[Bug 326645] [NEW] hardcoded settings make this useless

2009-02-07 Thread Simon Raven
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gadmin-bind Here's an example: Make changes to the selected resource. %s/etc/named.conf Couldnt find: %s ipv4 "sites/%s/reverse.zone.ipv4" %s/etc/sites/%s/reverse.zone mv %s %s "sites/%s/reverse.zone.ipv6" "%s" Forward zone not found: [%s] zone 127.in-a

[Bug 326645] Re: hardcoded settings make this useless

2009-02-07 Thread Simon Raven
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22091141/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22091142/ProcEnviron.txt -- hardcoded settings make this useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326645 You received this bu

Re: [Bug 321769] Re: gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in camera_init()

2009-01-30 Thread Simon Raven
2009/1/29 Marcus Meissner : > what device was this? > > Also, gphoto2 requires 2.6.28.2 to work, 2.6.28 and 2.6.28.1 are known > to be broken in regards to libusb usage. > At the time it was the ubuntu -4-generic kernel, though usb seems to be iffy with -6 also. Sudden disconnects and apps crashing

Re: [Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade

2008-12-24 Thread Simon Raven
worked wonderfully, thank you very much :D. -- nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Raven
2008/12/19 Kees Cook : > Why is this certain to be an nfs-utils bug? There is no newer upstream > version, and if "nolock" works, that seems like the kernel broke > something to me. > that's a very good point ;). i think you're right too, tbh. -- nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade

[Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade

2008-12-17 Thread Simon Raven
Hi, I've been seeing this in Ubuntu, but not Debian (I triple-boot between Debian and Ubuntu almost evenly, and the unnamed obsolete OS rarely). In Debian, they mount instantly with the same exact mount options in fstab, whereas in Jaunty they don't, and I see the same errors as the original repor

[Bug 219760] Re: package update-manager 1:0.87.21 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134

2008-04-19 Thread Simon Raven
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13582717/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13582718/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package update-manager 1:0.87.21 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation

[Bug 219760] [NEW] package update-manager 1:0.87.21 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134

2008-04-19 Thread Simon Raven
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager unsure what happened, as i did not see console output, but it seems to be a postinst error. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Apr 19 16:28:20 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script