[Bug 1192965] Re: user-mail abstraction refers to /var/spool/mail rather than /var/mail

2013-06-20 Thread Terry Burton
** Tags added: apparmor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1192965 Title: user-mail abstraction refers to /var/spool/mail rather than /var/mail To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1192965] [NEW] user-mail abstraction refers to /var/spool/mail rather than /var/mail

2013-06-20 Thread Terry Burton
Public bug reported: Nowadays /var/spool/mail is a symlink to /var/mail. /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/user-mail should be updated to reflect this. Patch attached... ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: user-mail patch for /var/mail

[Bug 870127] Re: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-11-11 Thread Terry Burton
** Tags removed: verification-needed-natty ** Tags added: verification-done-natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870127 Title: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at

[Bug 870127] Re: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-22 Thread Terry Burton
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oneiric ** Tags added: verification-done-oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870127 Title: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at

[Bug 870127] Re: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-22 Thread Terry Burton
Testing successful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870127 Title: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 756485] Re: [e1000e] Intel 82579V suffering from packet drop with e1000e 1.2.20

2011-10-11 Thread Terry Burton
After testing with affected hardware I can confirm that Intel 82579V NICs experience the same issue as the 82579LM reported in bug 870127 which the test kernels resolve. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 870127] Re: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-10 Thread Terry Burton
Hi Leann, Both the Natty and Oneiric kernels have been tested successfully on several machines and resolve the issue at we are seeing. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870127

[Bug 870127] [NEW] e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-07 Thread Terry Burton
Public bug reported: Many (but not all) devices including an Intel 82579LM NIC have a hardware fault that results in packet loss that is worked around by the following recent patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/109926/ More detail provided here:

[Bug 870127] Re: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-07 Thread Terry Burton
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870127 Title: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps To manage

[Bug 833479] Re: thinkpad x201 82577LM e1000e and wireless connections drop out, show high packet loss

2011-10-07 Thread Terry Burton
Long shot... Can you use another device with ping and tcpdump to determine whether the packet loss is during reception or transmission? If it is only at reception then it might be that the 82577LM chipset is affected by the same issue as the 82579LM chipset reported in bug 870127. (Intel may be

[Bug 870127] Re: e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-07 Thread Terry Burton
Thanks for the immediate attention and test Oneiric kernel which I will test on Monday. The patch resolves issues with a teaching/research lab of ~200 Natty hosts so I would be grateful if this was considered for a Natty SRU as it makes these simpler to maintain. I have tested the same patch with