system that I connect to this TV. It's built around an
old Haswell, Z87-chipset desktop motherboard. I installed Linux on it
today, to test this, and so far it seems to work fine.
I noticed that the Haswell doesn't even support ASPM; the BIOS either
doesn't implement the required AC
My bad. Looks like 5.4.0-32 never made it out of -proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879690
Title:
Docker registry doesn't stay up and keeps restarting
To manage notifications
I noticed something unexpected with the kernel in -proposed:
/proc/version_signature reverts the upstream patchlevel to 5.4.34. If
there's a mistake and it's really reverting all the upstream SRU
patches, I may have a problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
*meant to say, whether receiver is on or off.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[XPS 13 7390 2-in-1, Intel Icelake HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] sound
rarely works
To manage
By the way, the TV I'm connecting to is an LG C9 running firmware
04.71.25 (current as of this writing) which is further connected to a
Sony STR-DH750 via HDMI ARC. I connect the laptop via the TV, not the
receiver, and problem persists whether TV is on or off.
--
You received this bug notificati
Tested version_signature Ubuntu 5.3.0-53.47-generic 5.3.18.
Unfortunately the problem persists.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[XPS 13 7390 2-in-1, Intel Icelake HDMI,
I tested the PPA. It doesn't help. If anything, it might make things a
bit worse.
Also, I can now confirm that I spoke a bit too soon in comment #19 when
I said "linux-image-5.4.0-32-generic after removing kernel command line
pcie_aspm.policy=powersupersave --> seems better so far". That
configura
Sorry, I got it! Priority needs to be 1000 or more for a "downgrade"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[XPS 13 7390 2-in-1, Intel Icelake HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] sound
I'm having trouble coming up with a pin to get the PPA to install with
apt update && apt upgrade. Why doesn't this work?
nbryant@atlantis:/etc/apt/preferences.d$ cat fix
Package: *
Pin: release o=LP-PPA-kaihengfeng-fix-lp1869819
Pin-Priority: 999
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Tested some mainline kernels, no luck. None of the following seem to be
any better:
* 5.6.13
* 5.7-rc6
* drm-tip 202005190212
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[XPS 13 73
I did some more testing today:
* linux-image-5.4.0-31-generic --> not any better
* linux-image-5.4.0-32-generic --> not any better
* linux-image-5.6.0-1010-oem after removing kernel command line
pcie_aspm.policy=powersupersave --> not any better
* linux-image-5.4.0-32-generic after removing ker
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374064/+files/Lspci-vt.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374067/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374070/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374069/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374066/+files/Lsusb-v.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374073/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[X
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374068/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374074/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374065/+files/Lsusb-t.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374071/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Titl
apport information
** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374072/+files/RfKill.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[X
apport information
** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374062/+files/IwConfig.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374063/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[XPS
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374061/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
apport information
** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401/+attachment/5374060/+files/CRDA.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879401
Title:
[XPS 1
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
I have an Ice Lake laptop (Dell 7390 2-in-one) which I am connecting to
a TV over HDMI via a Novoo USB-C multiport adapter. This is not a
Thunderbolt device, it is just USB-C.
It seemed like things used to work
Public bug reported:
I have an Ice Lake laptop (Dell 7390 2-in-one) which I am connecting to
a TV over HDMI via a Novoo USB-C multiport adapter. This is not a
Thunderbolt device, it is just USB-C.
It seemed like things used to work fine before I upgraded this system
from Ubuntu 19.10 to 20.04, al
I want to amend that comment. The expected result should be-
---
$ java TLSVersions
java.vendor java.versionproto enabledProtocols
Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_36TLSv1.2
java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: TLSv1.2 SSLContext not available
Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_36
JDK6 is not working as expected. See my test programs above posted in
previous comments.
Actual result:
---
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_36"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.13.8)
(6b36-1.13.8-0ubuntu2~ppa2~snapshot20150911020748)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mo
Tiago--thanks, I've just found some time to test this again. We have
some servers with TLSv1.0 disabled now, and I've tested your Precise
JDK7 package against those--this works, the old package does not connect
and the new package connects.
I will follow up with a JDK6 test.
--
You received this
Another small test program. When run on the openjdk-6 PPA test package,
it only sends a TLSv1.0 ClientHello. Compare what happens when you
change the USE_DEFAULT constant to 'true':
*** ClientHello, TLSv1
RandomCookie: GMT: 1423929043 bytes = { 49, 232, 48, 176, 78, 19, 219, 62, 52,
29, 6, 29, 9
I should clarify that my tests results for 6b36-1.13.8-0ubuntu1 are
based on a modified java.security file which removed SSLv3 from the
jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms property. That may be the reason why they
show SSLv3 as a default-enabled algorithm.
Also, I was finally able to test your Wily package
Here's a small test class and the results from a few different JVMs I
have access to:
--- cut here ---
import javax.net.ssl.SSLContext;
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocket;
public class TLSVersions
{
public static void main( String[] args )
{
String vendor = System.getProperty( "java.vendor" )
See this issue to drop RC4 support in the Chromium project:
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=375342
Lots of good discussion but especially comment #44, #49, and perhaps the
real key takeaway is comment #53:
-- quote --
#53 t...@ritter.vg
On the topic of PCI and CVSS sco
Original discussion of AEAD -
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-
dev/2011-April/003097.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482924
Title:
Regressions due to USN-2696-1
Stay tuned, I'll have something a little later. In the meantime I found
this:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-2210924
(backport request for AEAD ciphers to JDK7 - closed as Won't Fix)
If that remains the decision, it would at least be nice to see the
default ClientHello changed from 1.0
Test results suggest that openjdk-6 supports the TLSv1.2 ClientHello but
not the new TLSv1.2 cipher suites. The following is from a VM launched
with -Djavax.net.debug=all -Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.2:
openjdk-6-jre-6b36-1.13.8-0ubuntu1~12.04
*** ClientHello, TLSv1.2
RandomCookie: GMT: 1422580230 by
Also affects JDK6; the situation is a little worse on 6, which does not
support anything newer than TLS1.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482924
Title:
Regressions due to USN-2696-1
** Also affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482924
Title:
Regressions due to USN-2696-1
To manage notifications ab
** Description changed:
Due to [CBCATT], some server administrators (including the webservices
gateway for a major airline reservations provider) choose to disable CBC
ciphersuites unless the protocol level is TLSv1.1 or later; [TLS1.1]
introduced an explicit CBC IV to guard against such a
Public bug reported:
Due to [CBCATT], some server administrators (including the webservices
gateway for a major airline reservations provider) choose to disable CBC
ciphersuites unless the protocol level is TLSv1.1 or later; [TLS1.1]
introduced an explicit CBC IV to guard against such attacks. (Se
61 matches
Mail list logo
