[Bug 1705320] Re: [SRU] update whoopsie to include openjdk's hotspoterror key and network manager state fix

** Patch added: "whoopsie_0.2.52.3_0.2.52.4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/+bug/1705320/+attachment/4917748/+files/whoopsie_0.2.52.3_0.2.52.4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1705320] Re: [SRU] update whoopsie to include openjdk's hotspoterror key and network manager state fix

** Patch added: "whoopsie_0.2.55_0.2.55.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/+bug/1705320/+attachment/4917749/+files/whoopsie_0.2.55_0.2.55.1.debdiff ** Description changed: whoopsie needs a SRU with 2 recent fixes for both Xenial and Zesty. - The first fix is

[Bug 1696814] Re: add openjdk hs log to list of acceptable_fields in whoopsie

** Description changed: - OpenJDK 8 apport hook attaches the hs_err_pid.log (if it exists) to - a Crash report under the HotspotError key. The hook is currently limited - to attaching files under 100 KB. + [Impact] + By default OpenJDK 8 generates an hs_err file when it crashes, this file

[Bug 1704174] [NEW] update apparmor rules to include wicd's dhclient.conf file

Public bug reported: Package: isc-dhcp-client Version: 4.3.5-3ubuntu Arch: amd64 Release: artful Report == The apparmor rules for /sbin/dhclient are missing an entry for wicd's dhclient.conf file, see the log bellow: audit: type=1400 audit(1499962030.711:50): apparmor="DENIED"

[Bug 1701268] [NEW] [FTBFS] python-pysam fails to build due to htslib update

Extensions that are have a cyclic dependency with an existing Extension, which eventually causes library loading to fail when nose tests are run. ** Affects: python-pysam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) Status: Confirmed ** Tags: artful ftbfs

[Bug 1652759] Re: eclipse-mylyn 3.12.0-2 FTBFS (Unable to find plug-in: org.apache.commons.lang_0.0.0)

files. I tried to track down why bnd was dropped, but couldn't (so far) find any references to why that was done. ** Changed in: libcommons-lang-java (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1699599] Re: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS when building against glib2.0-2.53.1-1 (or later)

Debdiff between 1.18.0-1 (Artful) and 1.18.0-1ubuntu1 (to sponsor a new upload). ** Patch added: "libqmi_1.18.0-1_1.18.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/libqmi/+bug/1699599/+attachment/4901193/+files/libqmi_1.18.0-1_1.18.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this

[Bug 1699599] Re: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS when building against glib2.0-2.53.1-1 (or later)

Upstream patch with DEP3 header. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #865579 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865579 ** Also affects: libqmi (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865579 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Patch

[Bug 1699599] Re: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS when building against glib2.0-2.53.1-1 (or later)

** Summary changed: - libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS on artful due to test failure + libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS when building against glib2.0-2.53.1-1 (or later) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1699599] Re: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS on artful due to test failure

Tracked the error down to glib2.0 version update from 2.52.0-1 to 2.53.1-1 (and later versions). They introduced an additional NULL check to g_file_test [1] that now breaks this particular test, as the code in qmi-utils.c provides a NULL `path` to g_file_test. [1]

[Bug 1699599] Re: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS on artful due to test failure

** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699599 Title: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS on artful due to test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1699599] Re: libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS on artful due to test failure

** Summary changed: - [FTBFS] libqmi 1.18.0-1 fails test during build time + libqmi 1.18.0-1 FTBFS on artful due to test failure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699599 Title: libqmi

[Bug 1699599] Re: [FTBFS] libqmi 1.18.0-1 fails test during build time

** Description changed: After the Debian sync that update libqmi from 1.16.2-1 to 1.18.0-1, the package FTBFS due to a new step in the test setup for the test-generated suite. - From the buildlogs: - + == Current FTBFS (from the our artful buildlog) == TEST: test-generated...

[Bug 1699599] Re: [FTBFS] libqmi 1.18.0-1 fails test during build time

** Description changed: After the Debian sync that update libqmi from 1.16.2-1 to 1.18.0-1, the package FTBFS due to a new step in the test setup for the test-generated suite. From the buildlogs: TEST: test-generated... (pid=17634)   /libqmi-glib/generated/core:

[Bug 1699599] Re: [FTBFS] libqmi 1.18.0-1 fails test during build time

** Description changed: After the Debian sync that update libqmi from 1.16.2-1 to 1.18.0-1, the package FTBFS due to a new step in the test setup for the test-generated suite. From the buildlogs: TEST: test-generated... (pid=17634) - /libqmi-glib/generated/core:

[Bug 1699599] [NEW] [FTBFS] libqmi 1.18.0-1 fails test during build time

Public bug reported: After the Debian sync that update libqmi from 1.16.2-1 to 1.18.0-1, the package FTBFS due to a new step in the test setup for the test-generated suite. >From the buildlogs: TEST: test-generated... (pid=17634) /libqmi-glib/generated/core:

[Bug 1647638] Re: W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

I could replicate it on my system, I got the following message on the tests: W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back (0 vs 4). Affected packages: linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic:amd64 == Reproducer == $ sudo tee /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-fail

[Bug 1647638] Re: W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

Small correction to get the right zz-fail file (needs to escape $), please run: $ sudo tee /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-fail

[Bug 1696886] Re: add apport hook for openjdk-8

The duplication was probably caused by myself while I was simultaneous running apport-cli, apport-noui and update-notifier-crash - for some reason my system does not set the systemd user graphical-session, so I ended running stuff manually and a duplication occurred somewhere along that. I did

[Bug 1696886] Re: add apport hook for openjdk-8

Verified to be working. The HotspotError is attached to the reports. The reports got associated with this problem: https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/0b7b808952f02c3d51897e490710eddc225ba21c I had 2 instances reported - so far, I tested if a few times, so more might show up:

[Bug 1611598] Re: jamvm is broken due to missing native methods in sun.misc.Unsafe

Set main task as invalid since this does not affect ubuntu devel and it has been fixed on the supported releases. ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) => (unassigned) -- You re

[Bug 1696886] Re: add apport hook for openjdk-8

** Tags added: artful xenial yakkety zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696886 Title: add apport hook for openjdk-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1694358] Re: [SRU] update jtreg in 14.04 LTS to 4.2-b05

** Changed in: jtreg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694358 Title: [SRU] update jtreg in 14.04 LTS to 4.2-b05 To manage

[Bug 1696886] Re: add apport hook for openjdk-8

** Patch added: "openjdk-8_8u131-b11-2_8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/1696886/+attachment/4892717/+files/openjdk-8_8u131-b11-2_8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.debdiff ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1696886] [NEW] add apport hook for openjdk-8

Public bug reported: OpenJDK crashes generates a hs_err file that includes additional information for debugging. This apport hook adds the generated hs_err file as long as it exists in the java process cwd and is smaller than 100 KB (to avoid filling up error tracker). OpenJDK 8 conffiles

[Bug 1696814] Re: add openjdk hs log to list of acceptable_fields in whoopsie

** Attachment removed: "source-openjdk-8.py" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/+bug/1696814/+attachment/4892544/+files/source-openjdk-8.py ** Attachment added: "source-openjdk-8.py"

[Bug 1696814] Re: add openjdk hs log to list of acceptable_fields in whoopsie

This is the proposed openjdk-8 hook. ** Description changed: - This is for Tiago's openjdk apport package hook. + OpenJDK 8 apport hook attaches the hs_err_pid.log (if it exists) to + a Crash report under the HotspotError key. The hook is currently limited + to attaching files under 100 KB. + +

[Bug 1696604] [NEW] excessive ipv6 adding/deleting default route in artful

Public bug reported: Package: dhcpcd5 Version: 6.11.5-0ubuntu1 Release: artful dhcpcd5 in artful is outputting repeated messages about adding/deleting ipv6 default routes. I didn't check other releases. The actual log is not the problem, but the actual behavior seems to be: I don't expect

[Bug 1694358] [NEW] [SRU] update jtreg in 14.04 LTS to 4.2-b05

Public bug reported: [Proposal] * Update jtreg (universe) in 14.04 LTS from 4.1-2 to 4.2-b05-1, which is also the same version that is running on Zesty and above. [Impact] * In 14.04 LTS jtreg has no reverse runtime dependencies and a single reverse build dependency: openjdk-7

[Bug 1694358] Re: [SRU] update jtreg in 14.04 LTS to 4.2-b05

Attached debdiff containing the changelog and a updated debian/control file. ** Patch added: "jtreg-4.2-b05-1ubuntu0.14.04.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jtreg/+bug/1694358/+attachment/4885996/+files/jtreg-4.2-b05-1ubuntu0.14.04.1.debdiff ** Tags added: patch -- You

[Bug 1691126] Re: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: System property jdk.tls.namedGroups(null) contains no supported elliptic curves

** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 1691126] Re: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: System property jdk.tls.namedGroups(null) contains no supported elliptic curves

** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691126 Title: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: System property jdk.tls.namedGroups(null) contains no supported

[Bug 1691126] Re: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: System property jdk.tls.namedGroups(null) contains no supported elliptic curves

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This regression was introduced in OpenJDK 7 by the backport of JDK-8148516 [1] from OpenJDK 8 to OpenJDK 7. The backport was done under JDK-8175450 [2] and committed to 7u121 in revision #8321 [3]. The fix, as

[Bug 1691126] Re: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: System property jdk.tls.namedGroups(null) contains no supported elliptic curves

** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1672101] Re: FTBFS: undefined reference (cups-pdf-3.0.1-2) [zesty/all arches]

FTBFS fix that sets the cups library as the last param to gcc. The debdiff is between 3.0.1-3, so the changelog chunk will not apply cleanly to 3.0.1-2 (currently what has been synced from Debian), but it is an easy fix. I would recommend syncing zesty to cups-pdf 3.0.1-3 anyway. ** Bug watch

[Bug 1672101] [NEW] FTBFS: undefined reference (cups-pdf-3.0.1-2) [zesty/all arches]

Public bug reported: cups-pdf 3.0.1-2 currently FTBFS on Zesty on all arches. [1] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -lcups -o src/cups-pdf src/cups-pdf.c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions

[Bug 1671959] Re: FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1)

** Tags added: ftbfs patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671959 Title: FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc- dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1) To manage

[Bug 1671955] Re: FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1)

** Tags added: ftbfs patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671955 Title: FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc- webviewer 2.2-1) To manage notifications

[Bug 1671959] Re: FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1)

** Summary changed: - orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1 ftbfs on all arches + FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1671955] Re: FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1)

** Summary changed: - orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 ftbfs on all arches + FTBFS: undefined references - affects zesty/all arches (orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1640320] Re: FTBFS in zesty

I believe that the failed builds were re-run since the first report by Dimitri and then failed due to googletest. After fixing the googletest issues then we end up with another FTBFS caused by missing 'vector' includes. I have added a merge proposal with the fixes in place. ** Branch linked:

[Bug 1671959] [NEW] orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1 ftbfs on all arches

Public bug reported: orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1 has been recently imported from Debian, unfortunately it FTBFS on all arches on zesty [1]. The failure is triggered when linking CXX shared library libOrthancDicomWeb.so and causes quite a few "undefined reference" in various objects (Dicom.cpp.o,

[Bug 1671955] Re: orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 ftbfs on all arches

** Changed in: orthanc-webviewer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671955 Title: orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 ftbfs on all arches To manage

[Bug 1671959] Re: orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1 ftbfs on all arches

The attached debdiff modifies debian/patches/cmake to prevent: 1. the manual inclusion of libraries in LINK_FLAGS 2. the removal of the call to target_link_libraries 3. the removal of uuid from link_libraries in Orthanc/Resources/CMake/Compiler.cmake -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1671959] Re: orthanc-dicomweb 0.3+dfsg-1 ftbfs on all arches

** Patch added: "debdiff-orthanc-dicomweb_0.3+dfsg-1_0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/orthanc-dicomweb/+bug/1671959/+attachment/4835606/+files/debdiff-orthanc-dicomweb_0.3+dfsg-1_0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.diff ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #857424

[Bug 1671955] Re: orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 ftbfs on all arches

Correct debdiff with updated maintainer. ** Patch removed: "debdiff-orthanc-webviewer_2.2-1_2.2-1ubuntu1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/orthanc-webviewer/+bug/1671955/+attachment/4835599/+files/debdiff-orthanc-webviewer_2.2-1_2.2-1ubuntu1.diff ** Patch added:

[Bug 1671955] [NEW] orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 ftbfs on all arches

Public bug reported: orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 has been recently imported from Debian, unfortunately it FTBFS on all arches on zesty [1]. The failure is triggered when linking CXX shared library libOrthancWebViewer.so and causes quite a few "undefined reference" in GdcmImageDecoder.cpp.o The root

[Bug 1671955] Re: orthanc-webviewer 2.2-1 ftbfs on all arches

The attached patch modifies debian/patches/cmake to prevent: 1. the manual inclusion of libraries in LINK_FLAGS 2. the removal of the call to target_link_libraries ** Patch added: "debdiff-orthanc-webviewer_2.2-1_2.2-1ubuntu1.diff"

[Bug 1637239] Re: Please merge ncurses 6.0+20160917-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

nee: Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: ncurses (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Description changed: Ubuntu version: 6.0+20160625-1ubuntu1 - Debian verison: 6.0+20160917-1 + Debian verison: 6.0+20161126-1 Details: https://merges.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 1482777] Re: [MIR] open-vm-tools 10.0.x build dependencies: xml-security-c and xerces-c

The Debian maintainer reached out to me through the debian bug 856569. He will be moving from xmlsecurity to xmlsec1 after stretch is released. He has also updated the package to have a libssl-dev as an alternate dependency to libssl-1.0-dev (ie. Build-Depends on 'libssl-1.0-dev |libssl-dev')

[Bug 1666430] Re: Please merge open-vm-tools 10.1.0-4449150-3ubuntu1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

The Debian maintainer reached out to me through the debian bug 856569. He will be moving from xmlsecurity to xmlsec1 after stretch is released. He has also updated the package to have a libssl-dev as an alternate dependency to libssl-1.0-dev (ie. Build-Depends on 'libssl-1.0-dev |libssl-dev')

[Bug 1482777] Re: [MIR] open-vm-tools 10.0.x build dependencies: xml-security-c and xerces-c

I got to this bug through the last merge (LP: #1666430) that pointed to LP: #1492429 which linked here. I was also investigating that merge (somehow we got two bug reports open for the same thing) and I agree with Seth Arnold that it is better (ubuntu-wise) to use xmlsec1 than xml-security-c +

[Bug 1651608] Re: please rebase open-vm-tools to version 10.1.5

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1666430 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666430 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1666430 Please merge open-vm-tools 10.1.0-4449150-3ubuntu1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1255821] Re: A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment on start-up eclipse in ubuntu-13.04

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, according to this report, you are using Ubuntu 13.04 (Raring Ringtail) which reached EOL on January 27, 2014. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

[Bug 1573673] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u77-b03-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. > {~} $ sudo dpkg --configure -a > Setting up openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 (8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2) ... > update-alternatives: error: alternative path > /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/rmid doesn't

[Bug 1659808] Re: package openjdk-8-jdk-headless 8u111-b14-2ubuntu0.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script was killed by signal (Killed)

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, according to this report, you are not using the most recent version of this package for your Ubuntu release. Please upgrade to the most recent version and let us know if you are still having this issue.

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-2183 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-5546 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-5547 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-

[Bug 1646927] Re: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-5549 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646927 Title: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized

[Bug 1471894] Re: _bad_oauth_token crashes on python3 (str vs bytes)

And the exact version tested: $ apt-cache policy python3-launchpadlib python3-launchpadlib: Installed: 1.10.3-3ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1.10.3-3ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1.10.3-3ubuntu0.1 400 400 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 400

[Bug 1471894] Re: _bad_oauth_token crashes on python3 (str vs bytes)

Yes, I can confirm that the package in -proposed fixes that. Now: $ python3 Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 17 2016, 17:05:23) [GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import sys >>> from launchpadlib.launchpad import Launchpad >>> def

[Bug 1553603] Re: openjdk 8 ParallelGC effectively not working, useless for desktop use

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, according to this report, you are not using the most recent version of this package for your Ubuntu release. Please upgrade to the most recent version and let us know if you are still having this issue.

[Bug 1573673] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u77-b03-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, according to this report, you are not using the most recent version of this package for your Ubuntu release. Please upgrade to the most recent version and let us know if you are still having this issue.

[Bug 1558865] Re: AppStream icon for openjdk-8-policytool.desktop

** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558865 Title: AppStream icon for openjdk-8-policytool.desktop To manage

[Bug 1637776] Re: Crashed during automated update: package openjdk-7-jre-headless:amd64 7u111-2.6.7-0ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned e

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to update openjdk-7-jre-headless. Please execute the following commands, as it will clear your package cache and then perform an update+upgrade, in a

[Bug 1642420] Re: Enable OpenJDK update through uscan

** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~tdaitx/openjdk/+git/openjdk7/+merge/311088 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642420 Title: Enable OpenJDK update through

[Bug 1642420] [NEW] Enable OpenJDK update through uscan

Public bug reported: In order to make OpenJDK 7 updates easier uscan/watch file should be enabled. The OpenJDK 7 package is comprised of tarballs for IcedTea, JamVM, IcedTea sound, and OpenJDK modules (the OpenJDK "root", corba, hotspot, jaxp, jaxws, jdk, and langtools). Both IcedTea and

[Bug 1642028] Re: package openjdk-6-jre 6b39-1.13.11-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to update openjdk-6-jre due to openjdk-6-jre-cacao and openjdk-6-jre-jamvm not being updated together with it. Please execute the following commands, as

[Bug 1640845] [NEW] Strip -O3 from hotspot and jdk build flags

Public bug reported: ppc64el has -O3 set on dpkg-buildflags' CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS vendor setting, thus it is necessary to strip -O3 from those during the hotspot and jdk builds (as openjdk sets its own optimization flags). Example from the the 8u111-b14-2ubuntu0.16.10.2 (Yakkety) ppc64el buildlog:

[Bug 1639861] Re: package openjdk-8-jre 8u111-b14-2ubuntu0.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to uninstall the openjdk 8 package. Please execute the following commands, as it will clear your package cache and try to install openjdk again, in a

[Bug 1637239] [NEW] Please merge ncurses 6.0+20160917-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Public bug reported: Ubuntu version: 6.0+20160625-1ubuntu1 Debian verison: 6.0+20160917-1 Details: https://merges.ubuntu.com/n/ncurses/REPORT ** Affects: ncurses (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Tiago Stürmer Daitx (tdaitx) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ncurses

[Bug 1628665] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', que também está no pacote openjd

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1623951] Re: please remove mozart from yakkety

** Description changed: Which release to remove it from: Yakkety Whether to remove both the source package and all binary packages: Both A rationale for why they should be removed: - mozart requires autoconf 2.13 - generated configure is incompatible with gcc6 - a test fails

[Bug 1623962] [NEW] please remove mozart-stdlib from yakkety

Public bug reported: Which release to remove it from: Yakkety Whether to remove both the source package and all binary packages: Both A rationale for why they should be removed: - it is not being maintained any longer [1] - it is the single reverse dependency of mozart that can't be build on

[Bug 1623951] [NEW] please remove mozart from yakkety

Public bug reported: Which release to remove it from: Yakkety Whether to remove both the source package and all binary packages: Both A rationale for why they should be removed: - mozart requires autoconf 2.13 - generated configure is incompatible with gcc6 - a test fails because g++ -E output

[Bug 1622598] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-j

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1622592] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: a(z) „/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h” felülírási kísérlete, amely a(z) openjdk-9-jdk-headl

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1621913] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket openjdk-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1621250] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h », qui appartient aussi au p

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1619551] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h », qui appartient aussi au p

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1619289] Re: repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6

GCC 6 abs to std::abs fix accepted and committed upstream: https://github.com/timschmidt/repsnapper/commit/93dde1ef83c0c1c555f3f1ca8ff477d14d29a1e9 Original pull request: https://github.com/timschmidt/repsnapper/pull/119 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1619530] Re: bcftools FTBFS on i386, powerpc, s390x due to failing tests

The failing build of htseq on i386, powerpc, and s390x is holding htseq on yakkety-proposed due to the chain dependency: htseq -> python-pysam -> bcftools. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1619530] [NEW] bcftools FTBFS on i386, powerpc, s390x due to failing tests

Public bug reported: bcftools currently FTBFS on yakkety-proposed for i386, powerpc, s390x due to failing tests. Number of failures per arch: - i386: 74 - s390x: 10 - powerpc: 6 This numbers are bigger than the tests listed bellow because some tests are repeated with different arguments. Some

[Bug 1619100] Re: FTBFS on ppc64el: termios problems

** Patch removed: "repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/repsnapper/+bug/1619100/+attachment/4732559/+files/repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff"

[Bug 1619100] Re: FTBFS on ppc64el: termios problems

Debdiff with the current patch. Also includes the fix for bug #1619289. ** Patch added: "repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/repsnapper/+bug/1619100/+attachment/4732559/+files/repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff --

[Bug 1619289] Re: repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6

Debdiff with the current patch. Also includes the fix for bug #1619100. ** Patch added: "repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/repsnapper/+bug/1619289/+attachment/4732557/+files/repsnapper_2.4a0-1_repsnapper_2.4a0-1ubuntu1.debdiff --

[Bug 1619446] Re: mismatching headers between powerpc/ppc64el and other archs

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619446 Title: mismatching headers between powerpc/ppc64el and other archs To

[Bug 1619289] Re: repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6

** Changed in: repsnapper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619289 Title: repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1619100] Re: FTBFS on ppc64el: termios problems

Improved patch that fixes issues and allows the build on all arches. Should be removed as soon as the linux-libc-dev bug #1619446 gets fixed. ** Patch removed: "ppc64el-asm-generic.patch"

[Bug 1619100] Re: FTBFS on ppc64el: termios problems

Opened bug #1619446 due to mismatching headers on linux-libc-dev between powerpc/ppc64el and the other archs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619100 Title: FTBFS on ppc64el: termios

[Bug 1619446] [NEW] mismatching headers between powerpc/ppc64el and other archs

Public bug reported: the header files from linux-libc-dev are causing repsnapper on -proposed to FTBFS on powerpc/ppc64el I tracked it to 2 include clauses: #include #include causing the following error on powerpc/ppc64el builds: following errors: src/printer/custom_baud.cpp: In function

[Bug 1619100] Re: FTBFS on ppc64el: termios problems

** Description changed: + Note: on yakkety-proposed the build FTBFS first due to bug 1619289, + after that is fixed then we get this issue. + As reported in debian bug #810907 by Fernando Seiti: The package repsnapper fails to build from source on ppc64el with the following errors: -

[Bug 1619289] Re: repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6

Reported upstream at https://sourceforge.net/p/amftools/discussion/general/thread/bea6ee53/ Relying on SF forum because for some reason I'm not allowed to create a ticket there. ** Patch added: "0004-make-compile-with-gcc6.patch"

[Bug 1619289] Re: repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6

While this patch fixes the GCC 6 FTBFS, the ppc64el/powerpc build fails later on due to bug 1619100. ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619289 Title: repsnapper

[Bug 1619289] [NEW] repsnapper FTBFS with gcc6

Public bug reported: repsnapper currently FTBFS on Yakkety with the message "replace abs() with std::abs() for gcc6 compatibility". Building with GCC 6 fails with "call of overloaded ‘abs(double)’ is ambiguous" - for some reason only on PowerPC and PPC64. ** Affects: repsnapper (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1619100] [NEW] FTBFS on ppc64el: termios problems

Public bug reported: As reported in debian bug #810907 by Fernando Seiti: The package repsnapper fails to build from source on ppc64el with the following errors: src/printer/custom_baud.cpp: In function 'bool set_custom_baudrate(int, int)': src/printer/custom_baud.cpp:15:19: error:

[Bug 1618825] Re: Unable to install openjdk-9-jdk (details inside of report)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1617378] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-i386/include/linux/jawt_md.h', que também está no pacote openjdk

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1617379] [NEW] ftbfs due to missing headers when pch is disabled

Public bug reported: When pre-compiled headers are disabled the build fails due to psOldGen.hpp being missing from a few headers. The fix is to apply the same patch that openjdk-7 has (debian/patches /no-pch-build.patch) and to update the rules from: ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), sparc64))

[Bug 1615975] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-j

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1615877] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-j

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >