[Bug 658616] Re: gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing

2010-10-25 Thread Patrick Farrell
Great, thanks for that. Is there any way I can track how the SRU is getting along? (I don't know much about how they work) -- gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 658616] Re: gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing

2010-10-18 Thread Patrick Farrell
Does anyone have any advice? I guess if no one is interested, I'll just bundle the clearlooks icons with my application .. -- gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 658616] Re: gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing

2010-10-12 Thread Patrick Farrell
** Attachment added: "And here's what it looks like with the ambiance icons" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mono/+bug/658616/+attachment/1687316/+files/ambiance-icons.png -- gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658

[Bug 658616] Re: gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing

2010-10-12 Thread Patrick Farrell
** Attachment added: "Here's what it looks like with the clearlooks icons" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mono/+bug/658616/+attachment/1687315/+files/clearlooks-icons.png -- gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658

[Bug 658616] [NEW] gtk.STOCK_REMOVE has changed to something (I think is) confusing

2010-10-11 Thread Patrick Farrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-mono I maintain a GTK app used in-house at my university. It's a graphical editor for the input to a scientific model. (You can see a screenshot at http://amcg.ese.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Spud .) In the model options, some things are optional, and

[Bug 260027] Re: libopenmpi segfaults when electric fence is enabled

2008-08-23 Thread Patrick Farrell
Expanding the OBJ_CONSTRUCT_INTERAL macro with its definition in opal/class/opal_object.h, one finds that the illegal instruction is ((opal_object_t *) (item))->obj_class = (flist->fl_elem_class); I modified the openmpi source to print out the argument to malloc, the returned pointer, and the a

[Bug 260027] Re: libopenmpi segfaults when electric fence is enabled

2008-08-22 Thread Patrick Farrell
After struggling a bit to build libopenmpi1 with debugging symbols (even with libopenmpi-dbg installed, libopal-pal does not have debugging symbols installed), I managed to get a more useful backtrace: 0xb5cdd334 in opal_free_list_grow (flist=0xb2b46a50, num_elements=1) at class/opal_free_list.

[Bug 260027] Re: libopenmpi segfaults when electric fence is enabled

2008-08-21 Thread Patrick Farrell
** Attachment added: "A crashing program, when electric-fence is enabled" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16977965/test.cpp -- libopenmpi segfaults when electric fence is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 260027] [NEW] libopenmpi segfaults when electric fence is enabled

2008-08-21 Thread Patrick Farrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libopenmpi1 Electric Fence is a library for finding memory access bugs. It wraps malloc in such a way that a segfault is issued upon invalid memory access. When I load my MPI program with electric-fence enabled, MPI::Init issues a segfault: Program rec

[Bug 225269] Re: MPI::TAG_UB has a value not allowed by the standard

2008-05-02 Thread Patrick Farrell
Ah, thanks for clearing up my mistake. I'm just amazed the code worked before the switch to OpenMPI! -- MPI::TAG_UB has a value not allowed by the standard https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 225269] [NEW] MPI::TAG_UB has a value not allowed by the standard

2008-05-01 Thread Patrick Farrell
8.04 [16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ apt-cache policy openmpi-common openmpi-common: Installed: 1.2.5-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.2.5-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.2.5-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Thanks, Patr