Same here,
happens when more than one office document is opened.
I also have a 2 monitors (laptop internal, DVI external) with TwinView
setup. (so quite similar to Ed Hill's setup).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Björn Michaels
Sorry, to say it this way, but in my eyes this bug is not fixed at all because
what led all these people here to vote affects me is definitively not off the
table. So it is rather a way of closing the eyes and ignoring what is happening
instead of just acting to close this bug
@Scott Severance
Saying that the initial bug report has been fixed is ok for me.
But: there are still issues with the menu (and I mean really big issues). Today
I had to close and open LibreOffice nine times to get the menu back to work
(and this really was only today).
So please do me a
Providing the IP address works for me, too.
But this is only a workaround. What about those who want to add a
printer without researching the IP addess (for instance on a large scale
network.)
Furthermore, if someone configures the printers of a network to search
for an address via DHCP this
The device with the network address 192.168.1.11 is one of two network
printers (a Brother MFC 9840 CDW).
I am adding the output of the avahi-browser commands here as txt file.
** Attachment added: Output of avahi-browse -a -v -c- r via LAN
Sorry, could not find out, how to add more than one text file, so here
the second textfile.
** Attachment added: avahi-browse-a-v-c-r-output-wlan.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/987212/+attachment/3208924/+files/avahi-browse-a-v-c-r-output-wlan.txt
--
You received
Third file?field.comment=Third file
** Attachment added: avahi-browse-a-v-t-r-output-LAN.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/987212/+attachment/3208925/+files/avahi-browse-a-v-t-r-output-LAN.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
And the last one.
** Attachment added: avahi-browse-a-v-t-r-output-wlan.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/987212/+attachment/3208926/+files/avahi-browse-a-v-t-r-output-wlan.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Ok,
I did some checks and research myself:
1) as it seems dnssd does not work over WLAN
2) seemingly it is a problem with my router (at least I see no other
cause for the problem).
So what now? The problems with dnssd over WLAN appeared only AFTER the
upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04LTS. So
@steve taylor
have a look at bug 987212 it could be that you are affected by the same issue.
Something in cup's dnssd module is seemingly broken (at least if you try to
discover printers over WLAN).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Ok, I tried what you told me at home (got the same problem here in my
home LAN)
1) Yes, I can access the configuration interface of the printer via
WLAN
2) Yes, I can ping the printer (over WLAN and LAN)
--- At first all the commands, tested while connected to network via WLAN
@Till Kamppeter
btw: a few minues ago I found your PPA, in which you put some changed/updated
cups packages. I added it and installed you (cups) packages.
But, I am afraid they do not help here either. So this seems to be a problem
which is different from the one you already fixed.
Same here,
updated three laptops to Ubuntu 120.4 LTS. Printing works fine as long
as I am connected to the network via (LAN) cable. The moment it pull the
cable and switch to WLAN I get the message unable to locate printer.
(All other functions work when connected via WLAN: so I have mail in
Just to add something:
1) I certainly use Ubuntu 12.04 and not 120.4 ;)
2) the problems occur on three different laptops, of different age and totally
different hardware configuration. I therefore expect that this problem might
bother quite a lot of people and without wanting to hurry anybody:
Hi,
I got the same problem and made some tests on several machines. I made
the discovery that the problem occurs always, when you try to print via
W-LAN (Wifi). The moment I plug a cable into the PCs I have no printing
problems at all.
Can anybody confirm that the he/she can make the same
@James Tunnicliffe
Damn! Then I have a different problem... ok I'll file a bug report for this one
then. But thx for the fast reply.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973270
Title:
Can we get an estimate when this will be fixed?
It is not only an annoying problem, it is worse than that, for I am
syncing my Ubuntu One files now since yesterday and still only have 25%
of them downloaded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
By the way:
just referring to bandwidth reduction as the root of the problem sounds not
entirely correct.
I have be monitoring the syncing process for about forty minutes now,
using the u1sdtool --current-transfers command. It seems that the
syncing process is not only painfully and achingly
I would assume that everybody has this bug or is having this problem.
I asked of couple of friends who use Ubuntu and tried to figure out why
some of them have the CPU overload problem and some other have no
problem at all.
It turned out that those who do not suffer from the problem have the
@Danillo (and @all who want a summary of the whole discussion)
Concerning sheer, childish stubborness
1) comment 2# told us already the bug won't fix - there was no explanation
besides saying it is a design decision
2) comment #13 stated they will explore an RTL decision (after it was pointed
@Tal Liron
It's just sheer, childish stubborness at this point. All of the reasons
provided for the won't fix on this bug (and let's remember: those kept
changing) turned out to be excuses. They decided not to make the Launcher
movable, and they're going to stick to that decision whatever the
@Danillo (and @all)
What I liked very much about your comment are two things:
Firstly:
If there still is activity in a bug and there's even people forking Unity to
fix it, then the bug's not just someone's pet peeve, it's a real problem for a
lot of users. Otherwise, the affects me too is
@Tal Liron
he remaining option is that I break the walls in my office and staple my desk
to the ceiling so that I can make sure that the leftmost monitor is my primary
monitor, because that's the only configuration Unity supports. :/
Funny as your comment is, I am afraid that it is not true
If you want to prove your point, the best way to do this is to do usability
tests, and not with the Gnome-2 power users, but with the simple people that
Ubuntu is aiming for. Get two Ubuntu computers, one with the default
left-launcher and another with the bottom-launcher from Unity plugin
@Tal Liron
I already mentioned that strange new Multi Monitor concept before. But up to
now, there has not been any comment/answer to that.
@Fernando
As I said before I was happy that all of the last comments were not about
leaving Unity behind but instead focused on bringing forward valid
@Maarten Kossen
Swiping into any direction would be a nice and handy metaphor for turning the
pages of a book. But instead of this the swiping will reveal the launcher which
people might not even know exists because it is auto-hidden on a touch screen?
Well, nicely done. For me this sound not
@Maarten KossenThere is at least one major argument
There is at least one major argument
for not moving it: cross-device functionality. It should be able to
works well on a tablet or smartphone exactly as on the desktop
Good. Then make it configurable only on the desktop and not on TVs,
smart
@John Lea
I usually accept reasonable arguments given for decisions. And in this case I
can accept that once cannot expect the launcher to be movable in the near
future.
But: Mark Shuttleworth himself stated that the decision is won't fix and will
stay won't fix. And I had the feeling that he
@Magnes
left hand side is quite good default, but everyone is different, there are
lefthanded people and poeple who have different preferences than you, your
test group or anyone. And you left (no pun intended) them with no choice.
Thanks to point this out. Indeed this is the one really
John Lea wrote:
the cost is because adding configurability exponentially increases the number
of permutations that need to be designed, user tested, implemented, bug
fixed, etc..
If I buy a car, I expect that one can open all of its doors. Certainly the
manufacturer would have saved money and
First of all it would be nice to see here some answer to Tal's comment
#112, which includes some very good and valid points. ANd I do not see
any sane and logical way to ignore the arguments he gives. But where is
the answer to the arguments he wrote?
Secondly, concerning kikl's comment (#113):
Referring to this answer:
If you agree that there should of necessity be some bugs we will not
fix, who do you think should decide which of those suggestions or
wishlist items should be in, and which should be out? Don't you think
the underwriters, designers and developers of the project should
Have a look at:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/12/gnome-shell-extensions-site-enters-
alpha-makes-adding-extra-features-easy/
Having this for Unity would solve all the problems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Just have a look. Here one can see how dealing with a community can be
done easily.
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/12/gnome-shell-extensions-site-enters-
alpha-makes-adding-extra-features-easy/
Especially that part hits the mark:
This is despite the fact that many of the extensions presently
What if have been asking myself now for a time is the reason why there
is no nautilus data source/nautilus data provider?
I suppose I do not get the problem entirely, because otherwise it would
have been implemented already.
After you installed a fresh system you could simply copy back all files
Now, I am the one, who does not understand the fuss.
I actually thought we went one step further down the right direction. At
least in the direction that most of the people here wanted this
discussion heading.
* we could have an option to reveal the launcher after a top left
corner hit (so
Now, to be a little bit more productive, I stumbled upon this several times now
during the last three days:
http://www.webupd8.org/2011/10/how-to-move-unity-launcher-to-bottom-of.html
So, there is currently a rough patch to make the launcher moveable (or
rather to move the launcher to the
If you all do not mind, I want to answer to the request of Mr
Shuttleworth to define the term power user and will then elaborate on
my perspective on the term Power User.
Wikipedia:
A power user is a user of a personal computer who has the ability to use
advanced features of programs which are
@Tal Liron
I am sorry, if I was misunderstood by you. To say they are hiding
behind their design decision was my way to describe that they do not
deal with complaints uttered by the community and that they do not see
any need to explain their decisions.
With reasonable I meant that most of the
While messages (or texts in general) written in English, are sometimes
prone to be misunderstood if it comes to understanding the terms and
styles of address, due to the illusive nature of the pronoun you I
would like to point one simple aspect of your message out to all the
reader and perhaps
After reading the first lines of the article I nearly skipped it and
thought it was only written from a much too narrow, geeky perspective.
But I am glad I continued reading because all the things the author
writes are really, really true. He definitively hits the mark. So thanks
for mentioning
@Paul Sladen
Would you mind explaining to me where, in any way, Mark Shuttleworth's answer
made it clear that there is a we as in Canonical plus Ubuntu community? Tal
wrote about the patches that were rejected and about the total lack of
transparency and communication. And he did this more well
Btw.
This was originally posted on bug 668415
I am reposting the link here because I think it is worth the read (despite the
first lines of the article being somewhat awkward)
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/why-ubuntu-1110-fills-me-with-rage/19103
It is not about Unity bashing, it is about
Same problems here.
This is definitively a problem as it makes the expo mode nearly unusable
when using more than one monitor.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854556
Title:
expo mode
@Tal Liron
I currently imagine myself going to buy a new car and ask if they have got the
model in black colour instead of white colour and if they have got different
seats and perhaps even a more sophisticated navigation system.
I wonder what exactly I would say if they told me that they
Addition: I am sorry, it should read
... that the bar is always visible...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415
Title:
Movement of Unity launcher
To manage notifications about this
@IKT
Let me ask this questions in a very special way: Hello? Is someone there?
Did you actually read the discussion on this launchpad page? This,
here, is a filed bug which includes a request (or wish).
Being part of a open source community means to contribute? Well, then
everybody IS
@Roland
I am afraid it IS handled the same way in other cases. For instance, bug
668415 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/668415) was treated the
same.
Users (= 105 Affects me voters) complained about the inability to move
the launcher. They said they want the option to move the position of
Did you all know that somebody tried to raise a discsussion on the
Ayatana Mailing List?
Have a look at the archive https://lists.launchpad.net/ayatana/maillist.html
Look for Hide application windows via launcher From: Ed Lin, 2011-06-21.
There are no real, official comments by Canonical
Yep,
noticed the return of the problems, too. Firefox 5.0 very often loses
keyboard focus if I have more than one Firefox window opened (no matter
how many tabs I opened within the windows).
Interestingly, the problems are now more grave than before. When I lose
the keyboard focus, the old
I get the same problem here.
I opened two different windows, each with several opened tabs. I close
Firefox, so that sessionmanager saves the opened windows including their
opened tabs. When I reopen Firefox, the windows are arestored, the tabs
are restored, but only one of the Firefox windows
Hoping that enough people read this, I will write a few more words here:
I started a discussion on the Ubuntu Power Users mailing list (Ubuntu-
power-us...@lists.ubuntu.com) and I want to invite you all to join the
list and participate in the conversation/discussion.
I hope there is a chance
Ok, hoping that some are still reading answers to this bug I will drop a
few lines here:
Two days ago I started a discussion on the Power User mailinglist
(ubuntu-power-us...@lists.ubuntu.com). I hope that together we can come
up with some solutions to the problem that Ubuntu Unity lacks anything
First of all: thanks to you Marco for fixing this!
@John Lea and the Canonical team
What I do not understand is the politics behind some of the decisions here:
1) there is a huge number of users who want a change to the current state of
things and gladly somebody had the abilities to implement
@All
The problem I have with this whole decision is that a real question was raised
in the whole discussion and then it was ignored:
1) When the window of a program/application is already focused and you
click the corresponding launcher icon (of that program) you expect
usually that something
@The Fiddler
Thank you.
@All
I personally would like to discuss the whole topic of design decisions. I know
that to some I am becoming a nuisance because this is not the first bug where I
start complaining about the term design decision but, to me, it seems to be
the source of many disputes.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libreoffice
When trying to work on a samba share mounted via gvfs-mount the Open-
File dialogue of libreoffice does not work. (System Ubuntu 11.04, natty)
To reproduce:
1) mount a samba share with the gvfs-mount command (example: gvfs-mount
I am glad to see that we see here an increase in voices that call for a
change of the Launcher.
Just to comment on one statement that I read here:
Some here are not postulating the idea that one should be able to change the
position of the Launcher for its own sake. This is different.
Some time
@Chow Loong Jin
Ok, seems this solves the issued.
Is there any plan for a bug fix, concerning the problem with the Library
Watcher?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659364
Title:
Public bug reported:
I have been trying to install Natty on a Dell Precision M4500 notebook with a
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M graphic card for quite some time now.
I always get the same result: when I start a session from the live CD, the
CD/USB-Stick boots and after a few seconds the screen goes
** Attachment added: hwinfo_output.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761821/+attachment/2041342/+files/hwinfo_output.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761821
Title:
Installing
Hi,
I am sorry to say this but I still get duplicates when importing from
CD. I am using the latest Banshee version (2.0) updated today from PPA
but no change at all concerning the behaviour of the software.
Sebastian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Is it possible to restart the discussion about the open new window
quicklists entry?
While I like the idea to use the middle click to open a new window, I
can imagine that some users will have a problem with this
implementation.
Is it thus possible to keep both solutions? A quicklists entry to
Hi,
ok sorry for starting the fuzz then.
I just saw that the open new window option disappeared and, therefore,
thought that the entry was dropped from the quicklists.
Anyway, thanks for the fast reply.
Sebastian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hi,
you should lock your screen and then wait for a couple of seconds.
I tried this myself. I you unlock the screen immediately after locking
it, nothing happens and the autocompletion works quite fine. But if your
are running Compiz on your machine, lock the screen and then wait for a
couple of
Same problem on a Dell Latitude E6500 with an Intel graphic card (Intel
Corporation Mobile 4 Series Integrated Controller), and on a Dell XPS
M1710 with Nvidia graphic card (GeForce Go 7950 GTX).
Here, also, the problem appears after visual effects are turned on.
--
after screensaver
66 matches
Mail list logo
