** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942843
Title:
cheese crashed with SIGSEGV in cogl_object_unref()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859906
Title:
chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in free()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859868
Title:
unity-greeter crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 840456 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840456
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843598
Title:
zeitgeist-daem
Thanks for this Martin, I've tested on the EfikaMX smartbook, and it
looks to be working here. (ARM Cortex A-8 running Maverick)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610820
Title:
Download
Looks like that fixed it!
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Update Manager.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/update-manager/+bug/610820/+attachment/2025141/+files/Screenshot-Update%20Manager.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
The cache.cc portion has 1 failed hunk, at 221. The version in Maverick
(0.7.96.1ubuntu11.1) Looks like whatever is in Debian is a few paces
ahead, as it doesn't have that function. I built it with that portion
left off, and running the script from earlier in the bug, I get the
following output.
> 722042880 => 1304
>
I just ran it on a fresh install, ran apt-get update, and then ran the
script before installing any of the updates.
I get the following:
722042880 => 33216
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
722042880 => 1304
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610820
Title:
Download size discrepancies
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
Fwiw, the command that Loic provided, with the package installed gives:
Installed-Size: 188
Size: 38864
Do these comments help?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610820
Title:
Download
Sorry, as I had already updated the machine, and natty is in development
mode, there just haven't been any updates on my Maverick box that I've
seen in order for me to reproduce this again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
t will always be run with --express, since we don't run the
netbook remix on our machines.
--
Steev Klimaszewski
Senior Software Engineer, Genesi USA, Inc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.laun
This isn't actually a dbus bug, it's a bug in the version of libimobile
device that is in Maverick. This has been broken since November, and
the only "fix released" was in Natty. It would be nice if one of the
kind Ubuntu developers could push 1.1.0 to Maverick so we can mount and
use our iPhones
When will this resync occur? I keep hearing it being thrown around a s
a reason to not implement features but nothing seems to be being done to
make it happen. The other reason we are proposing this change here is
because linaro supports like 3 boards and Debian supports ~40. We can
make the chang
Comment #2 is a TO3 (Most people will have these), This is the cpuinfo
from a TO2. The TO2 has a NEON bug.
steev@pond:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l)
BogoMIPS: 799.53
Features: swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee vfpv3
CPU implementer : 0
Adding per hrw's request on IRC.
steev@martha:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l)
BogoMIPS: 799.53
Features: swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x2
CPU part: 0xc08
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/173890/comments/125
This is incorrect - apt-get still states that the package *is* installed. That
was how I figured out what the issue was in order to come to bugs and search to
see how many others were running into the issue -
I think a more important issue (not that flash not being installed is
unimportant - i can live without it - i am just saying) - is the fact
that apt reports it as being installed even though the install failed.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I can confirm this - Just attempted to install this via Firefox, which
loaded the plugin installer. Firefox will continuously prompt you to
install Flash, but the installer will state that it is already
installed.
When attempting to do so from the command line, the following output is
observed.
Sorry to double post - I also meant to add - perhaps a better title
would be "md5sum mismatch for flashplugin-nonfree" which is much more
descriptive of the problem.
--
flashplugin-nonfree : seems to install but finally not
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181765
You received this bug notificatio
20 matches
Mail list logo
