This problem persists with Ubuntu 20.10 released today.
The modprobe/rmmod/modprobe method above still works there, however it
is very inconvenient to have to perform those steps after each reboot.
Unfortunate, as Ubuntu has been the distro that I've used and
recommended to others for the last
Confirmed working Xenial:
snmpd:
Installed: 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4
Candidate: 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4
Version table:
*** 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
And Bionic:
snmpd:
Confirmed testpkg20190906b3 fixes the issue for me as well.
I imagine there will need to be a xenial backport too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843036
Title:
[regression] SNMP
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1843036 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843036
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1842924
hrStorage Not Available In 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.3
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1843036
[regression] SNMP missing disks in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1843036 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843036
Dev is apparently happening on this ticket FYI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1843036
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1843036
[regression] SNMP missing disks in
Docker test case attached - if you untar this, and
cd DockerTestCase
docker build .
It'll run through, download the pkg from your PPA and illustrate that OIDs
above 30 are missing.
8ubuntu3.1 returns this:
iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3.1 = STRING: "Physical memory"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3.3 =
Duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-
snmp/+bug/1842924
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843036
Title:
[regression] SNMP missing disks in hrStorageTable
To
Need this too if you haven't included it...
** Patch added: "fix_hrstorage_after_autofs.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1843036/+attachment/5287145/+files/fix_hrstorage_after_autofs.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Patch provided on upstream bugreport
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/patches/1350/
Here's the quilt version of the chatter...
** Patch added: "fix_hrstorage_after_autofs.patch"
Or not, I think I found it.
This line:
/* Skip AUTOFS entries */
if (entry->type == NETSNMP_FS_TYPE_AUTOFS)
continue;
Looks really innocuous until you run it through gcc -E:
if (entry->type == 7 | 0x1000 | 0x2000)
continue;
At which point you
I removed
#if HAVE_GETFSSTAT
And
#endif /* HAVE_GETFSSTAT */
Based on looking at the Check_HR_FileSys_NFS function earlier in the file, it
was structured like:
#if HAVE_GETFSSTAT
something that looks nothing like the autofs function above with different
constants
#else
something that looks
While that's wrong it must be more than that because changing it didn't
fix it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842924
Title:
hrStorage Not Available In 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.3
To
This part looks questionable:
@@ -839,6 +839,27 @@ Check_HR_FileSys_NFS (void)
return 0; /* no NFS file system */
}
+/* This function checks whether current file system is an AutoFs
+ * HRFS_entry must be valid prior to calling this function
+ * return 1 if AutoFs, 0 otherwise
+ */
Some behavior seen here, on Xenial but also on Bionic @
5.7.3+dfsg-1.8ubuntu3.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842924
Title:
hrStorage Not Available In 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.3
To
Any word on when this will be fixed? Or has it been fixed but not
backported to 12.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045326
Title:
using valgrind with mpirun causes problems
To
Public bug reported:
My computer errored out I'm not sure why..
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: ureadahead 0.100.0-12build1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.46-generic 3.5.7.7
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
AptOrdering:
vsftpd:
It would be great to see this backported to versions that the various
long-term support Linux distros use. Otherwise this bug fix (long
overdue) still won't reach a lot of users until their next OS upgrade,
at least.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
On a 64-bit install of precise, there's no way to install acroread.
Here's what doesn't work on my system:
- A direct install (via synaptic, software manager, apt-get or dpkg) of
acroread fails, because the only version available is a 32-bit version
from oneiric that depends
The only obvious difference, to my eye, is the order in which precise
partners is read relative to other repos. This seems -way- too
sensitive to me.
** Attachment added: With this sources.list file, acroread doesn't install.
** Attachment added: With this sources.list file, everything goes smoothly.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1078103/+attachment/3431667/+files/sources.list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
This error occurred when attempting to apt-get install gedit
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libglib2.0-0 2.32.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-31.50-generic 3.2.28
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-31-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060977
Title:
package libglib2.0-0 2.32.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
triggers looping, abandoned
To manage notifications about this bug go
I have had a similar problem over HTTPS with flash player 8/9.
After browsing the adobe forums the problem seam's to be, and i quote
here
There is a Flash-Player-and-Firefox issue with putting :443 in the
url. For standard http port 80 and https port 443, when Firefox returns
policy
23 matches
Mail list logo
