Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "This is a debdiff for the Focal SRU"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905393/+attachment/5443865/+files/skiboot_6.5.2-1_6.5.2-1ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "This is a debdiff for the Groovy SRU"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905393/+attachment/5443864/+files/skiboot_6.5.2-1_6.5.2-1ubuntu0.20.10.1.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907265
Title:
[UBUNTU 21.04] s390/pci: vfio-pci mmio being disabled
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-15 08:28 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed. Fix Released for all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854148
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-12-14 19:40 EDT---
Hi,
Thanks for your patience.
I tested 5.10.0-8-generic. /boot/config-5.10.0-8-generic contains:
# CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST is not set
It boots fine in a P9 kvm guest, both when loaded by kexec and when
loaded by grub. There
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-14 06:24 EDT---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Excellent.
>
> Finally Can you verify the latest update for bionic and xenial on this ppa.
> Once confirmed we should be able to formally release everything
Looks good.
>
> Also in preparation for
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-14 06:20 EDT---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 146860 [details]
> skiboot_6.6.2-1_6.6.2-1ubuntu1.diff
>
> default comment
Looks good.
-Vasant
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 10:43 EDT---
It has nothing to do with a performance improvement. It's just broken. Thus
your Ubuntu 20.10 has a regression compared to Ubuntu 20.04! The issues were
reported via glibc-upstream bugzillas:
- "Bug 26636 - 32-bit shmctl(IPC_INFO)
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:37 EDT---
Hi Dimitri, now I understood.
As mentioned in LP1876715 (LTC 185713) in my last recent comments, the naming
problem is fixed with zfcpdump-kernel 5.4-0ubuntu1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1877089 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877089
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:34 EDT---
Version of zfcpdump-kernel is 5.4-0ubuntu1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:37 EDT---
Yes you are right, in this case send_dg() from glibc is not invoked.
Thus from my side, you can exclude commit "resolv: Handle transaction ID
collisions in parallel queries (bug 26600)" for groovy.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-11 00:22 EDT---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Excellent, Can you also validate the solution for groovy and focal from this
> ppa?
Looks good.
-Vasant
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-11 00:22 EDT---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Excellent, Can you also validate the solution for groovy and focal from this
> ppa?
Looks good.
-Vasant
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 13:43 EDT---
I updated to
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=3_text=zfcpdump-kernel
as of focal-proposed.
Then I zipled the SCSI dump LUN:
root@t35lp25:~# zipl -d
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1877089 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877089
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 13:33 EDT---
Still not fixed with focal updates as of 2020-12-10.
Then I updated to
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 10:23 EDT---
The sysvipc related bugs were introduced with glibc 2.32 and are fixed upstream
and will be included in upcoming glibc 2.33 release. In addition those commits
were also cherry-picked to the release/2.32/master branch. Therefore no
--- Comment From mjros...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-10 10:05 EDT---
(In reply to comment #10)
> This is in qemu 5.2 which I'm already working on for hirsute.
> So -devel should be fixed soon (althrough testing on 5.2 will consume a few
> days).
>
> Three questions for the following SRU as this
--- Comment (attachment only) From mjros...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-10 10:07
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Sample Guest XML"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907656/+attachment/5442524/+files/kexec-test.xml
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2020-12-10 08:39 EDT---
Unfortunately .defval="1" functionality doesnt work for this case.
Instead, what we do is, we modify the root_check() function in root.c,such a
way that, the required functionality of zdev:early=1 is enabled by default,
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-12-10 08:44 EDT---
Hi,
We've had some good progress with debugging upstream:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201209202732.5896-1-ure...@gmail.com/t/#u
fixes the issue properly.
Would you prefer to take that and leave the config unchanged? It'll
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-26 04:03 EDT---
Verified successfully on 18.04.5 LTS:
# pkcsep11_migrate -slot 4 -adapter 16 -domain 76
Using slot #4...
Enter the USER PIN:
Card ID 0x10, domain ID 76 has committed pending(next) WK
going to reencrpyt key 0 with blob len 240:
Public bug reported:
Description: s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Reset PCI devices during subsystem reset
Symptom: PCI devices are unavailable after a subsystem reset
Problem: When a subsystem reset event occurs (e.g. via kexec) PCI
devices are not being reset and are
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 04:58 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903817
Title:
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-10 02:01 EDT---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Hello,
> I've uploaded a new version of skiboot for hirsute to this ppa
> ppa:mclemenceau/distro-work
> Can you confirm this resolve the issue on this LP and I'll start release
> process for hirsute
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-10 01:17 EDT---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hello,
> I've uploaded a new version of skiboot for hirsute to this ppa
> ppa:mclemenceau/distro-work
> Can you confirm this resolve the issue on this LP and I'll start release
> process for hirsute
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-09 08:56 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892824
Title:
--- Comment From ar...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-09 08:09 EDT---
The Valgrind z14 support is upstream now:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commit;h=159f132289160ab1a5a5cf4da14fb57ecdb248ca
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Description: vfio: pass DMA availability information to userspace
Symptom: vfio-pci device on s390 enters error state
Problem: Commit 492855939bdb added a limit to the number of concurrent
DMA requests for a vfio container. However, lazy
--- Comment From mjros...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-08 17:39 EDT---
Thanks! I tested the provided focal build and was able to verify that it
resolves the issue.
Re: groovy -- Sorry, my mistake I was not looking at the latest versions
of groovy/focal when listing which patches needed
Public bug reported:
Description: s390/pci: vfio-pci mmio being disabled erroneously
Symptom: PCI virtual functions passed through via vfio-pci are unusable
Problem: The fix for CVE-2020-12888 'abafbc551fdd vfio-pci: Invalidate
mmaps and block MMIO access on
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-07 05:17 EDT---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Could someone try to put the attached script into /etc/kernel/postinst.d and
> let me know whether that make installkernel work? Thanks.
I can confirm this works with installkernel and the
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-12-03 11:51 EDT---
There is not a mechanism to give direct access to this systems, we understand
that this makes thing much more difficult but is another method of debug that
we could use? like forcing a crash dump?
--
You received
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-12-02 12:13 EDT---
is it any update about this? We still have the issue, is there anything else
that we could do to help this keep moving?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-02 08:27 EDT---
Verified
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884
Title:
s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-02 03:32 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865032
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-02 03:36 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released by Canonical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902254
Title:
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 23:08 EDT---
No worries, let me know if you'd like me to test another spin.
We continue to look into the issue upstream: https://lore.kernel.org
/linuxppc-dev/87eekfh80a@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net/
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From pr...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 12:25 EDT---
verified on bionic (zipl 2.3.0-build-20201124)and xenial (zipl
1.34.0-build-20201124)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-01 08:05 EDT---
(In reply to comment #74)
> @Jason, seems to be some build failures. Can you please have a look.
It looks like there are two versions of this patch applied:
[PATCH] s390-tools: zipl: Fix NVMe partition and base device detection
--- Comment From geral...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 09:14 EDT---
Verified
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884
Title:
s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading from
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 08:55 EDT---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Well, that's a pity, because it means that a manual kernel SRU is needed now.
> It's needed to make sure that someone who has the fix in focal and upgrades
> to groovy will not run into a
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 06:51 EDT---
Ahh, got it 5.8 stable is already EOL according to https://www.kernel.org/
By the way, is the plan for 21.04 LTS still to go with v5.11,
seeing as Greg announced that v5.10 will be the next long term
stable kernel, picking
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 06:43 EDT---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Hi Niklas,
> I found the ticket upstream accepted with hash 0b2ca2c7d0c9
> and the provenance in 'git show 0b2ca2c7d0c9' mentions:
> Cc: # 5.8
> So I'm expecting that in 5.8 (rather than in 5.9)
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 05:26 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867118
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 05:27 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896216
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "lvm.conf file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906384/+attachment/5439973/+files/lvm.conf.1120
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)
--
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "console-log during boot"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906384/+attachment/5439972/+files/isvcl1-cons2.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
boot failure with LVM root disk
---uname output---
4.15.0-91-generic #92-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 28 11:07:52 UTC 2020 s390x s390x s390x
GNU/Linux
Machine Type = 8561 LT1
---System Hang---
Boot failure with LVM root disk and enter emergency shell
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:45 EDT---
@Frank Heinz-Werner said you had trouble finding the upstream stable commit for
this.
The original upstream commit is
0b2ca2c7d0c9e2731d01b6c862375d44a7e13923 s390/pci: fix hot-plug of PCI
function missing bus
This was
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:29 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested Distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896726
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:31 EDT---
IBM Buzgilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899582
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-30 07:50 EDT---
For addl. info only:
https://linux-on-z.blogspot.com/2020/11/new-release-qclib-v221.html
https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/qclib.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-30 07:41 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released by Canonical
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2010
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Tags added: architecture-s3903164 bugnameltc-190018 severity-low
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904899
Title:
pixel color access delivers wrong data on
Public bug reported:
commit 0b0ed657fe ("s390: remove critical section cleanup from entry.S")
introduced a problem where FPU registers were not properly restored when
entering SIE. This leads to crashes of applications runnning inside kvm,
as most of the programs in use nowdays are using FPU
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
On a x86_64 machine with Ubuntu 20.04, running a s390x (or ppc64) binary with
qemu leads to a segmentation fault in ld.so while lookup in /etc/ld.so.cache.
Contact Information = via bugzilla
---uname output---
Linux 5.4.0-54-generic
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 21:40 EDT---
Ok, so sadly I cannot find a tarball with the patches not already applied,
which is very frustrating. However, it turns out I don't need that because, as
it turns out...
Doing an upstream checkout of v5.10-rc4 and building
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 06:47 EDT---
Hi,
Thanks, I'll look at sources tarball, hopefully tomorrow. (I'm in AU, so
no thanksgiving here!)
Have you tested this on any of your local systems? I can't get it to
work much on P9, even on stock hardware/qemu without
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 00:34 EDT---
Hi,
Looks like it fails to boot on a p9 qemu/kvm guest even out of grub:
hangs trying to bring up SMP. That's probably what we saw in bare-metal
too, the console probably just didn't catch up.
I will continue investigating,
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - VASANT HEGDE - 2020-11-23 23:23:22 ==
---Problem Description---
opal-prd fails to start on 20.04
Contact Information = Vasant hegde
---uname output---
Ubuntu 20.04
Machine Type = All Power System
---Steps to Reproduce---
opal-prd fails to start on
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-24 02:07 EDT---
Hi,
Ok, I have been experimenting with the hirsute kernel: 5.10.0-4-generic
#5-Ubuntu
It boots without issue on a pseries guest with secure boot both on and
off. However, this doesn't exercise booting out of kexec.
Booting
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-23 11:20 EDT---
The attached patch applies cleanly to binutils-2_30 tag and
binutils_2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.4ubuntu1.
** Attachment added: "for 18.04"
--- Comment From tuan.hoa...@ibm.com 2020-11-23 06:18 EDT---
Hello,
I tested the latest kernel 5.4.0.55.58 (#61) in 'proposed-focal' and it
seems to work just fine.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From stefan.schulze.frielingh...@ibm.com 2020-11-20 10:37
EDT---
The problem boils down to a buffer overflow. Consider the following code
snippet from file pair_dist.c
int iChunkStarts[iNumberOfThreads];
int iChunkEnds[iNumberOfThreads];
// ...
for(iChunk = 0; iChunk <=
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884/+attachment/5436363/+files/mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884/+attachment/5436362/+files/mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
--- Comment From geral...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-20 09:50 EDT---
(In reply to comment #14)
> suggested bionic backport for /mm/page_idle.c
Hmm, not sure if I read this diff correcty, but it seems to remove
struct zone and spinlock, which would not be right, and introduce a new
bug.
The
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-19 20:25 EDT---
Hi,
I think that's the only feature patch required. There's not a lot
because at this stage it's all based on static keys. So unlike the
OpenPower secure boot, there's no code to interact with keys stored in
firmware.
There
Public bug reported:
Canonical requests to test the secure boot for the 5.10 kernel but
kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled.
The 5.10 kernel can be found in:
https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap
They can be installed by installing the
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 10:17 EDT---
Reduced importance from "ship issue" to "high", not a real ship issue, but is
mandatory to be fixed within the service stream
** Tags removed: severity-critical
** Tags added: severity-high
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
System hangs on dbginfo.sh script execution.
Solution:
Commit 92fb1db26eef ("mm/page_idle.c: skip offline pages")
Included upstream since kernel v5.8, so it is already included in Ubuntu
20.10, but not in 20.04 and earlier.
Commit 92fb1db26eef ("mm/page_idle.c: skip
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:27 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with H
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887806
Title:
[21.04
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:25 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with H
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887920
Title:
[21.04
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:24 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with H
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902047
Title:
[21.04
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:24 EDT---
IBM Buzgilla status-> closed, Fix Released with H
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902865
Title:
[21.04
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 09:38 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released for all requested distros..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:48 EDT---
After investigation , not required for bionic...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859018
Title:
[UBUNTU
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:42 EDT---
Ok, let me see if I can port tests as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903814
Title:
[binutils] Prevent GOT
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:36 EDT---
@xnox, sorry, I didn't quite get your comment - do you need some info about
gzip from us?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:01 EDT---
IBM Buzgilla status-> closed, Fix released for all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 07:03 EDT---
After internal discussion, this feature is not required for bionic..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:21
EDT---
** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0003 of 0003 for focal-proposed"
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:21
EDT---
** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0002 of 0003 for focal-proposed"
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:20
EDT---
** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0001 of 0003 for focal-proposed"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179/+attachment/5435246/+files/0001-zipl-Support-nvme-devices.patch
--
You received
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:23 EDT---
I've attached the three backported s390-tools patches for focal-proposed. They
received a basic compile test and a very quick "it runs" sanity check.
If we need more testing at this stage, let me know and I'll see about
getting
--- Comment From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 11:58 EDT---
Verified for focal and groovy:
20.04:
waiki@ltc-wspoon3:~/DI/code/boot$ ~/mpe.py vmlinux-5.4.0-55-generic
System.map-5.4.0-55-generic
stvx found using register r28:
c002cbfc: ce e1 00 7c stvxv0,0,r28
addi
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-17 09:58 EDT---
(In reply to comment #16)
> This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the
> problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the
> problem is solved, change the tag
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin18045
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904585
Title:
opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining
Public bug reported:
--Problem Description---
https://github.com/open-
power/skiboot/commit/8cbd0de88d162e387f11569eee1bdecef8fad2e3
opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining
The memory_error() hservice interface expects the memory_error() call to
just accept the offline request
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179
Title:
[20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL
To manage notifications
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179
Title:
[20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL
To manage notifications
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179
Title:
[20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL
To manage
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-17 02:52 EDT---
affects 2.32, hence SRU to G requested, yes
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2004
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2010
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-16 14:19 EDT---
(In reply to comment #60)
> Hi Jan, yes (almost) all Ubuntu packages are hosted nowadays at our
> Launchpad git (at least all packages in main, incl. s390-tools).
> Please see: https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools
--- Comment From jan.hoepp...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-16 11:16 EDT---
Canonical,
are there public s390-tools repositories with the Ubuntu versions available
that we can mirror internally and which we could then use for potential
backport work (such as this feature seems to require)?
Please
Public bug reported:
The current libc6-2.32-0ubuntu3 package lacks some of the upstream glibc
commits on the "release/2.32/master" branch (see
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/2.32/master).
Does Ubuntu automatically pick the commits from this release branch?
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-16 06:50 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882502
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 06:58 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902874
Title:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 06:57 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902870
Title:
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 04:03 EDT---
This is a setup without crypto cards (Secure Execution guests don't support
passthrough yet). I think that we can live with the new kdump default settings,
as I wouldn't want to suggest putting half of the memory away for kdump
801 - 900 of 14242 matches
Mail list logo