[Bug 1957024] Re: pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

2024-09-20 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Vladmir, Thanks for looking into this. I agree this is a change in behaviour and it's late in the cycle for Oracular. I'll hold this one off until Oracular is out, and will re-subscribe next month. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1957024] Re: pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

2024-09-02 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching the patch from #2 as a debdiff. ** Patch added: "private_home.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5812180/+files/private_home.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 1957024] Re: pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

2024-08-30 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2068743] Re: Ceph PGs get stuck in repair state

2024-08-27 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Regression potential is high and also not within the SRU requirements: https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs- hosted.com/en/latest/explanation/requirements/#minimal-changes-only Auto repair can still be enabled - just need to be aware that sometimes there can be false positive "repair" status but

[Bug 2068743] Re: Ceph PGs get stuck in repair state

2024-08-23 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: Due to bug [0], auto_repair, when enabled, doesn't work correctly and the PGs get stuck in repair state even when there was no scrub repairs needed/done by Ceph. It's been fixed from Pacific onwards. Need to be backported to Octopus. + Upstream patch: https://

[Bug 2060666] Re: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-08-15 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Verfiication has been repeated with 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 from focal-proposed and has been confirmed to fix the leak (memory usage is stable after several hours - following the test procedure). Marking verification done. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: veri

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-08-14 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: ucf (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061825 Title: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy To manag

[Bug 2060666] Re: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-08-08 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
1.17-6ubuntu4.6 has superseded the previous version 1.17-6ubuntu4.5 :( Uploading a new debdiff on top of 1.17-6ubuntu4.6. ** Patch added: "focal-new-patch.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2060666/+attachment/5803755/+files/focal-new-patch.diff -- You received this

[Bug 2060666] Re: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-08-02 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Thanks, Andreas, and Mitchell. All passed now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666 Title: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: http

[Bug 2060666] Re: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-07-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
1.17-6ubuntu4.5 has been installed from focal-proposed and has been confirmed to fix the leak (memory usage is stable after several hours - following the test procedure). Marking verification done. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done veri

[Bug 2039955] Re: Opening NFS tab in the dashboard leads to ceph mgr crash - orchestrator._interface.NoOrchestrator: No orchestrator configured

2024-06-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
The proposed patch [0] to fix this has been merged in main. I have created the backport PRs: Reef: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58283 Squid: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58285 Quincy: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58284 [0] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/56876 -- You received t

[Bug 2068743] Re: Ceph PGs get stuck in repair state

2024-06-07 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068743 Title: Ceph PGs get stuck in repair state

[Bug 2068743] [NEW] Ceph PGs get stuck in repair state

2024-06-07 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: Due to bug [0], auto_repair, when enabled, doesn't work correctly and the PGs get stuck in repair state even when there was no scrub repairs needed/done by Ceph. It's been fixed from Pacific onwards. Need to be backported to Octopus. [0] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5044

[Bug 2067722] Re: cephfs-mirror package is missing systemd unit files and manpage

2024-05-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/caracal Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/bobcat Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/yoga Importance: Undec

[Bug 2067722] [NEW] cephfs-mirror package is missing systemd unit files and manpage

2024-05-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: The missing unit file makes the cephfs-mirror essentially broken. This is due to the upstream bug: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59682 We would have to SRU this to Squid, Reef, and Quincy. ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affec

[Bug 2028358] Re: [SRU] missing cephfs-mirror package

2024-05-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
This has been fixed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2003704 ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028358 Tit

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-05-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Robie 1. From man page does allude to that. " -P foo, --package foo Don't follow dpkg-divert diversions by package foo when updating configuration files. " which implies ucf should (and does) respect/handle diversions. 2. Further: "ucf should respect dpkg-divert" (refer ht

[Bug 2065854] [NEW] Provide a table for Ceph support timelines

2024-05-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: Currently the "supported Ceph versions" info is available in a few places: [0], [1], and [2]. But none of them provide a complete information. Even then, it's not straightforward to work out the EOL dates for a given Ceph version. Something similar to OpenStack's [2] that c

[Bug 2060666] Re: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-05-14 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching the debdiff for Focal. ** Attachment removed: "krb5-focal-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2060666/+attachment/5777986/+files/krb5-focal-debdiff.txt ** Attachment added: "krb5-focal-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/

[Bug 2060666] Re: [SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-05-13 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching the debdiff for Focal. ** Attachment added: "krb5-focal-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2060666/+attachment/5777986/+files/krb5-focal-debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2060666] Re: Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-05-13 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: - Commit 1cd2821 altered the memory - management of krb5_gss_inquire_cred(), introducing defcred to act as + [ Impact ] + + Commit https://github.com/krb5/krb5/commit/1cd2821c19b2b95e39d5fc2f451a035585a40fa5 + altered the memory management of krb5_gss_inquire_cred(), intr

[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

2024-05-03 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@SRU team, is this good to move to jammy from jammy-proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009885 Title: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

[Bug 2057713] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.15

2024-04-30 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Can the packages be moved to wallaby/focal-updates pocket now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057713 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

2024-04-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Set the locale variables to de_DE.UTF-8. Then testing timeshift: ubuntu@bronzor:~$ dpkg -l | grep timeshift ii timeshift 21.09.1-1 amd64System restore utility ubuntu@bronzor:~$ locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_US LC_CTYPE="en

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-04-24 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Thanks, Heitor. I'll remember to run `update-maintainer` going forward! Re. Focal: The syntax error and relevant code was introduced in 3.0040 whereas Focal is using older ucf. Thus Focal is unaffected. Likewise Lunar/Mantic/Noble have the fixed version already. So this is a Jammy- only backport.

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-04-24 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Thanks, Dariusz! I've attached a new debdiff. ** Attachment added: "debdiff_2061825_new.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucf/+bug/2061825/+attachment/5770060/+files/debdiff_2061825_new.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-04-18 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching the debdiff. ** Attachment added: "debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucf/+bug/2061825/+attachment/5767388/+files/debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-04-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Tags added: sts ** Description changed: - ucf doesn't work correctly when local diversions in place. + [ Impact ] - This is due to a syntax error and has been fixed in Debian upstream: + When a dpkg-diversion is used to setup a package diversion and ucf for managing + the configuration fil

[Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-04-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Summary changed: - ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy + [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061825 Title: [SRU] ucf

[Bug 2061825] [NEW] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-04-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
al. This will be a Jammy-only backport. ** Affects: ucf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: ucf (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: High Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: ucf (Ubuntu Jammy)

[Bug 2060666] Re: Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-04-11 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666 Title: Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2060666] Re: Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666 Title: Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

[Bug 2060666] [NEW] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17

2024-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
e fix). Bionic doesn't have the commit the introduced the memory leak. So this fix needs to be backported to Focal (only). ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan

[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

2024-04-02 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: timeshift (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009885 Title: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 bro

[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

2024-04-02 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: [ Impact ] Timeshift is broken after upgrade to 21.09.1-1. This is because of a change in behaviour by rsync; rsync 3.2.4 changed how the locale's worked out. From https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.2.4 "A long-standing bug was preventing rsync from

[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

2024-04-02 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: - Timeshift version 21.09.1-1 broken after rsync upgrade to - 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2. I had to upgrade Timeshift to version 22.11.2 - from Mint PPA to have it working again. Log messages tell rsync failed - to create backup file. The behavior to note is that in the Timeshif

[Bug 2009885] Re: Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2

2024-03-29 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Mantic and Noble have newer packages of timeshift which contain the upstream fix [0]. Focal is at 3.1.3-8ubuntu0.7 which predates the rsync change (3.2.4). So this issue affects just Jammy. I've created a PPA with this fix for Jammy [1] to test. I'll do an SRU for Jammy after confirmation. [0]

[Bug 2056572] Re: [SRU] Ceph 16.2.15 point release

2024-03-13 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2057713 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057713 Marking as duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057713 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2057713 [SRU] ceph 16.2.15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 2056572] [NEW] [SRU] Ceph 16.2.15 point release

2024-03-08 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: Ceph 16.2.15 has been released. https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2024/v16-2-15-pacific-released/ This is also the last point release in Pacific and contains several bug fixes. It also contains the fix for CVE-2023-43040. ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1975906] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.9

2022-05-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975906 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975906

[Bug 1975906] [NEW] [SRU] Ceph 16.2.8

2022-05-27 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: A Pacific point release is now available: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/#v16-2-8-pacific ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 1970460] Re: [SRU] Avoid premature onode release

2022-04-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: - The upstream bug is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53002 + [Impact] - It's been backported to relevant releases upstream (Octopus, Pacific, and Quincy). - Octopus 15.2.16 has the fix. So does Quincy 17.2.0. However, the latest Pacific release missed out this fix. So

[Bug 1970460] Re: Avoid premature onode release

2022-04-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: The upstream bug is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53002 It's been backported to relevant releases upstream (Octopus, Pacific, and Quincy). Octopus 15.2.16 has the fix. So does Quincy 17.2.0. However, the latest Pacific release missed out this fix. So needed to

[Bug 1970460] Re: Avoid premature onode release

2022-04-27 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching debdiff for Pacific (hirsute). ** Attachment added: "debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1970460/+attachment/5584420/+files/debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1970460] [NEW] Avoid premature onode release

2022-04-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: The upstream bug is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53002 It's been backported to relevant releases upstream (Octopus, Pacific, and Quincy). Octopus 15.2.16 has the fix. So does Quincy 17.2.0. However, the latest Pacific release missed out this fix. So needed to be SRU'ed f

[Bug 1969000] Re: [SRU] mon crashes when improper json is passed to rados

2022-04-14 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 1955345] Re: Active ceph-mgr crashes on receiving report from a non-active mgr

2022-04-04 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
This has been superseded by https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1964802 which is a newer Octopus release (15.2.16) and contains the commits for fixing this as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1852441] Re: In bionic, one of the ceph packages installed causes chrony to auto-install even on lxd

2022-03-21 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: ntp-charm Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852441 Title: In bionic, one of the ceph packages instal

[Bug 1852441] Re: In bionic, one of the ceph packages installed causes chrony to auto-install even on lxd

2022-02-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
I am not sure if there's anything to fix here for the ntp charm. The ntp charm shouldn't really be installed in a container. In general, It should be installed alongside a principal charm that's on a bare-metal machine. In situations like charm upgrade, The ntp charm could end up installing the c

[Bug 1955345] Re: Active ceph-mgr crashes on receiving report from a non-active mgr

2021-12-20 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-archive Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) ** Changed in: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => In

[Bug 1955345] Re: Active ceph-mgr crashes on receiving report from a non-active mgr

2021-12-19 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching debdiff for Focal. ** Patch added: "focal1955345.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1955345/+attachment/5548581/+files/focal1955345.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1955345] [NEW] Active ceph-mgr crashes on receiving report from a non-active mgr

2021-12-19 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
backport bug: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53198 This has been already been fixed and available in Pacific. So needed to backport only for Octopus. ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu

[Bug 1942182] Re: apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu

2021-10-12 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: - Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in - a loop and takes up 100% of cpu. + Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng seems to get stuck in a + loop and takes up 100% of cpu. root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are a

[Bug 1942182] Re: apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu

2021-08-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in a loop and takes up 100% of cpu. root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 21.04 Release: 21.04 Codename:

[Bug 1942182] Re: apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu

2021-08-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attached apt-cacher-ng logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942182 Title: apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub

[Bug 1942182] Re: apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu

2021-08-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "apt-cacher-ng.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1942182/+attachment/5521847/+files/apt-cacher-ng.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 1942182] Re: apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu

2021-08-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in a loop and takes up 100% of cpu. root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 21.04 Release: 21.04 Codename:

[Bug 1942182] [NEW] apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu

2021-08-31 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in a loop and takes up 100% of cpu. root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 21.04 Release:21.04 Codename: hirsute root@magic

[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

2021-08-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri Importan

[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

2021-08-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data e

[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

2021-08-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

2021-08-26 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => nikhil kshirsagar (nkshirsagar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusi

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-08-18 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Reverted the 'status' of the bug to the previous states. As Dan Streetman pointed out, 'reuse' of this bug causes confusion and strays from the standard SRU process. I creates a new bug to carry out the SRU https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1940456 The fixed patch is already a

[Bug 1940456] [NEW] [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

2021-08-18 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Public bug reported: This is same as LP#1914584 but its original patch was wrong which was found out in SRU tests and that particular release went ahead without the patch. Since that LP is kind of in hard-to-follow/confusing states, opened this new bug to carry out the SRU work. ** Affects: ceph

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-07-29 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria Status: Triaged => New ** Changed in: cloud-archive/train Status: Triaged => Won't Fix ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Fix Committed => New ** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: Fix Released => New ** Changed in: ceph

[Bug 1936136] Re: ceph on bcache performance regression

2021-07-15 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936136 Title: ceph on bcache performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-06-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens Status: Triaged => Won't Fix ** Changed in: cloud-archive/rocky Status: Triaged => Won't Fix ** Changed in: cloud-archive/stein Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 1914911] Re: [SRU] bluefs doesn't compact log file

2021-05-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Verified that log compactions occur in bluefs with read/write I/O. Attaching test notes. ** Attachment added: "queens_sru_1914911" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914911/+attachment/5500895/+files/queens_sru_1914911 ** Tags removed: verification-queens-needed ** Tags adde

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-30 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
This (incorrect) patch is in upstream master and backported to Nautilus, Octopus, and Pacific. This isn't critical and doesn't break functionality - except for an incorrect error message if user attributes modification fails. However, the reported problem still exists. So I've marked all verificati

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-29 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914584 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confu

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Confirmed that the patch needs re-work. So marking all verification failed. I've opened an issue in upstream tracker [0]. Submitted the patch upstream [1]. Once that gets approved, backports to Nautilus, Octopus, and Pacific to follow. I am not sure how 15.2.11 release can be worked around whethe

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added: verification-failed verification-failed-focal verification-failed-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Submitted patch upstream: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41065 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914584 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-27 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
With SRU verification test, it doesn't quite work as intended. I believe the problem is with the upstream patch [0]. I've asked for clarification/confirmation [1]. I'll then have to mark the verifications failed, I am afraid. This obviously affects 15.2.11 release as well. I'll try to get this fix

[Bug 1911900] Re: [SRU] Active scrub blocks upmap balancer

2021-04-12 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
The regression that this patch fixes wasn't introduced (or backported to) Luminous by upstream. So this doesn't affect Bionic (confirmed by checking Ubuntu's latest Bionic source too). ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Thanks, James. Do you know this is in the SRU queue and when this patch might be committed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914584 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching debdiff for Hirsute. ** Attachment added: "hirsute-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914584/+attachment/5486157/+files/hirsute-debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching debdiff for Groovy. ** Attachment added: "groovy-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914584/+attachment/5486155/+files/groovy-debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching debdiff for Focal. ** Attachment added: "focal-debidff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914584/+attachment/5486154/+files/focal-debidff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1914584] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with email already exists

2021-04-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Hi Brian, James Page is doing a newer hirsute release in [0] which includes this fix as well. I'll upload the debdiffs for various Ubuntu releases as well. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1922883 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1913284] Re: [plugin] [bcache] add a new bcache plugin

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
SRU verification for Bionic passed. Attached a text file w/ steps and relevant info. ** Attachment added: "bcache-bionic-verification.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1913284/+attachment/5483289/+files/bcache-bionic-verification.txt ** Tags removed: verification

[Bug 1913284] Re: [plugin] [bcache] add a new bcache plugin

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
SRU verification for Groovy passed. Attached a text file w/ steps and relevant info. ** Attachment added: "bcache-groovy-verification.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1913284/+attachment/5483278/+files/bcache-groovy-verification.txt ** Tags removed: verification

[Bug 1913284] Re: [plugin] [bcache] add a new bcache plugin

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
SRU verification for Focal passed. Attached a text file w/ steps and relevant info. ** Attachment added: "bcache-focal-verification2.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1913284/+attachment/5483242/+files/bcache-focal-verification2.txt ** Tags removed: verification-n

[Bug 1910264] Re: [plugin][ceph] include time-sync-status for ceph mon

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
SRU verification: Verification done on Bionic, Focal, and Groovy. Please refer comments above and let me know if there are questions. Thanks, Pon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910264

[Bug 1910264] Re: [plugin][ceph] include time-sync-status for ceph mon

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Verified on Groovy with 4.1-1ubuntu0.20.10.1. Time sync status is collected as expected. Attached a reference. ** Attachment added: "time-sync-groovy-sru-verify.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1910264/+attachment/5483241/+files/time-sync-groovy-sru-verify.txt **

[Bug 1910264] Re: [plugin][ceph] include time-sync-status for ceph mon

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Verified on Bionic with 4.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.1. Time sync status is collected as expected. Attached a reference. ** Attachment added: "time-sync-bionic-sru-verify.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1910264/+attachment/5483226/+files/time-sync-bionic-sru-verify.txt **

[Bug 1910264] Re: [plugin][ceph] include time-sync-status for ceph mon

2021-04-01 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Verified on Focal with 4.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1. Time sync status is collected as expected. Attached a reference. ** Attachment added: "time-sync-focal-sru-verify.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1910264/+attachment/5483227/+files/time-sync-focal-sru-verify.txt ** Ta

[Bug 1914911] Re: [SRU] bluefs doesn't compact log file

2021-03-25 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Hi James, I manually edited the debdiff because it produced a lot of cruft when doing debdiff which aren't relevant to the patch (that probably cause the issue). Perhaps that's not an issue after all? I created the patch again and attached here (that does contain the cruft I noted) and also lef

[Bug 1852441] Re: In bionic, one of the ceph packages installed causes chrony to auto-install even on lxd

2021-03-24 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: ntp-charm Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852441 Title: In bionic, one of the ceph packages installed causes chrony to auto- install e

[Bug 1914911] Re: [SRU] bluefs doesn't compact log file

2021-03-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attached debdiff for bionic (fixed the previous patch which had additional unnecessary changes). ** Attachment added: "bionic.debdiff.fixed" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914911/+attachment/5477289/+files/bionic.debdiff.fixed -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1914911] Re: [SRU] bluefs doesn't compact log file

2021-03-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed: [Impact] For a certain type of workload, the bluefs might never compact the log file, which would cause the bluefs log file slowly grows to a huge size (some bigger than 1TB for a 1.5T device). There are more details in the bluefs perf counters when this iss

[Bug 1917494] Re: ceph-mgr hangs in large clusters

2021-03-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
igh ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917494 Title: ceph-mgr hangs in

[Bug 1852441] Re: In bionic, one of the ceph packages installed causes chrony to auto-install even on lxd

2021-03-11 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
In case of ceph-mon, now it goes into error state because chrony is not there. So ntp charm should update the status before it checks if chrony is installed." ** Also affects: ntp-charm Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ntp-charm Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponn

[Bug 1915705] Re: Ceph block device permission gets wrongly reverted by udev

2021-03-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
James Page suggested this might need to be done in the packaging as well. Once the fix is finalized in charm-ceph-osd, I'll update the udev rules in debian/udev/95-ceph-osd-lvm.rules. ** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 1917651] Re: IndependentPlugin is not working

2021-03-04 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Done both - thanks, Eric! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917651 Title: IndependentPlugin is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun

[Bug 1917651] Re: IndependentPlugin is not working

2021-03-04 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attached debdiff for hirsute. ** Description changed: [IMPACT] Regression found while doing the verification testing of (LP: #1913284) As described by my colleague Ponnuvel: " The problem is that IndependentPlugin is not working in Focal's sosreport. The bcache plugin uses Indepe

[Bug 1913284] Re: [plugin] [bcache] add a new bcache plugin

2021-03-03 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Tested using the patch from [0] and it works (= generated sosreport contains the bcache stats). Attached the test sos report here. So once this is re-uploaded, I'll repeat the verification. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1917651/comments/3 ** Attachment added: "sos

[Bug 1917651] Re: IndependentPlugin is not working

2021-03-03 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attached debdiff for groovy. ** Attachment added: "groovy-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1917651/+attachment/5472233/+files/groovy-debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917651] Re: IndependentPlugin is not working

2021-03-03 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "focal-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1917651/+attachment/5472231/+files/focal-debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 1917651] Re: IndependentPlugin is not working

2021-03-03 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching debdiff for focal. ** Attachment added: "focal-debdiff.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1917651/+attachment/5472232/+files/focal-debdiff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

  1   2   3   >