[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2018-03-08 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi everyone. It seems like the TGT bug (when stopping, reloading or restarting the TGT deamon) is solved in Ubuntu Artful (17.10). I did not make tests, but now TGT uses the upstream init.d script or the TGT systemd config file (both of them address all of the previous described problems). The

[Bug 1475337] Re: grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM)

2017-01-09 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Description changed: Hi, I've had a problem when using the `grub-probe` binary to probe large LVM partitions (for example, a 1.5 TB partition). This problem was discovered/tested in an Ubuntu 12.04.5. When trying to probe these large LVM partitions, we get erros like: -

[Bug 1027363] Re: grub-install fails with "out of disk" error

2017-01-09 Thread Rarylson Freitas
If its a duplicate (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1475337), its already fixed in Ubuntu 14.04 or newer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027363 Title:

[Bug 1646233] Re: file command incorrectly identifies a gzipped file as being a Minix filesystem

2016-12-03 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Maybe related. http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/file/2013/001244.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646233 Title: file command incorrectly identifies a gzipped file as being a Minix

[Bug 1646202] Re: jetty init file prints wrong reachable information

2016-12-02 Thread Rarylson Freitas
And... ** Patch added: "etc_default_jetty.reachable.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jetty/+bug/1646202/+attachment/4786562/+files/etc_default_jetty.reachable.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1646202] Re: jetty init file prints wrong reachable information

2016-12-02 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi, I discovered another strange and related behavior. When leaving JETTY_HOST empty, instead of listening on all IPs (0.0.0.0 - IPv4 and IPv6), the server is listening on localhost (IPv4 127.0.0.1). I run some tests and I discovered that passing an empty jetty.host as param is different than

[Bug 1508562] Re: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1

2016-12-01 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I updated the workarounds in this post: http://stackoverflow.com/a/40893892/2530295. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508562 Title: Broken symlinks for JSP support in

[Bug 1508562] Re: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1

2016-12-01 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: "jsp-2.1-6.0.2.jar" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jetty/+bug/1508562/+attachment/4785985/+files/jsp-2.1-6.0.2.jar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1508562] Re: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1

2016-12-01 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Sorry, the last workaround does NOT work. Use the first or the second one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508562 Title: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java

[Bug 1646233] [NEW] file command incorrectly identifies a gzipped file as being a Minix filesystem

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 14.04, the command `file` (1:5.14-2ubuntu3.3) incorrectly identifies a gzipped file as being a Minix filesystem. Example: ``` $ file gzip-minix.eml gzip-minix.eml: Minix filesystem, V3, 43470 zones $ file -v file-5.14 magic file from

[Bug 1646202] [NEW] jetty init file prints wrong reachable information

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: When starting/stopping Jetty via its init script (/etc/init.d/jetty), we can get strange/wrong/inconsistent information about the host and port in which Jetty is/was listen. This occurs in Ubuntu 14.04, but probably occurs in other Ubuntu/Debian versions since the

[Bug 1596032] Re: jetty init file has bad rotatelogs location

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
The bug is fixed also in Ubuntu 16.04. So, basically, it's only necessary a backport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596032 Title: jetty init file has bad rotatelogs location To

[Bug 1596032] Re: jetty init file has bad rotatelogs location

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
In Debian: Fixed in version jetty/6.1.26-3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596032 Title: jetty init file has bad rotatelogs location To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1596032] Re: jetty init file has bad rotatelogs location

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Reported also here in Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719875 I think this is already fixed in Debian. I fixed it in my servers the same way: changing /usr/sbin to /usr/bin. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #719875

[Bug 1508562] Re: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi, I'm having the same problem when trying to run Solr from the `solr- jetty` package in Trusty. I discovered that the problem was solved in Debian, and I'm hope the solution will be backported to Ubuntu 14.04 soon. However, I'm here to share three **workarounds**. All of them consist on use

[Bug 1508562] Re: Broken symlinks for JSP support in libjetty-extra-java version 6.1.26-1ubuntu1.1

2016-11-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I've tested all the previous three workarounds with Jetty+Solr, and Solr is working normally. Maybe the last solution is the better one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508562 Title:

[Bug 1465386] Re: Default values for WAIT_STATE are wrong in the upstart wait-for-state job

2016-11-29 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi, I'm sorry for don't response these questions in the last months. However, in the last days, I had some time and I understood better the situation. I'll split my post in three parts. 1 - Technical background 1.1 - Lack of documentation The `wait-for-start` job is not documented. Because

[Bug 1465386] Re: Default values for WAIT_STATE are wrong in the upstart wait-for-state job

2015-10-19 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Of course. I actually only know two examples: - mounting-glusterfs.conf: The glusterfs-client package uses the command "wait-for-state WAIT_FOR=static-network-up WAITER=mounting-glusterfs" without passing "WAIT_STATE=running"; - So, this command doesn't works; - See:

[Bug 1274320] Re: Error: diskfilter writes are not supported

2015-07-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
One question: The solution made by Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@ubuntu.com is marked as Fix Released. However, I can't update my grub package to the released one. The new version is 2.02~beta2-26ubuntu3, and mine is 2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.3. I've tried to get it from the trusty-proposed

[Bug 1475337] Re: grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM)

2015-07-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I've discovered that the seg-extent_count and vg-extent_size counters are 64 bits in the upstream. So, the problem is only in the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS release (I don't know if it exists in the Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. So, consider applying this patch in Ubuntu 12.04 or backporting the 64bit counters to

[Bug 1475337] Re: grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM)

2015-07-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
More info: The output of the problematic LV is: $ lvs -o seg_size,vg_extent_size --units s --nosuffix \ /dev/data/mail SSize Ext 4294967296 8192 And if I do not specify the LV (output of all LVs): $ lvs -o seg_size,vg_extent_size --units s --nosuffix SSize Ext 1949696 8192 3221225472 8192

[Bug 1027363] Re: grub-install fails with out of disk error

2015-07-16 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi Carlos, Could you check the output of this grub-probe command (with three times 'v'): /usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map=/boot/grub/device.map --target=fs -vvv /boot/grub If your LVM where /boot is instaled is large, it's possible that its bug (with a proposed patch) is your same case:

[Bug 1475337] [NEW] grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM)

2015-07-16 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: Hi, I've had a problem when using the `grub-probe` binary to probe large LVM partitions (for example, a 1.5 TB partition). This problem was discovered/tested in an Ubuntu 12.04.5. When trying to probe these large LVM partitions, we get erros like: $ grub-probe -vvv

[Bug 1475337] Re: grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM)

2015-07-16 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I also proposed a patch for the upstream code here: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?45562 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475337 Title: grub-probe can't probe large logical

[Bug 1465382] [NEW] Upstart job mounting-glusterfs.conf increases unnecessary 30 seconds in Ubuntu boot

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: **Note:** This bug is already reported at upstream. However, as it occurs only in Ubuntu, I thought it makes sense to report it here again. So, if the upstream team do not merge the patch (they are mostly developers from Red Hat and may prioritize problems that affect RedHat

[Bug 1465382] Re: Upstart job mounting-glusterfs.conf increases unnecessary 30 seconds in Ubuntu boot

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Patch added: Patch to the mounting-glusterfs.conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1465382/+attachment/4415273/+files/mounting-glusterfs.conf.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1465382] Re: Upstart job mounting-glusterfs.conf increases unnecessary 30 seconds in Ubuntu boot

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I made an error when choosing the package. Please ignore the upstart package and consider only the glusterfs package. ** Package changed: upstart (Ubuntu) = ubuntu ** No longer affects: ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 962047] Re: document wait-for-state

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
This is not a bug. It's a feature. However, it's a desired feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962047 Title: document wait-for-state To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1465386] [NEW] Default values for WAIT_STATE are wrong in the upstart wait-for-state job

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 14.04, the wait-for-state job uses the env vars WAIT_STATE=started or WAIT_STATE=stopped. if the GOAL env var is set to 'start' or 'stop'. However, according to the upstart cookbook, the desired states for a already started/stopped job are 'start/running' and

[Bug 1006293] Re: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
It seems that this bug is not more present in Ubuntu 14.04 (exim4-base version 4.82-3ubuntu2). However, we've really liked if the Ubuntu Team merged this simple fix in the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. It isn't good to be obligated to update the distribution just because only some fixes are merged in the old

[Bug 1006293] Re: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k

2015-06-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
It seems that this bug is not more present in Ubuntu 14.04 (exim4-base version 4.82-3ubuntu2). However, we've really liked if the Ubuntu Team merged this simple fix in the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. It isn't good to be obligated to update the distribution just because only some fixes are merged in the old

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using backupvolfile-server fails on boot

2015-06-12 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Summary changed: - Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot + Gluster mount using backupvolfile-server fails on boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464494 Title: Gluster

[Bug 1464494] [NEW] Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: Consider that we have a fstab entry that uses both volfile-server and backupvolfile-server in a Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS Server: mygluster:/mydir /var/mydir glusterfs defaults,nobootwait,nofail,_netdev,backupvolfile-server=mygluster-bak 0 0 If the host mygluster is accessible

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1464494/+attachment/4413586/+files/dmesg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464494 Title: Gluster

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: boot.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1464494/+attachment/4413585/+files/boot.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464494 Title:

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: var-lib-glance-images.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1464494/+attachment/4413588/+files/var-lib-glance-images.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: mountall.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1464494/+attachment/4413587/+files/mountall.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464494

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I'm attaching a better patch here (file glusterfs-3.4.2/xlators/mount/fuse/utils/mount.glusterfs.in). ** Patch added: mount.glusterfs.in.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1464494/+attachment/4413589/+files/mount.glusterfs.in.patch -- You received this bug

[Bug 1464494] Re: Gluster mount using volfile-bak fails on boot

2015-06-11 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I'm sorry. Consider this patch instead of the previous one. ** Patch added: mount.glusterfs.in.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1464494/+attachment/4413591/+files/mount.glusterfs.in.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 50437] Re: Resume from hibernation may fail because swap partition UUID does not match /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume

2015-05-07 Thread Rarylson Freitas
The workaround in post 35 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /initramfs-tools/+bug/50437/comments/35) works, but there's a more simple workaround to get the same result: 1) Update your /etc/fstab with your new SWAP partition (or partitions); 2) /var/lib/dpkg/info/initramfs-tools.preinst

[Bug 1066156] Re: update-grub generates insmod part_gpt four times

2015-03-22 Thread Rarylson Freitas
At first, the GRUB `insmod` command is idempotent. It is, loading many times the same module is not a great problem. Moreover, fixing this bug could increase complexity, and complexity often leads to bugs. However, some people may thing a smaller generated GRUB config file easier to debug and

[Bug 998599] Re: console/ssh halt command hangs the computer

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 986463] Re: WUBI Failed Bash Shutdown

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 958838] Re: Precise Pangolin shutdown fails from serial console

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 883705] Re: 11.10 will not power off laptop

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 991997] Re: Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default behavior of halt changed to halt only instead of powering off

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I think the current behavior is correctly, but the comment in /etc/default/halt sould be updated. Currently, this file is only used by /sbin/shutdown (or by the /etc/init.d/halt, that can be called by the /sbin/shutdown depending of the situation). Updating the comment may avoid user

[Bug 967049] Re: Ubuntu 12.04-beta2-i386 as guest on KVM no halt

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 987027] Re: command halt does not turn off computer

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 781367] Re: system hangs on shutdown

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 992753] Re: Shutdown Problem

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 1008897] Re: Can not halt the system

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 885560] Re: Cannot shutdown 11.10 from Unity Ubuntu I installed 32 bit desktop version of Ubuntu 11.10 with Unity - activated updated drivers.Everything works well, Configured Firefox and thunder

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 950129] Re: sudo halt won't cause halt

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 965565] Re: shutdown hangs after init 0, sudo halt, sudo shutdown command

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 944908] Re: After the command [sudo][halt] PC is still open.

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 880240 system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 991997 Wrong comment in /etc/default/halt: Default

[Bug 880240] Re: system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given

2015-02-25 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 991997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991997 Hi, I think the current behavior is correctly, but the comment in /etc/default/halt sould be updated. So, I proposed a patch in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/991997/comments/6 (a

[Bug 1322431] Re: libsnmp-dev: Cannot create snmpv3 user with net-snmp-config command

2015-01-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I confirmed that this bug ocour in Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04. The @thorsten-hesemeyer response [#11] is right! The definitive solution is right and the explanation why adding `createUser $user $Aalgorithm $apassphrase $Xalgorithm $xpassphrase` entries work is right too. More info: The Ubuntu team

[Bug 1322431] Re: libsnmp-dev: Cannot create snmpv3 user with net-snmp-config command

2015-01-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I confirmed that this bug ocour in Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04. The @thorsten-hesemeyer response [#11] is right! The definitive solution is right and the explanation why adding `createUser $user $Aalgorithm $apassphrase $Xalgorithm $xpassphrase` entries work is right too. More info: The Ubuntu team

[Bug 1241612] Re: 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work

2014-08-14 Thread Rarylson Freitas
A similar patch was applyed in the package 3.8.1-1ubuntu2, as showed in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ddclient/+bug/980409 However, the last version in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is 3.8.0-11.4ubuntu1. It is, the patch was not applyed to all Ubuntu versions. Maybe the correct solution is apply

[Bug 980409] Re: ddclient init script fails to stop process

2014-08-14 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi. Although this thread shows the bug was fixed in the package ddclient@3.8.1-1ubuntu2, the last version in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS actualy is the 3.8.0-11.4ubuntu1. It is, the patch was not applyed to all supported Ubuntu versions. I tested this and a similar patch as posted in the follow link, and

[Bug 1241612] Re: 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work

2014-07-29 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Changed in: ddclient (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241612 Title: 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work To manage notifications

[Bug 1274320] Re: Error: diskfilter writes are not supported

2014-07-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Anders, I tested your patch (adapted and applied to the `/etc/grub.d/00_header` file), and it worked well. Thanks for the patch. If someone don't want to wait for the Debian guys confirm, test and merge the Anders patch, I'm updating my Github gist with a new patch to be applied in the

[Bug 1274320] Re: Error: diskfilter writes are not supported

2014-07-16 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Anders Kaseorg (anders-kaseorg), thanks for the links. Really, it's more safe not implementing LVM write support instead of accepting a risk. And about the RAID write support? Are there any considerations about? Well, I had a different idea (but a complex idea) about the write support: users

[Bug 1274320] Re: Error: diskfilter writes are not supported

2014-07-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I added more info about this bug here: http://askubuntu.com/a/498281/197497 To trying to help everybody with the problem solution, I'm copy/past my answer in the Ask Ubuntu here. This bug appears when you create the boot partition (or the root partition, when the boot partition doesn't

[Bug 1274320] Re: Error: diskfilter writes are not supported

2014-07-15 Thread Rarylson Freitas
In the last comment, I wrote: However, the best solution would be if Grub implements the `grub_diskfilter_write` function of the `diskfilter` module. This is because, with the actual patch, we lost some Grub features in RAID/LVM Grub instalations: the recordfail feature no more works. -- You

[Bug 1010861] Re: /etc/init.d/ddclient start/stop always returns 0

2014-06-10 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Nowdays, an other bug (with a better description) is a duplicated entry (same problem described here): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ddclient/+bug/1241612 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1241612] Re: 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work

2014-06-10 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Now, the entire file... ** Attachment added: ddclient.init.new https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ddclient/+bug/1241612/+attachment/4129372/+files/ddclient.init.new ** Changed in: ddclient (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: ddclient (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1010861] Re: /etc/init.d/ddclient start/stop always returns 0

2014-06-10 Thread Rarylson Freitas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1241612 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241612 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1241612 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1241612] Re: 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work

2014-06-10 Thread Rarylson Freitas
The reason is why the start-stop-daemon (--stop, --start and --status), when using the --name atribute, search for a program who had the correct PID file and the correct program name too. However, ddclient, when running in deamon mode, changes its name each 10 seconds (it starts with the name

[Bug 1241612] Re: 'service ddclient stop' doesn't work

2014-06-10 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I'm not a frequent commiter in Ubuntu Launchpad. So, I don't know if I must mark this BUG as 'In Progress' or as 'Fix Commited'. As my patch was not checked by the Ubuntu ddclient Team, some other improvements may be necessary in the patch, and I have no permition to commit to the Ubuntu branch

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi Serge Hallyn, I run some new tests and, in short, the problem I found is actually three problems (maybe this bug should be broke in three). I will summarize the problems I found: - Tgtd breaks when it receives a SIGHUP; - When we send a SIGHUP to tgtd (`reload tgt`), the deamon stops (and

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-30 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Hi Serge Hallyn, I run some new tests and, in short, the problem I found is actually three problems (maybe this bug should be broke in three). I will summarize the problems I found: - Tgtd breaks when it receives a SIGHUP; - When we send a SIGHUP to tgtd (`reload tgt`), the deamon stops (and

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-23 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I discovered that, although sending a SIGHUG signal to TGT (using the `reload tgt` command) doesn't works, I can correctly reload TGT using the following command: tgt-admin --update ALL I know upstart has the option to change the signal send to a deamon. However, if we could change the

[Bug 1296305] [NEW] The multipath-tools package in Ubuntu doesn't have the libprioweightedpath.so and the libprioiet.so modules

2014-03-23 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: In the multipath-tools upstream, there is a prioritizer called weightedpath. See: http://git.opensvc.com/?p=multipath- tools/.git;a=blob;f=libmultipath/prioritizers/weightedpath.h;h=509f21565d06d8c10a0f0a79756195a5583125d8;hb=HEAD This prioritizer exists in some

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-23 Thread Rarylson Freitas
In the attachment, I implemented a fix for the `restart` and `stop+start` bug. It's a poor fix, but it may help. Unfortunately, I don't found any fix for the reload method, since upstart (in Ubuntu 12.04) always send a SIGHUP signal to the deamon. ** Attachment added: tgt.override

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-23 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I discovered that, although sending a SIGHUG signal to TGT (using the `reload tgt` command) doesn't works, I can correctly reload TGT using the following command: tgt-admin --update ALL I know upstart has the option to change the signal send to a deamon. However, if we could change the

[Bug 1296305] [NEW] The multipath-tools package in Ubuntu doesn't have the libprioweightedpath.so and the libprioiet.so modules

2014-03-23 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: In the multipath-tools upstream, there is a prioritizer called weightedpath. See: http://git.opensvc.com/?p=multipath- tools/.git;a=blob;f=libmultipath/prioritizers/weightedpath.h;h=509f21565d06d8c10a0f0a79756195a5583125d8;hb=HEAD This prioritizer exists in some

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-23 Thread Rarylson Freitas
In the attachment, I implemented a fix for the `restart` and `stop+start` bug. It's a poor fix, but it may help. Unfortunately, I don't found any fix for the reload method, since upstart (in Ubuntu 12.04) always send a SIGHUP signal to the deamon. ** Attachment added: tgt.override

[Bug 1294267] [NEW] tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-18 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: Sometime, after run a `reload tgt`, some LUNs aren't correctly added to the targets. The error will be reproduced above: $ tgt-admin --dump default-driver iscsi target iqn.2014-03.br.com.2aliancas.storage2:vmware_iscsi_4 backing-store /dev/vg_vmware/vmware_4

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-18 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I think the problem can be related to this fact: the TGT daemon don't add a block storage to a LUN if some process was accessing it. The following command show another operation in which a similar problem occours: # All block storage added to the targets $ tgt-admin --dump | grep -o

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-18 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Sometimes, the restart operation doesn't works also: $ tgt-admin --dump default-driver iscsi target iqn.2014-03.br.com.2aliancas.storage2:vmware_iscsi_4 backing-store /dev/vg_vmware/vmware_4 initiator-address 192.168.130.0/24 initiator-address 127.0.0.1 /target target

[Bug 1294267] [NEW] tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-18 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: Sometime, after run a `reload tgt`, some LUNs aren't correctly added to the targets. The error will be reproduced above: $ tgt-admin --dump default-driver iscsi target iqn.2014-03.br.com.2aliancas.storage2:vmware_iscsi_4 backing-store /dev/vg_vmware/vmware_4

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-18 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Sometimes, the restart operation doesn't works also: $ tgt-admin --dump default-driver iscsi target iqn.2014-03.br.com.2aliancas.storage2:vmware_iscsi_4 backing-store /dev/vg_vmware/vmware_4 initiator-address 192.168.130.0/24 initiator-address 127.0.0.1 /target target

[Bug 1294267] Re: tgt doesn't export some LUNs after a reload operation (SIGHUP)

2014-03-18 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I think the problem can be related to this fact: the TGT daemon don't add a block storage to a LUN if some process was accessing it. The following command show another operation in which a similar problem occours: # All block storage added to the targets $ tgt-admin --dump | grep -o

[Bug 1006293] Re: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k

2014-01-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I had the same problem. When I read the source-code of the exiqgrep (exim-base package), I realized a question character was missing, and I applied the same patch. I'm using the 4.76-3ubuntu3 version too. So I was going to report the patch when I discovered that this bug was fixed in new

[Bug 1006293] Re: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k

2014-01-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
I had the same problem. When I read the source-code of the exiqgrep (exim-base package), I realized a question character was missing, and I applied the same patch. I'm using the 4.76-3ubuntu3 version too. So I was going to report the patch when I discovered that this bug was fixed in new

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: Third coredump https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826027/+files/core.60117 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: Second coredump https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826026/+files/core.14792 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: dmesg output https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826012/+files/dmesg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226833

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: Apport file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826013/+files/_usr_sbin_php5-fpm.33.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1226833] [NEW] zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: When the server is with a big load and, mainly, using a lot of memory (and swapping), the php5-fpm process crashs with a SIGFAULT signal. The service works again when I do a `service php5-fpm restart` command. The problem occours a few times (everytime, the server was with

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: Third coredump https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826027/+files/core.60117 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226833 Title:

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: Second coredump https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826026/+files/core.14792 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226833 Title:

[Bug 1226833] [NEW] zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
Public bug reported: When the server is with a big load and, mainly, using a lot of memory (and swapping), the php5-fpm process crashs with a SIGFAULT signal. The service works again when I do a `service php5-fpm restart` command. The problem occours a few times (everytime, the server was with

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: Apport file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826013/+files/_usr_sbin_php5-fpm.33.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1226833] Re: zend (php-fpm) crashes in high load/memory server

2013-09-17 Thread Rarylson Freitas
** Attachment added: dmesg output https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1226833/+attachment/3826012/+files/dmesg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226833 Title: zend