[Bug 1697501] Re: ksh segfault on job_chksave () after it receive a SIGCHLD (Signal 17)

2017-07-14 Thread Walter Richards
Bonjour, we have been running tests for over a week on trusty. No issue to report. I did not manage to get much tests going on xenial though. -- Walter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1697501] Re: ksh segfault on job_chksave () after it receive a SIGCHLD (Signal 17)

2017-07-07 Thread Walter Richards
Bonjour, preliminary tests were started yesterday with trusty-proposed. We will start running in loop over the weekend with the script that mostly had the issue. On Monday morning, this will be installed on our dev cluster which usually run 18M ksh a day. I will try to start a few tests on xeni

[Bug 1697501] Re: ksh segfault on job_chksave () after it receive a SIGCHLD (Signal 17)

2017-07-04 Thread Walter Richards
The suite of scripts that had the issue were run over 3000 times over the last week. No error have been reported. Looks good to me! Thanks -- Walter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/169

[Bug 1697501] Re: ksh segfault on job_chksave () after it receive a SIGCHLD (Signal 17)

2017-06-28 Thread Walter Richards
I installed the test package this morning, and we will try to reproduce for the coming week. Thanks. -- Walter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697501 Title: ksh segfault on job_chks

[Bug 720095] Re: vsftpd causes a vmalloc space leak in Lucid

2011-02-16 Thread Walter Richards
Hi, we have this issue on bare metal installation as you say. On a Dell M605 (AMD processor) and on an IBM x3650 (Intel). As well, it might help you to know that we tested it on SUSE with kernel 2.6.32-24, and the bug is not there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 649483] Re: Lucid update to 2.6.32.23 stable release

2010-11-12 Thread Walter Richards
Bonjour, it did not help for our specific memory issue. We are still looking and will probably revert back to our previous solution which is to use a 2.6.33 kernel. But it would still be nice to have a fix in the LTS and not use externally build kernels. For the rest, I have tested it on workstat

[Bug 649483] Re: Lucid update to 2.6.32.23 stable release

2010-10-26 Thread Walter Richards
These fixes and especially the ones on the "mm page allocator" are most likely affecting me. I was looking into filling up a bug report regarding my unanswered question, when I saw this one. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+question/130117 I will definitively be testing it wit