[Bug 1947695] Re: libaom update needed

2021-10-31 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #997983 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997983 ** Also affects: aom (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997983 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1763033] Re: Caja can't properly unmount FUSE file systems

2021-05-27 Thread Thomas Uhle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 254171 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254171 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #757535 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757535 ** Also affects: caja (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757535

[Bug 254171] Re: Nautilus can't properly unmount FUSE file systems

2021-05-25 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Package changed: fuse (Debian) => fuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254171 Title: Nautilus can't properly unmount FUSE file systems To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 254171] Re: Nautilus can't properly unmount FUSE file systems

2021-05-25 Thread Thomas Uhle
According to https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/pull/705, this issue seems to have been fixed natively in mount/libmount1 from util-linux (since version 2.34). So it should work with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (focal fossal) and newer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 254171] Re: Nautilus can't properly unmount FUSE file systems

2021-05-25 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Bug watch added: github.com/libfuse/libfuse/issues #246 https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/issues/246 ** Also affects: fuse (Debian) via https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/issues/246 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 254171] Re: Nautilus can't properly unmount FUSE file systems

2021-05-25 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/issues #133 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/issues/133 ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Medium => Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Status: Confirmed => Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #607706

[Bug 1765946] Re: Solaar tray icon not visible

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #845615 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845615 ** Also affects: solaar (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845615 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1807722] Re: ImageMagick without rsvg Support

2019-06-07 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #763056 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763056 ** Changed in: imagemagick (Debian) Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: imagemagick (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: imagemagick (Debian) Remote watch:

[Bug 1807722] Re: ImageMagick without rsvg Support

2019-06-07 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1807722 Title: ImageMagick without rsvg Support To manage

[Bug 1537059] Re: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

2016-01-25 Thread Thomas Uhle
As far as I understand ubuntu-wine/ppa is also maintained and it is maintained by the same people maintaining the wine packages in Ubuntu's universe repository. (Latest) wine1.8 in ubuntu-wine/ppa happens to have wrong dependencies which should be fixed before wine1.8 is going to be packaged in

[Bug 1530229] Re: Build without gstreamer0.10

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Also affects: wine1.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530229 Title: Build without gstreamer0.10 To manage notifications about

[Bug 1537059] Re: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Also affects: wine Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537059 Title: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

[Bug 1537059] [NEW] Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
Public bug reported: Current stable Wine (version 1.8.0) depends on wine-gecko version 2.40 and wine-mono version 4.5.6, but installing wine1.8 erroneously installs the packages wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 because of Recommends: [...], wine-gecko2.34, wine-mono4.5.4 in the binary packages

[Bug 1537059] Re: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Also affects: ubuntu-wine-ppa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537059 Title: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is

[Bug 1537059] Re: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
temporary work-around fixing Wine installation after installing package wine1.8: # apt-get remove wine-gecko2.34 wine-mono4.5.4 # apt-get remove wine-gecko2.34:i386 ## (only on amd64 platfrom) # apt-get install wine-gecko2.40 wine-mono4.5.6 # apt-get install wine-gecko2.40:i386 ## (only on

[Bug 1537059] Re: Recommending wine-gecko2.34 and wine-mono4.5.4 is wrong for wine1.8

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Also affects: wine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537059 Title:

[Bug 1518730] [NEW] transitional package libgnutls28-dev cannot be removed unless libgnutls-dev provides it

2015-11-22 Thread Thomas Uhle
Public bug reported: Since the development package in Debian is still called libgnutls28-dev (opposed to Ubuntu), there are several packages that build-depend on libgnutls28-dev instead of libgnutls-dev. Therefore, libgnutls28-dev cannot be removed from Ubuntu 15.04, 15.10 and upcoming 16.04

[Bug 1322533] Re: does not work with subversion 1.8

2015-11-10 Thread Thomas Uhle
** Also affects: eclipse-subclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322533 Title: does not work with subversion 1.8 To manage

[Bug 1322533] Re: does not work with subversion 1.8

2015-11-10 Thread Thomas Uhle
Both packages eclipse-subclipse and libsvnclientadapter-java have to be updated to version 1.10.3 as pointed out in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse- subclipse/+bug/1355097/comments/1 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1308054] Re: openconnect: PKCS#11 support broken with GnuTLS 2.12.x

2014-08-12 Thread Thomas Uhle
Mike, I can confirm that this bug is fixed in version 6.00 which is wonderful. Yet this still does not fix release 5.02-1 in Ubuntu 14.04LTS. Unfortunately, manually backporting and installing openconnect release 6.00-1 is not a solution since network-manager-openconnect-gnome depends on

[Bug 1308054] Re: openconnect: PKCS#11 support broken with GnuTLS 2.12.x

2014-06-20 Thread Thomas Uhle
Ken, you are right. This is exactly what happens without the patch from http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/openconnect.git/patch/43e514b4f53c147936a7379e8e6fc67f78cae2fb . I can confirm that downgrading and pinning openconnect and libopenconnect2 to version 5.01-1 is working, but that is IMHO

[Bug 1308054] [NEW] openconnect: PKCS#11 support broken with GnuTLS 2.12.x

2014-04-15 Thread Thomas Uhle
Public bug reported: As already pointed out in Debian bug ticket #744214, the changes in gnutls.c from v5.01 to v5.02 yield a bug in line 510, which is now already fixed upstream in commit http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/openconnect.git/patch/43e514b4f53c147936a7379e8e6fc67f78cae2fb but