[Bug 1944080] Re: [fan-network] Race-condition between "apt update" and dhcp request causes cloud-init error

2021-09-19 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Also added charm-rabbitmq-server, where this error is more clear. Rabbitmq-server fails on: https://github.com/openstack/charm-rabbitmq- server/blob/master/hooks/install#L9 because it runs a "dpkg" command before a successful execution of "apt update" on the container. Install eventually fails with

[Bug 1944080] [NEW] [fan-network] Race-condition between "apt update" and dhcp request causes cloud-init error

2021-09-19 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Public bug reported: Hi, Using manual provider on top of VMWare. Juju: 2.9.14 VM: Focal Containers: Bionic I've noticed that, in a given Focal host, 2x Bionic containers may have different behavior: one successfully completes cloud-init whereas the other fails. The failed container errors at "a

[Bug 1885169] Re: Some arping version only accept integer number as -w argument

2021-07-21 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Hi, here is the output of "apt policy python3-neutron": https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8xt5mdMkVg/ It shows: 16.4.0-0ubuntu2 as installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885169 Title:

[Bug 1885169] Re: Some arping version only accept integer number as -w argument

2021-07-21 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Hi, We've run a test with -proposed version and our tests have been successful. Test scenario: Run Rally test "VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete" 4x times with 2x as concurrency That fails on our current environment without the patch because some VMs are unreachable for several minutes. Once we've

[Bug 1885169] Re: Some arping version only accept integer number as -w argument

2021-07-16 Thread Pedro Guimarães
I've ran a test with both arping and iputils-arping. I can notice that using the "arping" package, indeed it works fine, just like @hopem commented previously. However, if we run with "iputils-arping" package, then I see the same issue: $ sudo arping -A -I -c 1 -w 1.5 127.0.0.1 arping: invalid ar

[Bug 1885169] Re: Some arping version only accept integer number as -w argument

2021-07-16 Thread Pedro Guimarães
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885169 Title: Some arping version only accept integer number as -w argume

[Bug 1889765] Re: Notification processing failure causes notifications to get stuck

2021-06-18 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Hi, downgraded masakari units to Bionic and re-ran the same test scenario. I can also see notifications eventually fail and do not get stuck in "running". Adding tag for bionic as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1889765] Re: Notification processing failure causes notifications to get stuck

2021-06-18 Thread Pedro Guimarães
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889765 Title: Notification processing failure causes notifications to get stuck To manage notifications about

[Bug 1889765] Re: Notification processing failure causes notifications to get stuck

2021-06-17 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Hi @james-page, I've ran the package in focal-proposed: *** 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.5 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages And I can see that now notifications do not get stuck in "running" anymore, but move to "failed" when an error happens. That fixe

[Bug 1889765] Re: Notification processing failure causes notifications to get stuck

2021-06-10 Thread Pedro Guimarães
I can reproduce this issue on the following scenario: 1) Create a segment and add the node 2) Create enough VMs so Masakari will take some time on the evacuation (e.g. 30 VMs) 3) Reboot the node 4) Masakari starts the migration of the VMs 5) Node eventually comes back and nova-compute is up & run

[Bug 1889765] Re: Notification processing failure causes notifications to get stuck

2021-06-09 Thread Pedro Guimarães
** Also affects: masakari (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889765 Title: Notification processing failure causes notifications to ge

[Bug 1927729] [NEW] Cinder packages should have sysfsutils as a dependency

2021-05-07 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Public bug reported: Running openstack Ussuri + Focal with Cinder HPE 3PAR on Fiber Channel. When trying to attach volumes or create a volume from an image, it fails with: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/mwPZhYK5c4/ That is cinder API-level error, but it happens on the client side of the communic

[Bug 1914988] [NEW] IGMP Snooping does not work with RBAC enabled ovn-controllers

2021-02-08 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Public bug reported: Hi, I've tested this on both 20.03 and 20.06. Looking into ovn-architecture.xml: https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/blob/master/ovn-architecture.7.xml#L2530 It states that once RBAC is enabled, ovn-controllers will have access to some of the tables and that is hardcoded within

[Bug 911981] Re: tracker-store uses 100% cpu and fills all the disk space in home partition

2020-07-06 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Using focal desktop and I am seeing the same issue. I was seeing tracker-store and tracker-miner-fs taking an entire core of my notebook. Tried: tracker reset --hard and reboot. Did not work for me. Only effective solution was to disable search engine on "Settings". -- You received this bug not

[Bug 1880959] Re: Rules from the policy directory files are not reapplied after changes to the primary policy file

2020-06-19 Thread Pedro Guimarães
** Tags added: cpe-onsite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880959 Title: Rules from the policy directory files are not reapplied after changes to the primary policy file To manage n

[Bug 1851676] Re: dmidecode decodes /sys/class/dmi/id/product_serial incorrectly

2019-11-07 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Hi Tim, I don't think patching kubernetes-master will resolve this issue. Mainly because the issue happens on kubernetes-workers. We were seeing PVCs failing with: "No VM found". When we look into the logs, actually kubernetes was trying to learn about its kubernetes- workers through SystemUUID.

[Bug 1832082] Re: bnx2x driver causes 100% CPU load

2019-08-12 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Hi, does the fix for Bionic has been backported to stable? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832082 Title: bnx2x driver causes 100% CPU load To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 1796292] Re: Tight timeout for bcache removal causes spurious failures

2019-05-14 Thread Pedro Guimarães
This script *should* trigger the issue on Bionic GA: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/WdKGbMWnM6/ Try it with both GA and HWE bionic, the commit on HWE should trigger up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1796292] Re: Tight timeout for bcache removal causes spurious failures

2019-05-14 Thread Pedro Guimarães
I was looking into kernel commits and I came across this: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/fadd94e05c02afec7b70b0b14915624f1782f578 So, as far as I understood, it actually deals with the issue of manual device detach during a writeback clean-up and causing deadlock. The timeline makes sens

[Bug 1828551] [NEW] ipmipower ignores timeout settings during RMCP handshake

2019-05-10 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Public bug reported: freeipmi: 1.4.11 Ubuntu Bionic MAAS 2.5.2 Using ipmipower with opensesspriv work-around enabled to power up/down my servers. However, due to my network connectivity, some packages may face longer latency on delivery. I can see on tcpdump that messaging follows: 1) ipmipow

[Bug 1817055] Re: Broken dependency when setting swift-proxy on Bionic

2019-02-24 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Well, I've found out why charm is not complaining: systemctl is marking as SUCCESS despite failures on journalctl. Also, running an strace on this, I see: close(3)= 0 stat("/etc/swift/proxy-server.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2797, ...}) = 0 openat(AT_FDCW

[Bug 1817055] Re: Broken dependency when setting swift-proxy on Bionic

2019-02-23 Thread Pedro Guimarães
Also, despite those issues, charm is stating "Ready/Active" on its status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817055 Title: Broken dependency when setting swift-proxy on Bionic To manage

[Bug 1817055] Re: Broken dependency when setting swift-proxy on Bionic

2019-02-23 Thread Pedro Guimarães
To keep it registered, I've set up swift-proxy on Bionic containers (same configs as described on the main text of this bug). After deployed, I've ran: juju run --application swift-proxy "add-apt-repository ppa:james-page/bug1817055" juju run --application swift-proxy "apt update" juju run --appl

[Bug 1817055] Re: Broken dependency when setting swift-proxy on Bionic

2019-02-23 Thread Pedro Guimarães
The problem disappears when switching to your PPA. However, I still see some trace on journalctl for swift-proxy: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/RFzk7qRQ6J/ The process marks: ● swift-proxy.service - LSB: Swift proxy server Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/swift-proxy; generated) Active: active (

[Bug 1718699] Re: curtin fails to setup bcache when unclean bcache from previous install exists

2019-02-07 Thread Pedro Guimarães
@raharper Please, reference to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1815018 I am adding all the info I've collected there on that bug report instead -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/171

[Bug 1718699] Re: curtin fails to setup bcache when unclean bcache from previous install exists

2018-10-28 Thread Pedro Guimarães
I'm facing this bug on a 33-server openstack deployment using xenial-queens. Curtin version: 18.1-17-gae48e86f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 As per comment #14, the fix seems to be applied to version 17.1. Therefore, I can point that the problem still persists. The failure is intermittent, meaning generally