Michael Prokop:
> Public bug reported:
>
> A user trying to rebuild a Debian package of us ran into the problem
> that he didn't get debug packages any longer. (The original bug report
> and discussion around it is available at
> https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/459 )
>
> In Ubuntu's d
Andrew Bird:
> Public bug reported:
>
> The debhelper shipped with 18.04 contains a typo that generates the wrong
> dependency when using dh_installxfonts in a package build. There is already a
> patch from the developer that introduced the typo available in Debian
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Dan Kegel:
> (Right... that's why I linked to that bug.
Apologies; I just hit reply when I saw the subject. I had not seen you
had already referenced relevant upstream bug. :)
Thanks,
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #894895
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894895
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766102
Title:
dh_installchangelogs fails if
Dan Kegel:
> Public bug reported:
>
> If the package's debian/changelog has a first line with version 0,
> dh_installchangelogs fails with
>
> dh_installchangelogs: changelog parse failure
>
> This is fixed upstream, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
> bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894895
>
> ProblemTyp
David Lechner:
> Public bug reported:
>
> According to the dh_clean man page, dh_clean "removes some other files
> including debian/files". In xenial, this was indeed the case. However,
> since I have upgraded to bionic, debian/files is no longer being
> deleted, for example, when I run debuild -S
Robie Basak:
> Based on https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/04/13/%23ubuntu-
> devel.html#t11:56, this sounds valid for either init-system-helpers or
> debhelper.
>
> 13:47 rbasak, the description sounds valid. i believe i have hit
> something similar before, thus yeah a fix to debhelper for this cla
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #814856
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814856
** Also affects: debhelper via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814856
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Sorry, misread the bug and unfortunately it seems I cannot undo the fact
that bug is closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675340
Title:
dh_fixperms unsets X permission to node.js s
This was fixed in debhelper/10.9 (per https://bugs.debian.org/840913),
which is available in Bionic.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #840913
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840913
** Also affects: debhelper via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=84091
The actual warning is from apt and not apt-file. It occurs because
multiple "fetch" directive refer to the same file, but they come from
different lines in the apt sources.list.
As noted (see #1579372), a long term fix would be to provide the
Contents in the "per component" location on the archiv
This looks like it is caused by the Ubuntu specific changes to
dh_installchangelogs.
Namely, the original debhelper will look for (among other) "CHANGES" as
an upstream changelog. Ubuntu have removed this to save disk space and
leads to debhelper picking "changelog" as a candidate for the "main
p
Hi,
Can you give a case where it would be useful to ask debhelper to build a
package for an architecture, where it is not supported (as declared by
the maintainer)? The only case I can come up with is that the
Architecture field is wrong/out of date. Though in this case, the
proper solution woul
Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable. The remaining Ubuntu delta
is unnecessary since the downloading of Contents files have been
delegated to APT and configured to look both in the Debian and the
Ubuntu locations.
Thanks,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Not sure if this is still relevant, but ...
If you are going to make debhelper use ".ddeb" rather than ".deb" for
dbgsym packages (and dpkg doesn't DTRT), I strongly recommend relying on
the "build_and_rename_deb" sub in dh_builddeb rather than computing the
filename yourself. Otherwise, "dh_genc
argh, I meant 3.1.3. Silly me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283
Title:
Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
Hi Hans,
With my upstream hat on, I believe that delta is redundant thanks to
changes in apt and apt-file. I do not remember the exact apt-file
version that solves it, but I can dig it up if it is relevant (it is
definitely prior to 3.1.4).
Also, I typoed the version; I meant please sync apt-fil
This is definitely fixed in lintian/2.5.13, where lintian relies on libc
to provide C.UTF-8 rather than generating an en_US.UTF-8.
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
In the mean time, rapt-file has been discontinued as the back end
service has stopped working. I suspect this bug ought to be closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263222
Title:
ra
apt-file 3 should support this provided you configure apt to fetch the
Contents files for armhf. Admittedly, this is waiting for #1641283
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296128
Title:
AFAICT, this would fix at least:
* #1296128
* #888316
* #817517
* #767061
* #567895
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283
Title:
Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
To m
Public bug reported:
Please update the apt-file version in Ubuntu to apt-file/3.1.3.
** Affects: apt-file (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
On 2014-11-12 11:56, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> I think this needs further discussion, then.
>
Hi Rolf,
Thanks for your interest in this matter.
Please note that my remarks here are from the perspective of Lintian
upstream and /not/ Ubuntu.
> Quite obviously, the current setup goes against the exp
On 2014-08-01 18:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> If I create a deb with install4j that installs to /opt/test/ - then
> lintian crashes:
>
> [...]
Hi,
Thanks for the report and the following analysis of the problem.
Should you run into future crash issues with lintian,
Forgot some bug tagging for: [Bug 1319295] Re: Lintian uses a lot of
time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package
bug 1319295
tags patch
status fixcommitted
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #745877
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745877
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319295
Title:
Lintian uses a lot of time doin
On 2014-05-14 10:18, Marius B. Kotsbak wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Reproduced by downloading this package:
> http://downloads.typesafe.com/scala/2.11.0/scala-2.11.0.deb and running
> lintian:
>
> $ lintian Downloads/scala-2.11.0.deb
> [...]
>
> After that output, lintian hangs using 100%
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #705553
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705553
** Also affects: lintian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705553
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Attached is a tarball containing a set of patches for fixing this in
2.5.6.
For Lintian 2.5.10.X, the patches can be pulled from upstream's git repository
via:
git show 2.5.10.4..2.5.10.5
For Lintian 2.5.11:
git show
a5680cc4f7ca733f83a16c9bff0e0fa10525c46e..751dee4653e5960ca03f3164c15bb849
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
An "unimportant" security vulnerabilities have been found in Lintian.
In short, using crafted packages an attacker could have Lintian leak
information about the "host" system provided the raw log is available.
Fixes avai
ields in debian/control
file.
* Bump Standards-Versions to 3.9.4
- Use the new URI for the DEP-5 copyright format.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:59:27 +0100
"""
To be honst, I think the upstream changes are slightly more interesting
for Ubuntu:
""
On 2012-12-23 12:18, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> If you can extract the i386 binary package produced by that test, I can
>> have a look at fixing it.
>
> Here it is.
>
> ** Attachment added: "libba
On 2012-12-23 09:52, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Niels (thanks for reading our reports!), do you know what can cause
> the shared-libs-non-pic-i386 error? Here's my log:
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1458988/.
>
No, I am afraid I don't. It is an i386-only test, so I haven't run it
for a while. Ther
This issue is fix in git. See commit f4bc03f. I suspect that the ARB
people would appreciate it if you cherry-picked 60b0055 as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092892
Title:
P
Fixed in 0.6.4-1 (raring).
** Package changed: sentinella (Ubuntu) => libsysactivity (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: libsysactivity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890587
Title:
lintian upgrade to 2.5.0ubuntu1~natty1 fails: no Filename: field
To mana
Hi,
This is fixed in Lintian/2.5.9 (i.e. Quantal Quetzal), so marking it as
"Fix Released".
~Niels
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Hi,
By the looks of it
"""
Log started: 2011-12-18 11:36:47
Paramétrage de man-db (2.5.7-2ubuntu1) ...
debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another
process: Ressource temporairement non disponible
dpkg : erreur de traitement de man-db (--configure) :
le sous-p
** Package changed: lintian (Ubuntu) => langpack-locales (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885106
Title:
package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessa
Log says:
"""
Setting up lintian (2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3) ...
Generating en_US.UTF-8 locale for internal Lintian use
Segmentation fault
dpkg: error processing lintian (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
"""
I strongly suspect it was either a tr
Hi,
In your apt log I found this:
"""
Setting up lintian (2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3) ...
Generating en_US.UTF-8 locale for internal Lintian use
/usr/share/i18n/locales/iso14651_t1:10: symbol `U8927' has the same
encoding as
/usr/share/i18n/locales/iso14651_t1:10: symbol `U8A07'
dpkg: error pr
Hi,
Sounds like your mirror was (temporarily) broken; can you retry this
(possibly with another mirror)?
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890587
Title:
lintian upgrade to 2.5.0
An update on this: Lintian/2.5.3 properly reports if certain overrides
may have been ignored due to the current profile (with --verbose it
lists tags it saw overrides for).
As mentioned earlier, patches for the Ubuntu profile are still welcome.
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification becau
Hi,
For the record, this has already been filed against Lintian as
#667614[1], where I have debating this with Benjamin Drung. Feel free
to follow up on the Debian bug if you have ideas for solving the problem
etc.
~Niels
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/667614
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracke
I haven't looked at the entire log or anything, but I suspect it is
because upstream is using a special source/target combination that
allows them to compile 1.5+ code into 1.4 byte code (or so). I believe
it is JSR14...
To my knowledge, upstream is already aware of it[1], though I am not
quite u
Hi,
I very much doubt that eclipse (itself) is using 900 MB of memory.
>From your logs (with manual re-alignment):
[ 5682.395679] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss cpu oom_adj
oom_score_adj name
[ 5682.383742] [ 1996] 1000 1996 24562060334 0 0
Thanks for the clarification. I believe the feature you requested are
already available in Lintian (since 2.5.0~rc4).
Please refer to [1] for more information. It matches more than a
regular shell glob, but I believe it covers what you wanted.
Furthermore, please note that it is also possible t
When you say "support shell globbing when specifying file paths", do you
mean in overrides?
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903146
Title:
please add support for globbing
To ma
Hi,
java-common has nothing to do with license issues in PPAs. I believe
those should be filed as questions against launchpad itself. I have
forwarded your request (see [1]).
I am leaving this open until the launchpad people has had a look.
~Niels
[1] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+
Hi,
According to your AptOrdering log, you are trying to install the Java
provided by sun-java6 instead of openjdk-6. In that case you should
remove default-jre (default-jre-headless/default-jdk/...) as well (they
are "meta" packages to pull in an open-source JVM; in your case
openjdk-6).
APT s
** Bug watch added: Eclipse bugs #351485
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351485
** Also affects: eclipse-eclipsers via
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351485
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 633198 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 633198
Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624693
Title:
Eclipse crashes on initialization or when clicking on menus
To manage no
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 759702 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759702
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 759702
eclipse crashed with SIGABRT in ContiguousSpace::block_start_const()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 604390 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604390
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 604390
Upgrade Eclipse to 3.7
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Hi
Looks like your DpkgTerminalLog log is incomplete, so I cannot diagnose
your problem. From the AptOrdering log it looks like you are trying to
remove (some) openjdk-6 (packages) and install sun-java6 instead. If
so, then you have to remove default-jre(-headless) as well since it
depends on op
I should clarify my last comment. This is a risk that the problem is in
eclipse-pde, but I strongly suspect the upgrade tool of being broken.
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8250
Hi
This is definitely not a problem in eclipse-pde; I suspect it is your
upgrade application that choked. I saw multiple errors from dpkg in the
"MainLog", the "DistupgradeTermlog" is "cut off" (not to mention it
starts with two "Segmentation Faults").
I am re-assigning this to the software-cent
Hi
This is a feature of the new Lintian profiles in 2.5.2. Vendor profiles may
declare some tags non-overridable and dir-or-file-in-opt is one of those. The
ubuntu vendor profile inherits this (indirectly) from the
ftp-master-auto-reject profile.
Whether these tags should be "non-overridab
Hi
I am going to mark this as fixed then, since I believe the 2.5.0~rc2 fix
should avoid the "undefined"/"internal" error problems.
~Niels
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Public bug reported:
Please sync sentinella/0.9.0-2 from Debian sid main.
Upstream informed me of an error in some logic in 0.9.0 and 0.9.0-2
carries a patch for this.
** Affects: libsysactivity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification beca
You might want to cherry-pick 5d5a40f[1].
~Niels
[1]http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=5d5a40fb5a5f7cbda8ec4b200decaba73d8c3580
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Considering eclipse-platform is already Recommending eclipse-pde and
suggesting eclipse-jdt (at least in 3.5.2-9), I am not really sure
changing anything will help.
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Hi
We should be carrying a fix for this issue in eclipse 3.5.2-8 or newer
(e.g. Natty and newer)[1]. So I guess we need a backport to Lucid. Are
there people using either Maverick or Karmic that would like this to be
backported to their repository as well?
Bejamin, I am leaving the actual backp
@andmark: Looks like you are not using eclipse from Ubuntu, if that is
the case, then there is little we can do you help you. Most likely your
eclipse is compiled against older versions of libraries shipped with
Ubuntu and a recompile will fix your issue.
@Adrian Casajus: Different issue as far a
Hi
There are two possible causes for this and I suspect you need to fix
both for it to work. First off there are some old shared libraries
extracted into ~/.eclipse/ that you have to remove. These are (most
likely) compiled against older versions of system libraries and will
definitely be a sour
Hi
I think you need to file a bug against the unity menu for these
applications (unfortunately the package name eludes me at the moment).
Currently eclipse (incl. vanilla Eclipse) has an exception in the menu,
but all this eclipse-derived applications probably do not.
As a temporary work around i
Actually I suspect this is (partly) fixed by commit 3b9d80fba[1]. It is
possible that the package is tagged for using LZMA compression, but it
should not cause an "internal error". If this not the case, please
provide the binary causing the internal error and I will have a look at
it.
~Niels
[1
@Gerhard Bogner:
The log posted is from an Ubuntu from eclipse.org; Ubuntu cannot really
do much to fix binaries supplied from upstream. You are welcome to file
a bug on eclipse.org's bug tracker about this.
Alternatively you can try to reproduce it with eclipse from Ubuntu (although
Ubuntu doe
Alright, I am closing this as invalid then since gtk-qt-engine has been
removed and the eclipse binary involved is not from Ubuntu so we cannot
really do much about it.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Mike does this problem still persist? My best guess would be that the
eclipse-rcp package for your architecture was not built/available on the
mirror when you tried.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
@McMenace:
You are using an eclipse from eclipse.org; Ubuntu people has little
chance to help you with that. You should file a bug against the
upstream eclipse bug tracker. Note, judging from the crash log your
problem could very well be different from the original one.
@Yoav Caspi:
I assume th
Hi Dmitrijs
Thanks for testing it; this will be fixed with the next version of
Lintian (expected to be 2.5.0)
~Niels
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Hey,
Got the same issue 3 times and it appears that the log itself is
prematurely terminated in relation to this error. My guess is that the
error happens because the log file is (for some reason) closed, when
dpkg is trying to configure java-common (or default-*).
Do you still experience the er
Hi
I have read the entire DpkgTerminalLog.gz file and I cannot seem to
find the point of failure. Are you certain you have attached the
correct log file?
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 653927 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653927
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 653927
package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben
von »«: No such file or directory
* You can subscribe to bug 653927 by follo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 653927 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653927
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 653927
package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben
von »«: No such file or directory
* You can subscribe to bug 653927 by follo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659789 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659789
package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso
vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659789 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659789
package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso
vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You
Hi
The relevant part of the DpkgTerminalLog.gz appears to be:
Configurazione di lintian (2.4.3ubuntu2)...
Generating en_US.UTF-8 locale for internal Lintian use
cannot open locale definition file `en_US': Nessun file o directory
I am guessing that last error is "... `en_US': No such file or
Hey Raphael,
Do you think this the same as http://bugs.debian.org/604047 ?
~Niels
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #604047
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604047
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659789 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659789
package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso
vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You
(0.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstrema release.
* Added --no-add-needed,--as-needed to linker flags.
* Removed a space from the version passed to help2man.
-- Niels Thykier Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:13:01 +0100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux
Hey,
Someone with sufficient permissions; please mark this as Triaged and
Priority Medium (or even High).
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198
Title:
Plugins Stopped Working
Hey,
Could you check if you are suffering from LP: #633198[1]?
~Niels
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/633198
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Hi
I have just committed a patch to Lintian's VCS[1] for this issue. I
used "allows one to" as correction based on a debate with the Lintian
maintainers[2].
Thanks for the report.
~Niels
[1]
http://git.debian.org/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba2d36f8b01f6db1bd12e14fe1ce798cdc7d5aa4
[
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dropbox
Hi
Debian bug #610257[1] suggests that there possibly multiple license
issues in dropbox:
"""
1) ncrypt-0.6.4-*.egg/, according to its PKG-INFO (which is horribly
mangled, BTW), contains a GPL-licensed library with accompanying source.
Additi
Hey,
Sounds like a decent idea. Do you have any suggestions for a correction?
~Niels
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608231
Title:
"allows to" in package descriptions not caught by l
Hi
Is this a migration from Karmic to Lynx? If so, have you upgraded your
dpkg and doc-base package first?
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Okay, that does not make sense after all. I checked[1] and "adduser"
clearly appears in the Depends of jetty.
~Niels
[1] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34043110/jetty_6.1.20-2.diff.gz
...
+Package: jetty
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libjetty-java (>= ${source:Version}),
+ libjett
Hi
It appears to be a missing dependency on "adduser". You can work around
this by installing "adduser" (e.g. aptitude install adduser jetty)
I cannot reproduce issue in an sid chroot, so it has probably been fixed
somewhere between 6.1.20-2 and 6.1.24-6.
~Niels
** Changed in: jetty (Ubuntu)
Hi
The change you suggest will solve your particular problem, but for someone
wanting to do the "other way" transformation (etc. sun-java6 -> openjdk-6) will
now have a problem.
That being said, I think the reverse is probably less likely to happen in the
real world and your solution here wil
Taking this (in regards to solving the default-java issue). We probably
need a separate bug for java-wrappers.
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Niels Thykier (niels-thykier) => (unassigned)
--
You re
t work on
this tool I will not make any promises on this; however, you should be
able to work around this issue by using JAVA_FLAVOR (see man 7 java-
wrappers).
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
You received this bug noti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 600584 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600584
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 600584
Eclipse crashes on startup because of kernel revision
* You can subscribe to bug 600584 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
@Henri Sivonen
Hey, sorry for the late reply.
The sed recipe looks like it will work in the "average" case, but unfortunately
not every case as you experienced. The "full" solution, which I referred to in
the Debian bug #587657, is to manually "merge" the two bundles info files.
The user leve
Hi
We have imported this on the Debian side to version 3.5.2-8 (not
uploaded yet). Nevertheless next time Ubuntu merges with Debian, this
patch will be included.
Thanks for a detailed report and finding the patch,
~Niels
--
Eclipse Foundation Code-signing certificate chain not trusted
https://b
Forwarded to Debian as #600175.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600175
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #600175
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600175
** Also affects: jetty (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600175
** Patch added: "Original patches merged into a unified patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jetty/+bug/656374/+attachment/1692246/+files/allow-jlp-default.patch
--
Can't set java.library.path in /etc/default/jetty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656374
You received this bug noti
Hey,
I noticed we fixed this on the Debian side 6.1.24-6, so Maverick should
be unaffected.
~Niels
--
jetty does not restart properly (test for already running is inverted for
restart action)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
