[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2017-03-21 Thread Thomas Leonard
I've now uploaded zeroinstall-injector 2.12-4 to Debian. That should fix the build problem here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673258 Title: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its

Re: [Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2017-03-20 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 20 March 2017 at 02:11, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > fails to build :( > > ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) >Status: Fix Released => Triaged Not sure why it builds in Debian but not Ubuntu. If you need a quick fix, adding a build-dependency on libsha-ocaml-dev

[Bug 1516491] Re: package 0install 2.10-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/applications/0install.desktop', which is also in package 0install-core 2.8-1build1

2015-11-17 Thread Thomas Leonard
Thanks - fixed in 2.10-2. ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Leonard (talex5) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1516743] Re: package 0install 2.10-1 failed to install/upgrade: try to rewrite «/usr/share/applications/0install.desktop», which is already available in the package 0install-core 2.8-1build1

2015-11-17 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Leonard (talex5) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1516743] Re: package 0install 2.10-1 failed to install/upgrade: try to rewrite «/usr/share/applications/0install.desktop», which is already available in the package 0install-core 2.8-1build1

2015-11-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
Should be fixed in 2.10-2 (just uploaded to Debian/sid). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516743 Title: package 0install 2.10-1 failed to install/upgrade: try to rewrite

[Bug 1023635] Re: 0desktop crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gdk_window_enable_synchronized_configure()

2014-11-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
No feedback from original reporter and software has been rewritten in a different language since this bug was reported, so closing. ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1033493] Re: iscsiadm: No portal found. in the newest code after 2012.8.6

2013-01-23 Thread Thomas Leonard
I was getting this error (Stderr: 'iscsiadm: No portal found.\n'). It turned out that I had both tgt and iscsitarget installed, and both were trying to run a service on the same port. Cinder was setting up a tgt target, but iscsiadm was connecting to the iscsitarget service and not finding it.

[Bug 1076353] Re: nova [-] Could not find driver for connection_type None

2012-12-20 Thread Thomas Leonard
What are the possible values for this option? The example file from the installation documentation doesn't have connection_type or libvirt_type: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/basic-install/content/basic- install_controller.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1076353] Re: nova [-] Could not find driver for connection_type None

2012-12-20 Thread Thomas Leonard
What are the possible values for this option? The example file from the installation documentation doesn't have connection_type or libvirt_type: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/basic-install/content/basic- install_controller.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1079611] [NEW] Download Juju Environment Config gives wrong credentials

2012-11-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: When I download the Juju configuration using Download Juju Environment Config in the dashboard, the EC2 credentials (combined-key and secret-key) are wrong. If I download using Download EC2 Credentials then they are correct. Comparing the code for these two, they are

[Bug 1079611] Re: Download Juju Environment Config gives wrong credentials

2012-11-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Description changed: When I download the Juju configuration using Download Juju Environment - Config in the dashboard, the EC2 credentials (combined-key and - secret-key) are wrong. If I download using Download EC2 Credentials - then they are correct. + Config in the dashboard, the EC2

[Bug 1079611] [NEW] Download Juju Environment Config gives wrong credentials

2012-11-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: When I download the Juju configuration using Download Juju Environment Config in the dashboard, the EC2 credentials (combined-key and secret-key) are wrong. If I download using Download EC2 Credentials then they are correct. Comparing the code for these two, they are

[Bug 1079611] Re: Download Juju Environment Config gives wrong credentials

2012-11-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Description changed: When I download the Juju configuration using Download Juju Environment - Config in the dashboard, the EC2 credentials (combined-key and - secret-key) are wrong. If I download using Download EC2 Credentials - then they are correct. + Config in the dashboard, the EC2

[Bug 1046851] [NEW] juju-origin: lp:juju fails to install dependencies

2012-09-06 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: units/*/output.log just contains lots to these: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 162, in _run_module_as_main __main__, fname, loader, pkg_name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 72, in _run_code exec code in

[Bug 1046851] [NEW] juju-origin: lp:juju fails to install dependencies

2012-09-06 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: units/*/output.log just contains lots to these: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 162, in _run_module_as_main __main__, fname, loader, pkg_name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py, line 72, in _run_code exec code in

[Bug 1023635] Re: 0desktop crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gdk_window_enable_synchronized_configure()

2012-07-14 Thread Thomas Leonard
I installed 12.10 alpha 2 in VirtualBox, and it worked fine for me. I then used update manager to upgrade to the latest version and it continue to work. Does it still crash for you with all updates applied? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-26 Thread Thomas Leonard
OK, good progress today: * Precise now contains 1.6. * I've updated the patch for 1.6 and sent a new merge request: https://code.launchpad.net/~talex5/ubuntu/precise/zeroinstall-injector/fix-for-953756/+merge/97807 * There's a patch version in my PPA:

[Bug 964415] [NEW] Please sync from Debian to get security fix

2012-03-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: 0install 1.4.1 has a certificate validation bug, which was fixed in 1.6: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel/5174 Please sync from Debian (testing or unstable), which has the fix. I'm reporting this as a bug here, as requested in

[Bug 964415] Re: Please sync from Debian to get security fix

2012-03-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
* A description of the proposed changes, with sufficient detail to estimate their potential impact on the distribution When connecting to the key information server, to check whether a GPG software-signing key should be trusted, 0install asks Python to check that the server has a valid HTTPS

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
They want to update to 1.6 before applying the patch (to get a security fix). I've filed a bug for that here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeroinstall- injector/+bug/964415 Note that my PPA now contains a plain 1.6 (from Debian) without the patch, as part of this process (to test

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-23 Thread Thomas Leonard
They are from 0install, but I'm not sure why you're getting them, because it shouldn't be querying for default-jre (unless you actually specified that as a dependency, which seems unlikely). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Branch linked: lp:~talex5/ubuntu/precise/zeroinstall-injector/fix- for-953756 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953756 Title: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin To

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
Actually, I think the problem is just that aptdaemon fails when we try the old PackageKit API (instead of just returning an exception). So, the solution is to try the new API first. I've put up a new PPA with the fix here: https://launchpad.net/~talex5/+archive/0install -- You received this

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-15 Thread Thomas Leonard
Ah, you're right. 1. I installed precise from a recent snapshot, upgraded, and installed PackageKit. It failed using zeroinstall-injector 1.4.1-1 but worked with 1.4.1-2. 2. I removed PackageKit and installed python-aptdaemon.pkcompat. Then it fails. According to the docs, InstallPackages only

[Bug 956391] Re: aptd crashed with TypeError in defer(): InstallPackages() takes exactly 4 arguments (3 given)

2012-03-15 Thread Thomas Leonard
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 953756 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953756 ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 953756 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-13 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Thomas Leonard (talex5) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953756 Title: 0install cannot install system

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-13 Thread Thomas Leonard
OK, looks like an exception changed. Fixed in Git: http://repo.or.cz/w/zeroinstall.git/commitdiff/9971094d50d82e798c6735276ae4ca82fb2d34f7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953756 Title:

[Bug 953756] Re: 0install cannot install system packages on Pangolin

2012-03-13 Thread Thomas Leonard
I've made a PPA with a patched version: https://launchpad.net/~talex5/+archive/ppa/+packages Does that fix it for you? ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 598411] Re: SystemError: An exception was thrown by the type initializer for CodecsInfo

2010-07-04 Thread Thomas Leonard
Thanks, that helped - my program gets a lot further now! -- SystemError: An exception was thrown by the type initializer for CodecsInfo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598411 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 598411] [NEW] SystemError: An exception was thrown by the type initializer for CodecsInfo

2010-06-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: (on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, ironpython 2.6~beta2-2) Almost anything I try to do in IronPython gives this error. e.g. $ ipy IronPython 2.6 Beta 2 DEBUG (2.6.0.20) on .NET 2.0.50727.1433 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import logging

[Bug 587248] [NEW] rsvg crashes rending a trivial file

2010-05-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: $ cat svg.py import gtk loader = gtk.gdk.PixbufLoader('svg') loader.write('style type=text/css /style') $ python svg.py zsh: segmentation fault python svg.py Tested on 64-bit and 32-bit Lucid. This is a simplified test-case. The original was an HTML error page. I

[Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-12-06 Thread Thomas Leonard
Same problem here, after updating to 9.10. Deleting login.keyring fixed it for me too, allowing me to commit without entering any password. -- gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473139 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 402188] Re: gvim complains about gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed in the shell it's started from

2009-11-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Description changed: Binary package hint: vim When running gvim (from vim-gnome) from a gnome-terminal, the terminal will get spammed with the following message: ** (gvim:5944): CRITICAL **: gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed A few

[Bug 366333] Re: Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop

2009-11-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
Fixed in 9.10 I guess. ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 366333] Re: Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Leonard
Another bug report about this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.desktop.rox.user/9110/focus=9122 What's the process to get the fixed version into the archive? -- Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366333 You received

[Bug 374118] Re: Please sync zeroinstall-injector (0.40-2) from Debian unstable

2009-05-24 Thread Thomas Leonard
Note that getting this synced would also fix #366333 (FTP not working with Python 2.6). ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please sync zeroinstall-injector (0.40-2) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374118 You received this bug

[Bug 366333] Re: Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop

2009-05-09 Thread Thomas Leonard
0.40 is now in Debian/unstable. Since this was mostly a bug-fix release anyway, it may be best to sync from there. The release notes are here: http://www.gnomefiles.org/version.php?soft_id=921 Alternatively, the patch is here:

[Bug 357901] Re: xinerama mouse cursor on every screen

2009-04-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
Switching to the nouveau driver fixed the issue for me. And XRANDR now works too! -- xinerama mouse cursor on every screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 191958] Re: xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time

2009-04-26 Thread Thomas Leonard
This bug still occurs on Jaunty, following the steps in the original report. -- xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 366333] Re: Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop

2009-04-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
Looks like downloads from FTP sites don't work when used with Python 2.6. Does the version below fix it? http://downloads.sourceforge.net/zero-install/zeroinstall- injector_0.40-1_all.deb -- Cryptic error message when trying to install Tasklist from the ROX desktop

[Bug 336317] Re: [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-04-13 Thread Thomas Leonard
Tested again today after updating to latest Jaunty using these commands: dget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zeroinstall-injector/zeroinstall-injector_0.39-1.dsc wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24830029/python2.6.debdiff cd zeroinstall-injector-0.39/ patch -p1

[Bug 336317] Re: [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-04-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
Should I upload a new deb to REVU, or is the debdiff enough? Thanks, -- [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 336317] Re: [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-04-05 Thread Thomas Leonard
Was a work-around for a problem with Python 2.5's distutils, I think. Looks like it's not needed with Python 2.6. The attached patch should fix it (while still supporting 2.5 if necessary). The resulting binary package's contents are the same, according to debdiff. Note that all previous

[Bug 336317] Re: [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-04-05 Thread Thomas Leonard
Here's a better patch. The problem was that Python 2.6 installs to /usr/local by default: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-February/027439.html ** Attachment added: python2.6.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24830029/python2.6.debdiff -- [FFe][jaunty] Please sync

[Bug 336317] Re: [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-04-01 Thread Thomas Leonard
Thanks, Iulian. Do I need to do anything else, or will the sync happen automatically now? -- [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
Note: the version currently in Jaunty also displays a lot of deprecation warnings due to the upgrade to Python 2.6. Using the Debian version would fix those too. -- Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
(changed status to Confirmed, as suggested on #ubuntu-motu) ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed -- Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
Requesting a freeze exception, as described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess. Proposed changes: Update to 0.39, since the version currently in Jaunty doesn't work (throws an exception when checking for updates due to removal of the actions feature from the notification service).

[Bug 336317] Re: [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Summary changed: - Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty + [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) -- [FFe][jaunty] Please sync zeroinstall-injector 0.39 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-18 Thread Thomas Leonard
Fix is in Debian, so status should be Fix Committed, I think. Please sync from there. ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
Please take the fixed zeroinstall-injector_0.39-1_all.deb from Debian/unstable. http://packages.qa.debian.org/z/zeroinstall- injector/news/20090315T220302Z.html Thanks, -- Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-08 Thread Thomas Leonard
Not quite. This bug is about moving from notifications to using the system tray. That bug is about another change: moving from using the system tray to using unfocussed windows. Probably best to see how people react to the new UI in Update Manager before doing the same thing to Zero Install. --

[Bug 336317] Re: Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-08 Thread Thomas Leonard
A new version using the system tray is now available here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zeroinstall-injector/ -- Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 336317] [NEW] Update notification doesn't work in Jaunty

2009-03-01 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zeroinstall-injector Jaunty has dropped support for part of the freedesktop.org notification system, and can now only display simple messages (not messages with buttons, like Updates available. [Download]): http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/265

[Bug 211464] Re: 0launch crashed with IOError in update_user_overrides()

2009-01-20 Thread Thomas Leonard
Note that the new version 0.38 takes care not to create root-owned files in the user's home directory, so it is safer to use it with sudo. -- 0launch crashed with IOError in update_user_overrides() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211464 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 163341] Re: git-svn gets wrong parent revision for tags

2008-12-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
Looks like a patch is now available: https://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2008/12/16/4429654 -- git-svn gets wrong parent revision for tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 266592] Re: New upstream release 0.35 zeroinstall-injector

2008-12-13 Thread Thomas Leonard
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307666 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307666 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307666 Please backport zeroinstall-injectory 0.37 from Jaunty to Intrepid -- New upstream release 0.35 zeroinstall-injector

[Bug 211464] Re: 0launch crashed with IOError in update_user_overrides()

2008-12-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
(sorry for the delayed reply: for some reason I wasn't notified when this bug was created, only when Daniel replied) Is the file in question ( /home/mark/.config/0install.net/injector/user_overrides/http%3a%2f%2fholizz.com%2fsoftware%2f0install%2fpysqlite2) owned and readable by the user (Mark)?

[Bug 55739] Re: No more mouse events after using rdesktop

2008-11-28 Thread Thomas Leonard
Locking the screen with xscreensaver and then immediately unlocking it seems to fix the problem too. -- No more mouse events after using rdesktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 55739] Re: No more mouse events after using rdesktop

2008-11-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
I'm having this problem several times a day since upgrading to 8.10 (all previous versions were OK). I use focus-follows-mouse and two screens. Window manager is Ion 3. I mainly run Firefox, Evolution, xterm and Vim. The mouse moves and the keyword works fine (including changing focus), but

[Bug 266592] Re: New upstream release 0.35 zeroinstall-injector

2008-09-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
mentors.debian.net is having some problems at the moment, but 0.36 will get uploaded when it comes back. Once in Debian/unstable, it should soon find its way into Ubuntu. In the meantime, please test the 0.36 deb and report here whether it works:

[Bug 191958] Re: xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time

2008-09-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
Ping? -- xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 191958] Re: xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time

2008-06-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
Are you able to reproduce this? Do you need more information? -- xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 129352] Re: Meld fails to display file diff interface

2008-06-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
Seems to be fixed in Hardy. ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Meld fails to display file diff interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 191958] Re: xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time

2008-05-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
Confirming that this bug also affects Hardy. ** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 163341] Re: git-svn gets wrong parent revision for tags

2008-04-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
Try: git-svn clone https://zero-install.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zero- install -T trunk/0publish -r1890:2072 -b releases/0publish git-svn version 1.5.2.5 (svn 1.4.4) Go into the created 'zero-install' directory and run: gitk --all As you can see, the git branch comes from r1894, yet the

[Bug 212258] [NEW] storebackup logging error

2008-04-05 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: storebackup storeBackup prints: unknown param 1 in printLog::print unknown param ARRAY(0xd90e00) in printLog::print I think it's caused by this bit: $prLog-print('-kind' = 'E', [cannot create $aktDir, exiting],

[Bug 191958] Re: xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time

2008-02-14 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Attachment added: Sample .desktop file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11966975/test-test.desktop ** Also affects: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191958

[Bug 191958] [NEW] xdg-desktop-menu install requires a logout the first time

2008-02-14 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xdg-utils When installing a new application for the first time, the new menu entry doesn't appear immediately. You have to log out and log back in again. However, installing further applications works fine. To reproduce (on a clean Gutsy system): 1.

[Bug 163341] git-svn gets wrong parent revision for tags

2007-11-17 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: git-core When converting a subversion repository to GIT using git-svn, the svn tags do not have the right parent. Each tag should be identical to a trunk revision (which it was copied from), but because git-svn uses an earlier revision as the parent it

[Bug 163341] Re: git-svn gets wrong parent revision for tags

2007-11-17 Thread Thomas Leonard
The attached patch to git-svn fixed the problem for my repository. ** Attachment added: git-svn-tag-parents.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10455142/git-svn-tag-parents.patch -- git-svn gets wrong parent revision for tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163341 You received this bug

[Bug 10669] Re: Filters are not applied to new mail on Exchange

2007-10-24 Thread Thomas Leonard
Same problem here (after upgrading to Gutsy) with evolution-exchange 2.12.0-0ubuntu1. Combined with the other new-in-gutsy bug which prevents disabling notification of new mail, this means I get a notification balloon and a flashing mail icon appearing every 30 seconds or so throughout the day to

[Bug 140508] aa-genprof can't parse logs

2007-09-17 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apparmor-utils After upgrading, aa-genprof in gutsy never finds any events. I tried with export LOGPROF_DEBUG=1, and the resulting log contained lines like this: read_log UNHANDLED: Sep 17 19:54:57 nono kernel: [ 7904.712000] audit(1190055297.170:473):

[Bug 138954] Profile doesn't conform to protocol

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apparmor AppArmor recently stopped working. When I tried to restart it manually, I got the above error. I tried removing it all and reinstalling, but I got the same error: $ sudo apt-get remove --purge apparmor apparmor-utils apparmor-profiles $ sudo

[Bug 129352] Re: Meld fails to display file diff interface

2007-09-09 Thread Thomas Leonard
** Changed in: zeroinstall-injector (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Meld fails to display file diff interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 129352] Re: Meld fails to display file diff interface

2007-08-28 Thread Thomas Leonard
The same bug in Zero Install goes away if I insert a sleep, so that seems likely. I've filed a pygtk bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-gtk2/+bug/131960 -- Meld fails to display file diff interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129352 You received this bug notification

[Bug 129352] Re: Meld fails to display file diff interface

2007-08-12 Thread Thomas Leonard
After upgrading to Gutsy, I get a similar error from the (entirely unrelated) Zero Install package: $ 0launch -g /home/talex/Projects/zero-install/0launch/zeroinstall/0launch-gui/mainwindow.py:83: Warning: IA__g_object_remove_toggle_ref: couldn' t find toggle ref 0xb7d07a30(0x84f2f7c)

[Bug 131960] IA__g_object_remove_toggle_ref: couldn't find toggle ref 0xb7c94a30(0x84f2f54)

2007-08-12 Thread Thomas Leonard
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-gtk2 After upgrading to Gutsy, I get this error: $ 0launch -g /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/zeroinstall/0launch-gui/mainwindow.py:83: Warning: IA__g_object_remove_toggle_ref: couldn't find toggle ref 0xb7c94a30(0x84f2f54)

[Bug 117745] Re: powertop suggests to remove g-p-m

2007-06-09 Thread Thomas Leonard
Stracing it, it looks like the main culprit is this (in gnome-power- manager-2.18.2/src/gpm-dpms.c): static void gpm_dpms_init (GpmDpms *dpms) { dpms-priv = GPM_DPMS_GET_PRIVATE (dpms); add_poll_timer (dpms, 500); } This wakes up the CPU twice a second to check the monitor's

[Bug 266592] Re: New upstream release 0.35 zeroinstall-injector

-- Thread Thomas Leonard
oogle_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "000000"; //--> [Bug 266592] Re: New upstream release 0.35 zeroinstall-injector Thomas Leonard Reply via email to