No longer using Ubuntu anywhere except my already-virtualized AWS
instance, so I'm unable to verify for this, but I appreciate the effort
to fix this. Hopefully someone else who's affected can verify.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Also affects vagrant due to it's use of virtualbox, Seems to be
accounted for upstream https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/pull/909
Haven't tried to see if VMWare is affected by this too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
I found https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=50368 which
gives some background.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031217
Title:
networkmanager+dnsmasq implementation seems
Public bug reported:
In Ubuntu 12.04, the way networkmanager now defaults to using dnsmasq as
a local resolver seems to break many VM configuration using VirtualBox,
because VirtualBox's DHCP server tries to inherit the host's DNS
configuration and provide it to the guest. In the default configura
Have not checked to see if this affects other versions of ubuntu or
other distributions, but Debian is likely affected as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017613
Title:
No manpag
Public bug reported:
There is no manpage for the gitolite package in Precise.
# man gl-setup
No manual entry for gl-setup
# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04
# apt-cache policy gitolite
gitolite:
Installed: 2.2-1
Candidate: 2.2-1
Version table:
*** 2
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14955076/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
Continued errors recieved after choosing not to provide the package files to
installer package / package sun-java6-doc 6-06-0ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess post-installati
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sun-java6-doc
Couldn't there be a better way to handle the removal of this half-
installed installer package after deciding not to provide the requested
archive file - right now you have to say "no" repeatedly when doing any
package maintenance operation
