[Bug 377376] Re: Update Robocode to current version

2010-12-22 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #551877 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551877 ** Also affects: robocode (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551877 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 503510] Re: [Karmic] Magnatune settings d oesn’t remember download option

2010-01-17 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
It works in 2.2.2. Marking as fix released since 2.2.2 is in Lucid's archives. ** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 504101] Re: wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate)

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 503510 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 503510 [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option -- wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5041

[Bug 504101] [NEW] wrong Magnatune subscriber URL (depend on locate)

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Amarok tries to stream from wrong Magnatune URL when subscribed and using nynorsk locate. Workaround: Use English locate ** Affects: amarok Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 503510] Re: [Karmic] Magnatune settings d oesn’t remember download option

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed: Binary package hint: amarok When trying to add my download subscription from magnatunes.com to Amarok it jumps back to stream. + + Workaround: change language to English -- [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 503510] Re: [Karmic] Magnatune settings d oesn’t remember download option

2010-01-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Summary changed: - Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option + [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option -- [Karmic] Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 503510] Re: Magnatune settings doesn’ t remember download option

2010-01-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Patch here: http://gitorious.org/amarok/amarok/commit/9070de03771104f4bac79f6673a877b1ae472778 Could it be backported to the version in Karmic? -- Magnatune settings doesn’t remember download option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503510 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 503510] [NEW] Magnatune settings doesn ’t remember download option

2010-01-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok When trying to add my download subscription from magnatunes.com to Amarok it jumps back to stream. ** Affects: amarok Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New *

[Bug 487851] [NEW] [feature request] booting El Torito CDs from GRUB

2009-11-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 It would be nice if Grub2 could load bootable cdroms from it's menu. (Use case: my BIOS is broken and refuse me to boot from CD) I don't know if the support from the Summer of code project 2007 still can be used with newer versions of GRUB 2. ** Af

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-21 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Added bug to xorg-server since it's fixed there upstreams: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=19f7c15e2008dab3c46ba3e14dfa353d01c74f72 According to a comment in the upstream bugreport it requires a newer version of xorg-server to work. The work around patch to xf86-video-intel in

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-21 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: Mandriva Linux #54712 http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54712 ** Also affects: mandriva via http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54712 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863 Yo

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-11-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #24482 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24482 ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24482 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS htt

[Bug 463004] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()

2009-10-28 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571828/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571829/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34571830/ArecordDevices.t

[Bug 463004] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x7c/0x80()

2009-10-28 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: After waking up from suspend to RAM apport asks me to report this bug. I don't notice that anything else is wrong ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Another reason to think the problem is in KMS is that this only happens when KMS is used. With KMS disabled (when nomodeset is passed as an argument to linux from the boot loader) the fonts are normal. -- Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863 You received th

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
To me it seems (from the sequence above) like it reads from EDID, understand that it's wrong when calculating the dpi but somehow forgets it when KMS is started. Could someone more experienced with this than my hours of googeling if I'm on the right track? -- Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34449141/Xorg.0.log -- Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili

[Bug 461863] Re: Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
What I find interesting here is this sequenze from /var/log/Xorg.0.log: (II) intel(0): clock: 71.2 MHz Image Size: 289 x 21 mm (...) (==) intel(0): DPI set to (96, 96) (...) (**) intel(0): Kernel mode setting active, disabling FBC. (...) (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 289 x 21

[Bug 461863] [NEW] Karmic regresion: Huge fonts with KMS

2009-10-27 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel Yesterday I upgraded to Karmic. Karmic uses KMS. When I rebooted kdm had huge fonts. KDE also had huge fonts, and Firefox had huge fonts and so huge graphics that only the three first buttons on the navigation tool bar was visible

Re: [Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-08-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Thank you very much for your help uploading and for your feedback. -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

Re: [Bug 398535]

2009-08-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Look here for the missing changelog entry: > https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/all-in-one-sidebar Seems like 0.7.4-0ubuntu2 disappeared when 0.7.4-0ubuntu3 got uploaded since it weren't pushed to the bazaar branch and 0.7.4-0ubuntu3 was based on the version in the bazaar branch (0.7.4-0u

Re: [Bug 398535]

2009-08-04 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> 1) you forgot adding some changelog's entry Not sure if I understand what you meant here. Please explain. If you mean from bazaar: I don't think "open tree for development" belong in the debian changelog when it's closed again. (See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Packaging where i

Re: [Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-08-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> I know this is a new upstream release, that's why I asked you to put it > on REVU for a better review. Good to know. I was confused after reading "If you packaged a new upstream version (of a package that is already in the archives), and you want to get it sponsored, do not use REVU to get it spo

[Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-08-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I tried to uploaded it to REVU a while ago as requested. I can't see that it has shown up. Please note that this is an updated version and not a new package. Does REVU block updates to packages already in Ubuntu? In that case I can upload it somewhere else. By the way, am I correct to assume that

[Bug 378419] Re: libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt

2009-07-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Just to document it: lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/packagekit-karmic contains a fix for this. Since it also fixes bug 345706 and bug 345706 already is in the sponsor queue I haven't added this bug to the queue. -- libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378419 You r

[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2009-07-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
A debdiff that fixes this in torbutton is attached to bug 401282 ** Also affects: torbutton (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5

2009-07-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Added a fix to bug 272959. Updated patch (debdiffv2.patch) attached. ** Attachment added: "debdiffv2.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257150/debdiffv2.patch -- Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282 You received this bug notification because you are a m

Re: [Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5

2009-07-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Debdiff that adds Firefox-3.5 as an alternative dependency. ** Attachment added: "debdiff.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29241409/debdiff.patch -- Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 401282] [NEW] Torbutton works with Firefox-3.5

2009-07-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Torbutton should have Firefox 3.5 as an alernative in depends ** Affects: torbutton (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New ** Changed in: torbutton (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Svein

[Bug 398535] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-07-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.10-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low - * new upstream release that works with Firefox 3.5 + * new upstream release (LP: #398535) + * list firefox-3.5 as alternate dependency -- Sveinung

[Bug 398535] [NEW] please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2009-07-12 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.10-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * new upstream release that works with Firefox 3.5 -- Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:32:11 +0200 ** Affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-07-10 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Updated fix in branch lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/packagekit-karmic that also contains a fix for bug 378419 -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-05-11 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I was told on #ubuntu-devel that a SRU for this is unlikely, so I won't try a sru unless it gets more likely. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-30 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed: libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes with Ubuntu) can't find it. The bug has been addressed in the branch ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit by moving it to /usr/shar

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-29 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I think I'll try to get a SRU anyway since a project I want to add some patches that depends on QPackageKit too say having working versions in the distros increases my chances of getting it accepted. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates the fix must first be in the current deve

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-29 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: packagekit - libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes - with Ubuntu) can't find it. If I link it to - /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ CMake discovers it and it's

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
James: Thank you for the clarification. I had actually retargeted it for karmic, but if you think this is serious enough to try to get a SRU I could give it a try. -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-04-23 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Updated my bazaar branch containing the fix since another packagekit 0.3.14-0ubuntu5 was released and Jaunty already is out ** Branch unlinked: lp:~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug no

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-03-30 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Sebastian: Does this mean that I now have an ack and can subscribe ubuntu-main-sponsors or should I do something else? -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 345706] Re: CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-03-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
In case the correct solution to this simply is to install to /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ instead of /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ the fix is in the branch ~kvilhaugsvik/packagekit/ubuntu-packagekit -- CMake can't find QPackageKit by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706 You received this b

[Bug 345706] [NEW] CMake can't find QPackageKit by default

2009-03-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit libpackagekit-qt-dev installs FindQPackageKit.cmake to /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindQPackageKit.cmake where CMake (as it comes with Ubuntu) can't find it. If I link it to /usr/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/ CMake discovers it and it's possible to use

[Bug 340806] Re: [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

2009-03-17 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Summary changed: - pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh + [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh -- [intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 340806] Re: pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

2009-03-10 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
However it works for the version in the PackageKit ppa. Should this be fixed in vanilla Intrepid? -- pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 340806] [NEW] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh

2009-03-10 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit After a 'pkcon refresh' 'pkcon get-updates' won't list the new updates that are available. Adept will however notice the new updates and pop up the update icon and a notification. If I do an 'apt-get update' 'pkcon get-updates' will list them.

[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't

2009-02-20 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Upstream just marked my previous mentioned bugreport as a dupe of http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=564 Since Launchpad still can't track upsream's bugtracker (Flyspray, see bug #28738 for status on this) I'm posting the new URL here. -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it

[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid

2009-01-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
new version in Debian. Pleace sync kdiff3 version 0.9.94-1 from Debian main experimental -- kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid

2009-01-15 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
The KDE4 version is now in Debian experimental. Pleace sync the package kdiff3 version 0.9.93-3-1 from Debian experimental main -- kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 292233] Re: kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid

2009-01-09 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #479316 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479316 ** Also affects: kdiff3 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479316 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- kdiff3 is no longer packaged in intrepid http

[Bug 272185] Re: [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )

2009-01-01 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272185 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 272185] Re: [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )

2008-12-31 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272185 You received this bug not

[Bug 218658] Re: FTBFS dbus-java

2008-12-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- FTBFS dbus-java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 297708] Re: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-12-15 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: firefox-extensions Status: New => Fix Released -- please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 291499] Re: Firefox 3.03 freezes under kde4

2008-12-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 279654 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279654 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 279654 firefox hangup while drag text in kde4 -- Firefox 3.03 freezes under kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291499 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 279654] Re: firefox hangup while drag text in kde4

2008-12-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Setting status to confirmed based on the many confirmations in this bug and that I myself could reproduce it ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- firefox hangup while drag text in kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279654 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-20 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Just one more thing: What do I do now? Should I just wait or should I do something (for example subscribe Universe Sponsors)? I didn't see anything on the wiki about subscribing them so I guessed the Mozilla team would sponsor the package and merge it into their tree if ready, but if I have missed

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-19 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.6-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low - * new upstream release (0.7.6) + * new upstream release (LP: #297708) * contens of chrome no longer shipped in jar file (LP: #217037) * No longer list fi

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Done. Thank you for your feedback! -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-18 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: firefox-extensions Importance: Undecided Status: New -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated)

2008-11-16 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Summary changed: - REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar + REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar (updated) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar - all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low + all-in-one-

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Thank you. New branch at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one- sidebar.ubuntu.try2 -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 217037] Re: Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file

2008-11-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New => In Progress -- Contents of chrome are shipped in jar file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217037 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 272959] Re: Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox

2008-11-14 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272959 You received th

Re: [Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Here is a patch that fixes it. It also adds a little more information to the description. changes: * kio-sword is no longer available (LP: #297908) * Expanded the description a little ** Attachment added: "sword-text-tr_1.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19632567/sword-te

[Bug 297908] [NEW] refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sword-text-tr sword-text-tr refers to kio-sword, but it isn't available any more. ** Affects: sword-text-tr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- refers to kio-sword that isn't available any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29

[Bug 297708] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
my updated packaging can be found at lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions /all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu -- REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 297708] [NEW] REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor all-in-one-sidebar

2008-11-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: all-in-one-sidebar all-in-one-sidebar (0.7.4-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low * No longer list firefox-2 as alternate dependency (LP: #272959) * Added watchfile I haven't updated it to 0.7.6 because I'm not sure how you want bug 217037 fixed but if you

[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder

2008-11-12 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Axos: Thank you. In order to get credit for fixing it here is what you do (in case you don't already know): cd to a new folder apt-get source libmatthew-java # you will need the original anyway, and if you didn't increase the changelog before you don't have the original but a changed thing cd li

[Bug 218658] Re: dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder

2008-11-11 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dbus-java will build under dpkg-buildpackage, but not under pbuilder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

2008-11-08 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
A libnanoxml2-java that builds in my Jaunty chroot uploaded to mentors.debian.net -- FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 295686] Re: FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

2008-11-08 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Changed in: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kvilhaugsvik) Status: New => In Progress ** Summary changed: - FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath + FTBFS - default-jdk-builddep on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

[Bug 295686] [NEW] FTBFS - default-java on Ubuntu isn't GNU Classpath

2008-11-08 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Public bug reported: libnanoxml2-java assumes that default-java is based on GNU Classpath. Since Ubuntu's default-java is based on OpenJDK (based on Sun's Java) it fails to build. ** Affects: libnanoxml2-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik (kv

[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't

2008-10-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Could you create a new Ubuntu account (or you don't have permission to do that: create an extra Firefox profile) and see if you can reproduce the problem there too? -- Torbutton say it is using Tor but it isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273027 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Just a few comments: * Even if I was not able to reproduce the bug by following the steps above letter by letter, I remember the thing about navigation hanging so I am quite sure that this is the same bug I used to see. * I'm using the Hardy packages firefox 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3, privoxy 3.

[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-06 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I was still not able to reproduce it, but since I have seen it myself before i filed it upstream as http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=832 ** Also affects: torbutton Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Torbutton does not install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27

[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
One more thing: Could you please check that it is in fact Torbutton 1.2.0 and not a Release Candidate you have? You can check by right clicking on the Torbutton and choose About Torbutton. (RC6 was on addons.mozilla.org) I wasn't able to reproduce the "green but not connected" error with 1.2.0, eve

[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
I am not able to find any Ubuntu specific changes to strings. I have an extremely limited understanding of the Ubuntu process, but I guess this means that an UserInterfaceFreeze Exception is not required. In case it is: There are changes in the user interface when it comes to configure the new feat

[Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Install log: # dpkg -i /var/cache/pbuilder/intrepid-amd64/result/torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb (Les database ... 217332 filer og katalogar er installerte.) Gjer klar til å byta ut torbutton-extension 1.2.0-1ubuntu1 (ved bruk av .../torbutton-extension_1.2.0-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Pakk

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
The new version of Torbutton will work with Firefox 3. It has additional features like blocking scripts and plugins that could leak traffic from Tor. This avoids people listening to the connection or at the destination to figure out the real IP. This change will support Firefox 3. There's no Firef

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Debdiff from the version currently in Intrepid (1.0.4-3ubuntu2) and diffstat on it. ** Attachment added: "diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18238628/diffstatFromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: "fromTorbutton_1.0.4-3ubuntu2.debdiff" http://lau

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Seems like Torbutton have changed in Ubuntu since I made my debdiff. Here is a new one where I have tried to merge the Ubuntu changes. (Added abrowser as a dependency to control and added the changelog entry) ** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff.updated" http://launchpadlibr

[Bug 273027] Re: Torbutton does not install

2008-10-05 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Setting confirmed since I have had those issues as well. The reason that it does not show up in Firefox 3 is that the version of Torbutton in Ubuntu is old and not made for Firefox 3. Bug 247867 already covers that. When it comes to the other issue you mention: Does it still pretend to be using T

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Are you going to apply for a feature freeze exception? Yes, but I'm not sure I will have time to do it before after the weekend. In case anyone else wants to file one before that: feature list (upstreams): https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbutton/trunk/src/CHANGELOG (also attached) ** Attachme

Re: [Bug 247867] Re: Please merge Torbutton 1.2.0~rc5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-03 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Unfortunately your merge of 1.2.0 doesn't appear to be attached > to the bug, so I can't review it. Ops! Sorry about that. Here it it is. ** Attachment added: "torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18160424/torbutton_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please merge Torbutto

[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-24 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
** Also affects: vlc Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: vlc Status: New => Fix Released -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-23 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Marking as "In Progress" since it seems like 0.9.2 (that includes my patch) will be uploaded to Intrepid. (See bug 270404) ** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 270404] Re: Please update VLC to 0.9.2

2008-09-22 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
Is it to late to add LP: 261567 to the Changelog? -- Please update VLC to 0.9.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://list

[Bug 261567] Re: VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it

2008-09-22 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
0.9.2-1 is now in Debian experimental. -- VLC is capable of opening Flash videos, but is not registered as a handler for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l