Evan == Evan Broder bro...@mit.edu writes:
Evan I think the patch is a little extensive to be directly
Evan uploaded as a Karmic SRU, but I'll look at pulling a SRU
Evan patch together for just the bugfixes.
If you don't want to take the full patch, then take a look at
This has been fixed upstream; I will be fixing for Debian shortly.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #557979
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557979
** Also affects: krb5 (Debian) via
This has been fixed upstream; I will be fixing for Debian shortly.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #557979
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557979
** Also affects: krb5 (Debian) via
Chuck == Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com writes:
Chuck Thanks I was wondering how I can reproduce this? Regards
Chuck chuck
Set up openssh-krb5 on a server with a keytab
set GssapiKeyExchange to yes in sshd_config
set gssapiKeyExchange to yes in a client config.
Set the replay
Chuck == Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com writes:
Chuck Thanks I was wondering how I can reproduce this? Regards
Chuck chuck
Set up openssh-krb5 on a server with a keytab
set GssapiKeyExchange to yes in sshd_config
set gssapiKeyExchange to yes in a client config.
Set the replay
The following patch is in karmic. It will cause things to work if a
password server has both v4 and v6 addresses and you have v4
connectivity.
I think the 1.7 server has v6 support, but I don't think the 1.7
client even has v6 support.
However, backporting this patch might make the problem
The following patch is in karmic. It will cause things to work if a
password server has both v4 and v6 addresses and you have v4
connectivity.
I think the 1.7 server has v6 support, but I don't think the 1.7
client even has v6 support.
However, backporting this patch might make the problem
Thanks, the following untested patch probably fixes.
This will make its way in in my next upload to Debian, where I'll test it.
From 19eab6834f793329a042279c5257bda12f2bed8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:32:58 -0500
Subject: [PATCH
Peter == Peter Cordes pe...@cordes.ca writes:
Peter On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:34:23PM -, Sam Hartman wrote:
-Source: krb5 +8Source: krb5
Peter Is that a typo?
Yes, *sigh*
--
Installs symlinks to files in non-dependency libkadm5clnt6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472080
As far as I can tell that was the only lintian error that represented
a real problem in the package.
--
Missing dependency on update-inetd and other issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374819
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
As far as I can tell that was the only lintian error that represented
a real problem in the package.
--
Missing dependency on update-inetd and other issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374819
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
krb5-kdc intentiollay does not require update-inted and will function if
update-inetd is not available. If it is available, it will add an
example line to inetd.conf. I'm not usre what's up with the doc-base
errors: in Debian, krb5-doc does install and register with doc-base
--
Missing
krb5-kdc intentiollay does not require update-inted and will function if
update-inetd is not available. If it is available, it will add an
example line to inetd.conf. I'm not usre what's up with the doc-base
errors: in Debian, krb5-doc does install and register with doc-base
--
Missing
1.7dfsg~beta1-4 includes a fix to a serious interop problem with
heimdal-kdc from universe and no other changes. Sync it instead
** Summary changed:
- Sync krb5 1.7dfsg~beta1-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
+ Sync krb5 1.7dfsg~beta1-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
--
Sync krb5
1.7dfsg~beta1-4 includes a fix to a serious interop problem with
heimdal-kdc from universe and no other changes. Sync it instead
** Summary changed:
- Sync krb5 1.7dfsg~beta1-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
+ Sync krb5 1.7dfsg~beta1-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
--
Sync krb5
Hi. I'm the Debian maintainer of the krb5 package. I think that
merging either 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-13 or doing a sync of unstable to
Ubuntu would be a reasonable course of action. The 1.7~beta1 packages
are not something I'd ship in a final release: I know of one upstream
patch expected to be in
While it looks like 1.7 has very similar functionality to Likewise, the
implementation and exposed API seems unrelated. So, syncing krb5 1.7
will break Likewise until their code changes
--
Please merge krb5 1.7dfsg~beta1-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Hi. I'm the Debian maintainer of the krb5 package. I think that
merging either 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-13 or doing a sync of unstable to
Ubuntu would be a reasonable course of action. The 1.7~beta1 packages
are not something I'd ship in a final release: I know of one upstream
patch expected to be in
While it looks like 1.7 has very similar functionality to Likewise, the
implementation and exposed API seems unrelated. So, syncing krb5 1.7
will break Likewise until their code changes
--
Please merge krb5 1.7dfsg~beta1-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
201 - 219 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
