--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2022-04-25 19:20 EDT---
(In reply to comment #94)
> Thanks Vanessa for the testing on the PPA!
>
> @Halil - I'd leave the debugging of the remaining issue to you as while you
> can't reproduce it yet it still is much closer to you than it is to me :-/
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "s390-tools-signed debdiff for LP#1968259 and LP#1968259 /
impish"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968259/+attachment/5580384/+files/debdiff_lp1968259+lp1968260_s390-tools-signed_sru_impish.patch
--
You received this bug notification because
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "s390-tools-signed debdiff for LP#1968259 and LP#1968260 /
jammy"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968259/+attachment/5580383/+files/debdiff_lp1968259+lp1968260_s390-tools-signed_patch_jammy.patch
--
You received this bug notification because
uploaded new debidff of the s390-tools-signed package for jammy that
incl. the needed d/c update
uploaded new debidff of the s390-tools-signed package for impish that
incl. the needed d/c update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "s390-tools-signed debdiff for LP#1968260 / focal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968260/+attachment/5580388/+files/debdiff_lp1968260_s390-tools-signed_sru_focal.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "s390-tools-signed debdiff for LP#1968259 and LP#1968260"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968260/+attachment/5580386/+files/debdiff_lp1968259+lp1968260_s390-tools-signed_patch_jammy.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "s390-tools-signed debdiff for LP#1968259 and LP#1968259 /
impish"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968260/+attachment/5580387/+files/debdiff_lp1968259+lp1968260_s390-tools-signed_sru_impish.patch
--
You received this bug notification because
--- Comment From stefan.am...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-08 08:01 EDT---
I opened
https://portal.support.canonical.com/ua/s/case/5004K0E93ZlQAJ/null-pointer-issue-in-nfs-code-running-ubuntu-on-ibm-z
after discussions with Frank.
I assume it is ok to close this bugzilla, correct?
--
You
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-08 05:20 EDT---
(In reply to comment #81)
> (In reply to comment #80)
> > Let me know if you had time to push the PPA through your testing.
>
> Pulled the PPA
>
> root@ilzlnx3:~# apt info qemu
> Package: qemu
> Version: 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.22~focalppa1
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-08 05:13 EDT---
(In reply to comment #81)
> (In reply to comment #80)
> > Let me know if you had time to push the PPA through your testing.
>
> Pulled the PPA
>
> root@ilzlnx3:~# apt info qemu
> Package: qemu
> Version: 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.22~focalppa1
--- Comment From tsta...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-08 02:44 EDT---
Hello Frank,
thanks for taking care of the bug.
The title should say [UBUNTU 20.04] - I can't seem to change that in Launchpad.
Boris should be back next week to take care of anything I missed.
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Viktor Mihajlovski - 2022-04-07 09:16:49
==
The s390-tools script check_hostkeydoc can be used to perform the verification
of the chain of trust for Secure Execution host key documents.
The certificate verification is however too strict and doesn't match
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Viktor Mihajlovski - 2022-04-07 08:55:11
==
DigiCert is the CA issuing the signing certificate for Secure Execution host
key documents. This certificate is used for the verification of the host key
document validity. Recently, DigiCert has changed the
--- Comment (attachment only) From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2022-04-07 18:44
EDT---
** Attachment added: "PPA_sosreport-ilzlnx3g1-195744-2022-04-07-eqybknm.tar.xz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814/+attachment/5578016/+files/sosreport-ilzlnx3g1-195744-2022-04-07-eqybknm.tar.xz
--- Comment (attachment only) From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2022-04-07 18:43
EDT---
** Attachment added: "PPA_DBGINFO-2022-04-07-15-31-16-ilzlnx3g1-23BBB8"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814/+attachment/5578015/+files/DBGINFO-2022-04-07-15-31-16-ilzlnx3g1-23BBB8.tgz
--
You
--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2022-04-07 18:42 EDT---
(In reply to comment #80)
> Let me know if you had time to push the PPA through your testing.
Pulled the PPA
root@ilzlnx3:~# apt info qemu
Package: qemu
Version: 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.22~focalppa1
I triggered a path failure from
--- Comment From stefan.am...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 10:32 EDT---
yes... makes sense :-) I forwarded the link to our compliance folks. I hope
they will say that it's ok to ftp the data.
Regarding salesforce: this is the first time I'm doing this.. and I asked
Nicolas Maeding about the
The delta between 5.4.0.107.121 and 5.4.0.90.101 are about 2000 commits
and more than 20 are NFS related and also some about vfs.
--- Comment From stefan.am...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 09:14 EDT---
thanks for starting to look into this issue!
We have a large number of LPARs running client
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 02:38 EDT---
After the announcement support for the official machine name z16 has been added
to binutils. Please consider picking up the following patch from 2.37 branch:
commit e24d2a2d11008aa363366c1087219f3e3405782a
Public bug reported:
State the component where the Bug is occuring:
kernel
Indicate the nature of the problem by answering the below questions:
- Is this problem reproducible? No
No, steps unknown, but we have seen these before
- Is the system sitting at a debugger (kdb, or xmon)?
--- Comment From fre...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-06 10:26 EDT---
Ok, thanks. I updated my system to Ubuntu 22.04 and ran my testsuite.
Looks fine - all seems to be good and CEX8 exploitation support is available.
Kernel used:
root@a35lp66:~# uname -a
Linux a35lp66 5.15.0-25-generic #25-Ubuntu
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-06 09:24 EDT---
(In reply to comment #76)
> I can confirm that just on the patch-level only two need backporting, the
> rest applies as is and I have regenerated them to match the packaging
> requirements. The backport-adaptations themselves are
--- Comment From fre...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-06 05:34 EDT---
Hm, I am not an expert in this -proposed thing...
I am currently using an Ubuntu 20.04 and added these lines to
/etc/apt/source.list:
deb http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ focal-proposed main
deb
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "proposed backport"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814/+attachment/5577049/+files/backport_qemu-4.2.mbox
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Disktest data miscompare and hear information"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814/+attachment/5577048/+files/disktest_miscompares-11_11_2021.pptx
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #63 - Halil Pasic - 2022-03-28 17:33:34 ==
I'm pretty confident I've figured out what is going on.
From the guest side, the decision whether the SCSI command was completed
successfully or not comes down to looking at the sense data. Prior to commit
a108557bbf
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-30 11:40 EDT---
With the fix being available for focal, impish and jammy, we can close the bug.
Changing IBM BZ status to: ==> CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-30 10:26 EDT---
This problem has been fixed with with openssl-ibmca 2.2.3:
* openssl-ibmca 2.2.3
- Fix PKEY segfault with OpenSSL 3.0
This 2.2.3 release has been made specifically to fix this bug, so you can
choose between the following
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
Summary
===
New IBM HW with Crypto Accelerator cards attached
Kernel level: 5.14
Core dump when configuring the ibmca engine with libica = libica.so.4 in the
openssl.cnf file in the engine section.
The problem only occurs with OpenSSL 3.0 and
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-30 09:22 EDT---
With the bug being fixed (in kdump-tools - 1:1.6.10ubuntu1) we can close this
item.
Changing IBM bugzilla status to: ==> CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Tags removed: bugnameltc-192677 severity-high
** Tags added: bugnameltc-194783 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927076
Title:
IPv6 TCP in reuseport_bpf_cpu from
--- Comment From far...@us.ibm.com 2022-03-23 11:42 EDT---
Verified with the assistance of kvm-unit-tests patches described here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220311173822.1234617-1-far...@linux.ibm.com/
...and further examination of the s390dbf/kvm- contents for a
running guest. Rolled
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962831
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] KVM: Enable storage key checking for
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962578
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] Fix SIGP processing on KVM/s390
To
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962831
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] KVM: Enable storage key checking for
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960182
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] kernel: Add support for CPU-MF counter
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-impish
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960875
Title:
--- Comment From w...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-16 13:22 EDT---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Patch request submitted:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2022-March/thread.html#128697
> Updating status to 'In Progress'.
Same as Bug 192590, pls don't just cherry-pick the certain
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-15 18:41 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 passes all of my tests on focal, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959529
Title:
Hipersocket page allocation failure on Ubuntu 20.04
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added:
"debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5569373/+files/debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8_impish.diff
--
You received this bug
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2104
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288
Title:
Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2104
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903289
Title:
[FFE] Power guest secure boot with static keys: GRUB2
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-14 04:15 EDT---
(In reply to comment #8)
> @IBM Am I right assuming that the KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION capability
> level needs to be set to 211 in 'include/uapi/linux/kvm.h', but also in
> 'tools/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h'?
> (That is at
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-
team/2022-March/thread.html#128449
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962578
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] Fix SIGP processing on KVM/s390
To manage
--- Comment From far...@us.ibm.com 2022-03-03 16:21 EDT---
A draft of the kvm-unit-test patches for these changes are now posted upstream:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220303210425.1693486-1-far...@linux.ibm.com/
There are a couple of additional cleanups in the series, but the key points
--- Comment (attachment only) From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-03 05:32
EDT---
** Attachment added: "backported patches (combined, cap=211)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962831/+attachment/5565243/+files/patches.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-03 05:34 EDT---
Here is the action performed to arrive at the specific patch, respectively:
01. backporte2c12909ae5f (selftests: kvm: add _vm_ioctl)
02. backporta46f8a63cde8 (selftests: kvm: Introduce the TEST_FAIL macro)
03.
Public bug reported:
Description:
KVM uses lazy storage key enablement as Linux does no longer make use of the
storage keys. When the guest enters keyed mode, then KVM will save/restore the
key during paging, provide change/reference tracking for guest and host and for
all interpreted
This was adressed in jammy by LP#1959735, hence updating the jammy entry
to Fix Released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962578
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] Fix SIGP processing (KVM: s390)
Public bug reported:
Decription:
KVM: SIGP RESTART is reporting a CPU state 'stopped' after SIGP RESTART was
issued, while it should report a 'busy' condition until the CPU is really
started.
The patches to fix this have already been picked for jammy/master-next:
812de04661c4 "KVM: s390:
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2022-02-28 09:03 EDT---
(In reply to comment #11)
> And for focal this commit is included (as 00501b41aaf7) in Ubuntu-5.4.0-100
> (and higher).
> It came in via upstream stable bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956381
> And since focal-updates
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-25 12:03 EDT---
I installed and tested:
# add-apt-repository ppa:fheimes/lp1959529
# apt install linux-image-unsigned-5.4.0-102-generic/focal-proposed
(The instructions in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed did
nor work for me)
--
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-25 08:08 EDT---
Verification done & fix released. Hence closing the bug.
Status change: ->CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-25 07:32 EDT---
Capability number will be 211, see this merge
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git/commit/?h=next=4dfc4ec2b7f5a3a27d166ac42cf8a583fa2d3284
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index
--- Comment From janis.schoetterl-glau...@ibm.com 2022-02-24 07:29
EDT---
Am I looking at the wrong thing?
https://git.launchpad.net/~fheimes/+git/lp1933179/commit/?h=master-next=1e2aeba3bda1e4ab7e91487ac1df29f1e3767adc
Those lines are superfluous:
+/x86_64/amx_test
+/x86_64/cpuid_test
--- Comment From janis.schoetterl-glau...@ibm.com 2022-02-24 04:54
EDT---
You only need the s390 specific lines for the two conflicts, i.e.
+/s390x/tprot
and
+#define KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION 210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-23 04:02 EDT---
Hi @Frank: yes, fix needs to be applied to focal and higher, i.e. impish &
jammy as well. Would you prefer to have separate bugzilla / LP entries for
impish and jammy or handle all three through this item?
--
You received
Public bug reported:
Description: s390/pci: move pseudo-MMIO to prevent MIO overlap
Symptom: On some configurations of z15 LPARs having an ISM device
attached may cause other PCI devices like NVMes or RoCEs to
be unusable and fail to probe. An error message
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2022-02-22 09:29 EDT---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Marking as "incomplete" while waiting for input from Power MMU experts.
Adding a couple of developers from MM team to review...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "debdiff_s390-tools_2.17_to_2.20.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959420/+attachment/5562617/+files/debdiff_s390-tools_2.17_to_2.20.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "debdiff for version bump from 2.17 to 2.20"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959420/+attachment/5562574/+files/debdiff_s390-tools_2.17_to_2.20.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "debdiff for version bump from 2.17 to 2.20"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959420/+attachment/5562500/+files/debdiff_s390-tools_2.17_to_2.20.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From jan.hoepp...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-21 07:08 EDT---
Commit ee2c6d4160c9 ("zipl: Allow optional entries that are left out when files
are missing.")
is now available adapting the suggested patches in
https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/pull/2.
Here the GitHub link to
Public bug reported:
Description: zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15
Symptom: Passing the result of compressBound() to compress()
results in an error code.
Problem: compressBound() is not adjusted for DFLTCC.
Solution: Adjust compressBound()
--- Comment on attachment From tmri...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-15 07:49
EDT---
This is the upstream patch which applies with 3 lines off message
** Attachment added: "s390/cpumf: Support for CPU Measurement Sampling Facility
LS bit"
--- Comment From tmri...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-15 07:46 EDT---
I have downloaded the master-next branch from ubuntu version 20. I used this
repository: Fetch URL:
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/focal
The patches needed to support the new machine are
--- Comment on attachment From tmri...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-15 07:48
EDT---
Reworked patch for ubuntu 20.04 branch master-next
** Attachment added: "s390/cpumf: Support for CPU Measurement Facility CSVN 7
for Ubuntu 20"
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-14 20:28 EDT---
The root-patch which has introduced the bug is from kernel 5.11.
Therefore, Ubuntu 21.10 and higher need to be fixed.
The fix is already available in stable now:
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959529
Title:
Hipersocket page allocation failure on Ubuntu 20.04
Public bug reported:
Description: s390/cio: verify the driver availability for path_event call
Symptom: If no driver is attached to a device or the driver does not
provide the path_event function, an FCES path-event on this
device could end up in a
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-11 09:02 EDT---
Thanks again to Krzysztof and Thadeu for the careful review of the backport.
I'm embarrassed to admit that my initial tests didn't show the problem;
possibly a build error on my side. I tried again today and KASAN showed the
--- Comment From dieg...@br.ibm.com 2022-02-11 07:35 EDT---
Hi Julian,
Thank you for your reply - this was a very nice bunch of info and ideas.
This patch is very old and, although not accepted upstream, we have this
running for a long time on others distros.
We are making a big effort
--- Comment From ch...@us.ibm.com 2022-02-10 08:49 EDT---
IDAA team tested the new image with stress on the Hipersocket and did not
observe any problem. We need this fix to progress to focal-updates as quickly
as possible. Thank you for your rapid turnaround on this customer issue.
--
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-09 09:45 EDT---
Did a quick test of HiperSockets and OSA with
add-apt-repository ppa:krzk/linux-testing
apt install linux-image-unsigned-5.4.0-100-generic/focal
Looks good to me.
I did not exercise any memory pressure though. So it makes sense
--- Comment From ch...@us.ibm.com 2022-02-08 17:25 EDT---
Acknowledging we (IBM SSC, IDAA) saw this and are working on verification.
Successfully pulled 5.4.0-100.113~test2 patches for packages included in SSC
(linux-cloud-tools-common, linux-libc-dev, linux-tools-common,
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-08 07:17 EDT---
FWIW: Backporting the long kernel command line is not a pre-req for adding this
to QEMU. This change is required to support *guests* which have the necessary
kernel support(e.g. future Ubuntu 22.10 or upcoming HWE kernels).
--
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-07 07:54 EDT---
The bug was fixed with successful verification on hirsute, hence closing this
bug.
Status update: ->CLOSED
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-06 22:16 EDT---
Eigen v3.4 landed in U22.04, therefore we can close this bugzilla.
BZ Status change: ->CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Fix CPU-MF error on new IBM Z Hardware by adding support for CPU-MF
counter second version 7
Error Symptom: Daemon cpacfstatsd fails on start up of the system
with this error message
cpacfstatsd: Event DEA_FUNCTIONS for pmu cpum_cf
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959421/+attachment/5559325/+files/debdiff_libica_3.9.0_to_4.0.0.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-04 09:19 EDT---
Actually the customer problem is fixed by the second part of the patch.
(alloc_page can issue warnings, but dev_alloc_page does not).
Would it be a solution to only backport the second part?
Are there any conventions how to
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-03 03:44 EDT---
Here's the backported patch, based on
git://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/focal
===
Author: Julian Wiedmann
Date: Wed
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-02 07:03 EDT---
(In reply to comment #50)
> There was an issue with our builders yesterday,
> restarting the same build today worked again - package is now there (at the
> PPA).
>
> I did a quick test (since I had the env. still from the
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2022-02-02 03:21 EDT---
(In reply to comment #48)
> All autopkgtests for the newly accepted qemu (1:4.2-3ubuntu6.20) for focal
> have finished running.
> The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the
> package:
>
>
** Tags removed: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959421
Title:
[22.04 FEAT] Upgrade libica to latest version (crypto) (v4.0)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - D. Gary Chapman - 2022-01-26 12:43:25 ==
---Problem Description---
IBM IDAA customer exposes hypersocket page allocation failure on Ubuntu 20.04
based SSC
Contact Information = Gary Chapman (ch...@us.ibm.com)
---uname output---
5.4.0-73-generic
--- Comment From juergen.chr...@ibm.com 2022-01-24 06:22 EDT---
For the DES tests, you can simply skip them with openssl 3.0. The 3des-ecb for
some reason unknown to me needs an iv with openssl 3.0 just to ignore it. But
if it is not there, openssl 3.0 complains. I am in the process
--- Comment From fre...@de.ibm.com 2022-01-24 04:38 EDT---
Verified this with an update from the 'proposed' repository:
uname -a shows:
Linux a35lp66 5.4.0-97-generic #110-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 13 18:22:14 UTC 2022
s390x
s390x s390x GNU/Linux
and I can see the new sysfs attributes
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/1958419
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958419
Title:
[22.04 FEAT] [LDP2025] Upgrade openssl-ibmca to latest version
(crypto) (2.2.1)
--- Comment From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 23:16 EDT---
New patches attached. All patches were based on top of the code pointed out by
paelzer. Old patches were marked obsolete.
This series includes 9 patches, as opposed to the 8 from the previous
series. This is due to presence
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 23:00
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0009-s390x-pv-Fix-diag318-PV-fencing"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953338/+attachment/5556025/+files/0009-s390x-pv-Fix-diag318-PV-fencing.patch
--
You received this bug
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 23:00
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0007-s390-guest-support-for-diagnose-0x318"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953338/+attachment/5556023/+files/0007-s390-guest-support-for-diagnose-0x318.patch
--
You received
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 23:00
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0008-s390x-pv-Remove-sclp-boundary-checks"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953338/+attachment/5556024/+files/0008-s390x-pv-Remove-sclp-boundary-checks.patch
--
You received
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 22:59
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0006-s390-sclp-add-extended-length-sccb-support-for-kvm-g"
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 22:59
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0005-s390-sclp-use-cpu-offset-to-locate-cpu-entries"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953338/+attachment/5556021/+files/0005-s390-sclp-use-cpu-offset-to-locate-cpu-entries.patch
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 22:58
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0004-s390-sclp-check-sccb-len-before-filling-in-data"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953338/+attachment/5556018/+files/0004-s390-sclp-check-sccb-len-before-filling-in-data.patch
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 22:58
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0003-s390-sclp-read-sccb-from-mem-based-on-provided-lengt"
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 22:57
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0002-s390-sclp-rework-sclp-boundary-checks"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953338/+attachment/5556016/+files/0002-s390-sclp-rework-sclp-boundary-checks.patch
--
You received
--- Comment (attachment only) From collin.wall...@ibm.com 2022-01-20 22:56
EDT---
** Attachment added: "0001-s390-sclp-get-machine-once-during-read-scp-cpu-info"
201 - 300 of 14242 matches
Mail list logo
