Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
The package should of course be correctly spelt as "software-centRE".
Since Canonical is based in London I'm amazed that American spellings should be
so widely used.
Perhaps it might be possible to include the correct spellings as a part
Hi
I have no problem auto-connecting to a vpn services using openvpn on the
command line - or autostarting openvpn at boot. But if I try to connect
via network-manager then connection (apparently) "times out". This never
happened on karmic.
--
vpn connection handshake times out too soon
https://
That geometry was reported by fdisk following my own clean win7 install
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Ulrich
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:44:22
To:
Subject: [Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries
Rachael wrote:
> Windows 7 uses a geometry of 240 heads with 63 s
Only quoting the fabled Ted Tso on that one :) personally I don't think it
makes much difference!
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Ulrich
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:51:48
To:
Subject: [Bug 415888] Re: Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD
Rachael wrote:
> formatting should t
Also forgot to mention lol...
If you're using logical volumes on a solid state drive the default space
allocated for metadata is 192k which breaks the 128k multiple rule. So
the metadata size needs to be defined as 256k using (bizarrely) the
command "metadatasize=250k".
Finally, although I don't
How complicated an answer do you want to this question?
The default Linux geometry is 255 heads with 63 sectors per track.
Windows 7 uses a geometry of 240 heads with 63 sectors per track to
accommodate solid state drives.
According to Ted Tso the ideal geometry (which I use) is 224 heads with
5
I suspect that the client isn't waiting for the network to become
available and giving up after its first (unsuccessful) attempt to
connect.
This would explain why it works after logging out/in.
I don't have any data to support this theory - it's just an idea!
Rachael
On 15 Feb 2010, at 10:
** Attachment added: ".home.joan..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39145896/.home.joan..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39145898/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
Opera 10 doesnt show any files under the "files tab" but correctly shows
notes and contacts
hmmm
ProblemType: Bug
.home.joan..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log:
.home.joan..config.ubuntuone.syncdaemon.conf:
[bandwidth
netbook-launcher *was* working fine... now it isnt in Karmic :(
extract from syslog:
netbook-launche[2457]: segfault at 0 ip 00c86f93 sp bfd0e54c error 4 in
libc-2.10.1.so[c14000+13e000}
--
Lucid netbook-launcher segfaults when started
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495066
You received this bu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 488413 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488413
Hi Joshua
Sorry for taking so long to reply to your email. I hope you've had a
good Christmas and new year.
Anyway I've just completed a re-install of karmic and can now report
that ubuntuone-client now
Are you dual booting?
Rachael
www.rlb.tel
On 2 Nov 2009, at 22:51, Pete24v wrote:
> how do i update the bios?
>
> --
> Can not set backlight brightness on my Samsung NC10 in karmic
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438763
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscribe
if it's any help, updating to the latest 11C BIOS from the samsung web-
site cured this problem for me as well. the voria ppa works as well, but
has to be updated with every kernel update. the function key scripts
package is very useful tho :)
--
Can not set backlight brightness on my Samsung NC1
This has just happened to me - shortly after authorising Tomboy notes
and then re-booting the pc. Don't know if the 2 events are connected :(
--
Is 'Fatal Error' the type of language we want to use on Ubuntu ONE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429228
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: "syncdaemon-log.tar.bz2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34968165/syncdaemon-log.tar.bz2
** Attachment added: ".home.rachael..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34968168/.home.rachael..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt
** Attach
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
Files held on the server are not automatically re-synced to a clean
install of 9.10 ubuntuone-client 1.0.2-0ubuntu2 unless a file is placed
into the local ~/Ubuntu One folder first
ProblemType: Bug
.home.rachael..config.ubuntuone.ubuntuo
** Attachment added: ".home.rachael..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33630165/.home.rachael..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33630166/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
I have a paid ubuntu one 50gb account til Nov 23rd
The latest web-update now shows me on the regular free 2gb plan
WTF has happened?
Not impressed here at all... in fact I'm very, very angry about this
ProblemType: Bug
.home.rachael..
hi joshua
have run the command, but it doesn't seem to have attached anything
The result in terminal is:
"No additional information collected."
Anything else I can provide for you?
--
ubuntuone does not auto-connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441362
You received this bug notification becau
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33170601/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33170602/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33170603/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
So that people can find this thread, can someone please correct the typo
in the thread? It should be "Samsung NC10" *not* "sharp NC10" :)
--
Can not set backlight brightness on my sharp NC10 in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438763
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
I have applied the karmic "nc-10 backlight" and "scripts" packages from below:
https://launchpad.net/~voria/+archive/ppa
and for the first time ever everything now works on my NC10.
I'm using a very old BIOS btw - I've never been brave enough to try to update
it through Linux :-p
Perhaps these pa
Okey-dokey... I know what to do now :) Thanks!
Anyhooo... as of a complete update at 9:32pm BST, the UNR applet isnt
working, nor are the brightness function keys. Ho-hum
Guess this shouldn't be under "KDE workspace" anymore... feel free to
move this somewhere more appropriate if you wish.
I
Sorry to email directly but the bug has disappeared off launhpad.
Just done (another) update (mainly python stuff I think) and now its
not working again :'(
Care to reinstate?
Thanks
Rachael
www.rlb.tel
On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:10, Richard Johnson wrote:
> That was quick. I read my email where
W-Ho!!!
It works again :)
And for the first time so do the NC10's brightness function keys :-D
** Changed in: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Battery monitor applet no longer controls brightness on Samsung NC10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4176
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-ubuntuone-client
The latest version of the ubuntuone applet no longer auto-connects to
the server on system start (even with the correct setting in
preferences!)
** Affects: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
Public bug reported:
libstdc++5 needs to be re-added to the karmic repository
without it ubuntu is unable to recognize/use the lexmark x1180 printer
(possibly others as well)
it's also a required dependency for programs like ubuntuzilla
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Stat
Hi
It turns out this isn't a specific KDE problem... the brightness applet in UNR
doesn't work any more either :(
So I guess it must be something to do with the sub-system?
This is a fairly major issue tho for all NC10 owners since the
brightness function keys don't map under *buntu without a re
P.S. Please let me know if you think I've messed up the maths somewhere
and got the geometry wrong! :(
--
Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415888
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Hi Colin,
So sorry for the delay - been up to my neck in work and kind of forgot about
your request.
Anyway, attached is the sda folder - I hope it helps you.
As I said before tho, the problem doesn't appear to the balancing of the ssd
itself.
The problem definitely resides with the implementat
OK... problem solved (at least, sort of...)
the installation failure is entirely to do with the ext4 file system.
using ext3 gives no problems whatsoever. this is irrespective of whether
or not the ssd is correctly balanced.
the correct balancing for a 128k erase block ssd (most ssd but not ocz)
and this is the partition manager screen photo...
** Attachment added: "DSCN0358.JPG"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30717933/DSCN0358.JPG
--
Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415888
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
hi colin
thnkyou SO much for looking at this - i'm very relieved to know that i'm
definitely not going round the twist!
the only other information i think i can give you which may help are the
attached 2 photographs. the first is a shot of how GParted sees the disk
structure of a successful ext3
and the partman file for the successful installation...
told ya it wasnt my SSD lol
** Attachment added: "partman"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30706404/partman
--
Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415888
You received this bug notification b
Ah-Ha now THAT'S interesting
have just tried the install again from the 9.04 live CD, but this time
with ext3 formatting instead of ext4 and its worked
So I guess the problem must lie either in the ext4 file system
itself or the way the installer attempts to implement it
And
and here's the partition manager log
** Attachment added: "partman"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30705887/partman
--
Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415888
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
OK these are the install files for the 9.04 Kubuntu live cd. Hope they
help.
On this occasion the error give was "/target/bin is read only" - which
it isn't and there is nothing wrong with the SSD.
** Attachment added: "syslog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30705876/syslog
--
Installation f
Public bug reported:
The battery monitor applet's "brightness" controller successfully
changed the brightness for the Samsung NC10 in 9.04. In 9.10 this
functionality has been lost (reverting to the bad old days of 8.10). Can
we have the old applet back please?
** Affects: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
it doesnt work, the installer cd still mis-represents the size of the
partitions.
crucial support (us) also suggested using GParted to form a unformatted
partition which could then be used. once again, doesnt work
the installation fails universally at one of 3 points:
(1) right at the beginning
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Installation fails on a Solid State Drive for:
Ubuntu/Kubuntu - Live CD All versions
Ubuntu - UNR
Kubuntu - Netbook Remix
Ubuntu/Kubuntu - Alternate CD 9.10 "Karmic" Alpha 4
Please see bug #415888 for full details
** Affects: debian-in
Might also be something to do with "partition balancing" Apparently
this is required for SSD operation
--
Installation fails on Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415888
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
have just spent most of today on the phone to Crucial support.
Apprently the 256gb SDD drive does only have 238.47gb of usable space...
so, therefore, my unit is fine.
What I'm guessing is that the installer disks are trying to partition to
the declared 256.1gb and so are crashing when unable to
Public bug reported:
Have just installed a Crucial/Micron M225 256gb SSD with Indilinx
"Barefoot" controller.
The installation of Kubuntu 9.10 from live CD and alternate CD fails (error:
"/target is read only")
The installation of UNR 9.10 also fails
The installation of Kubuntu 9.04 from live cd
43 matches
Mail list logo
