--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-09 11:50 EDT---
Did another experiment and removed the IP assigned to both RoCE adapters vLans
using ip command and ran the netplan apply.
The issue was recreated only one of the vLans gets the ip assigned the
other one didn't.
--
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-09
11:34 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl vlan setup whit ip cmd"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5503581/+files/journalctl_ipcmd.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-09 11:37 EDT---
Adding another journalctl to trace the setup with ip command
I proceded to execute:
root@ilabg13:~# ip addr add 192.168.171.53/24 dev enP53p0s0.171
And that get the ip assigned:
root@ilabg13:~# ip a
1: lo: mtu
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-09
11:22 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl verbose"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5503579/+files/journalctl_verbose.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-09 11:27 EDT---
Attached the output of journalctl -o verbose
Also did some changes int he netplan config file and the result was the
same:
config file:
network:
version: 2
ethernets:
encdb0:
addresses:
- 11.111.114.213/22
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-09 05:41 EDT---
Hi Frank,
Do we know which component is supposed to set the IP address in Mario's case?
Probably netplan...?! It's debug log doesn't say anything about IP addresses
being set, which is unfortunate.
So here's a couple of
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-07 16:13 EDT---
Just executed netplan try and netplan apply and take snapshot of journalctl.
It is attached now!
- The configuration has not being touched for long time
- Correct is the only one presenting this problem
- Correct all
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-07
16:08 EDT---
** Attachment added: "joutnalctl"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5502963/+files/dump-of-journalctl.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-07 14:49 EDT---
Compressed and attached system.journal.
Frank,
I have other systems with similar configurations but not exactly the same. It
is another ubuntu host but Native linux installed in its own Lpar, and have
some other
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-07
14:39 EDT---
** Attachment added: "system.journal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5502962/+files/system.journal.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-07 13:56 EDT---
Could you provide a place to upload the system.journal file? it pass the limit
of 51200 KB
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From tuli...@br.ibm.com 2021-06-07 10:25 EDT---
> I think this affects pmdk (rather the Linux kernel).
Correct.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931063
Title:
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Lucas Alexandre Mello Magalhaes - 2021-06-04
14:06:47 ==
On PPC64LE there is an issue on librpmem check for RPMEM_RAW_BUFF_SIZE. This is
fixed upstream already. Please include the follow commits to include the fix.
652659830 rpmem: Fix RPMEM_RAW_BUFF_SIZE
--- Comment From juergen.chr...@ibm.com 2021-06-04 04:47 EDT---
Test successful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926960
Title:
OpenSSL 1.1.1g function EC_KEY_set_group()
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-01 13:57 EDT---
This is the actual configuration of HBA assigned to the Host:
root@ilabg13:~# znetconf -c
Device IDs TypeCard Type CHPID Drv. Name
State
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-01
13:30 EDT---
** Attachment added: "lshw"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5501728/+files/lshw.rtf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-01 09:37 EDT---
Here is a small test that doesn't require installing extra tools or building
code:
echo "r:bash_readline /bin/bash:0x$(nm -D /bin/bash | awk '/T readline$/ {print
$1}')" >/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
echo 1
** Tags removed: severity-high
** Tags added: severity-critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929923
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] LPAR becomes unresponsive after the Kernel panic -
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-28 05:09 EDT---
Please close this ticket. The problem only occurs in the testsuite not in the
production package... Many thanks
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-28 05:10 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla
Public bug reported:
--Problem Description---
Using an uretprobe in QEMU without hardware acceleration causes a SIGSEGV.
---uname output---
na
Machine Type = na
---Debugger---
A debugger is not configured
---Steps to Reproduce---
Run attach_probe eBPF testcase in QEMU.
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
kernel panic rq_qos_wake_function
---uname output---
Linux version 5.4.0-71-generic
Machine Type = s390x
---Debugger---
A debugger is not configured
Stack trace output:
May 15 20:21:04 data1 kernel: Call Trace:
May 15 20:21:04 data1 kernel:
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
===
IBM z15 with D41C Bundle S39a and z/VM 7.2.0 guest with crypto cards attached
OS: Ubuntu 20.04.2 (focal fossa) with 5.4.0-73-generic and libica 3.6.1
installed
Core dump when running the eddsa_test from libica
Details
===
The available
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "compressed eddsa core file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929921/+attachment/5500847/+files/eddsa.core.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Core dump lines from journal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929921/+attachment/5500848/+files/journalextract.log
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package changed: ubuntu =>
Public bug reported:
The OSA Device doesn't get enabled if a vlan is specified on the kernel
cmdline for the installer.
with the cmdline
`ip=10.1.8.74::10.1.10.1:255.255.252.0::enc800.300:none nameserver=10.1.9.101
vlan=enc800.300:enc800
--- Comment From juergen.chr...@ibm.com 2021-05-27 07:05 EDT---
Please backport
https://github.com/opencryptoki/openssl-ibmca/commit/40928425d848827fa8427d677e37178ab3b57e50
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
TigerVNC 1.11.0 contains a regression that causes vncviewer to display
incorrect colors when vncviewer and X11 server use different endianness (e.g.,
when using X11 forwarding via SSH between an x86-64 desktop and a Linux system
on s390x). The
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
Doing vLAN configuration one of the vLANs is not getting static IP assigned
when the rest are workin without problems
Contact Information = Mario Alvarado/mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com
---uname output---
Linux ilabg13.tuc.stglabs.ibm.com
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin18042
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828187
Title:
ibm,dynamic-memory property not found while loading
--- Comment From naynj...@ibm.com 2021-05-19 16:51 EDT---
(In reply to comment #28)
> @Nayna Jain @Daniel
>
> Hm but we have CONFIG_LOAD_PPC_KEYS=y already which I would expect to be
> the only thing that loads keys into .platform keyring which was enabled as
> part of
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-19 07:18 EDT---
IBM Response:
Yes. this makes sense. Previously Canonical reverted the "s390/cio: remove pm
support from ccw bus driver" patch because of the issue. Right solution is to
unrevert the revert-patch and add "s390/cio:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-19 02:22 EDT---
Also to be added to 3.16 (impish) . I missed that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928780
Title:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-19 02:18 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-18 06:27 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
The Opencryptoki Soft token does not check if an EC key is valid when an
EC key is created via C_CreateObject, nor when C_DeriveKey is used with
ECDH public data. This may allow one to perform Invalid Curve Attacks.
Fix:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-18 05:04 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926584
Title:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-18 04:19 EDT---
Verified also on groovy and hirsuite..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925452
Title:
[Ubuntu 21.04]
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2021-05-17 10:50 EDT---
I just did an "apt update && apt upgrade" on a KVM guest with Ubuntu 20.04 that
I had previously used installkernel on with an early version of your updated
script:
Setting up linux-image-5.4.0-73-generic (5.4.0-73.82) ...
--- Comment From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-17 10:30 EDT---
Verified successfully on 5.4.0-74, with adapter in eswitch mode and adapter
firmware 16.27.2008. Thank you!
alexschm@pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s21:~$ uname -a
Linux pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s21 5.4.0-74-generic #83 SMP Mon May 17 09:04:32
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-192677 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927076
Title:
IPv6 TCP in reuseport_bpf_cpu from
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-07 04:07 EDT---
@Canonical, will this topic be addressed at least with 21.10? Many thx
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-07 03:58 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by Hirsuit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926268
Title:
--- Comment From danie...@br.ibm.com 2021-05-03 15:45 EDT---
There is no intent from our end to keep pursuing this feature anymore.
A community bug was created in gitlab
(https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/160) to report all the work
done in this feature during this time. The
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-03 10:12 EDT---
@Canonical, any updates available here? Many thx in adbvance
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916485
Public bug reported:
Problem Description:
Loading and initializing the OpenSSL configuration twice causes ibmca to
prematurely destroy global data.
This then causes crashes in applications that do this. It might happen if an
application first initializes OpenSSls libcrypto and then libssl.
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2021-04-29 10:52 EDT---
(In reply to comment #41)
> Hm, I think I know what went wrong. In my local tree the new script is
> executable but that seems to get lost when going via debdiff. Right now it
> likely will start to work doing a "chmod a+x
>
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2021-04-29 04:39 EDT---
Redid the test on a freshly installed Focal + Proposed + "apt update && apt
upgrade". Still the same behavior:
root@t46lp77:~/testkernel# installkernel 5.12.0-07607-g8029c2a40054 bzImage
System.map /boot
run-parts:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-28 09:21 EDT---
Verified by IBM for focal and groovy...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921498
Title:
[Ubuntu 21.04]
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2021-04-28 06:44 EDT---
(In reply to comment #36)
> The second attempt seems to have been made without undoing the files and
> links created by the old setup. The cases to handle with that mix get rather
> hard to handle. So if possible I would
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2021-04-27 09:16 EDT---
I just tested the installkernel script on Ubuntu 20.04 + Focal Proposed
with linux-base 4.5ubuntu3.2.
I performed the following testing on a s390x z15 LPAR:
# 5.12.0-07600-g75079231a966.tar is a tar of the modules compiled
--- Comment From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-27 07:51 EDT---
Also verified on the groovy build
root@pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s21:~# uname -a
Linux pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s21 5.8.0-51-generic #57~lp1925452-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr
26 15:27:41 UTC 2021 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
--- Comment From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-27 04:52 EDT---
Verified successfully on focal, ping works fine in switchdev mode.
root@pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s21:~# uname -a
Linux pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s21 5.4.0-73-generic #82~lp1925452-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr
26 15:44:18 UTC 2021 s390x s390x s390x
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-26 08:55 EDT---
SRU Justification:
==
[Impact]
* In addition to 9c9be85f6b59 "net/mlx5e: Add missing capability check
for uplink follow" (handled in LP#1921104) another fix 1a73704c82ed "Fix
HW spec violation
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-04-23 01:50 EDT---
---snip---
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
@@ -1525,8 +1525,7 @@ static int io_subchannel_sch_event(struct subchannel
*sch, int process)
switch (action) {
case IO_SCH_ORPH_UNREG:
case
--- Comment (attachment only) From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 10:39
EDT---
** Attachment added: "backport fix for groovy"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925452/+attachment/5491037/+files/groovy-0001-net-mlx5-Fix-HW-spec-violation-configuring-uplink.patch
--
You received this
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 07:23 EDT---
Hi,
I've also run some tests on s390x:
On Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) with libseccomp2 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 and linux
4.15.0.142.129:
In a systemd-nspawn hirsute container:
bash -c "test -x /bin/bash"
returns 1 and strace shows:
--- Comment (attachment only) From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 05:25
EDT---
** Attachment added: "backport fix for focal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925452/+attachment/5490926/+files/focal-0001-net-mlx5-Fix-HW-spec-violation-configuring-uplink.patch
--
You received this
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 05:19 EDT---
Fix already available with kernel 5.11.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.11.y=d2a6cda95cb037191963ca5481547bda46943625
Mean only 20.10 and 20.04 are needed...
** Tags
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 05:16 EDT---
More info will follow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925452
Title:
[Ubuntu 21.04]: net/mlx5: Fix HW
Public bug reported:
With the 5.4.0-48 update for Ubuntu 20.04, the commit
"net/mlx5e: Modify uplink state on interface up/down"
was integrated which contains a regression for mlx5 adapters with older
adapter firmware.
This is the second bugfix to repair the regression, required to operate the
--- Comment From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-21 08:50 EDT---
I verified the fix successfully on 5.4.0-73.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921104
Title:
net/mlx5e: Add missing
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-21 04:09 EDT---
Canonical, what is the current status of this LP? Thx
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921870
Title:
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192463 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925211
Title:
Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2021-04-20 23:25 EDT---
Hi,
Yes, actually. I've asked Nayna if she can extend those patches to also
allow things to be loaded into .platform.
Kind regards,
Daniel
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-bionic
verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192453 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-20 02:40 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925030
Title:
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2110
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839493
Title:
[21.10] gnutls28 asm accelerated crypto
To manage
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905412
Title:
LVM install broken if other disks have meta-data on the
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-15 07:11 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-15 07:09 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-14 02:14 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905020
Title:
--- Comment From bw...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-12 03:34 EDT---
Both life-cycle tests from above complete successfully on both bionic and focal.
# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04
Codename: bionic
--- Comment From mhart...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-08 08:37 EDT---
@Christian: I've verified the fix works.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921468
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] KVM guest
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-08 06:20 EDT---
Already verified on groovy by IBM
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904419
Title:
Upgrade glibc 2.32 by
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-08 06:13 EDT---
Already verified on groovy by IBM
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906250
Title:
Segmentation fault in
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-07 02:05 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-01 06:47 EDT---
I've debugged the problem using a go binary + libs from an IBM Z fedora and run
it on a 20.10 x86 system.
Here is the original bug report I got. There the experimental cross
platform feature of Docker has been used.
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-01 03:22 EDT---
No, this service (file) was introduced only later last year by us. We figured
that we should have some way to collect data on KVM for service cases - very
handy! The other distros adopted this, too :)
You could move
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2021-03-31 10:31 EDT---
Hi,
> If the key is self-signed, shouldn't having the key in .builtin_trusted_keys
> allow for loading it into the IMA keyring? Or is that insufficient for some
> reason?
Yes, you could do that (I tried recently, in fact!),
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin1804
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2110
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838743
Title:
luajit - is (or could) s390x be supported?
To manage
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-03-31 02:13 EDT---
Tested on focal.
---
dpkg -l | grep s390-tools
ii s390-tools 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3
s390xfundamental utilities for Linux on z Systems
ii s390-tools-signed
Public bug reported:
Running the IBM Z go binary under qemu segfaults.
---uname output---
Linux 97f388a80d88 5.8.0-45-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19 13:24:51 UTC 2021
s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
---Steps to Reproduce---
qemu-s390x-static -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./ ./go
Userspace tool
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-30 10:59 EDT---
OK, would that be a consideration? The idea is to have a service that logs kvm
events in a round-robin manner. To do so, 2 things need to happen:
(1) install the unit file kvm_stat.service
(2) install a respective logrotate
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-30 09:10 EDT---
OK, that sounds good!
Related question: Do you install that unit file and make available the kvm
service in Ubuntu at all? If so, could you try to reboot with the service
enabled to verify that it does work as expected
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Patch to fix the issue"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921870/+attachment/5482319/+files/tools-kvm_stat-Add_restart-delay.patch
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package
Public bug reported:
Description: tools/kvm_stat: Add restart delay
Symptom: If the kvm service is enabled and the system rebooted,
Systemd's initial attempt to start the kvm unit file may
fail in case the kvm module is not loaded. However, once the
--- Comment From mhart...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-29 13:09 EDT---
(In reply to comment #22)
> This iso should do the trick "SLE-15-SP2-Full-s390x-GM-Media1.iso" to
> reproduce.
Yep exactly. Without the ISO it's harder to reproduce... Because then you have
to (AFAICR):
1. patch your zipl code
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-29 08:47 EDT---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Hi,
> I have tested this with:
> $ virt-install --name testinst1 --memory 2048 --disk
> path=/dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.151e --cdrom
> /var/lib/libvirt/images/ubuntu-18.04.5-server-s390x.iso
>
> But
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-29 08:04 EDT---
Looks like an updated version of "s390-tools-signed" with the same version
number than the normal s390-tools is needed for verification.
# sudo apt-get install s390-tools/focal-proposed
Reading package lists... Done
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-29 07:42 EDT---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Hi @Christan B. :-)
> With "rebuild of the bios image" I guess you meant:
> /usr/share/qemu/s390-ccw.img
> /usr/share/qemu/s390-netboot.img
> Those are built from the same source, so fixing and
Public bug reported:
Description: s390/vtime: fix increased steal time accounting
Symptom: Increased steal time values.
Problem: Commit 152e9b8676c6e ("s390/vtime: steal time exponential
moving average") inadvertently changed the input value for
--- Comment From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-26 06:23 EDT---
Additions for the Impact statement:
[Impact]
* Since older firmware may not support the uplink state setting, this can lead
to problems.
* Now expose firmware indication that it supports setting eswitch uplink state
to follow
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-26 05:16 EDT---
SRU Justification:
[Impact]
* Since older firmware may not support the uplink state setting, this can lead
to problems.
* Now expose firmware indication that it supports setting eswitch uplink state
to follow the
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-26 04:38 EDT---
Just to avoid any bad surprise, these patches require a rebuild of the bios
image so the binary must also be updated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
A KVM guest fails to find the zipl boot menu index if the "zIPL" magic value is
listed at the end of a disk block.
---System Hang---
System sits in disabled wait, last console display
LOADPARM=[]
Using virtio-blk.
Using ECKD scheme (block
--- Comment From alexs...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-25 04:24 EDT---
I tested Frank's build successfully.
Using adapter firmware 16.27.2008.
BAD TEST
=
root@pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s01:~# uname -a
Linux pok1-qz1-sr1-rk011-s01 5.4.0-67-generic #75-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19
18:00:48
--- Comment (attachment only) From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-24
07:21 EDT---
** Attachment added: "net/mlx5e: Add missing capability check for uplink follow"
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-24 07:23 EDT---
Expose firmware indication that it supports setting eswitch uplink state
to follow (follow the physical link). Condition setting the eswitch
uplink admin-state with this capability bit. Older FW may not support
the
Public bug reported:
x
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
Status: New
** Tags: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192185 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2004
** Tags added: architecture-s39064
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] udev rule change did not get applied
To manage notifications about this bug
501 - 600 of 14241 matches
Mail list logo
