Based on comment above by Luis, this bug is confirmed.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
** Changed in: juju-website
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug
Unfortunately in my haste to verify this, I bungled my test of -55 and
managed to pull down the wrong source for -55 as well. Now that I have
corrected both those mistakes, I can verify that the code for the fix is
in -55 and the code for the fix functions properly. Sorry about
that.
**
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-needed-precise
** Tags added: verification-done-precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
The route metrics added ip route
I just downloaded linux-image-3.2.0-55-generic from -proposed and the
bug is still in this version. I inspected the source for linux-
image-3.2.0-55-generic and I see no evidence that the patches cited
above have been applied. There is no implementation or invocation of
inetpeer_invalidate_tree
** Tags added: verification-failed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
The route metrics added ip route are not being inherited by route
cache entries
To manage
Does the move from Incomplete to Fix Committed mean that the fix for
this bug will be in -54 or we miss the window for that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
The route
So what is the status of this bug. The 3.2.0-53 update arrived today and the
fix wasn't in it.
Is this bug going to be fixed or not?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
Joe,
Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation. I will load it up and
give it a ride.
Tim Hartrick
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 18:04 +, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
I built a Precise test kernel with commits 5faa5df and 55432d2 applied.
The test kernel can be downloaded from:
http
Joe,
This kernel fixes the problem.
Thanks
Tim Hartrick
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 17:29 -0600, Tim Hartrick wrote:
Joe,
Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation. I will load it up and
give it a ride.
Tim Hartrick
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 18:04 +, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
I
Joe,
These three seem to be relevant.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
stable.git/commit/?h=linux-3.5.yid=5faa5df1fa2024bd750089ff21dcc4191798263d
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-
Public bug reported:
There is a bug in the the management of inet peers which prevents route metrics
like initcwnd from being inherited by route
cache entries. An example:
$ ip route show
default via 172.16.231.2 dev eth0 metric 100
172.16.231.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
apport information
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751679/+files/AlsaDevices.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected precise
** Description changed:
There is a bug in the the management of inet peers which prevents route
metrics like initcwnd from being inherited by route
cache entries. An example:
$ ip route show
default via 172.16.231.2 dev
apport information
** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751685/+files/PciMultimedia.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751690/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751686/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751689/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
The
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751687/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751682/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751688/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
apport information
** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751691/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751680/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751681/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751684/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Title:
The
apport information
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741/+attachment/3751683/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205741
Christoper,
The report was made again the natty 2.6.38-8 kernel. It was
subsequently reproduced on upstream kernels out to 3.2. As I noted in
my previous comment, I worked with the upstream developers to create a
patch that works on the 2.6.38 kernel as well as newer kernels (see
previous
If the patch has been applied to the 2.6.38 natty line, the 2.6.32 lucid
line and the 3.2.0 precise line, then all the releases that we use have
been fixed. If all those releases have been fixed then from my
perspective the bug can be closed. Of course the 3.0.0 oneric line also
had the bug.
--
Christopher,
I worked with the upstream developers back in November to generate a
patch for this.
The original commit was from Tejun Heo
a855b84c3d8c73220d4d3cd392a7bee7c83de70e
It was merged into the 3.2 tree at
9b5a4d4f65e260a109eaeea8bbc8062a7c58b55e
--
You received this bug notification
I am curious to know whether this problem and 882340 have any chance of
getting fixed in a future natty update. If not, what is the chance that
they ever get fixed? We would very much like to use kexec/kdump on our
largish servers (48GB) but we can't as long as they bugs are in the
way.
--
You
I installed linux-
image-3.1.0-030100rc10-generic_3.1.0-030100rc10.201110200610_amd64.deb
and got essentially the same result.
[ 73.637287] SysRq : Trigger a crash
[ 73.640783] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
(null)
[ 73.648611] IP: [813aa2b6]
Public bug reported:
For 2.6.38-8-server and 2.6.38-10-server running on Dell R710s and R610s with
50GB of memory it isn't possible to create a crashkernel area of 512M or
larger. The limit is actually less than 512M but I haven't bothered to do a
binary search
between 384M and 512M to
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882322
Title:
The crashkernel size can't be = 512M
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
For 2.6.38-8-server and 2.6.38-10-server running on Dell R610s and R710s
with 50GB of memory we see consistent failure of vmcore_init because of
an invalid physical address. The invalid address is always the same,
db74. Below is the dmesg of the event. The
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882340
Title:
Invalid physical address encountered during vmcore_init.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
34 matches
Mail list logo