[Bug 495723] Re: the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load

2010-04-05 Thread Starcraftmazter
Hmmm, I ran it, but CTRL+A, CTRL+C, CTRL+V don't seem to do anything, nor does right click :S -- the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 495723] Re: the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load

2010-04-04 Thread Starcraftmazter
Hey mate thanks, sorry but how would I go about installing that? :P -- the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 495723] Re: the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load

2009-12-14 Thread Starcraftmazter
Happens to me literally all the time. No need to visually parse the directory if you cache the required query :P -- the copy action doesn't work in the second after a directory load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 495723] Re: Nautilus File Copy Lag

2009-12-14 Thread Starcraftmazter
Pardon me, I thought it was more clear than that. If you consider the "Ctrl+C" keyboard shortcut as a trigger to the operation of placing the file(s)/directory(s) into the clipboard for copying, and I am saying is that the trigger does not initiate the operation until about 2 seconds after the dir

[Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-18 Thread Starcraftmazter
@Ramon md5sum filename or sha256sum filename -- in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-03 Thread Starcraftmazter
@Steve Langasek I understand that, though what I'm wondering is whether there was any change from 46 to 48, which could have fixed this issue. -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-03 Thread Starcraftmazter
Furthermore, I should state the full kernel version that the final version of Ubuntu (which we did our testing on) is 2.6.31-14.48 and not 14-46. Is there a fix from 46 to 48? -- corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received

[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-03 Thread Starcraftmazter
Hello. I have wrote a C program to implement the test I described above. Currently, it checks 100x 8K blocks around the 512MB mark, by swapping them with each other, back to front. Running the program twice should thus result in an identical file. Using this program, you can check that read/wri

[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-11-01 Thread Starcraftmazter
@aldebx Of course I realise this, perhaps I need to elaborate my idea. I mean, since the error apparently occurs when large files are edited, a test should be devised whereby changes are made to a large file, saved, and then un-done and saved - and the before and after checksums compared, to see i

[Bug 453579] Re: corruption of large files reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4

2009-10-30 Thread Starcraftmazter
fimbulvetr - did you try editing the file? On that note, I'm doing a fresh install of 9.10 with ext4 on my laptop around the start of next week, and I'm wondering if anyone can suggest some methods to try and reproduce the bug. So far I'm thinking about obtaining a very large file, copying it arou

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2009-05-28 Thread Starcraftmazter
I've applied the latest update to my DV5-1138tx, and I can too confirm that sleep now works!! Thanks a lot to Paul Swanson and everyone else who worked hard to make this happen :D And to HP for finally fixing it, hehe. -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launch

[Bug 161787] Re: Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep.

2009-03-26 Thread Starcraftmazter
Also, the pcspkr creates static for me on reboot, which is an extra annoyance. -- Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 161787] Re: Gnome Sound Preferences help refers to a system bell, but it's called system beep.

2009-03-26 Thread Starcraftmazter
I would like the developers to elevate the importance of this bug. This issue is present in jaunty, in the beta, with all the packages up to date. I have found it impossible to disable the system beep in any way. None of the configuration options noted above work for me. I also cannot simply blac

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2009-03-11 Thread Starcraftmazter
RetributionLSR, I have Jaunty with that kernel and suspend does *not* work for me. What exact model is your laptop? And are you sure it all works? Also, I have been using Jaunty for almost a month, and have had no real sound issues (just a bit of static sometimes). Cheers -- HP Pavilion dv5: AT

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2009-03-06 Thread Starcraftmazter
I just flashed to F.14, didn't do anything as far as the problem is concerned :( -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2009-02-28 Thread Starcraftmazter
hey mlaverdiere, thanks for that. Can you please outline exactly how the menu.lst file has to be edited? Can you post the exact line which you added to it? Or is it some other change? Cheers -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You rece

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2009-02-17 Thread Starcraftmazter
I have upgraded to 9.04 alpha4, and now have the 2.6.28 kernel. Unfortunately, it does not improve the problem. -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2009-01-09 Thread Starcraftmazter
Doesn't seem to be working for me Carlos, and I'm on intepid. -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2008-12-22 Thread Starcraftmazter
Wooops, here are mine. Once again, this is a dv-5 1138tx. Thanks! ** Attachment added: "lspci & dmesg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20631874/diagnostics.tar.bz2 -- HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301353 You received this bug notification

[Bug 301353] Re: HP Pavilion dv5: ATA exception on resume from suspend

2008-12-15 Thread Starcraftmazter
Hello guys. I have the HP Pavilion dv-5 1138tx, and I can confirm to having this exact problem. I am using 8.10, fully updated and such. Just to test it out, does anyone know how to install the HP bios updates from a bootable cd? HP help site mentions something called ROMPaq, but it doesn't hav