[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-11-19 Thread kkm
All three distros are fixed, thanks! What about Eoan? Does it need this fix, too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833660 Title: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'schedul

[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-11-19 Thread kkm
** Attachment added: "testlog-disco.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gce-compute-image-packages/+bug/1833660/+attachment/5306548/+files/testlog-disco.log ** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed verification-needed-disco ** Tags added: verification-done-disco -- Y

[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-11-19 Thread kkm
** Changed in: gce-compute-image-packages (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic verification-done-xenial ** Attachment added: "testlog-xenial.log" https://bugs.la

[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-11-19 Thread kkm
Sorry about messing with the status. I should have RTFM twice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833660 Title: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partit

[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-11-19 Thread kkm
Sorry Brian, I managed to miss the original notification. I'll check all 3 distros right now on the GCE. ** Changed in: gce-compute-image-packages (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-11-19 Thread kkm
** Attachment added: "testlog-bionic.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gce-compute-image-packages/+bug/1833660/+attachment/5306541/+files/testlog-bionic.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 1835738] Re: SRU: Update Python interpreter to 3.6.9 and 3.7.4

2019-09-21 Thread kkm
Adding a console log text from above because line wrapping made it unreadable in the body of my comment. ** Attachment added: "console-log-python3.6.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.6/+bug/1835738/+attachment/5290266/+files/console-log-python3.6.log -- You received this

[Bug 1835738] Re: SRU: Update Python interpreter to 3.6.9 and 3.7.4

2019-09-21 Thread kkm
I am not sure if this is the place to report this, but I cannot think of a better one to attract Mathias' attention, sorry. Four python3.6 packages (and likely also python3.7 and python3.8) currently available in the ubuntu-toolchain-r PPA have an unmet version dependency on the 'python3' packag

[Bug 1833660] Re: /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-06-21 Thread kkm
** Description changed: Xfer: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-image- packages/issues/783 I initially reported the bug there, but it appears the file is owned by you guys? I see this bug in Google Cloud images of 18.04 in --image=ubuntu-1804-bionic-v20190514 --image

[Bug 1833660] [NEW] /lib/udev/rules.d/99-gce.rules tries to apply 'scheduler=none' to partitions

2019-06-21 Thread kkm
Public bug reported: Xfer: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-image- packages/issues/783 I initially reported the bug there, but it appears the file is owned by you guys? I see this bug in Google Cloud images of 18.04 in --image=ubuntu-1804-bionic-v20190514 --image-project=gce-uefi-i

[Bug 1774794] Re: btrfs-convert executable is not included in btrfs-progs

2018-06-11 Thread kkm
FWIW, it looks like btrfs-convert is being dropped upstream. I just compiled mine from source, and it crashed after some heavy churning. The package description should be changed though (it explicitly mentions btrfs-convert). Here's a relevant thread: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?