*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1188399 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188399
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1188399
ess is incompatible with xemacs21
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
** Summary changed:
- package emacs23-nox 23.4+1-4ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso
instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1
+ ess will not install / upgrade; upstream 13.05-1 is buggy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Quoting the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz:
> Install emacsen-common for xemacs21
> emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor xemacs21
>
> WARNING:
> Couldn't find obvious defaults for:
> data-
The "listp :after" error also seems to be prevalent in #794216 reports,
but this is emacs23.
** Summary changed:
- package emacs23-lucid 23.3+1-1ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
status 2
+ speechd-el byte compil
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 794216 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794216
Thank you for your bug report. Given that emacs22 is no longer
supported, I would suggest that you remove this package and try again
with emacs23 or emacs24.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 79
Anyway, an unconfirmed but fairly obvious workaround would be to remove
unsupported emacs versions like emacs22 or emacs-snapshot and trying to
install the package again for emacs23 or emacs24.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 794216 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794216
There was a bug in speechd-el which made upgrades complex for users of
emacs22. I am not entirely sure what the reasons for that were, but
emacs22 is unsupported in current versions of Ubuntu. I would recomme
> Sorry for the long time before this response; it appears that speechd-
el does not have an active maintainer.
Sorry, just to clarify: There does not seem to be any volunteers to look
after this package in Ubuntu. The Debian maintainer and the upstream
for Debian both work to keep the package in
Marked as Confirmed based on the existence of an upstream bug in Debian.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #694676
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694676
** Also affects: speechd-el (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694676
Importance: Unk
Quoting DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'
> make: *** [braille.elc] Errore 255
This looks like an error in braille.el, but given the amount of time
that has passed, I would be tempted to close this bug report as
unreproducible now.
Sorry for the long delay in getti
Quoting DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> Cannot open load file: eieio
> make: *** [braille.elc] Error 255
You seem to be missing the eieio package. The dependencies for speechd
2.4-1
Also, I don't think emacs-snapshot was supported even at the time this
bug report was submitted ...?
Sorry for the long tim
> The dependencies for speechd 2.4-1
Sorry. The dependencies for speechd 2.4-1 ought to have pulled it in,
but maybe it wasn't supported for emacs-snapshot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Upstream 5.0.23 fixed this issue. There is no separate upstream bug
report.
http://ftp-
master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/w/whois/unstable_changelog
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
(iconv tells me it cannot convert from EUC-KR to UTF-8 from the old
input so I'm not sure if that's actually true, but the domain should be
set up to use the new, well-defined server anyway.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Additionally, the message from the old server is misleading.
precise$ whois devunt.kr | less
...
湲 蹂대 UTF-8
몄⑸
鍮ㅻ怨
듬.
EUC-KR 몄
鍮ㅻ
oldwhois.kisa.or.kr
鍮
怨 듬
.
The above information is encoded with UTF-8
EUC-KR encoding WHOIS is being serviced in this URL:oldwhois.kisa.or.kr
- KISA/KRNIC Wh
Small correction: unlike the suggested packages, the plain whois package
is in main, not in universe. This makes this bug even more puzzling.
precise$ whois launchpad.net
No command 'whois' found, did you mean:
Command 'rwhois' from package 'socks4-clients' (universe)
Command 'jwhois' from pack
For what it's worth, installing Lightning turned out to be a fairly good
workaround. It certainly displays the invitations in a readableformat
in the message pane.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Public bug reported:
I use Thunderbird in a mainly Outlook-dominated organization. Since a
while back (after I installed XUbuntu 12.04? After the organization
upgraded to Outlook 2013?) I no longer see any indication when emails I
receive actually contain an invitation. I have multiple times re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770682 alleges that setting
NSS_SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV=0 globally is a security problem. As an
alternative, what I did was this:
Create the following file in /tmp/pidgin
#!/bin/sh
NSS_SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV=0 exec /usr/bin/pidgin "$@"
Then run the following com
For what it's worth, I have submitted the whoopsie reports, but I was
unable to find any reports for readpst at https://errors.ubuntu.com/ ...
Maybe I lack privileges, or skills.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Public bug reported:
I have had a couple of crashes with readpst, but the Makefile which runs
the job just happily continues as if there had been no problem.
Unfortunately, these issues seem timing / threading related, so it is
somewhat hard to repro. I am rerunning the failed jobs in a separate
The trivial fix is to fail gracefully if the user cannot read this log
file. It should hardly prevent you from reporting bugs!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799240
Title:
apport scr
Please clarify: if you used apt-build to install emacs23, which version
did you build and install? Do you have a transcript of the build? What
does dpkg -l emacs23 print?
Could you please also add build information about emacs-jabber (apt-
cache policy emacs-jabber if you installed by regular me
or something? For lack of repeatability in
other applications, I am assuming this is a bug in evince, but I could
of course be wrong.
I am running dual monitors, the screen geometry as reported by xwininfo
-root is 3840x1080.
era@precise$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Is this a duplicate of bug #1100177?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039598
Title:
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
Turns out the problem was that I lacked the precise-updates repo for
main.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177
Title:
kr
I imagine this may be a duplicate of bug #1100177 but it was rather
messy so I opted to create a new bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177
Title:
krb5-user security updat
Public bug reported:
After enabling precise-updates for universe, krb5-user is not
installable. It depends on libkrb5-3 = 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 but
there is no such version in the repositories.
precise# apt-cache policy krb5-user
krb5-user:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.10+dfsg~bet
Thank you for your bug report. Unfortunately, your bug report only
contains a partial transcript of the error messages (the message "No
apport report written because MaxReports is reached already" indicates
that an earlier error message was truncated or elided). Could you
please follow up with ad
I believe it was removed.
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/tramp/ChangeLog?root=tramp&r1=1.194&r2=1.195
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041474
Title:
TRAMP should know how to work w
Did you add this to your personal .bashrc or to something like
/etc/profile (system-wide)? Your personal environment should certainly
be sanitized away if you install packages using sudo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
So how about limiting the scope of the fix even further? It seems that
the majority of the complaints are about patterns where the plus sign
follows straight after the colon. While there are no registered URL
protocols which start with a plus sign, it strikes me as awfully ad-hoc;
but it should c
** Package changed: emacsen-common (Ubuntu) => xemacs21 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074688
Title:
emacsen failed to install on upgrade to Kubuntu 12.10
To manage notific
DiagonalArg: Your problem seems complex enough to warrant a separate bug
report. But please, let's keep this bug report focused strictly on the
problem of the original reporter. For what it's worth, the warnings
from update-alternatives in the log snippet you posted seem completely
benign.
--
Y
DiagonalArg: As per comments above, you should attempt to remove
xemacs21. The log file you attached seems to corroborate.
"subprocess installed post-installaction script returned error exit
status 1" is not informative by itself, although often, the lines just
before this error message can be he
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862610 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862610
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #862610, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862610 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862610
Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> Setting up dictionaries-common (1.12.10) ...
> update-default-wordlist: Question empty but elements installed for class
> "wordlist"
> dictionaries-common/default
@Steve White: You should submit a new bug report. Even if the symptoms
are identical, neither you nor the original reporter can be properly
analyzed without a proper log file dump. If you let Apport report a bug
for you, it will include all the files we require, this time hopefully
without the pr
Yours looks very similar to bug #1026778, could you check the comments
there and follow up here? Thanks!
** Changed in: dictionaries-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
I didn't get a conclusive answer to comment #5 at
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+question/212059
but looking at the bug reports here, I guess this really does belong in
ubiquity.
** Package changed: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) => ubiquity (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug noti
So the bug would appear to be in "startup disk creator" from 10.04
actually?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063390
Title:
no welcome screen, start as live cd
To manage notifications
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #691345
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691345
** Also affects: emacs24 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691345
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because y
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
Perhaps the ditaa add-on, or even the entire scripts directory, should
be shipped with emacs24, not with emacs24-el. Anyhow, this bug report
belongs upstream. Will forward.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1066102 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066102
xnox: I asked how to find out where to file it, and was told this was a
good place. Cf comment #1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Marked as Confirmed; this is trivially reproducible out of the box.
(Open a new file, enter org mode, enter some content, hit C-c C-e.)
Attaching the resulting Lisp backtrace.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Attachment added: "backtrace.txt"
https://bugs.la
Reassigning to xemacs21.
** Package changed: emacs23 (Ubuntu) => xemacs21 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Title:
emacs depencies broken after upgrade to ubunutu 12.10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
Public bug reported:
I tried the Live CD in Virtualbox. The default memory allocation (in my
old version, still run 10.04) is 384MB, which is apparently insufficient
to even get a working GUI, let alone use the distro productively.
A warning message when you run in low-memory conditions would be
Tangentially related: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/livecd-rootfs/+question/212059
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070323
Title:
Double keyboard icons in "Try Ubuntu"
Attached a screen shot from Virtualbox, with the cursor over the right-
hand keyboard toolbar icon.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot, cursor over toolbar icon"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1070323/+attachment/3410373/+files/Screenshot-Quantal%2032bit%20Live%20%2
Public bug reported:
When I boot the Ubuntu 12.10 Live CD, there is a splash screen with a
toolbar, a language picker, and two big buttons "Try Ubuntu" and
"Install".
On the toolbar, in the upper right corner, are a number of icons. Two
of these are identical, as far as I can tell, although they
@Josy: Alas, the output from dpkg -l is truncated to make room for the
version number and short description. In the general case, you can use
something like COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l whatever; but in this particular
case, the packages you want to remove are the ones you have installed in
/var/lib/dpkb/in
cscope is a red herring; the bug, as you can see from the bug report, is
in xemacs21. The original reporter was installing cscope when the bug
was discovered.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Resisting the temptation to mark this as a duplicate of bug #789706. I
think it probably is a duplicate, but since several people are signing
up for this particular bug, let's keep it open for a little whiĺe
longer.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You r
Thanks for the update.
The wildcard move of the prerm scripts looks pretty dangerous, are you
sure it's really necessary? At least using, as it were, a less "wild"
wildcard would be recommended. On my system, for example, em* would
match empathy as well as emacs. So I'd say if you really can't
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #789706, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Looks like at least part of the problem is due to xemacs21, not emacs23.
If you remove xemacs21 temporarily (or permanently, for all I care), are
you able to resolve the problem? See also LP bug# #789706.
I am setting the Status of this bug report to Incomplete to mark it as
pending on your input
By the looks of it, the culprit is ilisp, not emacs24. Hence,
reassigning. See also LP bug #154205 which was closed when ilisp was
removed from Hardy (!) but apparently never really analyzed.
** Package changed: emacs24 (Ubuntu) => ilisp (Ubuntu)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #680646
More like LP bug #466531 actually. What is your target Emacs platform?
If you are installing for emacs23 then that includes its own copy of
cogre and possibly some of the other packages. Perhaps in theory it
should have Provides: cogre etc but I'm not sure it's worth the effort
for an old release
Thanks for the clarification. So do I understand correctly that it
passed sponsor review and is waiting for SRU review?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Title:
ecb: incompatible
I'm sorry, I don't understand (probably an incomplete understanding of
the process on my part). Why is there nothing to review and sponsor?
Isn't the pending package in the review queue the thing which needs to
be reviewed and sponsored? In particular,
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/118400222/ecb_
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Quoting the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz:
> ecb-common-browser.el:47:1:Error: Failed to find version for newly installed
> cedet
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
U
The error log seems to indicate speechd-el as the culprit. Reassigning.
In the meantime, if you could try to uninstall speechd-el and then
finish the emacs23-lucid install, and follow up here with the results,
that would be very useful. Thanks in advance!
** Package changed: emacs23 (Ubuntu) =>
Did you click through? This is "Unity Linux"
https://launchpad.net/unitylinux not the Unity desktop environment
wannabe. But I agree with your conclusion, and thank you for your
corrections and added details. Perhaps Ubuntu should split linux-
firmware into linux-firmware-free and linux-firmware-n
So in other words this is a bug in Unity Linux (which as per
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware is the upstream for
the Ubuntu linux-firmware-free package) for including a non-free driver;
and in Ubuntu's own linux-firmware-nonfree package for not including the
driver. A reasonabl
Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11: Resource temporarily
> unavailable)
> E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), is another
> process using it?
Looks like you had multiple APT clients running at the same time.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> install/dictionaries-common: Byte-compiling for emacsen flavour emacs23
> Unsuitable coding system for keyboard: vietnamese-tcvn-unix
> emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/dictionaries-common
> emacs23 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-commo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Closing as Invalid as per latest comment.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991526
Title:
package emacs23-nox 23.3+1-1ubunt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 466531
ecb: incompatible with emacs23, breaks installation / upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #466531, so is being marked as such. Pleas
Quoting the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermLog.gz:
> install/dictionaries-common: Byte-compiling for emacsen flavour emacs23
> Wrote /usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp/dictionaries-common/debian-ispell.elc
> >>Error occurred processing ispell.el: error (("IO error reading
> >>/usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #789706, so is being marked as such. Pleas
The dictionaries-common postinst script wants to compile for xemacs21,
which is not found. This points to a possible problem with your
xemacs21 installation, but nothing is visible from the logs. What is
the status of your xemacs21 installation? If you remove it, are you
able to proceed with the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #789706, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
While the error message is unsettling, the actual error message looks
more like just a warning. Is your system operational and usable? Do
you have any comments on how to reproduce this problem?
** Changed in: emacsen-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
"Affects me too" reporters: Please check your /var/log/dist-
upgrade/term.log (if you did a dist-upgrade) or /var/log/apt/term.log.
The error message about emacs23 is misleading and uninformative; you
have to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
Bump? Could we at least have the importance of bug #466531 upgraded to
Outrageous?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051783
Title:
SRU request: please merge 2.40+cvs20110608-3 to 12.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
Huh? It depends on emacsen, not emacsen-common.
** Changed in: emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055697
Title:
emacs-goodies
Marking as Invalid as per OP's last comment, with some hesitation. Do I
understand you correctly that this works as intended in new
installations? Feel free to change the bug's status back to New if you
think there is something here for us to investigate.
** Changed in: haskell-mode (Ubuntu)
The error which relates to xemacs21 is apparently bug #971562 but there
is a large number of other errors in VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz which
seem more serious, including a problem with LSB. Reassigning to lsb for
further investigation.
** Package changed: xemacs21 (Ubuntu) => lsb (Ubuntu)
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
Identical dupe to bug #1054532. Closing as Invalid rather than
duplicate in order to keep duplicate counts sane.
** Changed in: xemacs21 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
I should also note that (emacs.gz)Minibuffer works for me. But
obviously, the hyperlinks between officially packaged documents should
work without manual editing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Confirmed; trivially reproducible (though you have to be somewhat
familiar with the Info reader to know how to navigate; press Enter on a
link etc).
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
The attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt indicates a problem while removing
emacs23. Your report states that installing it is not possible, either.
The DpkgTerminalLog.txt seems truncated; do you have older versions of
this file /var/log/dpkg/term.log.0 term.log.1.gz etc which you could
upload? Or better
** Description changed:
This is basically a request to fix bug #466531 for Precise users, but
because the original bug report is more wide in its scope and has a long
history, I am opting to file a separate SRU request under a dedicated
bug number.
[IMPACT]
- * Upgrading to Precis
See also bug #1051783 for a SRU proposal for Ubuntu 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Title:
ecb: incompatible with emacs23, breaks installation / upgrade
To manage notifi
@ubuntu-sru: please accept this nomination for Precise. I cannot add a
"target for release" myself but I hope you can cope with this minor
deviation from protocol.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Public bug reported:
This is basically a request to fix bug #466531 for Precise users, but
because the original bug report is more wide in its scope and has a long
history, I am opting to file a separate SRU request under a dedicated
bug number.
[IMPACT]
* Upgrading to Precise is impossible on
201 - 300 of 2285 matches
Mail list logo
