[Bug 367774] Re: EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros

2009-10-07 Thread beltbraces
What is not working is really your BIOS; the GIGABYTE engineers have been aware of the problem with their BIOSes since it was reported to them back in April, but to date they have been unable to correct the problem. I have no idea if they are still trying, or if they have decided it is not worth th

[Bug 367774] Re: EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros

2009-05-04 Thread beltbraces
That works perfectly well until the next reboot. I just tried it, and it certainly stops the error messages being added to the log, with no other observable effect. It does leave the edac_core module still loaded, so to get the same effect as a blacklist/reboot you would also need to do "rmmod edac

[Bug 367774] Re: EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros

2009-05-04 Thread beltbraces
Oops, sorry, I was confusing you with Marty Lucich who mentioned i82975x! And I am obviously out of date with my module management. OK, I created myself a file named /etc/modprobe.d/edac.conf that contains one line: blacklist x38_edac and after reboot I no longer see any EDAC messages on my

[Bug 367774] Re: EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros

2009-05-04 Thread beltbraces
I see the fix 100% of the time (in fact I do it about once a day, every time I turn on my PC), so it would seem we have different problems. Can you turn off EDAC reporting by creating a file named /etc/modprobe.d/edac that reads: alias i82975x_edac off and then rebooting? -- EDAC spam in dm

[Bug 367774] Re: EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros

2009-05-03 Thread beltbraces
Does running memtest86+ fix things until the next cold boot? -- EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 367774] Re: EDAC spam in dmesg, edac-utils shows no erros

2009-04-30 Thread beltbraces
Just for the record, I too am seeing this behavior (Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 motherboard). However, I don't see it with an ASUS P5E motherboard (all the other components being the same, swapped to test the different motherboard). Also, if I run memtest86+ for a few seconds (just long enough to make a c