I appreciate this is not a direct reference to firehol, but I have put
together a patch for my fork, sanewall, see here:
http://lists.sanewall.org/pipermail/sanewall-dev/2013-March/42.html
If anyone is able to help test + verify the principle idea I can extend
the change to cater for early
Is the reason is that the change (or similar) was already made upstream?
See:
http://firehol.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/firehol/firehol/firehol.sh?r1=1.292r2=1.293
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
At the risk of courting contreversy, is the real solution not to only
use IP addresses in firehol scripts and possibly better failsafe if the
firewall does not load (although good look googling for the reason or
remotely logging into your box to fix it with everything set to deny).
Using names
