[Bug 1298552] Re: bluetooth enabled after resume

2015-02-04 Thread PomCompot
Is there any importance if I do the new report when the bug is present or not (when bluetooth is enabled after suspend or at any time)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298552 Title: b

[Bug 1298552] Re: bluetooth enabled after resume

2015-02-04 Thread PomCompot
As the other user concerned by this bud, can I do the apport-collect so that it is reopened and investigated? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298552 Title: bluetooth enabled after res

[Bug 1280109] Re: Upgrade to Skype for Linux version 4.3.0.37

2014-07-15 Thread PomCompot
There's less interest on depending on a repository if update can not be done. And as said before, it becomes difficult to use the old version as incompatibilities arrise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1780] Re: apt-spy does not have ubuntu mirror listing

2013-11-03 Thread PomCompot
It seems now that Ubuntu provides a mirror list through http://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt. Is it enough to push back apt-spy in repository (with some modifications to retrieve the list of mirrors from this URL)? The only problem seems to be that mirros.ubuntu.com is regularly down. It seems th

[Bug 264333] Re: remote printer : freeze when not available

2012-09-13 Thread PomCompot
I can confirm this problem is gone for me in Precise Pangolin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264333 Title: remote printer : freeze when not available To manage notifications about t

[Bug 494400] Re: Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one

2012-01-02 Thread PomCompot
As you can see here (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560180#10), nautilus-gksu is discontinued : a good way to fix a bug concerning a feature is to remove the feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 12893] Re: Shouldn't put .Trash-$USER on removable devices

2011-11-01 Thread PomCompot
What people seems to not understand it's that it's counter-intuitive to pretend that a user must be aware of the destination of it's removed files and moreover that it doesn't free its key space as expected. When you delete files, there are two reasons: the file is useless + you don't have enough

[Bug 361550] Re: Help button does nothing

2011-09-27 Thread PomCompot
Thanks a lot for having take time to look at this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361550 Title: Help button does nothing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.la

[Bug 668821] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665892 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug

[Bug 676792] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 681579] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665892 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug

[Bug 684847] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665892 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug

[Bug 690162] Re: package udev 151-12.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 684853] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 691177] Re: package udev 151-12.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 691985] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 692228] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesso instalado o programa post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 694340] Re: package udev 151-12.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 694673] Re: package udev 162-2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** This bug has be

[Bug 695529] Re: package udev 151-12.3 failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subscribe to bug 681579 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ude

[Bug 676792] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 684853] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 690162] Re: package udev 151-12.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 691985] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 694340] Re: package udev 151-12.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 691177] Re: package udev 151-12.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 692228] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesso instalado o programa post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 694673] Re: package udev 162-2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subs

[Bug 642998] Re: package udev 162-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 641902 package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 (live usb

[Bug 660765] Re: package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 642998 package udev 162-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subsc

[Bug 662122] Re: package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 660765 package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug

[Bug 663009] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 662122 package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 * You ca

[Bug 663356] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: underproces installed post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 663009 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug

[Bug 663610] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 663356 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: underproces installed post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1 * You can subscribe to

[Bug 665443] Re: package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-01-20 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 663610 package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1 * You can sub

[Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem

2010-11-30 Thread PomCompot
@hedgehog#29 Brillant simple patch! Works like a charm now. -- ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 494400] Re: Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one

2010-11-30 Thread PomCompot
I cannot reproduce the bug in Lucid. I haven't migrated to Maverick yet, but this bug does no more affect me. @jay armstrong Try $gksu 'nautilus --no-desktop' with single quotes instead of $gksu nautilus --no-desktop to prevent the unrecognized option message. -- Opening folder with nautilus-gk

[Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem

2010-10-25 Thread PomCompot
Any proof of a link with ureadahead? Would be interesting for others to give some details on this (first, to know if we can make a migration with /var on another part). -- ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523484 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 494400] Re: Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one

2010-10-12 Thread PomCompot
It's normal. When you launch Nautilus as root without the option --no- desktop, this new nautilus instance begins to manage the desktop. You just have to launch gksudo nautilus --no-desktop. -- Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 402188] Re: gvim complains about "gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed" in the shell it's started from

2010-01-13 Thread PomCompot
When using the PPA, I now get this new error : "GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times". Anybody else with the same problem ? -- gvim complains about "gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed" in the shell it's started from https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 300271] Re: Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic proxy settings (gnome-network-preferences) for authenticated proxies

2009-12-24 Thread PomCompot
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #562399 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562399 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562399 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic

[Bug 300271] Re: Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic proxy settings (gnome-network-preferences) for authenticated proxies

2009-12-24 Thread PomCompot
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #605357 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605357 ** Also affects: gnome-control-center via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605357 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic

[Bug 300271] Re: Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic proxy settings (gnome-network-preferences) for authenticated proxies

2009-12-24 Thread PomCompot
** Description changed: -- Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic proxy settings (gnome-network-preferences) for authenticated proxies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 494400] Re: Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one

2009-12-09 Thread PomCompot
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #560180 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560180 ** Also affects: gksu (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560180 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change deskto

[Bug 494400] Re: opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root

2009-12-09 Thread PomCompot
** Summary changed: - nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one + opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root ** Summary changed: - opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root + opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu chang

[Bug 494400] Re: nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one

2009-12-09 Thread PomCompot
** Summary changed: - nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper + nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one -- Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 12154] Re: Nautilus should have a superuser mode

2009-12-09 Thread PomCompot
What do you think of an ‘Unlock button’ like the one of the time-admin app ? The user open the permissions dialog. There is already a message “You are not the owner, so you cannot change these permissions.”. An ‘Unlock’ button give him the ability to bypass its user privileges to perform permissio

[Bug 494400] Re: nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper

2009-12-09 Thread PomCompot
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #604153 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604153 ** Also affects: gksu via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604153 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 494400] [NEW] nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper

2009-12-09 Thread PomCompot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gksu In Nautilus, when you open a folder as admin through the nautilus-gksu script, it changes the background of the desktop to the root one. I suspect the nautilus-gksu script doesn't invoke the nautilus command with the --no-desktop option. Additionna

[Bug 66015] Re: Duplicate spell checking dictionaries for every entry

2009-09-09 Thread PomCompot
I don't think this bug is only a Firefox one. I'm French and often use English on the web. Thus, I need both language-support-en and language- support-fr. But, those meta-packages install a lot of dictionaries that I don't care because I live in France, not in Belgium, not in Canada, so fr-CA, fr-B

[Bug 66015] Re: Duplicate spell checking dictionaries for every entry

2009-09-09 Thread PomCompot
A advice to everybody: the installation of Dictionary Switcher add-on (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3414) doesn't solve the problem but leverage it a lot. It automatically detects your typing language and select the right dictionary. No more need to change it in the context menu

[Bug 157921] Re: language-support-en pollutes Firefox's spell-check languages list

2009-09-09 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66015 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66015 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 66015 Duplicate spell checking dictionaries for every entry -- language-support-en pollutes Firefox's spell-check languages list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 208179] Re: Spell checker Firefox has too much options.

2009-09-09 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66015 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66015 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 157921 language-support-en pollutes Firefox's spell-check languages list ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 66015 Duplicate spell checking dictionari

[Bug 190263] Re: Wrong character encoding in text input

2009-09-03 Thread PomCompot
This bug is also reported twice on the JIRA bugtracker of Adobe : http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-133 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-40 (opened 04/09/08) -- Wrong character encoding in text input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190263 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 190263] Re: Wrong character encoding in text input

2009-09-02 Thread PomCompot
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/jaunty-updates/flashplugin-nonfree ** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/flashplugin-nonfree ** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/flashplugin-nonfree -- Wrong character encoding in text input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190263 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 190263] Re: Wrong character encoding in text input

2009-09-02 Thread PomCompot
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #532666 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532666 ** Also affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532666 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Wrong character encoding in text

[Bug 247894] Re: Flash Player with Strange Characters

2009-09-01 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 190263 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190263 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 190263 Wrong character encoding in text input -- Flash Player with Strange Characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247894 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 211252] Re: Cannot receive files using bluetooth

2009-08-19 Thread PomCompot
I can confirm that installing and setting up properly gnome-user-share make the deal. I have a Nokia 6630 and I can send files from it to my laptop now. There's the problem of the notification of gnome-user-share that stays here after the transfer and which is completely useless because you cannot

[Bug 277211] Re: Dell Wireless 355 Bluetooth card can't turned on in Ubuntu

2009-08-19 Thread PomCompot
Get a Dell Latitude D530 with an Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan]. Can confirm this. I have fought 1 entire day with this problem trying also solution on Ubuntu forums and launchpad bugs to not having to boot to Windows. I finally boot to Windows, activate the bluetooth and it works

[Bug 412382] Re: meld (or other) must be used instead of kdiff3 by default in Jaunty

2009-08-12 Thread PomCompot
A small patch correcting the problem. Just a modification of the gconf diff-ext schema default values. ** Summary changed: - meld (or other) must be use instead of kdiff3 by default in Jaunty + meld (or other) must be used instead of kdiff3 by default in Jaunty ** Attachment added: "use-of-meld-

[Bug 412382] [NEW] meld (or other) must be use instead of kdiff3 by default in Jaunty

2009-08-12 Thread PomCompot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: diff-ext Overview: When you just installed diff-ext and try to compare two (or three) files from the context menu Compare entry in Nautilus, you get no result. Steps to reproduce: – Fresh install ofdiff-ext, – Select two (or three) files in Nautilus, – 

[Bug 18995] Re: [MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly

2009-08-11 Thread PomCompot
This subject has, of course, already been talked on FreeDesktop. No exactly from this point of view, but for setting up a consensus on the best way to conceive the MIME database. It seems that Gnome and KDE have both common and specific ways of handling that. I will not enter in the details because

[Bug 18995] Re: [MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly

2009-08-11 Thread PomCompot
@Coren: Thanks Coren, it makes things clearer. Your patch is then needed (solving a first problem, without solving the 'Open with' one, but it's better than nothing). @ktulu77: In the Gmome mailing list (MarkMail) I referenced, there are two points of view : - extraction from Nautilus and integra

[Bug 18995] Re: [MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly

2009-08-11 Thread PomCompot
@ktulu77 : I have forgotten the MarkMail URL in my previous post: http://markmail.org/message/mcarb3i4gg5hcvm3#query:+page:1+mid:qxaeqv22o3pkzgvx+state:results. On Nautilus 2.26.2, on Jaunty, I don't have the two tabs. Strange. You will not be happy, because you're right. First, the freedesktop

[Bug 18995] Re: [MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly

2009-08-10 Thread PomCompot
Have found this thread on MarkMail speaking of the exactly same problem with another point of view (extracting the 'Open with' dialog from the libnautilus to be usable elsewhere). -- [MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18995 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 18995] Re: [MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly

2009-08-10 Thread PomCompot
@ktulu77 : From where di you get this 'Open with' dialog with two tabs 'Installed applications' and 'Available applications'? Is it in the Karmik alpha? I personaly doesn't have such a dialog. I'm new on this bug, but wondering technically what prevent an extension from replacing the 'Open with' d

[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume

2009-08-10 Thread PomCompot
Same problem but a startup. Can confirm almost the same problem on a Dell Inspiron 1520 (iwl3945). Have to wait from 30s to 3min before connection is done. Happen on my WPA encrypted network with only this laptop. Non problem with others and apparently no problem with this laptop on another WPA ne

[Bug 368760] Re: NM takes too long to connect to wifi after login (jaunty regression)

2009-07-26 Thread PomCompot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 321098 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321098 I comment here because I experience the same problem at startup. From 0s to 1min to connect on my two Dell laptops. Annoying, because I also experienced some connection failures with my ISP and I'm always aski

[Bug 28622] Re: Warning should be displayed when a filesystem is remounted read-only.

2009-01-15 Thread PomCompot
Could confirm the importance of such a dialog. Get a FAT32 external media corrupted (accidentally unplugged while writing) and search for a while what was the reason for the mount read only behavior. dmesg was helpfull but it's not a acceptable solution for the common user. I use Ubuntu Hardy. Str

[Bug 38748] Re: eclipse JVM/gcj don't use same configuration

2008-10-28 Thread PomCompot
Moreover, using Eclipse 3.2.2 on Hardy (Build id: M20070212-1330 (Ubuntu version: 3.2.2-5ubuntu2)), Eclipse use by default the GCJ JVM and doesn't ask for workspace whatever the value of SHOW_WORKSPACE_SELECTION_DIALOG in ~/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/.settings/org.eclipse.ui.

[Bug 12893] Re: Shouldn't put .Trash-$USER on removable devices

2008-04-02 Thread PomCompot
The problem cannot be reduced to a wide system setting. Here we talk of removable media, it meens you take it and plug it wherever you want on multiple PCs. If you don't want a .Trash on your usb stick, you don't want it whatever the Ubuntu where you plug it. It means that what is needed here is a