[Bug 1772148] Re: Mount.cifs does not work without keyutils being installed

2020-09-28 Thread krbvroc1
>From https://www.kernel.org/doc/readme/Documentation-filesystems-cifs- README Enabling Kerberos (extended security) works but requires version 1.2 or later of the helper program cifs.upcall to be present and to be configured in the /etc/request-key.conf file. The cifs.upcall helper program is

[Bug 1772148] Re: Mount.cifs does not work without keyutils being installed

2020-09-28 Thread krbvroc1
As far as I can tell, mount.cifs will not work properly without keyutils for several scenarios: - 'cifsacl' option is used or - kerberos auth is used / spnego is used - when kernel level dns resolution is needed - so the cifs upcall for dns.resolver is required All these cases where the cifs

[Bug 1772148] Re: Mount.cifs does not work without keyutils being installed

2020-09-26 Thread krbvroc1
I just spent days troubleshooting mount.cifs not working and ultimately determined it was due to this bug. I could mount okay, but no id/group mapping to the proper users would take place. All files were owned by the mounter or the uid/gid passed to the mount command. For 'cifsacl' option, this is

[Bug 241440] Re: bacula catalog fails due to missing script

2008-08-25 Thread krbvroc1
I recently updated my system from the 2.2.8 to the 2.4.2 release (Centos RPM). On my system I noticed that the files you are referring to moved from /etc/bacula to /usr/lib64/bacula. However, my bacula-dir.conf, bacula-fd.conf and bacula-sd.conf all contained references to the old /etc/bacula

[Bug 241440] Re: bacula catalog fails due to missing script

2008-08-25 Thread krbvroc1
I recently updated my system from the 2.2.8 to the 2.4.2 release (Centos RPM). On my system I noticed that the files you are referring to moved from /etc/bacula to /usr/lib64/bacula. However, my bacula-dir.conf, bacula-fd.conf and bacula-sd.conf all contained references to the old /etc/bacula