[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-06-20 Thread Carlos Nihelton
There was a funky character stream in the changelog due a fancy apostrophe that got messed during the Jammy debdiff generation, I don`t know how... `1. Copy the font to userM-CM-"M-bM-^BM-,M-bM-^DM-"s directory.$` ... ** Patch added: "wsl-setup debdiff for jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 2098698] Re: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble

2025-06-17 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Updated the bug description and title to turn this into a SRU bug. ** Description changed: - While doing the WSL Import and run test for 24.04.2, gtk4-demo failed to - launch due to missing the library for libGLESv2. + [ Impact ] + + * libgtk-4-1 has an implicit dependency on libgles2. GTK4 apps

[Bug 2109978] Re: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: gtk4 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109978 Title: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble To manage notific

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The previous debdiff of livecd-rootfs for jammy contained a bunch of spurious whitespace changes in the debian/changelog file. This one eliminates those spurious changes. Otherwise, the source contents remain the same. Proof of build can be found at: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+ar

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Questing) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble + [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The previous debdiff contained undesired changes past the changelog. This one is correctly bound to only add the relevant changelog entries without rewriting the package history. Otherwise, the source contents remain the same. Proof of build can be found at: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihe

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "wsl-setup debdiff for jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5875016/+files/jammy-wsl-setup.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "livecd-rootfs debdiff from jammy-updates" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5874911/+files/jammy-livecd-rootfs.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-05-07 Thread Carlos Nihelton
We need to update questing first, thus here's the appropriate debdiff. ** Patch added: "debdiff for questing" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5876408/+files/questing.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 2109978] Re: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-05-07 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [ Impact ] 4.14.5 is a new bugfix release from upstream: - https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/4.18.5/NEWS?ref_type=tags + https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/4.14.5/NEWS?ref_type=tags - * Bugs fixed: - - #5844 `gdk_surface_get_device_position: asser

[Bug 2109978] [NEW] [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-05-05 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] 4.14.5 is a new bugfix release from upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/4.18.5/NEWS?ref_type=tags * Bugs fixed: - #5844 `gdk_surface_get_device_position: assertion 'GDK_IS_SURFACE (surface)' failed` on popover close (Alessandro Astone) - #7

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: - [WIP] + [Impact] + + With the increasing adoption of tools like authd, it's very likely that + Linux desktop users in corporate environments end up with their + usernames like 'u...@org.com', what doesn't play nice with + sbuild/schroot. Without properly escaping the use

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Here's the debdiff for oracular ** Patch added: "oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/2109853/+attachment/5875432/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Here's the debdiff for noble. ** Patch added: "noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/2109853/+attachment/5875433/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Here's the debdiff for plucky ** Patch added: "plucky.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/2109853/+attachment/5875431/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 2109853] [NEW] [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: [WIP] Fore more information about the issue, please check the upstream bug: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/issues/4 Skipping questing because it will receive the fix via debian-merges. ** Affects: sbuild (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The AMD64 build above behaved as expected in my tests. Other community members are invited to test them if they have some time to spare. ** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Images for AMD64 and ARM64 architectures are available at the following Launchpad build links: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl-dev/+livefs/ubuntu/jammy/wsl/+build/781418 - ARM64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl-dev/+livefs/ubuntu/jammy/wsl/+build/781419 Those images were built from

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Attached is the debdiff proposed for wsl-setup on 22.04 to make it possible to build images of that LTS in the new WSL tar-only image format. The following links point to proof of builds from a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl- dev/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/30662779 and https://launchpad.ne

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Attaching now my proposed debdiff for livecd-rootfs targetting 22.04, based on the current version available in jammy-updates. Here's a link to a PPA as a proof of build: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu/pplayground/+build/30661786 With that we aim to provide supported images from

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-04-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Proof of builds with the already attached debdiffs can be found on the following PPA links. Their version numbers are suffixed with the "~ppaN" to ensure version released in the archive will override the PPA version afterwards. Plucky: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu

[Bug 2107145] [NEW] [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: As part of our offerings to bring Ubuntu Pro to wider audiences we need to backport this service to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, so users can benefit of the upcoming GA of Ubuntu Pro for WSL, as Windows system that allows more easily secure and manage WSL instances, by automatically pro-

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Proof of build can be seen in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu/pplayground/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=jammy The version numbers are slightly changed because I wanted to make sure the archive will contain a higher version

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871127/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.buildinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871126/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.buildinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871125/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871124/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
tem journal. + * Removes workaround for livepatch no longer needed since pro-client v35 + - systemd service is more confined again. + * Prevents unnecessary re-registration with Landscape + - by passing the CLI flag --register-if-needed to landscape-config. + * Upgrades va

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373 + [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5870932/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for oracular" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5870931/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5870908/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: - WIP + [ Impact ] + + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and justification +for backporting the fix to the stable release. + + * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an +explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. + + [ T

[Bug 2106757] [NEW] [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: WIP ** Affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106757 Title: [SRU] Fix too much loggin

[Bug 2100586] Re: package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2025-03-29 Thread Carlos Eduardo Dutra Brum
Skia, Thanks for your support. I've issued that command you recommended, got some more errors googled a bit and got the solution (chatgpt). You were right. I've tried to upgrade my hole system some days before. You support was fundamental to get me to the solution. Thanks a lot. -- You received

[Bug 2100586] Re: package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2025-03-29 Thread Carlos Eduardo Dutra Brum
This was what I'd got from GPT GPT's Message The message indicates that your system needs to be fully updated before you can upgrade to a new Ubuntu release. Follow these steps to resolve the issue: ### Step 1: Update Your Current System Run the following commands: ```bash sudo apt update

[Bug 1987970] Re: after installing wsl-setup WSLG GUI apps stopped working

2025-03-27 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The current way of updating WSL is via its own command line: wsl --update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987970 Title: after installing wsl-setup WSLG GUI apps stopped working To m

[Bug 2104307] Re: wsl-setup script not waiting for cloud-init to finish on plucky

2025-03-27 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: wsl-setup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Carlos Nihelton (cnihelton) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104307 Title: wsl-setup script not waiting for cloud

[Bug 2104307] Re: wsl-setup script not waiting for cloud-init to finish on plucky

2025-03-27 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: wsl-setup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104307 Title: wsl-setup script not waiting for cloud-init to finish on plucky To man

[Bug 2104307] [NEW] wsl-setup script not waiting for cloud-init to finish on plucky

2025-03-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: This bug is fixed upstream already but not yet released to Ubuntu. The wsl-setup script should detect whether cloud-init is supposed to run or not, and if so wait for it to complete before proceeding with its other business. That's the behaviour observed on Noble but not on Pl

[Bug 2064284] Re: apparmor.service fails because of invalid config

2025-03-12 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I'm seeing this on a fresh install of Plucky, I'm not sure when or how mediascanner2.0 would have been installed and removed, unless if it was a dependency of some other package and no longer is. cn@a515 ~$ apt policy mediascanner2.0 mediascanner2.0: Instalado: (nenhum) Candidato: 0.117-3 Ta

[Bug 2098930] Re: openvpn profile doesn't allow access to files on home dir

2025-03-12 Thread Carlos Nihelton
> atm It looks that way, there certainly should be some though > > comment #4's > @{HOME}/.cert/nm-openvpn/* r, > > seems reasonable. We will have to look into others I'd rather use .config/ instead of .cert/ to be more aligned with the XDG Base directories specification. -- You received this b

[Bug 2100586] Re: package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2025-03-02 Thread Carlos Eduardo Dutra Brum
** Changed in: javascript-common (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100586 Title: package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: in

[Bug 2098513] Re: eglinfo -B crash (seg fault)

2025-03-01 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Also reproduceable on a fresh install of Plucky. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098513 Title: eglinfo -B crash (seg fault) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs

[Bug 2100586] [NEW] package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2025-02-28 Thread Carlos Eduardo Dutra Brum
Public bug reported: Almost every installation I try using apt-get I get an error like this: dpkg: error processing package javascript-common (--configure): installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 (...) # this changes the depending on

[Bug 2098698] Re: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble

2025-02-18 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: gtk4 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098698 Title: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble To manage notificati

[Bug 2098698] Re: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble

2025-02-18 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: gtk4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098698 Title: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble To manage notifications

[Bug 2098698] Re: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble

2025-02-18 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Summary changed: - gtk-4-examples: Missing dependency libgles2 + libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098698 Title: libgtk-4-1: Missing

[Bug 2098698] Re: gtk-4-examples: Missing dependency libgles2

2025-02-18 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Hi! Many thanks for reporting this bug. In fact the test case already warns about the implicit dependency. The key point is that libgtk-4-1 up until version 4.14.4 didn't explicitly depended on libgles2, even though it tries to render with libGLESv2 at runtime. Newer versions of Ubuntu have that s

[Bug 2098724] Re: Missing package linux-signatures-nvidia-6.11.0-18-generic

2025-02-18 Thread Juan Carlos
Missing package released (linux-signatures-nvidia-6.11.0-18), so I upgraded and solved it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098724 Title: Missing package linux-signatures-nvidia

[Bug 2098724] Re: Missing package linux-signatures-nvidia-6.11.0-18-generic

2025-02-18 Thread Juan Carlos
Same here :( Operating System: Kubuntu 24.10 KDE Plasma Version: 6.1.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 6.6.0 Qt Version: 6.6.2 Kernel Version: 6.11.0-18-generic (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2096649] Re: Installation failed - snap installation failed

2025-02-16 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Hi folks! I came across a very similar installer error related to snap seed validation when trying the latest Kubuntu Plucky image published on Feb 14. Calamares session.log (see attachment) contains this interesting snippet: ``` 2025-02-15 - 06:37:58 [6]: DEBUG (Qt): "Downloading snaps completed"

[Bug 2098513] Re: eglinfo -B crash (seg fault)

2025-02-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Package changed: mesa-demos (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098513 Title: eglinfo -B cra

[Bug 2098513] Re: eglinfo -B crash (seg fault)

2025-02-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
If I add both nvidia and mesa json files to that environment variable it also crashes. $ echo $__EGL_VENDOR_LIBRARY_FILENAMES /usr/share/glvnd/egl_vendor.d/10_nvidia.json:/usr/share/glvnd/egl_vendor.d/50_mesa.json $ eglinfo -B GBM platform: EGL API version: 1.5 EGL vendor string: NVIDIA EGL ve

[Bug 2098513] Re: eglinfo -B crash (seg fault)

2025-02-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
It seems pretty much like this bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/12300 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues #12300 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/12300 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 2098513] [NEW] eglinfo -B crash (seg fault)

2025-02-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: On a plucky system recently upgraded from oracular with nvidia- driver-570, `eglinfo -B` crashes with seg fault but if I run `__EGL_VENDOR_LIBRARY_FILENAMES=/usr/share/glvnd/egl_vendor.d/10_nvidia.json eglinfo -B` it succeeds. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04 Pack

[Bug 2009825] Re: [snap] thunderbird cannot sign messages with external gnupg

2025-02-07 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Is the approach documented in https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/thunderbird- snap-and-external-gnupg-for-smart-cards/39553 a viable solution to this problem? In a nutshel: 1. Forcing GPGme library to invoke the gpg binary shipped inside the snap and 2. Changing the AppArmor profile to allow connecting

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-31 Thread Carlos Nihelton
@ahasenack, in case you need to track, with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/comments/22, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/comments/23 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/comments/24 we complete one r

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-31 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I successfully completed the following test cases: * New instances on WSL1 (with cloud-init and WSL 2.4.8 or later - previous versions of WSL had a bug not handling WSL1 properly) * Package a rootfs containing wsl-setup 0.5.8 in the current format (Windows application package) on a Windows 11 l

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-31 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-31 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-31 Thread Carlos Nihelton
To ease testing those packages @didrocks made available a test image in the new format (.wsl) at the following address: https://people.canonical.com/~didrocks/tmp/livecd.proposed.ubuntu- wsl.wsl The image was built with livecd-rootfs from noble-proposed and it contains wsl-setup from noble-propos

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.2 ** Changed in: wsl-setup (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Hi @Andreas! Per our conversation (for future reference): 1. do-release-upgrade: nothing happens. Upgrading the wsl-setup package won't trigger any scripts per se. The content introduced in version 0.5.8 is only invoked by WSL itself (the Windows machinery) at provisioning time. WSL has no notion

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-23 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "Noble livecd-rootfs debdiff (24.04.82 to 24.04.83)" https://launchpadlibrarian.net/772357299/livecd-rootfs_24.04.82_24.04.83.diff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-23 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Notice the binary ubuntu.ico didn't exist in previous versions, it's an addition as part of the new format. That's the reason for this line in the diff: ``` Binary files /tmp/tmpyoybmkkw/NMxChGAzw2/wsl-setup-0.5.4~24.04/wsl/ubuntu.ico and /tmp/tmpyoybmkkw/QP2sYT2qeL/wsl-setup-0.5.8~24.04/wsl/ubu

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-23 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-23 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-01-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

Re: [Bug 2093366] Re: failed mirros minimal instalation

2025-01-11 Thread Carlos Suarez
Thanks a lot. El jue, 9 ene 2025 a las 15:45, Julian Andres Klode (< 2093...@bugs.launchpad.net>) escribió: > Thank you for your bug report. It seems your machine is using an out of > date mirror configuration. Please pick a new one from software & updates > in the desktop, or editing sources.lis

[Bug 2093366] [NEW] failed mirros minimal instalation

2025-01-09 Thread Carlos Suarez
Public bug reported: There are error for mirror not disponible for minimal instalation from 16.04 to 18,04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:16.04.32 [origin: unknown] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-210.242-generic 4.4.262 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-

[Bug 2092548] Re: mipi camera ipu6 dell latitude 7440 ubuntu 24.10 not working

2024-12-27 Thread Jose Carlos Cirqueira Junior
** Attachment added: "pro_logs.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/+bug/2092548/+attachment/5847788/+files/pro_logs.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2092548] [NEW] mipi camera ipu6 dell latitude 7440 ubuntu 24.10 not working

2024-12-26 Thread Jose Carlos Cirqueira Junior
Public bug reported: the camera was working on ubuntu 24.04 but stopped working on ubuntu 24.10 and I have already tried using the kernel's native drivers and the previous ones via intel and it doesn't work. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10 Package: intel-ipu6-dkms (not installed) Pro

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2024-12-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [Context] + Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2]. Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2024-12-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: - Microsoft is moving to a new package format which will allow us to - release a .wsl rootfs and will be published to releases.ubuntu.com. Move - to that format. + [Context] + Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2024-12-09 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Summary changed: - Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format + [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091293 Title: [SRU] Move WSL t

[Bug 2091044] [NEW] I cant update to ubuntu 24.04

2024-12-04 Thread Carlos Reynaldo Portocarrero Tovar
Public bug reported: Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. If you want to investigate this yourself the log f

[Bug 2087605] Re: Initial install of WSL showed cloud-init failure

2024-11-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Was cloud-init meant to be used in this set up at all? It would be good to have the /run/cloud-init/ds-identify.log as part of this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087605 T

[Bug 2069649] Re: lshw hangs running forever at Network Interfaces CLASS

2024-10-14 Thread Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos
Hi Dennis, thanks for you answer. This week a did a upgrade to VMWare Workstation Pro 17.6.1 and the issue with the lshw continues. # vmware --version [AppLoader] Use shipped Linux kernel AIO access library. An up-to-date "libaio" or "libaio1" package from your system is preferred. # modinfo v

Re: [Bug 2074234] Re: net usershare add: cannot convert name "everyone" to a SID. The transport connection is now disconnected.

2024-09-23 Thread Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos
4 and 172.16.12.0/24 to share folders. Regards ====== Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos Eng. de Computação http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlostoca Campinas-SP / Brasil On 9/23/24 06:38, Miriam España Acebal wrote: > Hello Carlos Alberto, > > Thank you for taki

[Bug 2079003] [NEW] package firefox (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-09-04 Thread Carlos De Matos
Public bug reported: Failed to install. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: firefox (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass Da

[Bug 1047384] Re: System Encryption Password set before setting keyboard locale

2024-09-03 Thread José Carlos Cárcamo Camacho
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => José Carlos Cárcamo Camacho (charlisious) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047384 Title: System Encryption Password

[Bug 2073267] Re: Virtualbox Guru meditation on VM start caused by kernel commit in v6.9-rc4

2024-08-28 Thread Carlos Cristian Rios Donoso
Same bug in Ubuntu 22.04.4, to install virtualbox-7 fixed the problem. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073267 Title: Virtualbox Guru meditation on VM start caused by kernel com

[Bug 2075357] Re: pro collect-logs takes more than 1:30 minutes to complete on air-gapped envs, `pro status` and `pro help` doesn't work

2024-08-09 Thread Carlos Bravo
This is a common scenario for some customers on AWS, where they either have strict rules for allow-listing external endpoints (so, instead of getting a quick response for pro with the error, they only get a timeout) and airgapped customers with no knowledge about setting up an airgapped-contract se

[Bug 2075357] [NEW] pro collect-logs takes more than 1:30 minutes to complete on air-gapped envs, `pro status` and `pro help` doesn't work

2024-07-31 Thread Carlos Bravo
Public bug reported: pro collect-logs takes more than 1:30 minutes to complete on air-gapped envs, while `pro status` and `pro help` won't work at all. After the same amount of time they throw the `[Errno 101] Network is unreachable` message. Tested on 24.04 Pro on AWS and pro client version 31.2

[Bug 2067059] Re: Auto-attach image support is not available on none

2024-07-29 Thread Carlos Bravo
We have seen this bug quite often on AWS when the customer is using imported VMs. This means that cloud-init was initialized before the image being imported to AWS, therefore, customers get that error when converting to Pro. It has been quite a headache to be honest and while the workaround works,

[Bug 2074234] [NEW] net usershare add: cannot convert name "everyone" to a SID. The transport connection is now disconnected.

2024-07-26 Thread Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos
Public bug reported: If use Nautilus or command line to share a folder 'net usershare' returned error 255: cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: rpc_pipe_bind for pipe lsarpc failed with error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_DISCONNECTED net usershare add: cannot convert name "Everyone" to a SID. The transport connec

[Bug 2063966] Re: version not compatible with python3

2024-06-28 Thread Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Hi, dhcpig is working for sure with python 3 since version 1.5-4 (in Debian at least, can't be sure for Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063966 Title: version not compatible wi

[Bug 2069649] Re: lshw hangs running forever at Network Interfaces CLASS

2024-06-18 Thread Carlos Alberto Santos
7:55:35-03:00 [TERM="xterm-256color" TTY="/dev/pts/1" COLUMNS="152" LINES="24"] - [?2004h]0;root@toca-work: /home/carlos/Dados/BeginConfigroot@toca-work:BeginConfig# lshw -html + [?2004h]0;root@toca-work: /home/ca

[Bug 2069649] [NEW] lshw hangs running forever at Network Interfaces CLASS

2024-06-17 Thread Carlos Alberto Santos
" LINES="24"] [?2004h]0;root@toca-work: /home/carlos/Dados/BeginConfigroot@toca-work:BeginConfig# lshw -html [?2004l DMI SMP PA-RISC device-tree SPD memory /proc/cpuinfo CPUID PCI (

[Bug 2066081] Re: Nouveau failing to boot or glitches

2024-06-12 Thread Carlos V
I don't have access to that PC now, it belongs to someone else, othere people reported issues with their gpus, I think you should launch an ISO before 24.04.1 correcting this with an upgraded version of drivers and the oem installer as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2064177] Re: Window borders and shadows missing from GTK3 dialogs (if autologin is enabled and Xorg is used)

2024-06-04 Thread Carlos Ramos
Same problem here. Affects some apps like VS Code, LibreOffice... But not others like Firefox or Nautilus. Using Xorg and NVIDIA drivers. Never turned on autologin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 2067417] [NEW] package texlive-fonts-extra-doc 2015.20160320-1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/latex/mweights/README', que está también en el paque

2024-05-28 Thread Carlos Vásquez
Public bug reported: error al procesar el archivo /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-fonts- extra-doc_2017.20180305-2_all.deb ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: texlive-fonts-extra-doc 2015.20160320-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-119.166-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Lin

[Bug 2065349] Re: [SRU] Default user created by cloud-init confuses WSLg

2024-05-23 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Your question means that I didn't clarify enough the test I followed and how it related to the original test plan proposed. The gap in understanding is more due WSL specifics than cloud-init itself. The fundamental difference between what is proposed in the bug report and what I applied manually i

[Bug 2064189] Re: Screen flickers after installing Ubuntu 24.04

2024-05-23 Thread Carlos Gomez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2062951 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062951 Well guys, yesterday I had the brilliant idea to update my Ubuntu from 23.10 to 24.04 LTS. Silly me for not doing much research, but my laptop (which I use for work) has burst all its graphic power, I don't

[Bug 2065946] Re: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-hwe-6.5-ZV1Qen/linux-hwe-6.5-6.5.0

2024-05-18 Thread Luiz Carlos da Silveira Júnior
** Description changed: - This error occurred on my PC when booting Ubuntu from 22.04 in any + This error occurred on my PC when booting Ubuntu from 22.04/24.04 in any flavor, in Zorin and also with Pop!_OS 22.04. Looks like a new kernel issue. It seems to me that it has to do with Kernel

[Bug 2066081] [NEW] Nouveau failing to boot or glitches

2024-05-18 Thread Carlos V
Public bug reported: I tried 24.04 on a Nvidia 4090 and It only booted on safe graphics mode, I haven't had this issue with any other Ubuntu previous versions on the same computer. A lot of people with other NVIDIA cards are complaining about this on YouTube, please release an URGENT ISO with a n

[Bug 2065946] [NEW] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-hwe-6.5-ZV1Qen/linux-hwe-6.5-6.5.0

2024-05-16 Thread Luiz Carlos da Silveira Júnior
Public bug reported: This error occurred on my PC when booting Ubuntu from 22.04 in any flavor, in Zorin and also with Pop!_OS 22.04. Looks like a new kernel issue. It seems to me that it has to do with Kernel 6.5, 6.8 +. Should I be worried about this? The problem does not occur in Fedora 39 o

[Bug 1717878] Re: gdm3/gdm-session-worker crashed with SIGTRAP logging "GdmSession: no session desktop files installed, aborting..." from get_fallback_session_name from get_default_session_name from g

2024-05-12 Thread Carlos V
It's unbelievable that this single package can broke your system and that this bug has been unresolved for seven years -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717878 Title: gdm3/gdm-session-w

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >