[Bug 1905393] This is a debdiff for the Focal SRU

2020-12-15 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "This is a debdiff for the Focal SRU" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905393/+attachment/5443865/+files/skiboot_6.5.2-1_6.5.2-1ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1905393] This is a debdiff for the Groovy SRU

2020-12-15 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "This is a debdiff for the Groovy SRU" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905393/+attachment/5443864/+files/skiboot_6.5.2-1_6.5.2-1ubuntu0.20.10.1.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1907265] Re: [UBUNTU 21.04] s390/pci: vfio-pci mmio being disabled erroneously

2020-12-15 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2104 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907265 Title: [UBUNTU 21.04] s390/pci: vfio-pci mmio being disabled

[Bug 1854148] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-15 08:28 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed. Fix Released for all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854148

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-12-14 19:40 EDT--- Hi, Thanks for your patience. I tested 5.10.0-8-generic. /boot/config-5.10.0-8-generic contains: # CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST is not set It boots fine in a P9 kvm guest, both when loaded by kexec and when loaded by grub. There

[Bug 1904585] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-14 06:24 EDT--- (In reply to comment #11) > Excellent. > > Finally Can you verify the latest update for bionic and xenial on this ppa. > Once confirmed we should be able to formally release everything Looks good. > > Also in preparation for

[Bug 1905393] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-14 06:20 EDT--- (In reply to comment #10) > Created attachment 146860 [details] > skiboot_6.6.2-1_6.6.2-1ubuntu1.diff > > default comment Looks good. -Vasant -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1904419] Re: Upgrade glibc 2.32 by required upstream patches

2020-12-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 10:43 EDT--- It has nothing to do with a performance improvement. It's just broken. Thus your Ubuntu 20.10 has a regression compared to Ubuntu 20.04! The issues were reported via glibc-upstream bugzillas: - "Bug 26636 - 32-bit shmctl(IPC_INFO)

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:37 EDT--- Hi Dimitri, now I understood. As mentioned in LP1876715 (LTC 185713) in my last recent comments, the naming problem is fixed with zfcpdump-kernel 5.4-0ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1876715] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-11 Thread bugproxy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1877089 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877089 --- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:34 EDT--- Version of zfcpdump-kernel is 5.4-0ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1904419] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:37 EDT--- Yes you are right, in this case send_dg() from glibc is not invoked. Thus from my side, you can exclude commit "resolv: Handle transaction ID collisions in parallel queries (bug 26600)" for groovy. Thanks. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1904585] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-11 00:22 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) > Excellent, Can you also validate the solution for groovy and focal from this > ppa? Looks good. -Vasant -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1905393] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-11 00:22 EDT--- (In reply to comment #7) > Excellent, Can you also validate the solution for groovy and focal from this > ppa? Looks good. -Vasant -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 13:43 EDT--- I updated to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=3_text=zfcpdump-kernel as of focal-proposed. Then I zipled the SCSI dump LUN: root@t35lp25:~# zipl -d

[Bug 1876715] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1877089 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877089 --- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 13:33 EDT--- Still not fixed with focal updates as of 2020-12-10. Then I updated to

[Bug 1904419] Re: Upgrade glibc 2.32 by required upstream patches

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 10:23 EDT--- The sysvipc related bugs were introduced with glibc 2.32 and are fixed upstream and will be included in upcoming glibc 2.33 release. In addition those commits were also cherry-picked to the release/2.32/master branch. Therefore no

[Bug 1907656] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mjros...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-10 10:05 EDT--- (In reply to comment #10) > This is in qemu 5.2 which I'm already working on for hirsute. > So -devel should be fixed soon (althrough testing on 5.2 will consume a few > days). > > Three questions for the following SRU as this

[Bug 1907656] Sample Guest XML

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mjros...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-10 10:07 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "Sample Guest XML" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907656/+attachment/5442524/+files/kexec-test.xml -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1892367] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2020-12-10 08:39 EDT--- Unfortunately .defval="1" functionality doesnt work for this case. Instead, what we do is, we modify the root_check() function in root.c,such a way that, the required functionality of zdev:early=1 is enabled by default,

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-12-10 08:44 EDT--- Hi, We've had some good progress with debugging upstream: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201209202732.5896-1-ure...@gmail.com/t/#u fixes the issue properly. Would you prefer to take that and leave the config unchanged? It'll

[Bug 1854148] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-26 04:03 EDT--- Verified successfully on 18.04.5 LTS: # pkcsep11_migrate -slot 4 -adapter 16 -domain 76 Using slot #4... Enter the USER PIN: Card ID 0x10, domain ID 76 has committed pending(next) WK going to reencrpyt key 0 with blob len 240:

[Bug 1907656] [NEW] [UBUNTU 21.04] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Reset PCI devices during subsystem reset

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Description: s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Reset PCI devices during subsystem reset Symptom: PCI devices are unavailable after a subsystem reset Problem: When a subsystem reset event occurs (e.g. via kexec) PCI devices are not being reset and are

[Bug 1903817] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 04:58 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903817 Title:

[Bug 1904585] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-10 02:01 EDT--- (In reply to comment #7) > Hello, > I've uploaded a new version of skiboot for hirsute to this ppa > ppa:mclemenceau/distro-work > Can you confirm this resolve the issue on this LP and I'll start release > process for hirsute

[Bug 1905393] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-12-10 01:17 EDT--- (In reply to comment #5) > Hello, > I've uploaded a new version of skiboot for hirsute to this ppa > ppa:mclemenceau/distro-work > Can you confirm this resolve the issue on this LP and I'll start release > process for hirsute

[Bug 1892824] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-09 08:56 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892824 Title:

[Bug 1825343] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From ar...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-09 08:09 EDT--- The Valgrind z14 support is upstream now: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commit;h=159f132289160ab1a5a5cf4da14fb57ecdb248ca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1907421] [NEW] [UBUNTU 21.04] vfio: pass DMA availability information to userspace

2020-12-09 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Description: vfio: pass DMA availability information to userspace Symptom: vfio-pci device on s390 enters error state Problem: Commit 492855939bdb added a limit to the number of concurrent DMA requests for a vfio container. However, lazy

[Bug 1907265] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mjros...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-08 17:39 EDT--- Thanks! I tested the provided focal build and was able to verify that it resolves the issue. Re: groovy -- Sorry, my mistake I was not looking at the latest versions of groovy/focal when listing which patches needed

[Bug 1907265] [NEW] [UBUNTU 21.04] s390/pci: vfio-pci mmio being disabled erroneously

2020-12-08 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Description: s390/pci: vfio-pci mmio being disabled erroneously Symptom: PCI virtual functions passed through via vfio-pci are unusable Problem: The fix for CVE-2020-12888 'abafbc551fdd vfio-pci: Invalidate mmaps and block MMIO access on

[Bug 1877088] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-07 05:17 EDT--- (In reply to comment #23) > Could someone try to put the attached script into /etc/kernel/postinst.d and > let me know whether that make installkernel work? Thanks. I can confirm this works with installkernel and the

[Bug 1896575] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-12-03 11:51 EDT--- There is not a mechanism to give direct access to this systems, we understand that this makes thing much more difficult but is another method of debug that we could use? like forcing a crash dump? -- You received

[Bug 1896575] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-12-02 12:13 EDT--- is it any update about this? We still have the issue, is there anything else that we could do to help this keep moving? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1904884] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-02 08:27 EDT--- Verified -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884 Title: s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading

[Bug 1865032] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-02 03:32 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865032

[Bug 1902254] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-02 03:36 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released by Canonical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902254 Title:

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 23:08 EDT--- No worries, let me know if you'd like me to test another spin. We continue to look into the issue upstream: https://lore.kernel.org /linuxppc-dev/87eekfh80a@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net/ -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1865032] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pr...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 12:25 EDT--- verified on bionic (zipl 2.3.0-build-20201124)and xenial (zipl 1.34.0-build-20201124) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-12-01 08:05 EDT--- (In reply to comment #74) > @Jason, seems to be some build failures. Can you please have a look. It looks like there are two versions of this patch applied: [PATCH] s390-tools: zipl: Fix NVMe partition and base device detection

[Bug 1904884] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From geral...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 09:14 EDT--- Verified -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884 Title: s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading from

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 08:55 EDT--- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, that's a pity, because it means that a manual kernel SRU is needed now. > It's needed to make sure that someone who has the fix in focal and upgrades > to groovy will not run into a

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 06:51 EDT--- Ahh, got it 5.8 stable is already EOL according to https://www.kernel.org/ By the way, is the plan for 21.04 LTS still to go with v5.11, seeing as Greg announced that v5.10 will be the next long term stable kernel, picking

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 06:43 EDT--- (In reply to comment #16) > Hi Niklas, > I found the ticket upstream accepted with hash 0b2ca2c7d0c9 > and the provenance in 'git show 0b2ca2c7d0c9' mentions: > Cc: # 5.8 > So I'm expecting that in 5.8 (rather than in 5.9)

[Bug 1867118] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 05:26 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867118

[Bug 1896216] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 05:27 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896216

[Bug 1906384] lvm.conf file

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "lvm.conf file" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906384/+attachment/5439973/+files/lvm.conf.1120 ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) ** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) --

[Bug 1906384] console-log during boot

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "console-log during boot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906384/+attachment/5439972/+files/isvcl1-cons2.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1906384] [NEW] [UBUNTU 18.04] lvm boot failure

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: ---Problem Description--- boot failure with LVM root disk ---uname output--- 4.15.0-91-generic #92-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 28 11:07:52 UTC 2020 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux Machine Type = 8561 LT1 ---System Hang--- Boot failure with LVM root disk and enter emergency shell

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:45 EDT--- @Frank Heinz-Werner said you had trouble finding the upstream stable commit for this. The original upstream commit is 0b2ca2c7d0c9e2731d01b6c862375d44a7e13923 s390/pci: fix hot-plug of PCI function missing bus This was

[Bug 1896726] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:29 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested Distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896726

[Bug 1899582] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:31 EDT--- IBM Buzgilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899582

[Bug 1902870] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-30 07:50 EDT--- For addl. info only: https://linux-on-z.blogspot.com/2020/11/new-release-qclib-v221.html https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/qclib. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1904899] Re: pixel color access delivers wrong data on s390x (e.g., tests/color_test.py)

2020-11-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-30 07:41 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released by Canonical ** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2010 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1904899] Re: pixel color access delivers wrong data on s390x (e.g., tests/color_test.py)

2020-11-30 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s3903164 bugnameltc-190018 severity-low targetmilestone-inin--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904899 Title: pixel color access delivers wrong data on

[Bug 1906255] [NEW] [UBUNTU 20.10] Applications runing in QEMU/KVM get translation faults

2020-11-30 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: commit 0b0ed657fe ("s390: remove critical section cleanup from entry.S") introduced a problem where FPU registers were not properly restored when entering SIE. This leads to crashes of applications runnning inside kvm, as most of the programs in use nowdays are using FPU

[Bug 1906250] [NEW] Segmentation fault in s390x ld.so while parsing /etc/ld.so.cache using qemu-s390x on x86_64.

2020-11-30 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: ---Problem Description--- On a x86_64 machine with Ubuntu 20.04, running a s390x (or ppc64) binary with qemu leads to a segmentation fault in ld.so while lookup in /etc/ld.so.cache. Contact Information = via bugzilla ---uname output--- Linux 5.4.0-54-generic

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 21:40 EDT--- Ok, so sadly I cannot find a tarball with the patches not already applied, which is very frustrating. However, it turns out I don't need that because, as it turns out... Doing an upstream checkout of v5.10-rc4 and building

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 06:47 EDT--- Hi, Thanks, I'll look at sources tarball, hopefully tomorrow. (I'm in AU, so no thanksgiving here!) Have you tested this on any of your local systems? I can't get it to work much on P9, even on stock hardware/qemu without

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-25 00:34 EDT--- Hi, Looks like it fails to boot on a p9 qemu/kvm guest even out of grub: hangs trying to bring up SMP. That's probably what we saw in bare-metal too, the console probably just didn't catch up. I will continue investigating,

[Bug 1905393] [NEW] Ubuntu 20.04: opal-prd fails to start on 20.04

2020-11-24 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: == Comment: #0 - VASANT HEGDE - 2020-11-23 23:23:22 == ---Problem Description--- opal-prd fails to start on 20.04 Contact Information = Vasant hegde ---uname output--- Ubuntu 20.04 Machine Type = All Power System ---Steps to Reproduce--- opal-prd fails to start on

[Bug 1904906] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-24 02:07 EDT--- Hi, Ok, I have been experimenting with the hirsute kernel: 5.10.0-4-generic #5-Ubuntu It boots without issue on a pseries guest with secure boot both on and off. However, this doesn't exercise booting out of kexec. Booting

[Bug 1903814] for 18.04

2020-11-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-23 11:20 EDT--- The attached patch applies cleanly to binutils-2_30 tag and binutils_2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.4ubuntu1. ** Attachment added: "for 18.04"

[Bug 1899582] Re: ceph: fix inode number handling on arches with 32-bit ino_t

2020-11-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From tuan.hoa...@ibm.com 2020-11-23 06:18 EDT--- Hello, I tested the latest kernel 5.4.0.55.58 (#61) in 'proposed-focal' and it seems to work just fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1903817] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From stefan.schulze.frielingh...@ibm.com 2020-11-20 10:37 EDT--- The problem boils down to a buffer overflow. Consider the following code snippet from file pair_dist.c int iChunkStarts[iNumberOfThreads]; int iChunkEnds[iNumberOfThreads]; // ... for(iChunk = 0; iChunk <=

[Bug 1904884] mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884/+attachment/5436363/+files/mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1904884] mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904884/+attachment/5436362/+files/mm_page_idle.c_skip_offline_pages-backport.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1904884] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From geral...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-20 09:50 EDT--- (In reply to comment #14) > suggested bionic backport for /mm/page_idle.c Hmm, not sure if I read this diff correcty, but it seems to remove struct zone and spinlock, which would not be right, and introduce a new bug. The

[Bug 1903288] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-19 20:25 EDT--- Hi, I think that's the only feature patch required. There's not a lot because at this stage it's all based on static keys. So unlike the OpenPower secure boot, there's no code to interact with keys stored in firmware. There

[Bug 1904906] [NEW] 5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: Canonical requests to test the secure boot for the 5.10 kernel but kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled. The 5.10 kernel can be found in: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap They can be installed by installing the

[Bug 1904884] Re: [UBUNUT 20.04] s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading from /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 10:17 EDT--- Reduced importance from "ship issue" to "high", not a real ship issue, but is mandatory to be fixed within the service stream ** Tags removed: severity-critical ** Tags added: severity-high -- You received this bug

[Bug 1904884] [NEW] [UBUNUT 20.04] s390: dbginfo.sh triggers kernel panic, reading from /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: System hangs on dbginfo.sh script execution. Solution: Commit 92fb1db26eef ("mm/page_idle.c: skip offline pages") Included upstream since kernel v5.8, so it is already included in Ubuntu 20.10, but not in 20.04 and earlier. Commit 92fb1db26eef ("mm/page_idle.c: skip

[Bug 1887806] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:27 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887806 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1887920] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:25 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887920 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1902047] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:24 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902047 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1902865] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-19 08:24 EDT--- IBM Buzgilla status-> closed, Fix Released with H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902865 Title: [21.04

[Bug 1859018] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 09:38 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released for all requested distros.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1859018] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:48 EDT--- After investigation , not required for bionic... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859018 Title: [UBUNTU

[Bug 1903814] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:42 EDT--- Ok, let me see if I can port tests as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903814 Title: [binutils] Prevent GOT

[Bug 1884514] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:36 EDT--- @xnox, sorry, I didn't quite get your comment - do you need some info about gzip from us? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1860574] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:01 EDT--- IBM Buzgilla status-> closed, Fix released for all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1860574] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 07:03 EDT--- After internal discussion, this feature is not required for bionic.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1902179] nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0003 of 0003 for focal-proposed

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:21 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0003 of 0003 for focal-proposed"

[Bug 1902179] nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0002 of 0003 for focal-proposed

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:21 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0002 of 0003 for focal-proposed"

[Bug 1902179] nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0001 of 0003 for focal-proposed

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:20 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "nvme-ipl s390-tools patch 0001 of 0003 for focal-proposed" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179/+attachment/5435246/+files/0001-zipl-Support-nvme-devices.patch -- You received

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 16:23 EDT--- I've attached the three backported s390-tools patches for focal-proposed. They received a basic compile test and a very quick "it runs" sanity check. If we need more testing at this stage, let me know and I'll see about getting

[Bug 1902694] Re: Undetected Data corruption in MPI workloads that use VSX for reductions on POWER9 DD2.1 systems

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-17 11:58 EDT--- Verified for focal and groovy: 20.04: waiki@ltc-wspoon3:~/DI/code/boot$ ~/mpe.py vmlinux-5.4.0-55-generic System.map-5.4.0-55-generic stvx found using register r28: c002cbfc: ce e1 00 7c stvxv0,0,r28 addi

[Bug 1896216] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-17 09:58 EDT--- (In reply to comment #16) > This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the > problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the > problem is solved, change the tag

[Bug 1904585] Re: opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining (Fixes "PlatServices: dyndealloc memory_error() failed" is getting reported in error log (opal-prd))

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin18045 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904585 Title: opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining

[Bug 1904585] [NEW] opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining (Fixes "PlatServices: dyndealloc memory_error() failed" is getting reported in error log (opal-prd))

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: --Problem Description--- https://github.com/open- power/skiboot/commit/8cbd0de88d162e387f11569eee1bdecef8fad2e3 opal-prd: Have a worker process handle page offlining The memory_error() hservice interface expects the memory_error() call to just accept the offline request

[Bug 1902179] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL To manage notifications

[Bug 1902179] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL To manage notifications

[Bug 1902179] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902179 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Support/enhancement of NVMe IPL To manage

[Bug 1904419] Re: Ugrade glibc 2.32 by required upstream patches

2020-11-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-17 02:52 EDT--- affects 2.32, hence SRU to G requested, yes ** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2004 ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2010 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jjhe...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-16 14:19 EDT--- (In reply to comment #60) > Hi Jan, yes (almost) all Ubuntu packages are hosted nowadays at our > Launchpad git (at least all packages in main, incl. s390-tools). > Please see: https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools

[Bug 1902179] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From jan.hoepp...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-16 11:16 EDT--- Canonical, are there public s390-tools repositories with the Ubuntu versions available that we can mirror internally and which we could then use for potential backport work (such as this feature seems to require)? Please

[Bug 1904419] [NEW] Ugrade glibc 2.32 by required upstream patches

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported: The current libc6-2.32-0ubuntu3 package lacks some of the upstream glibc commits on the "release/2.32/master" branch (see http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/2.32/master). Does Ubuntu automatically pick the commits from this release branch?

[Bug 1882502] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-16 06:50 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882502

[Bug 1902874] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 06:58 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902874 Title:

[Bug 1902870] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 06:57 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with hirsuite -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902870 Title:

[Bug 1877533] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-13 04:03 EDT--- This is a setup without crypto cards (Secure Execution guests don't support passthrough yet). I think that we can live with the new kdump default settings, as I wouldn't want to suggest putting half of the memory away for kdump

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >