[Bug 309790] [NEW] nvidia-glx-71 fails to compile module

2008-12-19 Thread Phillip Calvin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nvidia-glx-71 When installing nvidia-glx-71 (71.86.04-0ubuntu10), the post- installation compilation of the module produces this error: ubu...@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-71 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree

[Bug 309790] Re: nvidia-glx-71 fails to compile module

2008-12-19 Thread Phillip Calvin
** Attachment added: Output of the failed build. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20581723/make.log -- nvidia-glx-71 fails to compile module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 102511] Re: apt throws bzip2/gzip errors for duplicated sources.list entries or duplicated componenes (race condition?)

2007-05-31 Thread Phillip Calvin
I agree with Ulrik: I have also never modified my sources.list except via the Synaptic interface. -- apt throws bzip2/gzip errors for duplicated sources.list entries or duplicated componenes (race condition?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102511 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 108214] Re: cannot execute programs/scripts from USB drives

2007-05-31 Thread Phillip Calvin
This is the opposite bug to #60722. Since USB drives that must interface with Windows are formatted with FAT, they lose all permission data, including the executable permission. Hence, when a FAT drive is mounted, either all the files must be marked as executable, or none. If they are all

[Bug 108214] Re: cannot execute programs/scripts from USB drives

2007-05-31 Thread Phillip Calvin
I agree -- filesystems that support the execute bit should work, which is a bug. I did not realize you were talking about non-FAT drives... perhaps you could add reiserfs or ext to the bug description so this is clearer? -- cannot execute programs/scripts from USB drives

[Bug 86882] Re: lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade

2007-03-29 Thread Phillip Calvin
No, I was serious! I'm used to certain other open source projects that don't care about bugs, but I'll leave those unnamed. Thanks again for your work making Ubuntu even better. -- lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/86882 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 86882] Re: lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade

2007-03-28 Thread Phillip Calvin
Thanks for the quick resolution of this! -- lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/86882 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 86882] Re: lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade

2007-02-21 Thread Phillip Calvin
Attaching logs. ** Attachment added: Main upgrade log http://librarian.launchpad.net/6494655/main.log -- lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/86882 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 86882] Re: lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade

2007-02-21 Thread Phillip Calvin
Attaching logs. ** Attachment added: Term log http://librarian.launchpad.net/6494656/term.log -- lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/86882 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 86882] Re: lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade

2007-02-21 Thread Phillip Calvin
Attaching logs. ** Attachment added: apt upgrade log http://librarian.launchpad.net/6494650/apt.log -- lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/86882 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 86882] lighttpd and apache2 conflict and break edgy upgrade

2007-02-21 Thread Phillip Calvin
Public bug reported: This bug results from having both lighttpd and apache2 installed prior to running the upgrade to Edgy. When lighttpd is updated, the installation script restarts the server. However, if you choose to replace the configuration file (the only option other than cancel),

[Bug 60722] Re: Set better umasks for FAT filesystems (USB drives etc)

2007-02-21 Thread Phillip Calvin
The executable bit being set also causes Nautilus to ask the user what to do (Open or Execute) when a user double-clicks a file on a FAT USB disk. This can be confusing for users unfamiliar with executable permissions who simply expect the file to open in its associated program. -- Set better