[Bug 2080257] Re: [WSL] systemd fails to upgrade on WSL1

2024-10-04 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080257 Title: [WSL] systemd fails to upgrade on WSL1 To manage notifications ab

[Bug 2083311] Re: Upgrade to Oracular requires snaps changes

2024-10-04 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I added a note about this in the release notes. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083311 Title: Upgrade to Oracul

[Bug 2083704] [NEW] systemd TEST-69-SHUTDOWN autopkgtest fails

2024-10-04 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Public bug reported: E.g.: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/amd64/s/systemd/20241003_175213_c04ab@/log.gz Debian already skips this test due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075733. Let's do the same for Ubuntu. ** Affects: systemd (Ubun

[Bug 2083700] [NEW] rsyslog FTBFS (s390x only) against zlib 1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.1-1ubuntu1

2024-10-04 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Public bug reported: During an archive rebuild, rsyslog FTBFS on s390x only: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/751879056/buildlog_ubuntu- oracular-s390x.rsyslog_8.2406.0-1ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz The build fails due to two tests: FAIL: gzipwr_flushInterval == testbench: TZ e

[Bug 2083616] [NEW] deb2snap entry for thunderbird should use ubuntu-destkop, not ubuntu-desktop-minimal, as metapkg

2024-10-03 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Public bug reported: Follow up for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release- upgrader/+bug/2083311. ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 2078803] Re: 22.04->24.04 upgrade fails: "Could not calculate upgrade"

2024-10-03 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1970018 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970018 Reviewing the files from your upgrade attempt, you have installed packages from the deadsnakes PPA. Some of the packages installed are newer than those in the official archive, which is keeping some python p

[Bug 2081640] Re: Upgrade to the Kubuntu 24.10 beta errors out complaining that the 24.10 kernel does not support ZFS

2024-10-03 Thread Nick Rosbrook
LXD uses zfs by default, which may have been why zfs was loaded for you. But yes, we dropped this quirk because it turns out ZFS support will be in the 24.10 kernel in time for the release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 2083522] Re: The 'snap revert' hint displayed on upgrade is misleading

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083522 Title: The 'snap revert' hint displayed on upgrade is misleadi

[Bug 2083243] Re: [FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083243 Title: [FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub

[Bug 2083245] Re: [FFe] libgcrypt: FTBFS on s390x due to failed tests

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083245 Title: [FFe] libgcrypt: FTBFS on s390x due to failed tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.laun

[Bug 2076227] Re: shim(-signed) NX support feature freeze exception request

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Merged and uploaded both. ** Changed in: cd-boot-images-arm64 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: cd-boot-images-amd64 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 2069041] Re: Changing Port in sshd_config requires calling systemctl daemon-reload

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069041 Title: Changing Port in sshd_config requires calling systemctl daemo

[Bug 2071815] Re: Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071815 Title: Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children To

[Bug 2080216] Re: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216 Title: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces To manage notifications abou

[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076023 Title: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-so

[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: [Impact] When users have a Match section in their sshd config, their configuration cannot be parsed by the sshd-socket-generator (because there is no connection, hence no connection spec to be matched), and the generator fails. This means no custom config is ap

[Bug 2071815] Re: Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: + [Impact] + The systemd-socket-activation.patch patch has an Ubuntu delta to fix bug 2011458, but this results in ASLR not being re-randomized for children because the patch delta does "rexec_flag = 0;". This was discovered as part of the CVE-2024-6387 discover

[Bug 2080216] Re: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces

2024-10-02 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216 Title: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces To manage notifications abou

[Bug 2080216] Re: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces

2024-10-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + The default listening sockets for sshd are different depending on + whether socket activation is used or not, even when /etc/ssh/sshd_config + is the default. E.g.: + + # Socket-activated + + root@n2:~# systemctl status ssh.socket + ● ssh.socket - OpenBSD

[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator

2024-10-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + When users have a Match section in their sshd config, their + configuration cannot be parsed by the sshd-socket-generator (because + there is no connection, hence no connection spec to be matched), and the + generator fails. This means no custom config is ap

[Bug 2080216] Re: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces

2024-10-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20

[Bug 2080216] Re: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces

2024-10-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Okay, I am not sure why the ipv6 socket is not accepting ipv4, because AFAICT (and when I test on my machine) the way IPV6_V6ONLY is being set in the default case, it should allow ipv4. However, I do think there is a case to be made about the socket unit being more aligned with the contents of /et

[Bug 2083051] Re: nose, git-buildpackage FTBFS

2024-10-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I uploaded nose. ** Changed in: nose (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083051 Title: nose, git-buildpackage FTBFS To manage notifications

[Bug 2071815] Re: Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children

2024-09-30 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 2069041] Re: Changing Port in sshd_config requires calling systemctl daemon-reload

2024-09-30 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069041 Title: Changing Port in sshd_config requires calling systemctl daemo

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Ah sorry, I missed that. Can you please do the following then: 1. Enable debug logs on systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: $ mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.d/ $ cat > /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.d/debug.conf << EOF [Service] Environment=SYSTEMD_LO

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Nick Rosbrook
It looks like bind9 (named.service) is able to bind to the address just fine after systemd-networkd reports the address is configured. Is named maybe not setting SO_REUSEADDR/SO_REUSEPORT or something? Or (as an experiment) does disabling named.service allow the others to start? ** Changed in: sys

[Bug 2081759] Re: lshw: FTBFS due to missing 'build-arch' target

2024-09-23 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: lshw (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081759 Title: lshw: FTBFS due to missing 'build-arch' target To manage notification

[Bug 2081759] [NEW] lshw: FTBFS due to missing 'build-arch' target

2024-09-23 Thread Nick Rosbrook
ng) debian/rules build ...SNIP... [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/749245587/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-arm64.lshw_02.19.git.2021.06.19.996aaad9c7-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/737811292/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-arm64.lshw_02.19.git.2021.06.19.996aaad9c7-2ubuntu1_BUILDIN

[Bug 2055012] Re: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

2024-09-23 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2054761 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054761 @mchelen Please open a new bug report by running `ubuntu-bug ubuntu- release-upgrader-core` on the affected system. This will attach the necessary logs to investigate your upgrade issue. -- You received th

[Bug 2054761] Re: Dist upgrades from Jammy to Noble crash [Oh no! Something has gone wrong.]

2024-09-19 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I'm sorry to hear about your upgrade troubles. If you have logs from the the boot where the upgrade occurred, please open a different bug with those logs so that the root cause for the hang can be investigated. But, if you unplugged your machine during the upgrade because it was unresponsive, I am

[Bug 2081192] Re: Cannot change MemoryKSM in systemd units

2024-09-19 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance:

[Bug 2080257] Re: [WSL] systemd fails to upgrade on WSL1

2024-09-19 Thread Nick Rosbrook
It appears to be a known issue that WSL1 does not support F_OFD_SETLKW, which is what systemd is using here. I could add a fallback to use F_SETLKW instead, but according to [1], it sounds like the locking is just broken on WSL1? So the "fallback" would probably lead to even more issues. Do you ge

[Bug 2077159] Re: i40e interfaces renamed after upgrade from hwe-6.5

2024-09-19 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Re-adding a Linux task to see if anyone can confirm whether kernel interface naming was changed between these two kernel versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077159 Title: i40e i

[Bug 2077159] Re: i40e interfaces renamed after upgrade from hwe-6.5

2024-09-19 Thread Nick Rosbrook
By default, the NamePolicy=[1] (as configured in /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link) is: [Link] NamePolicy=keep kernel database onboard slot path This means that if the kernel claims to assign a predictable name, then that will take precedence over other policies, including the "onboard" po

[Bug 2080257] Re: [WSL] systemd fails to upgrade on WSL1

2024-09-19 Thread Nick Rosbrook
This error is coming from systemd-sysusers in systemd.postinst. To isolate the failing call, can you share the output of: $ SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug systemd-sysusers basic.conf systemd- journal.conf systemd-network.conf Looking at the code, this is either failing on an open() or flock(), so likely

[Bug 2080254] Re: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-18 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I left questions on the PR. Please note that the "Fix Committed" status is intended to indicate that something has been uploaded to -proposed. As far as I can tell, that has not happened yet. ** Changed in: pbdagcon (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete -- You received this bug no

[Bug 2072974] Re: python3-paramiko is unusable on Jammy in FIPS mode

2024-09-18 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Could you please make the test plan more clear, in particular with steps on how to "Enable FIPS on a $RELEASE system"? I got there eventually on Jammy with: $ sudo pro attach $ sudo pro enable fips-preview # Non-preview not supported yet? $ sudo reboot After that, I observed the exception when a

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-09-18 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I am tracking this for future SRUs, so unsubscribing sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209 Title: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command To manag

[Bug 2080972] Re: /tmp as non-tmpfs doesn't get cleaned upon reboot

2024-09-18 Thread Nick Rosbrook
To be specific, the override I would suggest is: $ mkdir -p /etc/tmpfiles.d $ cat > /etc/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf << EOF D /tmp 1777 root root 10d q /var/tmp 1777 root root 30d EOF In particular, this is flipping the 'q' to a 'D' for the /tmp line. -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 2080972] Re: /tmp as non-tmpfs doesn't get cleaned upon reboot

2024-09-17 Thread Nick Rosbrook
This is expected behavior. Since /tmp is a tmpfs by default, the default /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf is configured with a 10d cleanup age for /tmp, but it is *not* configured to clean /tmp at boot, because that is unnecessary for a tmpfs. If you want to clean /tmp at boot *and* have your tmp.mou

[Bug 2080257] Re: [WSL] systemd fails to upgrade on WSL1

2024-09-12 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080257 Title: [WSL] syst

[Bug 2080233] Re: [wsl] do-release-upgrade fails with systemd disabled

2024-09-12 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2069383] Re: ftbfs in oracular and noble

2024-09-12 Thread Nick Rosbrook
The package built successfully: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd-hwe/255.1.4 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2078597] Re: Failed to flush binfmt_misc rules, ignoring: Permission denied

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Are you able to run unprivileged containers instead? That would be the suggested configuration from upstream LXD. There are many things that do not work with systemd in privileged LXD containers due to AppArmor etc. Upstream systemd does not like adding workarounds for issues caused by AppArmor ru

[Bug 2078571] Re: Removable Storage - Removable Drives not executed after upgrade 22.04 to 24.04

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I suspect a support site would be more appropriate, e.g. https://askubuntu.com, or for more options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Lo

[Bug 2078597] Re: Failed to flush binfmt_misc rules, ignoring: Permission denied

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
systemd-binfmt should just exit when /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc is not mounted rw, which I thought was usually the case in LXD containers. Are you running a privileged or unprivileged container? ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Imp

[Bug 2078564] Re: After upgrade 22.04 to 24.04, start delays by 2 minutes on udev

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I suspect a support site would be more appropriate, e.g. https://askubuntu.com, or for more options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status

[Bug 2051407] Re: qemu-net autopkgtest fails: Failed to send exit request: Resource temporarily unavailable

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051407 Title: qemu-net autopkgtest fails: Failed to send exit request: Resource tempora

[Bug 2080253] Re: The package 'postgresql-9.6' is marked for removal but it is in the removal deny list.

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
We don't remove old versions of postgres ourselves due to the risk of data loss when upgrading to new versions so it should be an informed user- driven process. If you are absolutely sure you no longer need that version of postgres, you can remove it and try the upgrade again. ** Changed in: ubun

[Bug 2080233] Re: [wsl] do-release-upgrade fails with systemd disabled

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080233 Title: [wsl] do-release-upgrade fails with systemd disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:

[Bug 2080216] Re: sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces

2024-09-10 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Is sshd not accessible at all over ipv4? How did you notice that sshd was not listening on ipv4? In the default case, we should end up with ssh.socket listening on [::]:22, but with IPV6_V6ONLY=0 so that sshd is still accessible over ipv4. > Setting net.ipv6.bindv6only=0 also helps, but that's no

[Bug 2079513] Re: Please remove sslh from the archive

2024-09-09 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I don't think I see a reason to remove from the release pocket. ** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079513 Title: Please rem

[Bug 2079993] [NEW] systemd initramfs-tools hook fails on s390x if /etc/udev/rules.d/*.rules empty

2024-09-09 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Public bug reported: E.g. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/s390x/i/initramfs-tools/20240909_091354_592dd@/log.gz 1489s autopkgtest [09:13:45]: summary 1489s qemu-ata-onlySKIP Test lists explicitly supported architectures, but the

[Bug 2058648] Re: Support upgrades from unmerged 22.04 - was: package libc6 2.35-0ubuntu3.6 [modified: usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian.gz usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libc6/README.hesiod.

2024-09-09 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058648 Title: Support upgrades from unmerged 22.04 - was: package libc6 2.3

[Bug 2079767] Re: proposed-migration for detox 2.0.0-3

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
There is still one more build-time test failure on armhf: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/747678259/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular- armhf.detox_2.0.0-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 2079513] Re: Please remove sslh from the archive

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: sslh 2.1.1-1 is stuck in -proposed. + + This package FTBFS on all arches (except riscv64), e.g. + https://launchpadlibrarian.net/744540879/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular- + amd64.sslh_2.1.1-1_BUILDING.txt.gz. + + It has no reverse dependencies: + + nr@six:~$ reverse-depends

[Bug 2079513] Re: Please remove sslh from the archive

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Ugh, LP ate my comment and I didn't notice. Sorry about that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079513 Title: Please remove sslh from the archive To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2079840] Re: proposed-migration for cruft-ng 0.9.63

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Forwarded to debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081002 ** Changed in: cruft-ng (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1081002 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081002 ** Also affects: cruft-ng (Debian) via

[Bug 2079840] [NEW] proposed-migration for cruft-ng 0.9.63

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
gtest [07:19:42]: test ncdu: ---] ** Affects: cruft-ng (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: cruft-ng (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) ** Description

[Bug 2074309] Re: upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to feature flags

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074309 Title: upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to fe

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-09-06 Thread Nick Rosbrook
This patch is in v256.5, which I prepared and uploaded today. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209

[Bug 2079777] Re: proposed-migration for vstream-client 1.2-7ubuntu1

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1075628 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075628 ** Also affects: vstream-client (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075628 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 2079777] [NEW] proposed-migration for vstream-client 1.2-7ubuntu1

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
icit-function-declaration] 91 | iattr = ntohl(*(u32 *)data); | ^ make[1]: *** [Makefile:22: object.o] Error 1 [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/744527373/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular- armhf.vstream-client_1.2-7ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: v

[Bug 2079776] Re: proposed-migration for datalad-next 1.4.1-1

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1080969 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080969 ** Also affects: datalad-next (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080969 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: datalad-next (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2079776] [NEW] proposed-migration for datalad-next 1.4.1-1

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
_url /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/datalad/support/s3.py:23: in import boto3 E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'boto3' ** Affects: datalad-next (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: datalad-ne

[Bug 2079770] [NEW] proposed-migration for mmc-utils 0+git20240329.f757f413-1

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
revious definition cc1: all warnings being treated as errors ** Affects: mmc-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: mmc-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)

[Bug 2079767] Re: proposed-migration for detox 2.0.0-3

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I did forward this to debian, but unfortunately forgot to include the link in Bug-Debian in the patch header. ** Changed in: detox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1080967 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080967 ** Also aff

[Bug 2079767] [NEW] proposed-migration for detox 2.0.0-3

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
process returned exit status 2 It seems that a simple fix is to remove the hard coded -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE lines in the relevant Makefiles, and instead let the distro build flags take precedence. [1]https://launchpadlibrarian.net/744524447/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular- amd64.detox_2.0.0-3_BUILDING.t

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags added: systemd-sru-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209 Title: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2079513] [NEW] Please remove sslh from the archive

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Public bug reported: sslh 2.1.1-1 is stuck in -proposed. ** Affects: sslh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) ** Summary chan

[Bug 2079490] [NEW] atlas: FTBFS: probe_comp.c:653:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘CompIsClang’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1066361: Source: atlas Version: 3.10.3-14 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid,

[Bug 2079355] [NEW] Please remove glosstex from the archive

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
: Undecided Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: glosstex (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) ** Description changed: glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4build1 is stuck in -proposed. + + It FTBFS[1] and has no reve

[Bug 2079349] [NEW] Please remove nield from the archive

2024-09-05 Thread Nick Rosbrook
c:nield -a source No reverse dependencies found [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/744524684/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.nield_0.6.1-2build1_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/6f24a4f8-fb07-409b-955a-9aad4ab37...@gmail.com/T/ ** Affects: nield (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided As

[Bug 2078852] Re: systemd-resolved was re-enabled during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04

2024-09-04 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078555 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078555 Thanks for your bug report. As you noted, this is the same issue as bug 2078555 so I am marking this as a duplicate to consolidate. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078555 Upgrading from 2

[Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-03 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078720 Title: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state To manage noti

[Bug 2078486] Re: unable to upgrade to 24.4.0

2024-08-30 Thread Nick Rosbrook
This looks like a server side error with your mirror: 2024-08-30 17:37:16,197 DEBUG examining: 'deb http://nl3.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jammy main restricted' 2024-08-30 17:37:16,197 DEBUG verifySourcesListEntry: deb http://nl3.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ noble main restricted 2024-08-30 17:37:

[Bug 2078498] Re: Unable to update to Noble Numbat

2024-08-30 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1970018 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970018 Reviewing the files from your upgrade attempt, you have installed packages from the deadsnakes PPA. Some of the packages installed are newer than those in the official archive, which is keeping some python p

[Bug 2078502] Re: Settings goes to the blue-tooth tab and I cannot choose any other tab

2024-08-30 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I suspect a support site would be more appropriate, e.g. https://askubuntu.com, or for more options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubunt

[Bug 2077122] Re: Update package to 1.4.3.

2024-08-28 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Hi Frode, The debian/changelog diff does not look right to me (it should only be adding new lines). Did you prepare this following the package merge process[1]? If not, that would be the best way to get back up to date with Debian. Also, we are passed feature freeze[2][3] in the Oracular developm

[Bug 2077089] Re: apr-util fails to build due to bad m4 script

2024-08-28 Thread Nick Rosbrook
It looks like this was fixed via a merge from Debian: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apr-util/1.6.3-3ubuntu1. ** Changed in: apr-util (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator

2024-08-28 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I am planning an SRU for noble in the next couple weeks. ** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076023 Title: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_con

[Bug 2078207] Re: NIC sporadiclly drops connection, can't ping anything for a few moments

2024-08-28 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I suspect a support site would be more appropriate, e.g. https://askubuntu.com, or for more options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubunt

[Bug 2069383] Re: ftbfs in oracular and noble

2024-08-28 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: + [Impact] + The build in both noble and oracular fails with FAIL: test_no_duplicates (__main__.RedundancyCheckTest.test_no_duplicates) -- Traceback (most recent call last): - File "/<>/./test

[Bug 2078043] Re: The package 'postgresql-client-12' is marked for removal but it is in the removal deny list.

2024-08-28 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2073278 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073278 This is intended behavior. We cannot automatically remove old postgresql-* packages without being sure that it won't cause data loss, for example if a database is still making use of postgresql-12 because it

[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator

2024-08-27 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076023 Title: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with ss

[Bug 2076023] Re: Failed to apply 'Match' directive in sshd_config with sshd-socket-generator

2024-08-27 Thread Nick Rosbrook
ged in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 2055239] Re: Warning: The unit file, source configuration file or drop-ins of {apt-news, esm-cache}.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to reload units.

2024-08-26 Thread Nick Rosbrook
@corradoventu - the output you shared demonstrates that you are *not* seeing this issue on 24.10. @sunneyxue- likewise, your output demonstrates that the issue is fixed on this system. Note that it is possible at the time when you run `apt update`, that a daemon-reload actually is needed, and the

[Bug 2055397] Re: netplan/systemd-networkd: route metric not applied to routes to the local subnet

2024-08-23 Thread Nick Rosbrook
The non-linux autopkgtest regressions were resolved with test retries/baseline tests. As previously stated, the linux-* tests should be ignored as they are denylisted. With, I believe the update could be released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 2055239] Re: Warning: The unit file, source configuration file or drop-ins of {apt-news, esm-cache}.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to reload units.

2024-08-23 Thread Nick Rosbrook
@sunneyxue, can you share the output of the following? $ apt policy systemd $ sudo systemctl daemon-reload $ sudo systemctl enable somethingthatdefinitelydoesnotexist.service $ sudo apt update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 1874272] Re: Stage "searching for obsolete software" takes a very long time (30 minutes)

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I have verified the fixes for the regressions caused by the initial upload of this fix, so I am going to remove the block-noble-proposed tag now. ** Tags removed: block-proposed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 2077358] Re: upgrades fail when package in ForcedObsoletes does not exist

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I verified the fix using ubuntu-release-upgrader 1:24.04.22 from noble- proposed: nr@clean-jammy-amd64:~$ do-release-upgrade --proposed [...SNIP...] System upgrade is complete. Restart required To finish the upgrade, a restart is required. If you select 'y' the system will be restarted. Conti

[Bug 2077344] Re: upgrades should change snap-store and firmware-updater tracking

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I have verified the the fix using ubuntu-release-upgrader 1:24.04.22 from noble-proposed: nr@clean-jammy-amd64:~$ snap info snap-store | grep "^tracking:" tracking: latest/stable/ubuntu-22.04 nr@clean-jammy-amd64:~$ snap info firmware-updater | grep "^tracking:" nr@clean-jammy-amd64:~$ do-rele

[Bug 1874272] Re: Stage "searching for obsolete software" takes a very long time (30 minutes)

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
Given the regressions related to this original patch, I re-did SRU verification using the latest upload: nr@six:~$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j1 Launching j1 nr@six:~$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j2 Launching j2 nr@six:~$ lxc exec j1 bash root@j1:~# do-release-upgrade --devel [...SNIP...] root@j1:~# gr

[Bug 2077437] Re: unable to upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1970018 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970018 Reviewing the files from your upgrade attempt, you have installed packages from the deadsnakes PPA. Some of the packages installed are newer than those in the official archive, which is keeping some python p

[Bug 2077310] Re: Can’t upgrade Ubuntu from 22.04.4 to 24-04

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1980574 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980574 Reviewing the files from your upgrade attempt, you have installed pipewire packages from the pipewire-debian/pipewire-upstream PPA. Some of the packages installed are newer than those in the official archive

[Bug 2076913] Re: 'DistUpgradeController' object has no attribute 'force_obsoletes'

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I have verified the fix using ubuntu-release-upgrader 1:24.04.22 from noble-proposed: nr@six:~$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j Launching j nr@six:~$ lxc exec j bash root@j:~# apt-add-repository -y ppa:enr0n/lp2076913 Repository: 'deb https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/enr0n/lp20

[Bug 2076913] Re: 'DistUpgradeController' object has no attribute 'force_obsoletes'

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: [Impact] It looks like the latest SRU has introduced a bug in https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release- upgrader/commit/?id=8c592abdf5047a6bd4da20dab1e444c6dcf8c842 There is a typo in s/force_obosoletes/forced_obsoletes/ which causes upgrades from noble to

[Bug 2067622] Re: cryptsetup-initramfs disappeared during upgrade from 23.10 to 24.04 leading to failing boot

2024-08-22 Thread Nick Rosbrook
The most recent upload contains a new quirk for an unrelated bug, and fixes for another unrelated bug. The previous verification done with 1:24.04.21 stands. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >