[Bug 779323] Re: Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver

2011-05-07 Thread lavinog
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779323 Title: Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu

[Bug 779323] [NEW] Xorg reboots with non-fglrx driver

2011-05-07 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H with embedded ATI Radeon HD3200 Video Card: ATI Radeon HD3650 Without fglrx installed, the system would reboot as soon as X is started (before login screen) This occurred on the live cd, however

[Bug 770480] Re: Multiple filesystems are mounted on same mountpoint

2011-04-25 Thread lavinog
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770480 Title: Multiple filesystems are mounted on same mountpoint -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai

[Bug 770480] [NEW] Multiple filesystems are mounted on same mountpoint

2011-04-25 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity While installing Natty beta2 from USB flash drive, I was unable to complete the install due to the installer not being able to unmount /dev/sda10: Apr 25 11:43:51 ubuntu ubiquity: umount: cannot umount /dev/sda10 -- /dev/sda6 is mounted over it

[Bug 740011] Re: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup

2011-04-19 Thread lavinog
I am having this problem with the beta2 live cd (64bit) I started writing about the issue on the forum: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1733315 ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I was able t

[Bug 373974] Re: Configuration Dialogs should not steal focus during updates

2011-01-30 Thread lavinog
I haven't had any updates that have brought up the dpkg screen, such as when there is a custom config file, and a update might overwrite that file. I think I may have been using grub1 when I first reported this bug. Having non-default settings in menu.lst was one of the things that triggered this

[Bug 559202] Re: xorg wrong window selected when clicking title bar

2010-12-05 Thread lavinog
This could be a duplicate of 494096: Clicking the title of a window is bringing a window underneath it into focus https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/494096 It should be fixed in 10.10, but so far, it doesn't look like a fix is released for 10.04 -- You received this bug noti

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-09-07 Thread lavinog
@jh: You might be experiencing a different bug, since both 32bit and 64bit guests are unusable with vmmouse installed. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-17 Thread lavinog
http://alinux.tv/Kernel-2.6.34/trace/mmiotrace.txt Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either $ grep -i lost mydump.txt which tells you exactly how many events were lost, or use $ dmesg to view your kernel log and look for "mmiotrace has lost events" warning. If ev

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-07-15 Thread lavinog
Package: ureadahead State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 0.100.0-4.1.1 -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-07-15 Thread lavinog
Ureadahead is not creating pack files now. $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb 128000 $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb 1408 $ ls /var/lib/ureadahead/ debugfs I was using a custom version before, the proposed patch should have overwritten it though. Can someone else c

[Bug 35009] Re: Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated

2010-06-27 Thread lavinog
Running Maverick in a vm. Update manager says: Your system is up-to-date The package information was last updated 20 days ago. This was using version 1:0.141 If the package information is older than a day old, it should only say when the package information was last updated. Not give the user a

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-06-17 Thread lavinog
@Julian: Does removing xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse from the client fix the issue? Also, what cpu do you have? I am wondering if this might be unique to AMD processors. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification

[Bug 575877] Re: gnome-keyring mysteriously asks for keyring password on startup

2010-06-10 Thread lavinog
There are three bugs here: - Keyring is not unlocked when user logs in with password. - Keyring steals focus with always on top dialog (frustrating when you are in the middle of typing something) - Keyring doesn't provide information about what application is requiring the keyring. This should b

[Bug 301203] Re: slabtop --once seems to exit without output

2010-06-07 Thread lavinog
This appears to still be an issue in Lucid slabtop -V procps version 3.2.8 slabtop --once > slabtop.txt cat slabtop.txt shows nothing, but the file size is 1518 bytes. head slabtop.txt will show the file as long as the last line isn't displayed. top -n 1 > top.txt creates a readable file -- s

[Bug 590455] Re: mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.

2010-06-06 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49775389/Dependencies.txt -- mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590455 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 590455] [NEW] mountmanager runs with admin privileges without user knowledge.

2010-06-06 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountmanager If sudo has been used for another program within the sudo time limit, starting mountmanager will automatically run with root privileges. For example the following commands will cause fstab to be rewritten without user consent: sudo ls mm T

[Bug 363550] Re: mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup

2010-06-06 Thread lavinog
Just running mountmanager clears all comments from my fstab without asking the user about saving any changes. Combined with running with admin privileges without the users knowledge, this is very dangerous. -- mountmanager deletes certain entries in fstab without creating a backup https://bugs.

[Bug 392073] Re: update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning

2010-06-04 Thread lavinog
Refreshing the package list by clicking "Check" button in update-manager allows the installation of the updates with the "Install Updates" Button. -- update-manager "Install Updates" button not functioning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392073 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 133139] Re: update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow

2010-06-04 Thread lavinog
I cannot recreate the issue in lucid. -- update-manager bug when loading Changes is slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears

2010-05-30 Thread lavinog
A couple of my family members liked the timer for the same reason Hellenion mentioned. It would seem that allowing the user to configure this behaviour would be the best way to go about this even if it is only configurable with gconf. -- Shutdown timer no longer appears https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 345374] Re: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet

2010-05-28 Thread lavinog
Why is this bug marked incomplete? Doesn't incomplete mean that more information is needed? -- Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 191 Gigabit Ethernet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 582432] Re: update manager should cache changelog information by url

2010-05-18 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48674263/Dependencies.txt -- update manager should cache changelog information by url https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 582432] [NEW] update manager should cache changelog information by url

2010-05-18 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Currently update-manager will download the same changelogs multiple times if there are multiple packages with the same changelog. Example: Today I started wireshark to capture packets. Started update manager The first package listed was ap

[Bug 582102] [NEW] Provide a method to ignore certain files

2010-05-17 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Wishlist: I noticed that dropbox can have a significant impact on boot time. I personally do not consider it to be essential to the boot loading experience, but if I happen to have the daemon set to start automatically, ureadahead will trac

[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)

2010-05-17 Thread lavinog
According to this site: http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2008/05/asus-eee-pc-ssd-read-and-write-tests-4g.html 32MB/s seems about right for a 16g 900. The 4g version reaches 44MB/s. I thought kerneloops was disabled in the final release, but it is shown in your bootcharts. Are you sure you are runn

[Bug 577763] Re: ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD)

2010-05-17 Thread lavinog
This could be a bug with the drive itself. 32MB/s seems really slow for a SSD. Maybe it would help if you post the specifics about your drive: sudo hdparm -i /dev/sda -- ureadahead slows down boot on cheap SSDs (e.g. EeePC 900 SSD) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577763 You received this bug no

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-05-14 Thread lavinog
The high cpu usage was on the host only when the mouse on the guest was being moved rapidly. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-05-14 Thread lavinog
Setting the live cd to run in safe mode works around the issue. -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 579523] Re: update should avoid being run when on the battery

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
I stand corrected, anacron does avoid running when on battery. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- update should avoid being run when on the battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 579523] [NEW] update should avoid being run when on the battery

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt-xapian-index Currently apt-xapian-index uses a significant amount of cpu while updating. If the battery level is low at the time of the update, the sudden increase in cpu usage could lead to a loss of the users data. I propose doing a check for if

[Bug 563076] Re: apt-xapian-index should live in /var/cache

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
If you delete the index, does it automatically rebuild itself, or does the user have to manually initiate the updater? The information is automatically generated on a weekly basis. Also it isn't a cache file, so why should it be stored in the cache folder? -- apt-xapian-index should live in /va

[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
some commands don't really need a space for values: ps aux|head -n1 is the same as ps aux|head -n 1 -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU

2010-05-12 Thread lavinog
I don't think the space makes a difference: Without the space: ionice -p 3477 idle with the space: ionice -p 3525 idle -- update-apt-xapian-index uses too much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-11 Thread lavinog
This bug exists in karmic also. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller

2010-05-10 Thread lavinog
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-10 Thread lavinog
I posted a upstart script that can recover the memory used after a profile: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9271524&postcount=9 -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller

2010-05-10 Thread lavinog
"should really raise a warning if ../base-dont-touch.img is smaller than 10GB" Here you are saying if the forked image is larger than the base image. "If QEmu doesn't handle a differnent size, even a bigger one, I don't see why qemu-img create -b ... should take a size argument at all." I just sh

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
@Petar: I replied to your comment at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1363165 I do not think this bug is related to your issue. I would like to help you figure out what is going on, but not here. To everyone else: The cause of the bug is known. Maybe Scott can give us so

[Bug 577592] Re: qemu-kvm dependencies require X

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
The guest is not required to use SDL though. The guest could use a vnc connection (I don't think audio is available when using a vnc connection either.) Although I am not sure of the actual issue with having X installed though. Is the issue the extra space used? If so, wouldn't the extra space

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
I am sure it is taken seriously. The dev is likely tending to more important issues at the moment. The issue isn't a security issue, and it doesn't seem to cause any data loss. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You

[Bug 565659] Re: qemu-img baseimage creation doesn't warn for image being smaller

2010-05-09 Thread lavinog
What image format is the base image? I just tested with qcow2 format and increased the size from 6g to 10g just fine (of course the file system size remained the same) kvm-img create -b Lucid_64_Base.qcow2 -f qcow2 test_img.qcow2 10G If you don't specify a format I think raw is used: kvm-img cre

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-05-08 Thread lavinog
I am attempting to install Lubuntu, but I am getting the same behavior with the live cd (there is no alt install yet). The problem here is that clicking install causes the screen to flicker and the installation dialog keeps moving down...I suspect this to be caused by this bug since I have exper

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-05-08 Thread lavinog
@james79: if the issue is that you are low on memory, you can release the trace buffer with: echo 1|sudo tee /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb I wrote a init script that does this automatically after a trace. I can clean it up and post it if it will help. If the issue is that you run ou

[Bug 18661] Re: Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp

2010-04-23 Thread lavinog
/tmp was a subdir of / in Karmic on my systems. -- Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.u

[Bug 548996] Re: high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized

2010-04-18 Thread lavinog
The issue seems to be fixed now. -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 501715] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling

2010-04-14 Thread lavinog
@Petar: I don't think this bug is your issue if uninstalling ureadahead didn't help. -- Kernel trace buffer should be cleared and size restored after profiling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 562774] Re: (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed

2010-04-13 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44114436/Dependencies.txt -- (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 562774] [NEW] (yelp:2664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed

2010-04-13 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp When starting yelp from the command line I get the following: --- (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MISC (misc)' failed (yelp:2889): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_misc_set_alignment: assertion `GTK_IS_MI

[Bug 559525] [NEW] Trace should ignore files in /var/log

2010-04-09 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Looking at the dump of my pack file, I see many log files listed. These files are constantly changing so it doesn't make much sense to store their information in the pack file. The files are more likely stored in more distant locations of the

[Bug 557887] [NEW] URL in description ends with a period

2010-04-08 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notification-daemon Viewing the information for popup notifications with ubuntu software center: The hyperlink includes the final period in the description. This is minor, but should be an easy fix. The simple solution is to remove the period. A better

[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
Nevermind about ureadahead. I uninstalled it and got the same behavior. -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
also after a successful reboot, I get a crash report for plymouthd (#553745) -- Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554079 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 554079] Re: Lucid boot failed to complete after fsck

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
Could ureadahead have something to do with this? I noticed this on my laptop when fooling around with ureadahead. After testing in a vm I can do the following: sudo touch /forcefsck reboot. fsck stalls at 70% for a sec, and the screen jumps directly to the desktop. ls / shows forcefsck still exist

[Bug 552165] Re: ureadahead should be disabled by default

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
Disabling ureadahead by default does not seem like a reasonable solution. There might be another problem that is compounded by ureadahead. It might help if you post a bootchart. You might want to look at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 -- ureadahead should be disa

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
I see 128000 kb was hardcoded into the source of ureadahead. I also see in mmiotrace.txt where this is used as an example: --- Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either $ grep -i lost mydump.txt which tells you exactly how many events were lost, o

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile

2010-04-07 Thread lavinog
It was mentioned in this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434502 that once online profiling is implemented, this issue will go away. I am wondering if a bug needs to be filed for the kernel because there is nothing to indicate that the memory is being used for tracing memory. Usi

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
If I am using kvm-qemu and not VMware, should the vmmouse driver be active? I will double check with the vmmouse_detect thing, but xorg is logging: (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_INIT (II) VMWARE(0): VMMOUSE DEVICE_ON (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enabled ... (II) VMWARE(0): vmmouse enable absolute mode

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
vmmouse_detect; echo $? produces 1, should that mean something? -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
If I attempt to move the mouse from one end of the screen to the other, it pauses half way in between and cpu usage goes to 80% - 100% (measured in htop) The lack of responsiveness makes it unusable. I will try jaunty and see...I don't recall having this issue with it. Removing vmmouse is a solut

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
I get the same result booting from the live cds: kvm -m 1024 -cdrom ubuntu-10.04-beta1-desktop-amd64.iso kvm -m 1024 -cdrom lucid-desktop-amd64.iso lucid-desktop-amd64.iso is the daily-cd md5sums: d88edd4c3640e2c90dd2bce16dbe86ae lucid-desktop-amd64.iso 7341b637218cf9a9b2334293c3df7e94 ubuntu-1

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
kvm /storage/greg/vm/Lucid_64.qcow2 -m 1024 -- [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
I removed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 and installed 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4 from launchpad, and the system was responsive after reboot. Then, I installed 1:12.6.5-4ubuntu1 back and the system had poor response again after reboot. What I don't understand though is that prior to today I had 1:12.6.5-2ubuntu4, but

[Bug 553081] Re: [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754836/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754837/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GdmLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42754838/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment ad

[Bug 553081] [NEW] [lucid kvm-qemu]High cpu usage when moving mouse

2010-04-01 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse Running lucid beta1 64bit in kvm-qemu vm: Sometime prior to beta1, system was responsive. Now I can barely move the mouse without causing one of the cpus on the host machine to peg out. And /usr/bin/X using all of the cpu resou

[Bug 137388] Re: LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set when it shouldn't be

2010-03-30 Thread lavinog
I just noticed this in a qemu vm with lucid. Desktop effects is not enabled, but launching the terminal with ctrl-alt-T I get direct rendering: No (LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT set) If I launch from the menu or alt-f2 then gnome-terminal I get yes. I am trying to troubleshoot some other weirdness and

[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart

2010-03-29 Thread lavinog
Could some sort of notice be displayed since other options take effect without reloading or restarting. The current behavior appears broken when there is no feedback of any kind. -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 550623] Re: hal-disable-polling assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: hal-disable-polling terminated

2010-03-28 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333874/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333875/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42333876/Disassembly.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 550515] Re: changes to indention options require restart

2010-03-28 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42316282/Dependencies.txt -- changes to indention options require restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550515 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 550515] [NEW] changes to indention options require restart

2010-03-28 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: geany Steps to recreate: open preferences>editor>indentation tab Change type (tabs to spaces or spaces to tabs) click OK The change doesn't take effect until geany is restarted. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: geany 0.18-1 ProcVers

[Bug 548996] Re: high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42075108/Dependencies.txt -- high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 548996] [NEW] high cpu usage when looking at package info when maximized

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Steps to reproduce: Click "more info" on a package. Maximize the window. Look at cpu usage, it will be really high (80-100%) and stay that way until you restore the window size or get out of the package detail page. ProblemType: Bug Arch

[Bug 548386] Re: Wrong Ubuntu Icon used

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Isn't it still the official logo? -- Wrong Ubuntu Icon used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 537418] Re: Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Something to also note is that clicking on the empty box displays an Ubuntu logo. So it seems that the logo should be displayed here, and not a blank image. -- Big empty box when there's no screenshot in software item screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537418 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 548937] Re: image not saved correctly on close

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42067469/Dependencies.txt -- image not saved correctly on close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 548937] [NEW] image not saved correctly on close

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot Steps to reproduce: Take a screenshot. Note the file size (mine were usually about 560k) Open the file in f-spot. Crop the image as small as possible. Exit f-spot, and click save. Look at the file size of the image: It didn't change. (560k for a 1

[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "screenshot of button corruption" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066750/Screenshot-Ubuntu%20Software%20Center.png -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42066220/Dependencies.txt -- resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 548920] [NEW] resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center If I resize the left pane back and forth, the forward and back buttons get distorted. I tested this on my laptop which is using the opensource radeon driver, and also using a qemu vm. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 26

[Bug 548911] Re: package details shows a shadow when no image is available

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42064045/Dependencies.txt -- package details shows a shadow when no image is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 548911] [NEW] package details shows a shadow when no image is available

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Steps to reproduce: Find a package that doesn't have a screenshot such as Biloba or 7zip. Click on "more info" to go to view the package details. A blank white screenshot is displayed with a drop shadow. The drop shadow gives the appearan

[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more

2010-03-26 Thread lavinog
Strike my last comment, it does it with packages that do have a screenshot. Openoffice.org Word Processor is one. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more

2010-03-25 Thread lavinog
I guess my issue requires a separate bug report. The issue I have only occurs when you view details of a package when the package doesn't have a screenshot and the window is maximized. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535292 You received this bug notif

[Bug 535292] Re: 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more

2010-03-25 Thread lavinog
Just noticed this today on my lucid -32bit machine. Open software center, maximize the window, choose a package and click more info. Cpu usage jumps really high until you restore the window size or get out of the info page. -- 100% processor load for 6 minutes or more https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 548415] Re: Shutdown timer no longer appears

2010-03-25 Thread lavinog
Looking at the source of gtk-logout-helper.c from indicator-session-0.2.7: in session_action(): if (action == LOGOUT_DIALOG_TYPE_LOG_OUT) { res = dbus_g_proxy_call_with_timeout (sm_proxy, "Logout", INT_MAX, &error,

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't reduce tracing buffer after profile

2010-03-23 Thread lavinog
Just found out about /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb It reads 128000 on my vm which is currently showing about 322M (tracing on) 182M (tracing off) diff=140M so it looks like it is the tracing buffer. Some questions: 1. Why is it that no application can differentiate memory used by the

[Bug 523072] Re: No longer able to resume from suspend with the Lucid kernel

2010-03-23 Thread lavinog
I am having the same problem except I am using the open source radeon driver. enabling pm_trace yielded this result: [0.601249] Magic number: 0:523:740 [0.601295] hash matches /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/drivers/base/power/main.c:471 Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu lucid

[Bug 543899] Re: import visual causes segfault

2010-03-21 Thread lavinog
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41579040/Dependencies.txt -- import visual causes segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 543899] [NEW] import visual causes segfault

2010-03-21 Thread lavinog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-visual Steps to reproduce in python: -- Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Mar 20 2010, 14:40:09) [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import visual Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- dme

[Bug 531823] Re: [lucid] All linux guests oops in kvm_leave_lazy_mmu during boot (9.04, 9.10, 10.04)

2010-03-20 Thread lavinog
I am experiencing some poor performance with beta-1 in qemu-kvm (didn't have this issue last month.) Would the removal of the patches (mentioned in comment #14) be the cause of this? I am using an AMD host, and just moving the mouse will cause the host cpu to spike. I tested an image of karmic,

[Bug 528543] Re: Optimize battery lifespan option

2010-03-08 Thread lavinog
The 40% limit is for if you plan to store your battery. I would not recomend operating a portable device at such a low capacity. Most manufactures seem to agree that charging a battery to the full capacity can reduce the life expectancy of the battery, but this seems to be in 80-95% area. Sho

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile

2010-03-02 Thread lavinog
This may need to fall under another bug report: Today I booted into recovery mode to recover some data from a failed drive, then resumed the normal boot into a console. I then moved a large number of files from one drive to another. During the transfer I thought that the system was acting slug

[Bug 424706] Re: libbluetooth3 removal would remove evolution

2010-02-15 Thread lavinog
What is the problem with leaving this package installed? It is not a very large package. If you are trying to go lightweight, you could try other email clients. I don't have any bluetooth devices, but I would imagine that evolution has many uses for bluetooth since it has features to sync with

[Bug 159594] Re: Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?)

2010-02-08 Thread lavinog
@shanen: Can you reproduce this after uninstalling ureadahead. I have noticed that when ureadahead does a trace (does it every 30 days or after an update) it can cause some xserver issues including segfaults. See Bug 501715 for more details. -- Crash to white screen of death (possibly Firefox?

[Bug 319146] Re: When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information.

2010-02-03 Thread lavinog
I am affected by this. I have installed Ubuntu on many computers for people that just wanted a basic computer. Ubuntu was perfect for them, and I rarely get any calls for help. Many of these users would want me to handle any major upgrades. I shouldn't have to keep records of who has what versi

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile

2010-01-22 Thread lavinog
I noticed that the first lines of dumping the pack file show the size of the pack which is pretty close to the size of the missing memory: Fri Jan 22 10:22:38 CST 2010 total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1021768 444560 577208 0

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile

2010-01-16 Thread lavinog
I see the debugfs mount also. Maybe it is related. I think this is also related to many users stability issues. If this doesn't get fixed, I would recommend disabling ureadahead for Lucid. It could be a bug in the kernel too. -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update

2010-01-16 Thread lavinog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 391479 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391479 @vish, no desktop effects. The problem occurs when dpkg requires a user response such as when a config file was modified by the user and dpkg asks whether to use the packaged version or keep the original. T

[Bug 373974] Re: Dialogs steal focus during update

2010-01-15 Thread lavinog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 391479 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391479 This bug effected me with metacity. I don't use compiz. -- Dialogs steal focus during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 501715] Re: ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile

2010-01-13 Thread lavinog
Since the used memory doesn't seem to belong to a process, and ureadahead requires the kernel to be patched, it seems that the issue might be in the kernel patch. Is there any information on what the patch is, or where to get the source? -- ureadahead doesn't free memory after profile https://b

  1   2   >