--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-12 09:39 EDT---
Some update info:
Here is the PR: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/631
No reaction from the maintainer though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
I have had trouble collecting data via the zcryptstats
(https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/s390-tools/blob/master/zconf/zcrypt/zcryptstats.c)
tool for our Hosting Appliance - VPC environment. Basically, the tool reports
data for only the last two
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-12 03:58 EDT---
Are there any suspicious warnings in the compile log?
What about "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing"? Does it work with these options?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From daniel.axte...@ibm.com 2020-11-12 01:12 EDT---
Hi,
So, here are what I believe are the relevant kernel changes.
Firstly, there is a common core with the support for OpenPower/PowerNV
Secure Boot - LP#1866909 and friends. This covers things like securing
kexec under
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-11 11:10 EDT---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I've build patches kernel packages and shared them here for further
> reference and testing:
> https://people.canonical.com/~fheimes/lp1903682/
I've just repeated the original test with this kernel
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-11 10:36 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, documented within the BZ
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878596
Title:
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-189191 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903817
Title:
Clustalo 1.2.4-6 segfaults on s390x
To
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-11 03:58 EDT---
Please provide the patch for bionic. We don't see an urgent need for
Xenial(runs out of base support in April 2021).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-11 03:56 EDT---
IBM will take a look . Sorry for the delay...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854148
Title:
[UBUNTU]
Public bug reported:
Please backport the following bugfix into Ubuntu LTS:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=e6213e09ed0e
Some relevant historic links:
Debian bugreport: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961736
glibc bugreport:
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-10 07:36 EDT---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Ok, I can see that the commit got accepted with 5.10-rc3, hence it will land
> in hirsute.
> And because the patch was tagged as stable for 5.8, it will land in groovy's
> kernel 5.8 (I'll check the
Public bug reported:
Background:
When handling multifunction devices in zPCI we take the
UID of the PCI function with function number 0
(that always exists according to the PCI spec)
as domain number.
Therefore when hot plugging functions with function
number larger than 0 before function 0, we
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #2 - Daniel John Axtens - 2020-11-05
20:15:10 ==
This is the kernel side of changes needed for LPAR/guest secure boot.
Because Ubuntu keeps its kernels so wonderfully up to date, I don't
think there are any extra patches you need to pick up. (I'll double-
check
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #2 - Daniel John Axtens - 2020-11-05
19:50:03 ==
This bug covers the grub part of our LPAR Secure Boot design, which I'd like to
propose for your 21.04 release.
Background
==
Please find attached an overall outline of the design.
Patches
===
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Document outlining design of LPAR Secure Boot design"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903289/+attachment/5431869/+files/PowerGuestSecureBootDesign.pdf
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 12:23 EDT---
We were finally able to cobble together a system to perform some testing on the
provided Ubuntu test kernel.
Here is what was tested (using Debian s390-tools 2.14):
- Using zipl to install the bootloader to NVMe works
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 05:44 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested Distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 05:39 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-04 13:19 EDT---
(In reply to comment #92)
> (In reply to comment #86)
> > Thanks, could you please also test Xenial and Bionic?
>
> I will try to get the Xenial verification done too before the end of day.
>
I've just verified Xenial. Surprise,
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-04 07:54 EDT---
(In reply to comment #86)
> Thanks, could you please also test Xenial and Bionic?
I've just verified bionic. The results are pretty much the same as the
results with the ppa version I tested before.
I will try to get the Xenial
** Tags removed: severity-medium
** Tags added: severity-high
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902694
Title:
Ubuntu 20.10- Undetected Data corruption in MPI workloads that use VSX
--- Comment (attachment only) From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-03 13:57
EDT---
** Attachment added: "mpe.py - test script for vmlinux misalignment"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902694/+attachment/5430774/+files/mpe.py
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
--- Comment From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-03 13:56 EDT---
Hello Patricia,
We have this script(mpe.py) which will detect if a vmlinux has the alignment
issue or not. We ran it against 16.04, 18.04, 20.04 and 21.04 kernels, and we
only found the misalignment in 20.04 and 21.04. 16.04's
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Waiki Wright - 2020-11-02 17:00:07
==
---Problem Description---
A data integrity issue was observed with the Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-52 and
20.10 - 5.8.0-26 kernel on Power 9. The root cause is found in the
compiling of p9_hmi_special_emu(). When doing a
--- Comment From andre.wi...@ibm.com 2020-11-03 06:04 EDT---
I was also not able to reproduce this with the latest updates from the
focal-proposed repository.
Both guests I set up had also used the qemu driver.
libvirt version: 6.0.0
package: 0ubuntu8.4
qemu version:
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-02 16:55 EDT---
This is being worked via a Nettle bounty:
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/80107582-ppc64le-aes-and-ghash-vector-acceleration
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2020-11-02 16:57 EDT---
Changing platform to ppc64le
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 07:49 EDT---
Right, but the only relevant line in this file is: "See ./test-suite.log",
which must be a separate file. So I wonder if it's saved somewhere alongside
stdout/stderr?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin20041
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] Failed to install ubuntu 20.04 on FBA
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 06:05 EDT---
Is test-suite.log saved somewhere?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899621
Title:
[Ubuntu 20.04] zlib:
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-188988 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902254
Title:
Bionic: btrfs: kernel BUG at /build/linux-
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 04:34 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Description:s390-cio: Add cond_resched() in the slow_eval_known_fn() loop
Symptom:Slow performance during the subchannel scanning
Problem:Higher scheduling latencies for tasks during the subchannel
scanning event on devices with lots
--- Comment From srikar.dronamr...@in.ibm.com 2020-11-02 01:52 EDT---
Harish,
Since its not updated for a while now, lets close this bug and reopen this or a
new one if we see similar problem again.
Since we dont know if this problem still exists or not, I am marking
this bug as
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "sosreport"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855679/+attachment/5430193/+files/sosreport-lep8d.stressngsoft-20180731003132.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-29 09:59 EDT---
With 2G, the crashkernel reservation will be 320K, which will not suffice to
unlock the LUKS volume when processing kdump. The installation was done using
2G.
Changing the VM size to 4+G will reserve 512K, and with this size
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 07:48 EDT---
Fix Released with focal, what about bionic ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860574
Title:
[UBUNTU
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 07:54 EDT---
Fix Released with focal, at least to be integrated into bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865032
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 07:46 EDT---
Fix released by groovy+focal, what about bionic?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859018
Title:
[UBUNTU
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 06:00 EDT---
Feature request moved to 22.04...
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-27 06:02 EDT---
Mistake: Changed to 21.04 again...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-26 11:51 EDT---
The problem persist even with the change in the rsyslog-rotate file
root@ilzlnx4:~# date
Mon 26 Oct 2020 08:46:50 AM MST
root@ilzlnx4:~# logger "Test Error"
root@ilzlnx4:~# tail /var/log/syslog
Oct 26 03:08:16 ilzlnx4
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 08:33 EDT---
We did the zlib part here - but the bugzilla is called "zlib/gzip" - will there
be gzip debs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
When zlib acceleration is enabled, gzip fails when given multiple files
larger than 5KB.
This problem does not happen when running gzip against a single file at
a time. It only happens when you provide multiple files as gzip
arguments.
So this works whether zlib
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 06:19 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 06:20 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 06:17 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-23 03:29 EDT---
*** Bug 185933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867118
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-23 03:27 EDT---
Verified by IBM:
Verified that the code is correctly included in s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-23 03:25 EDT---
Verified by IBM: Verified that the code is correctly included in
s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From y...@cn.ibm.com 2020-10-22 21:30 EDT---
Based on this comments, can I say the issue is fixed in Ubuntu20.04?
(In reply to comment #29)
> The focal part of this ticket is addressed by:
> "Focal update: v5.4.69 upstream stable release"
>
--- Comment From stefan.haberl...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-22 11:52 EDT---
*** Bug 188223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867118
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-22 11:54 EDT---
(In reply to comment #44)
> Thanks for all the attachments. This is Rafael from the Ubuntu Server team.
> I have gone through all the logs and I could find the I/O errors related to
> disk full (/var/log/syslog cannot
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 16:59 EDT---
(In reply to comment #38)
> Hi Mario, would you also be so kind to provide us with a "sos report" and
> the "dbginfo.sh" output?
> This should help to shed some more light into this ...
>
> Hi Mario, would you also be
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21
16:47 EDT---
** Attachment added: "sosreport_FCP"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425219/+files/sosreport-ilzlnx3-188206-2020-10-21-rilivdt.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21
15:00 EDT---
** Attachment added: "dbginfo_FCP"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425200/+files/DBGINFO-2020-10-21-11-52-07-ilzlnx3-23BBB8.tgz
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21
14:53 EDT---
** Attachment added: "dbginfo_iSCSI"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425199/+files/DBGINFO-2020-10-21-11-48-12-ilzlnx4-26BBB8.tgz
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21
14:48 EDT---
** Attachment added: "sosreport_iSCSI"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575/+attachment/5425198/+files/sosreport-ilzlnx4-2020-09-17-lercoxb.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 13:43 EDT---
That's correct, the second system presenting the issue is not an iSCSI system.
It has a mix of DASD and SCSI FCP
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-21 12:32 EDT---
Anything else that we can help with to keep this ticket moving?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896575
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-21 07:25 EDT---
zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.2_s390x.deb passes all of my tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899621
Title:
[Ubuntu
--- Comment From bw...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 09:05 EDT---
Sorry, this fell a bit through the cracks.
I have verified that all basic operations are working with the
backported version on Ubuntu 20.04.1. Do you require explicit testing on
Ubuntu 20.10?
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:53 EDT---
IBM Buzgilla -> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889059
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:52 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:50 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893170
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:40 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested Distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From marius.hillenbr...@ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:18 EDT---
Please note that the package description does not yet reflect that OpenBLAS now
dynamically switches to the best implementation on s390x, as well. To make that
clear, I propose to update the description as follows:
All
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 07:44 EDT---
Brian, thanks for the hint on installing the ppa!
In fact I now have a working opencryptoki 3.9 with the ppa on top, and I see in
the source package that the mentioned commit is applied in the ppa. I'm now
discussing with a
Public bug reported:
How to reproduce:
On the initial installation, Z cluster had 1 monitor node, 3 OSDs, 1 MDS and 1
MGR. Inorder to form a quorum, 2 more nodes have been added as monitor nodes
which are OSDs already.
The Z cluster then had 3 monitor nodes of which 2 are both OSDs and
Public bug reported:
It is impossible to run ceph cluster built of nodes over different
architectures. Specifically, when monitor node is built on s390 box, and
at least one OSD node is built on x86_64 box. Or vice versa: if monitor
node is deployed on x86_64, and OSD node on s390.
How to
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 05:11 EDT---
@Xnox: thx for this addl. information... This might help..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872941
Title:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 04:48 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released for all req. distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882494
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 02:13 EDT---
@Canonical, should be create a new LP, due to the fact, that this one is Fix
Released for furhter tracking ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-19 13:57 EDT---
Will 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu4 ultimately go into both 20.04 and 20.10? If yes, then
everything is OK.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-19 11:38 EDT---
zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu4_s390x.deb passes all of my tests.
1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.1 though looks old (Thu, 20 Aug 2020) - am I
missing something?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-19 07:41 EDT---
ok, I did some further testing:
- I re-installed a new Ubuntu 18.04.4 to avoid any side-effects with
previously installed code on this test system
- I installed the ep11 host library 3.0.1
- I applied the 3 .deb files again. I
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2020-10-19 05:54 EDT---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The commit has the hash 5f4b3a8fa343 in focal and is tagged with
> 'ubuntu-5.4.0-49.53'
> and since we are at 5.4.0.51.54 in focal-updates:
> ? linux-generic | 5.4.0.51.54| focal-updates |
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-19 04:02 EDT---
Hi Brian,
sorry, I mixed up two different utilities: pkcstok_migrate and
pkcsep11_migrate. So my installation is ok, but I tried to check the wrong
utility. I checked the commit you mentioned and I'll try to develop some
--- Comment From tuan.hoa...@ibm.com 2020-10-19 03:28 EDT---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Kernel test builds based on groovy master-next (cherry-pick) and focal
> master-next (backport) are available here for further testing:
> https://people.canonical.com/~fheimes/lp1899582/
The kernels
--- Comment From jschm...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-16 07:22 EDT---
Hi Brian,
I started testing on 18.04 and as far as I can see, applying the .deb
files went cleanly:
# dpkg -i opencryptoki_3.9.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.3~ppa2_s390x.deb
(Reading database ... 55068 files and directories currently
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-15 18:12 EDT---
- Here some details about the file system configuration:
root@ilzlnx4:~# ls -ltr /etc/fstab
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 714 Apr 28 23:41 /etc/fstab
root@ilzlnx4:~# cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system
--- Comment From jan.hoepp...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-15 13:47 EDT---
(In reply to comment #34)
> So I took the time to re-test this again.
> My z/VM guest has 4 CPUs (but SMT on), and 4 DASD FBA devices that equally
> split a 64GB zFCP/SCSI LUN in 4 16GB FBA chunks.
>
> I've tested (in comment
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-15 03:37 EDT---
@Canonical: Where is this commit currently integrated
commit 709192d531e5 ("s390/dasd: Fix zero write for FBA devices").
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-14 21:19 EDT---
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #72)
> > Checking SRU compatibility:
> >
> > #1 Source
> > Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> > Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> > Xenial: some more nois
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-14 14:30 EDT---
Anything that we can help on this?
Right now we have another system presenting the same problem:
root@ilzlnx3:~# tail /var/log/syslog
root@ilzlnx3:~# logger "Test Error"
root@ilzlnx3:~# tail /var/log/syslog
System
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-14 07:51 EDT---
Sorry for not responfing earlier. After installing a new system I can see that
the update happening:
$ cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root
--- Comment From tuan.hoa...@ibm.com 2020-10-14 04:43 EDT---
This is the original bug report at Ceph project :
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46828. Might help to clarify a bit ...
** Bug watch added: tracker.ceph.com/issues #46828
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46828
--
You
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-13 12:41 EDT---
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #72)
> > Checking SRU compatibility:
> >
> > #1 Source
> > Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> > Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> > Xenial: some more nois
--- Comment From tuan.hoa...@ibm.com 2020-10-13 11:40 EDT---
Hi,
This patch is not going to be merged to stable 5.8 tree, more details at
: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/5/106.
Thus we have to do this backport with minor change for 5.4 tree for
Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. The most significant
Public bug reported:
Description: zlib: inflateSyncPoint() returns an incorrect result on z15
Symptom: Certain rsync builds fail with "error in rsync protocol data
stream" on z15.
Problem: inflateSyncPoint() does not take into account the hardware
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899621/+attachment/5421694/+files/patch
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package changed: ubuntu => zlib (Ubuntu)
--
You received this
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-13 06:13 EDT---
The released zlib1g:s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu3 s390x passes all my tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884514
--- Comment From tmri...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-12 10:47 EDT---
I just downloaded the repository and installed it on a z15.
Verified ok
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893027
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "backport of commit ebce3eb to Ubuntu 20.04"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899582/+attachment/5421572/+files/0001-ceph-fix-inode-number-handling-on-arches-with-32-bit.patch
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug
Public bug reported:
Backport provided for git-commit to 20.04 kernel.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ebce3eb2f7ef9f6ef01a60874ebd232450107c9a
Backport patch attached for commit ebce3eb upstream.
It was applied and tested on top of Ubuntu commit :
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-12 21:16 EDT---
(In reply to comment #72)
> Checking SRU compatibility:
>
> #1 Source
> Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> Xenial: some more nois (tracepoint missing), but still ok
>
>
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-12 06:44 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed , Fix Released with groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884514
Title:
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-08 09:34 EDT---
Patch set is upstream.
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=6eeea6725a70e6fcb5abba0764496bdab07ddfb3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-07 01:53 EDT---
this is fixed by the following series:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-
devel/20201006183122.155609-1-th...@redhat.com/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From wa...@us.ibm.com 2020-10-06 11:40 EDT---
Barry verified on 18.04 and everything looks good.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-06 09:53 EDT---
Business Case: To accelerate an re-ipl, the memory will not be deleted first,
direct re-ipl possible. This is important if the system allocates terrabytes of
memory.
--
You received this bug notification because you
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2020-10-05 16:20 EDT---
(In reply to comment #28)
> I just recognized something in your log in comment #10 which concerns me a
> bit.
> You seem to have a massive amount of multipath paths in your system -
> represented (as usual) as scsi disk
901 - 1000 of 14241 matches
Mail list logo
