Public bug reported:
I could not build an application using the libgeoclue-dev APIs because the
header file:
/usr/include/geoclue/geoclue-provider.h,
tries to include the non-existent
/usr/include/dbus/dbus-glib.h:
Copying (duplicating) the tree
/usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/ to /usr/in
I reported it years ago and never heard anything. I don't even know if the
bug is still there in more recent releases of gcc. Once I recognized the
problem, it was easy to get around by adding do-nothing statements to
reference variables whose code was getting optimized out. I also tried to
make a
I have found another similar case where adding a meaningless reference to a
variable within a loop caused a crash to go away.
This time it is gcc 4.6.1 in Ubuntu 11.10. I have now found this bug 3 times in
3 different programs in the past. All 3 cases were similar loops to the one
below, with th
Good way to get rid of bugs - ignore until they expire.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817768
Title:
GCC optimizer removes necessary code
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Using Ubuntu 11.10 (alpha 3) I was unable to install GCC 4.5.3 together
with libgtk2.0-dev. Synaptic failed, also after installing all current
updates.
Note that enough information was provided above for anyone to make these
kinds of tests without big time and effort.
--
You received this bug no
Additional information using GCC 4.5.2 in Ubuntu 11.04:
Optimization -O3: bug present
Optimization -O2 or less: no bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817768
Title:
GCC optimizer rem
** Attachment added: "application demonstrating bug"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/817768/+attachment/2266961/+files/mashup-2.9.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Woops. Here is the attachment
On 08/08/2011 03:21 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - please recheck with GCC 4.5 and GCC 4.6 in oneiric.
> - please attach a self-contained example, including the command options used
> - include the warnings building the file.
>
> ** Changed in: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu)
>
I conducted these experiments and here are the results:
+ GCC 4.4.5 in Ubuntu 10.04: NO BUG
+ GCC 4.5.2 in Ubuntu 11.04: BUG PRESENT
+ GCC 4.6.1 in Ubuntu 11.10 (alpha 3): NO BUG
Other factors:
+ The bug goes away if optimization is -O0 instead of -O3
+ The bug goes away if a do-nothing line of co
I tried to make a small stand-alone test but the test program always
worked. The problem is more involved. Of course my first suspicion was
corruption of memory coming from somewhere else in my program, but this
seems ruled out by the fact that it works fine without optimization and
it works fine w
I believe I provided this kind of information when I submitted the
report. Anyway, the bug seems to be gone in later releases of Ubuntu. I
was just letting off steam about how many bugs there are and how
ineffective the whole system seems to be. I have filed several bug
reports that were never look
Good way to reduce the 8 bugs: wait for the support period to
expire.
I don't plan to file bug reports any more, because there are too many
for Canonical to deal with and they only work on the really big
problems.
On 08/08/2011 11:45 AM, Pascal De Vuyst wrote:
> Ubuntu 9.04 is no longer suppo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817768
Title:
GCC optimizer removes necessary code
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/
Sorry the formatting got destroyed.
It would be better if you used a monospace font for this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817768
Title:
GCC optimizer removes necessary code
To man
Public bug reported:
GCC 4.5.2 in Ubuntu 11.04
The program below crashes when compiled with GCC 4.5.2 with optimization
level -O3. This is apparently a bug in GCC.
The crash does not occur if the program is compiled with an earlier
release of GCC, also with -O3 optimization.
The crash does not
No they did not at the time, but this problem seems to be gone now.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Andrey Utkin
<757...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote:
> Menu entries appear after reboot.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launch
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xdg-utils
When run as root user (via sudo) xdg-desktop-menu install is supposed to
install the menu for all users, but it installs the menu only for user
root. Other users do not see the menu. Adding the option "--mode system"
makes no difference. There a
Yes I am using Thunderbird.
xdg-email attachments with Thunderbird work OK in Ubuntu 10.04 but not in 10.10.
So has the capability been removed from Thunderbird?
thanks
On 11/25/2010 04:23 AM, Florian Boucault wrote:
> @kornelix: are you using Thunderbird? If it is the case you are proba
I installed the new xdg-utils and tested. It does not work.
The following command was tried:
$ xdg-email --attach "/home2/mico/images/best/NZ Lake Wakatipu.jpg"
A popup window gave the following message:
An error occurred while creating a message compose window. Please try again.
On 11/22/2010
Huh? I just received a notice that a fix was released.
On 11/15/2010 04:45 PM, Bhavani Shankar wrote:
> Having a look at this now
>
> regards
>
--
xdg-email fails with Ubuntu 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This bug was apparently never looked at. It no longer causes me any
problems since I replaced the use of "lp" with the GTK print dialog. If
no one else has complained, I think it can be canned.
--
foomatic-rip crashes trying to print a JPEG file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502319
You received
I see from the "additional information" that Ubuntu thinks I am running 10.10
Beta.
I did start with this, but I have been installing all updates, so I hope this
is not true.
--
xdg-email fails with Ubuntu 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664531
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xdg-utils
The following command was working in Ubuntu 10.04 and fails in Ubuntu 10.10:
~ $: xdg-email --attach "Desktop/image.jpg"
The command output is:
awk: line 15: regular expression compile failed (bad class -- [], [^] or [)
[...@a-za-z0-9.-\\
awk:
fotoxx uses standard GTK dialog to open files, like most other Gnome
apps. If 64-bit works but 32-bit fails, the problem is likely in the GTK
library libgtk2.0 or something called from there.
--
Fotoxx samba share access 32 bit like Geequie
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617892
You received this
Yes, I have reported several bugs, some of which actually got fixed, but
not because I reported them. 1800 bugs per week is a problem. Some FOSS
developers release buggy apps and hope someone else will fix them. Some
like to wait for the next release. Some are thankfully very
conscientious, like th
It was likely the kernel scheduler. I did not say this because I did not trust
my judgment.
So your rule is to ignore bugs without a package assigned? And you don't even
ask? Bad rule.
On 08/29/2010 12:35 AM, Fabio Marconi wrote:
> Hello kornelix
> I admit that is not easy to underst
That was not my question. Something was fixed and now the problem is gone.
How does that translate into a status "invalid"? I don't think anyone
took a serious look anyway, so it does not matter.
On 08/28/2010 06:35 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote:
> Hello kornelix
> You said:
> T
Why did you change the status to "invalid"? Something in the kernel was
clearly changed to make the improvements noted, we just don't know what.
On 08/27/2010 10:45 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote:
> Thanks for the reply
> This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being
> f
On 08/27/2010 03:41 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote:
> Hello
> Is this problem present with the latest updated Karmic's or Lucid's packages?
> Thanks in advance
> Fabio
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
The problem appears to be gone or almost gone in Lucid. I ran benchmark
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51095579/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51095581/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51095583/Dependencies.txt
** A
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: simple-scan
When trying to save a large scanned document (80+ pages), simple-scan processes
for several minutes and then fails with the following message:
ImageMagick returned error code 9
Command line: convert -adjoin /tmp/simple-scan-XRTTEV.tiff ...
/
outputs:
~ $: system-config-printer
Using drv:///hpcups.drv/hp-officejet_6300_series.ppd (status: 0)
~ $: simple-scan
** (simple-scan:6970): WARNING **: Unable to start device: Error during device
I/O
Till Kamppeter wrote:
> kornelix, this is bug #520466 which is already fixed. Please upd
system-config-printer finds the HP network printer but when searching
for the driver here is what happens. The search for driver dialog simply
ends with no message. This is the console output.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/system-config-printer/asyncipp.py", line 192, in se
I set up the print queue the usual way using the menu Administration ->
Printing, and printing works fine. If this does not work for scanning,
then Ubuntu has a problem what was introduced with 10.04. 9.10 works
fine with xsane using the same printer setup method.
Thanks for the info, I will see i
Robert Ancell wrote:
> Could you run the following from a terminal:
> $ scanimage -L
> Thanks
>
> ** Changed in: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
Reports from Ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04 (beta 1)
===
Li
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41486344/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41486345/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41486346/Lspci.txt
** Attachment adde
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: simple-scan
SANE in prior releases of Ubuntu works OK.
Simple-scan tells me "no scanners detected".
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDmesg: [ 26.451706] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
Date: Sun Mar 21 08:54:30 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.0
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cups
The following command causes foomatic-rip to crash in Ubuntu 9.10.
In Ubuntu 9.04 and earlier versions, this command works OK.
$ lp /.../somefile.jpg
Here are the messages that appear in 4 different log files.
Likely the 2nd message is caused by t
Still a problem in 9.04 and 9.10.
--
open(filename, O_DIRECT) on ntfs fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269946
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
Maybe this kernel is scheduling a hyper-thread CPU even when a "regular"
CPU is available. This would cause thread performance to go down about
50%. This would not account for the variance in measured CPU time.
--
erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628
You
Information I should have included:
The tests were done on a processor with 4 cores, hence the CPU time
for 4 threads can be 400% of the elapsed time.
--
erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
I wish your bug report system would not mangle formatted inputs.
I have added the entire report as an attachment.
Please view with fixed-width font (e.g. gedit).
** Attachment added: "kernel bug"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34311813/kernel%20bug
--
erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.3
Public bug reported:
There is apparently a problem in the latest kernel used in Ubuntu 9.10.
The scheduling of contending threads has become erratic in comparison
with Ubuntu 9.04.
Summary of Tests
test program: loop-bench, 4 independent looping threads
kernel CPU time variancethroug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xdg-utils
xdg-open uses firefox to open .html files even if html "open with" preference
is set
to seamonkey and preferred applications > web browser is also set to seamonkey.
Workaround: use command: $ xdg-mime default seamonkey.desktop text/html
**
I run no screensavers and I have the same problem.
I have a graphics application that produces the same symptoms: desktop
frozen, KB frozen, mouse moves but clicks to nothing. Ctrl-Alt-Backspace
does nothing. PC must be rebooted to escape.
The graphics application runs normally with Visual Effect
Brian,
The problem is still there in Ubuntu 7.10.
I have files on /home2/username/... where /home2 is a separate disk.
If I select one of these file in Nautilus and then select the context
menu "move to trash", I get the popup message "Cannot move to trash, do
you want to delete immediately?"
Paul,
Thanks for writing. Yes, the bug is still there in Ubuntu 7.10.
I never understood the "incomplete" status since I feel I provided
enough information to verify the bug.
I have characterized it a bit more: growisofs takes output from mkisofs
or genisoimage and writes to the DVD. The probl
I have not seen this happen again in months. Whatever was causing the
problem seems to have gone away, at least on my current Ubuntu 7.04.
--
ver. 1.2.8rel-5.1ubuntu0.1 causes browsers to fail on links to .png or .jpg
files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72411
You received this bug notification
You asked for a simple step-by-step instruction how to reproduce.
What part of the original post needs more explanation?
Here is a more elaborate version:
1. if you are using a fresh install, start firefox and create a bookmark
2. from a terminal window: $ sudo nautilus (i.e. start nautilus as roo
#90321 might be the same bug.
--
firefox resets its files, with total data loss
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128493
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
1. $ sudo nautilus
2. find a .html file with browser and click on it
3. firefox starts up and displays the .html file
User files at ~./mozilla/firefox/* are now in an initial condition, as
found after first startup of firefox after a new Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome
I installed 7.04 on a new PC and started to customize my desktop.
Afterwards I was not able to log in: gnome crashed after flashing my
desktop briefly and went back to the login screen. After a long process
of testing the modifications one at a time
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome
This applies to Ubuntu 6.06, 6.10, and 7.04 (and any Gnome desktop?).
If a user owns files in a partition not mounted at /home, files deleted
in Nautilus will not go into trash, but will be immediately deleted.
Nautilus warns about this.
My case:
I now question whether this has anything to do with the libpng update
mentioned before.
Epiphany browser works at this moment and Firefox fails.
Sometimes Firefox works OK on the same links to the same .jpg files. It
seems more likely this is a Firefox problem which can come and go
depending on w
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libpng12-0
1. update ubuntu 6.10 package libpng12-0 to 1.2.8rel-5.1ubuntu0.1
(released to repository on or before Nov. 18 when I first installed it)
2. both firefox and epiphany fail on some web links to .jpg or .png files
2.1 open http://www.gnomefi
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dvd+rw-tools
This is a known bug in growisofs since May 2005.
See Debian bug #307660:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307660
How to reproduce:
- make a DVD+RW media sufficiently defective so that growisofs fails
(score deeply with
Sorry for my ignorance.
If synaptic works correctly, and the package dependencies are correct,
then why was I able to update the kernel without the restricted modules,
using only synaptic, making x11 unable to start?
--
critical graphics driver dependencies ignored by synaptic
https://launchpad.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: synaptic
When using synaptic to update the kernel version, mandatory dependencies
for nvidia or ATI driver are ignored and resulting system fails x11
startup. The fix is easy when understood (install the correct
"restricted" package and manually update /e
58 matches
Mail list logo
