I also vote for Fevrin's suggestion of implementing an option to choose
one's preferred behavior. There seem to be arguments for both (see
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8487 ), so why not let people choose?
I, personally, like the original "grey out" behavior better, since this
little asterisk
Public bug reported:
texlive-latex-recommended (or some other appropriate package) should contain
soulutf8, infwarerr and etexcmds from the oberdiek bundle:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
Maybe even all files from this bundle should be included?
soulutf8 allows fo
Public bug reported:
texlive-latex-recommended (or some other appropriate package) should contain
soulutf8, infwarerr and etexcmds from the oberdiek bundle:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
Maybe even all files from this bundle should be included?
soulutf8 allows fo
I also vote for Fevrin's suggestion of implementing an option to choose
one's preferred behavior. There seem to be arguments for both (see
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8487 ), so why not let people choose?
I, personally, like the original "grey out" behavior better, since this
little asterisk
I also vote for Fevrin's suggestion of implementing an option to choose
one's preferred behavior. There seem to be arguments for both (see
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8487 ), so why not let people choose?
I, personally, like the original "grey out" behavior better, since this
little asterisk
Public bug reported:
texlive-latex-recommended (or some other appropriate package) should contain
soulutf8, infwarerr and etexcmds from the oberdiek bundle:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
Maybe even all files from this bundle should be included?
soulutf8 allows fo
I also vote for Fevrin's suggestion of implementing an option to choose
one's preferred behavior. There seem to be arguments for both (see
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8487 ), so why not let people choose?
I, personally, like the original "grey out" behavior better, since this
little asterisk
Public bug reported:
texlive-latex-recommended (or some other appropriate package) should contain
soulutf8, infwarerr and etexcmds from the oberdiek bundle:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
Maybe even all files from this bundle should be included?
soulutf8 allows fo
I also vote for Fevrin's suggestion of implementing an option to choose
one's preferred behavior. There seem to be arguments for both (see
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8487 ), so why not let people choose?
I, personally, like the original "grey out" behavior better, since this
little asterisk
Public bug reported:
texlive-latex-recommended (or some other appropriate package) should contain
soulutf8, infwarerr and etexcmds from the oberdiek bundle:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
Maybe even all files from this bundle should be included?
soulutf8 allows fo
I also vote for Fevrin's suggestion of implementing an option to choose
one's preferred behavior. There seem to be arguments for both (see
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8487 ), so why not let people choose?
I, personally, like the original "grey out" behavior better, since this
little asterisk
Public bug reported:
texlive-latex-recommended (or some other appropriate package) should contain
soulutf8, infwarerr and etexcmds from the oberdiek bundle:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/oberdiek/
Maybe even all files from this bundle should be included?
soulutf8 allows fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
