GCC 11 branch is being closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953128
Title:
GCC ICE: in create_fix_barrier, at config/arm/arm.c:17891
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
GCC 14.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 14.2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030797
Title:
Parallel C++ algorithms run sequentially
To manage notifications about this
The question is whether the caller misbehaves according to the ABI here?
There's likely a known alignment present we could re-instantiate with a
__builtin_assume_aligned?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Fixed for GCC 10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862053
Title:
Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862053
Title:
Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el
To manage notifications
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890435
Title:
gcc-10 breaks on armhf (flaky): internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904630
Title:
gcc-10 compilation failure in c_expr_sizeof_expr
To manage notifications
works on x86_64-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890435
Title:
gcc-10 breaks on armhf (flaky): internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
To manage notifications about this
The GCC 7 branch is being closed, re-targeting to GCC 8.4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791425
Title:
Compiler error: constexpr with bitfields.
To manage notifications about this
Fixed in GCC 8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848795
Title:
Internal error in varasm.c
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I guess we need something better than a python testcase.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811798
Title:
gcc 8 miscompiles scipy/optimize/minpack/qrsolv.f
To manage notifications
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 12 09:48:56 2015
New Revision: 220642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220642root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
Backport from mainline
2014-07-24 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR c/57653
* c
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1112499
Title:
WiFi.cpp doesn't compile with default flags
To manage notifications
GCC 4.8.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295738
Title:
[4.8 Regression] unable to find a register to spill in class 'LO_REGS'
To
GCC 4.8.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1185028
Title:
drizzle FTBFS due to internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
whilst
Likely caused by extended checking. Works with x86_64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315365
Title:
[4.10 Regression] ICE building libjava (verify_flow_info failed) on
-fno-tree-dce is certainly not a good idea ... (doesn't make it a non-
bug, of course).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295738
Title:
[4.8 Regression] unable to find a register to
*** Bug 59557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261669
Title:
LibreOffice needs to be rebuild with gcc#58800 fixed.
To manage
*** Bug 59557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246802
Title:
STL std::nth_element bug (fixed upstream)
To manage notifications about
Cannot reproduce this one, but it looks like a dup of or related to
PR59121.
As the crash is in ISL please report the ISL and cloog versions you use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The revision probably exposed a latent issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251930
Title:
[4.8 regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7
To manage
Well, until the compiler comes along and inlines 'inner'.
This is really a GIGO test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203496
Title:
micompilation of autoconf stack growth test at -O
Confirmed on i?86-linux. The code may be confused by the delegate
label.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175744
Title:
[4.8 Regression] wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with -Os
Created attachment 30015
adjusted testcase
preprocessed source that also builds and fails on i?86-linux.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175744
Title:
[4.8 Regression] wrong
I don't see how this is a bug.
job_64 = job_new (class_39, );
# DEBUG job = job_64
if (job_64 == 0B)
goto bb 43;
else
goto bb 44;
bb 43:
# DEBUG __fmt = BAD: wrong value for %s, got unexpected %p\n\tat %s:%d
(%s).\n
__printf_chk (1, BAD: wrong value for %s, got unexpected
Thus, invalid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123588
Title:
[4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Fixed on the trunk I suppose.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049614
Title:
Assembler messages with -O0: Error: offset out of range
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Mine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065559
Title:
[regression] cone ftbfs on armel/armhf using GCC 4.7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Created attachment 28517
patch
Patch I am testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065559
Title:
[regression] cone ftbfs on armel/armhf using GCC 4.7
To manage notifications about
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 25 11:05:43 2012
New Revision: 192803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192803
Log:
2012-10-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/54902
* tree-ssa-pre.c (fini_pre): Return TODO.
(execute_pre): Adjust
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 25 11:16:12 2012
New Revision: 192804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192804
Log:
2012-10-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/54902
* tree-ssa-pre.c (fini_eliminate): Return TODO.
(do_pre): Adjust
Fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065559
Title:
[regression] cone ftbfs on armel/armhf using GCC 4.7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Please also check trunk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065559
Title:
[regression] cone ftbfs on armel/armhf using GCC 4.7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The 4.5 branch is being closed, adjusting target milestone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472056
Title:
[PR42536] crash trying to build portable .net
To manage notifications about
Blocks the memory-hog meta-bug which is marked as regression.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398403
Title:
[PR40735] gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an
internal
We seem to miss a reproducer here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598462
Title:
[PR38292] corrupted profile info with -O[23] -fprofile-use
To manage notifications about this bug go
(In reply to comment #4)
This is likely caused by the DF merge. There are numerous bugs about this
already and nothing really can be done here.
Btw, my numbers are
rguenther@murzim:/tmp ~/bin/maxmem2.sh gcc-4.4 -S -o /dev/null -g
-fstack-protector -fPIE -Os test_node.i -std=gnu99
total:
Confirmed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877712
Title:
cc1plus crashed with SIGSEGV in dependent_type_p()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Confirmed. Reducing (I think it's a dup).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841825
Title:
gcc SIGSEGV when building Firefox and Thunderbird
To manage notifications about this bug go
That would be the case if we're missing an update_stmt on the debug
stmt.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841825
Title:
gcc SIGSEGV when building Firefox and Thunderbird
To manage
Because gimple_build_debug_bind_stat does not set the stmt to modified? So
it's not automatically updated on gsi_insert_before ().
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841825
Title:
gcc
Created attachment 25201
reduced testcase
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841825
Title:
gcc SIGSEGV when building Firefox and Thunderbird
To manage notifications about this bug go
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 29 08:03:34 2011
New Revision: 178155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178155
Log:
2011-08-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR middle-end/50116
* varasm.c (decode_addr_const): Handle MEM_REF[X, OFF].
Modified:
branches
Mine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827990
Title:
internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2632
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Should be fixed now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827990
Title:
internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2632
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I see a very deep recursion in the C++ frontend instead which blows my
stack.
#7701 0x0079ae0f in cp_genericize_r (stmt_p=0x75b81a98,
walk_subtrees=0x7fffd100, data=0x7fffd4c0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c:1023
1023
4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598462
Title:
[PR38292] corrupted profile info with -O[23] -fprofile-use
To manage notifications
There are several places in the compiler where we assume DECL_ALIGN
constraints the lower bits of the address of the DECL.
See several similar bugs in the past (PR47239 comes to my mind).
fold-const.c:get_pointer_modulus_and_residue looks suspicious to me here,
so you might want to try
Index:
Btw, we finally should introduce a target hook for this I think.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721531
Title:
[armel] gcc computes wrong address for main() at build time
--
The issue is that gcc 4.6 does not have large file support enabled and so
on 32bit hosts with 64bit file systems you can get this if the inode number
does not fit in the 32bit stat structure. That's what we have seen on
32bit userland with 64bit kernels and big fs.
Should be fixed for 4.6.
--
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 19 10:54:47 2011
New Revision: 172706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172706
Log:
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
PR fortran/47976
* reload1.c (inc_for_reload): Return void. All callers changed
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 20 09:48:00 2011
New Revision: 172765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172765
Log:
2011-04-20 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
Backport from mainline
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
PR fortran/47976
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 20 11:05:09 2011
New Revision: 172766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172766
Log:
2011-04-20 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
Backport from 4.6 branch
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
PR fortran
Should be fixed on the trunk. Bootstrap/tests on the 4.5 branch running for
{x86_64,i586,ppc,ppc64,ia64,s390,s390x}-linux.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723086
Title:
GCC 4.5
Fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723086
Title:
GCC 4.5 20110221 test regressions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
A wrong-code regression on the branch for a primary taget. P1.
Bernd, can you at least investigate? Thanks.
Can someone check the status on the 4.6 and 4.7 branch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
56 matches
Mail list logo