For Jaunty it is preferred that you do not add a patch system since it
introduces more changes to the package than are necessary. If you insist
on adding the patch system, please follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines. As it
is now, there is no attribution, originat
This is in Jaunty now:
mktemp (1.5-9) unstable; urgency=high
* Upstream patch to remove pid from name generation. closes: #495193.
** Changed in: mktemp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
mktemp-generated filenames insufficiently random when too short
https://bugs.launchp
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
package system-tools-backends 2.6.0-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320819
You received this bug notifi
Thanks Paul. Marking Invalid per upstream bug report.
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Possible buffer underflow caused by integer overflow in the image conversion
routines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288823
You received this bug notification because y
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12335
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
crafted reiserfs filesystem image local DoS (reboot)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276350
You received this bug notification because
abstractions/ssl_keys on Jaunty). What do people think?
** Changed in: openldap2.3 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: openldap => apparmor
--
Apparmour doesnt suppo
I meant to have:
/etc/ssl/ r,
/etc/ssl/** r,
--
Apparmour doesnt support use of /etc/ssl/
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317109
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
Per Gentoo, it's now fixed in all releases.
** Changed in: gentoo
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
Bugwatch: Gentoo Bugzilla #209460 => None
Status: Confirmed => New
** Changed in: gentoo
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Local root exploit in kernel 2.6.17 - 2.6.24 (vmsplic
This is working fine for me on Jaunty now. Marking as Fix Released. If
you feel this in in error, please reset the status to New.
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: zim (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
zim crashed with SIGSEGV in Perl_av_clear()
https://bugs.lau
I didn't try, but the message made it clear that it would. The point
was that nautilus-cd-burner should have a similar warning.
--
nautilus-cd-burner silently fails when directory depth is too large
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292152
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Marking as Fix Released since I haven't seen this happen during the
Jaunty cycle.
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
occasional boot hangs after installs with kvm smp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221059
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Marking the iptables task as "Won't Fix" as it is too intrusive and ufw
in Jaunty can run without the newer iptables.
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Summary changed:
- Please backport ufw 0.22 from intrepid
+ Please backport ufw from Jaunty
** Descript
Marking the ufw portion of the bug as Fix Released, and assigning to me,
as the changes required for later versions of ufw to run on Hardy have
been incorporated in Jaunty. Leaving the Hardy Backports task to
Didier.
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Ja
** This bug has been flagged as a security issue
--
kvm vulnerable to several CVEs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213570
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
e reports similar, they can't connect to ther S-E phone
starting from Interpid.
-- Jamie
--
Bluetooth association no longer works
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
dpkg too many errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321000
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Jaunty now has 0.2.0.33-1
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu Dapper)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** C
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. This
package is in universe and is community supported. If you are able,
perhaps you could prepare debdiffs to fix this by following
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityUpdateProcedures.
--
Security fixes in tor 0.2.0.32 and .33
https:/
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Bug watch added: Pidgin Trac #8252
http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/8252
** Also affects: pidgin via
http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/8252
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Pidgin nickname html insertion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299048
You received this bug notif
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
ignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
netdiscover segfaults when looking up vendors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
Oh, I didn't look far enough. While sprintf doesn't write too much, and
the for loop doesn't access beyond the end, tmac isn't null-terminated,
which could cause strcmp to fail (it expects null terminated strings).
--
netdiscover segfaults when looking up vendors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
clamav (0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~dapper3.3) dapper-security; urgency=low
[ Leonel Nunez ]
* SECURITY UPDATE:
* [CVE-2008-5314]: remote attack by sending a specially crafted JPEG
file
libclamav/special.c, libclamav/special.h, libclamav/scanners.c
* [CVE-2008-3912]: libclamav/mbox.c, libclam
All of these issues are fixed in Intrepid and higher.
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Clamav modules still disabled even though security issues are fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 18905 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18905
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 18905
gksudo should notify users that the password is being remembered and used
--
Local privilege escalation when the user u
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
security vulnerability in sun java packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
Jaunty already has sun-java5 1.5.0-17-0ubuntu1 and sun-java6
6-11-0ubuntu1.
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
**
Jaunty has 2.8.1.dfsg-0ubuntu2
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: dkim-milter (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: dkim-milter (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Changed in: dkim-milter (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => In Prog
** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Kees Cook (kees)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
Quassel main inclusion report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317892
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
2007-2423 was fixed in 1.5.7-3 (Dapper and Gutsy also have the fix)
2007-2637 was fixed in 1.5.7-2 and 1.5.8 upstream. While not clear from the
changelog, Dapper and Gutsy also have this commit
http://hg.moinmo.in/moin/1.5/rev/0e41a0429ee1 (this CVE may have been split
after publication)
2008-0
** Changed in: moin (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: moin (Ubuntu Dapper)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
** Changed in: moin (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: moin (Ubu
** Attachment added: "bzr_links.tar.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21748467/bzr_links.tar.gz
--
ecryptfs does not handle symlinks within bzr
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322532
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
/
bzr_links/.bzr/
bzr_links/.bzr/repository/
...
bzr_links/bar
bzr_links/foo
$ cd bzr_links/
$ bzr status
modified:
bar@
$ bzr diff
bzr: ERROR: The dirstate file
(DirState(u'/home/jamie/Private/tmp/bzr_links/.bzr/checkout/dirstate')) appears
to be corrupt: Bad parse, we expected to end on \
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. This
package is in multiverse and is community supported. If you are able,
perhaps you could prepare new source packages to fix this by following
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityUpdateProcedures.
--
security vulnerability in sun jav
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-716-1
** Changed in: moin (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[moin] [DSA-1514-1] multiple vulnerabilities
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200897
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 305264 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305264
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and appears
to be a duplicate of bug 305264, so it is being marked as such. Ple
Commenting per request in #ubuntu-meeting.
It is a really unfortunate situation that these certificates
unintentionally passed verification before the updates. IMO, the
security fix (that is also in other distributions now) is needed and
should not be backed out. Without it, man-in-the middle atta
Sorry this slipped. We have updated our request for audit procedures
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Auditing and
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess) so this shouldn't happen
in the future.
** Changed in: dirmngr (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-
This does not appear to work on Jaunty (1.1.16.1-2ubuntu1) either, but
plays in totem.
--
[regression] xine will not play certain mpeg video files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322834
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: csound (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: csound (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: dia (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: dia (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: eog (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
** Changed in: epiphany (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Also affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python2.3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Con
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
kvm vulnerable to several CVEs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213570
You received this bug
** Changed in: firestarter (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Firewall not persistent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
** Changed in: wordpress (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: wordpress (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Hardening Wordpress
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct sub
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
kvm vulnerable to several CVEs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213570
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
** Changed in: stunnel4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: stunnel4 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[CVE-2008-2420] stunnel incorrect OCSP validation vulnerability
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257949
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Chang
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
[CVE-2008-3459] OpenVPN vulnerability allows arbitrary command execution via
crafted
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in:
** Changed in: makejail (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
makejail must use ldconfig.real by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263614
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
[gutsy] Last security Update does render system unusable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
** Changed in: movabletype-opensource (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: movabletype-opensource (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: movabletype-opensource (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: movabletype-open
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
CVE-2008-3949: python execution from current directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274514
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Marking as Fix Released. It is fixed upstream and Ubuntu and Debian
still have 0.10 (so when we do get 0.12 or higher, we won't be
affected).
** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Format string vulnerability in kerneloops 0.12
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27
** Changed in: gksu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: gksu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
gksu does not warn about programs not in root's $PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271820
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
Ubuntu changes WPA2-password by itself
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278674
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Are you able to reproduce this on up to date Ubuntu 8.10?
** Changed in: jokosher (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
jokosher crashed as
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
shorewall generating garbled syslog entries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Unflagging as a security vulnerability. It seems more like a missing
newline and the referenced bugs don't seem related. Please re-mark as
security if there is evidence of attacker controlled memory corruption.
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
defective log entries from pa
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
CVE-2008-3658,2008-3659,2008-3660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286851
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direc
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
‘Clickjacking’ issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
vlc: buffer overflow in TY demux
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285922
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 209627 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209627
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 209627
lighttpd (security) ssl fix
--
new lighttpd security fixes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279490
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 209627 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209627
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 279490
new lighttpd security fixes
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 209627
lighttpd (security) ssl fix
--
New upstream release 1.4.20 fixes se
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Firefox Should Not Prompt for Password Save in Guest Session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290507
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
tcptrace is vulnerable against some of the fragrouter attacks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289983
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
dns resolver does not support dnssec
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Francois, can you submit a debdiff and mark the bug In Progress? Thanks!
** Changed in: mahara (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: mahara (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
CVE-2007-3215: remote shell command execution in class.phpmailer.php
https://bugs.launchp
** Changed in: libphp-snoopy (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
CVE-2008-4796: missing input sanitising
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
--
The init-script for NetworkManager can be run by non-root
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Francois, can you submit a debdiff and mark the bug In Progress
(combined with the fix for bug #293003)? Thanks!
** Changed in: mahara (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
CVE-2008-4796: missing input sanitising in Snoopy.class.php
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293004
You received this bu
hyperair wrote:
> You kidding? Bluetooth works perfectly for me on Intrepid, so please
> don't talk as though the entire Ubuntu community is affected. Either
> way, can someone who is affected open up a Jaunty installation (or
> LiveCD) and see if the issue is fixed over there?
It does not work fo
04 Device 004: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd
Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)
But then I've said my bug may be a different one.
-- Jamie
--
Bluetooth doesn't work (hci_cmd_task: hci0 command tx timeout)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268502
You received this bug notific
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 331556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331556
Turns out this was bug #331556 for me. I enabled 'Gnome Compatibility'
in compiz config settings manager and it started working again.
--
[9.04] Alt+F2 not working anymore
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Dapper)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Gutsy)
unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[jaunty] no internet connection: dhclient-script cannot be execve'd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332521
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Statu
Andrew, thanks for yours patches. I just reviewed them and the patch for
CVE-2008-5619 is extremely invasive and does not seem to go along with
Debian's changes as you mentioned in the changelog. Can you look at
Debian's 0.1.1-10, redo the patch and resubmit? Also, please reference
this bug number
** Changed in: libphp-snoopy (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
CVE-2008-4796: missing input sanitising
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Vincenzo, thank you for your work on this, however I cannot process your
patch for Intrepid, because we do not do full version upgrades for
security patches in Ubuntu. Instead, we backport fixes to the version in
the release version of Ubuntu. Perhaps you could prepare debdiffs to fix
this by follo
Thanks for trying, NagPer. Yes, there's a small hunk missing from my "diff" -
in include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h. Here's a new one, called
make_2.6.24_bluetooth_work_in_2.6.28.diff. You still apply it after copying
over the bluetooth tree from 2.6.24 over 2.6.28, as per the instructions.
**
Here's an alternative patch which might be easier for some people to try.
Just apply this one to a linux-source-2.6.28-7 tree.
It's exactly the same as the previous small patch, but you don't have
fetch a 2.6.24 tree yourself and copy bits over.
There's no point trying both patches, they're the s
)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New => In Progress
--
AppArmor profile for sbin.dhclient3 should handle connman
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333711
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Marking connman task as "Won't Fix" for the above stated reasons.
** Changed in: connman (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
AppArmor profile for sbin.dhclient3 should handle connman
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333711
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23055606/lspci-vvnn.txt
--
amd76xrom amd76xrom_init_one(): Unable to register resource
0xffc0-0x - kernel bug?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
701 - 800 of 7316 matches
Mail list logo