[Bug 1048094] Re: Background image not set when wallpaper is in encrypted home

2012-09-08 Thread mac9416
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048094 Title: Background image not set when wallpaper is in encrypted home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu

[Bug 1048094] [NEW] Background image not set when wallpaper is in encrypted home

2012-09-08 Thread mac9416
Public bug reported: When I set my desktop wallpaper, I expect my login screen background to change accordingly. However, I have an encrypted home directory, so lightdm cannot access the image. My solution was to store my wallpaper outside my home directory. But it would be nice if this step coul

[Bug 593182] Re: Keys fail to import

2011-07-09 Thread mac9416
Hey, Pedro, thanks for replying. I'm really not sure what the problem was. Maybe PEBKAC. At any rate, everything works fine now, so the bug can be closed. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 668382] Re: No warning before removing important packages!!

2011-02-04 Thread mac9416
I agree, USC should definitely let you know what packages are being removed. I had thought that it already did, but perhaps not. But I think it should go a step further for users who don't know what packages are important (my example in Bug #653293 had no idea what gnome-panel was) by giving them a

[Bug 668382] Re: No warning before removing important packages!!

2011-02-01 Thread mac9416
If I understand you correctly, Matthew, we have a couple of problems. 1) This message fails to appear when a dependency of ubuntu-desktop is marked for removal: “{title} is a core item in Ubuntu. Removing it may cause future upgrades to be incomplete.” 2) When a very important package is marked

[Bug 668382] Re: No warning before removing important packages!!

2011-01-23 Thread mac9416
I guess "The Ubuntu desktop system" is the ubuntu-desktop package. I'm glad Natty warns before removing that. Obviously the warning should be more strong considering the effect of continuing. I had thought this sort of thing was caused by APT's dependency calculation going weird, so the same thing

[Bug 653293] Re: Software Center does not warn a user when something important is marked for removal

2010-11-29 Thread mac9416
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 668382 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668382 Makes sense. I guess that's a good reason to look at any given bug's duplicates to see different angles on the same problem. Thanks for the clarification! -- Software Center does not warn a user when somethi

[Bug 653293] Re: Software Center does not warn a user when something important is marked for removal

2010-11-27 Thread mac9416
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 668382 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668382 Hi, Kiwinote, thanks for your attention to this bug! I see that the other bug was reported almost a month after this one. Isn't it customary to mark the newer bug as duplicate? It really doesn't matter which i

[Bug 653293] Re: Software Center does not warn a user when something important is marked for removal

2010-10-01 Thread mac9416
Harley's on Lucid. So am I, and I can confirm that a dialog pops up listing extra apps to be removed. But what I'm looking for is a strong warning when something is marked for removal that an Average User wouldn't remove (such as gnome-session). Harley obviously didn't realize that what he was remo

[Bug 653293] [NEW] Software Center does not warn a user when something important is marked for removal

2010-10-01 Thread mac9416
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Have you ever started to remove an app, glanced through the to-be- removed list, and... What is gnome-panel doing in there‽ It's happened to me multiple times. Fortunately, I always take time to double-check what's going to be removed and

[Bug 15093] Re: gksudo fails if using libpam-krb5 for password auth

2010-08-09 Thread mac9416
Since Jeff's patch was rejected upstream, I am tagging this bug accordingly. ** Tags added: patch-rejected-upstream -- gksudo fails if using libpam-krb5 for password auth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a

[Bug 405576] Re: Leafpad clean up GTK Include

2010-07-27 Thread mac9416
I forwarded the bug and patch upstream. You can look at the report here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590583 ** Tags added: patch-forwarded-debian ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #590583 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590583 -- Leafpad clean up GT

[Bug 579669] Re: Creates sources.list.d file with illegal character in name

2010-07-19 Thread mac9416
I went ahead and submitted a merge request for the patch. It seems to do what its supposed to do. If there's anything wrong, the software- properties folks will catch it. Here's the request: https://code.launchpad.net/~mac9416/software-properties/illegalcharfix/+merge/30334 ** Tags ad

[Bug 446216] Re: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list

2010-07-18 Thread mac9416
Done. Thanks, Philip! ** Tags added: patch-forwarded-upstream ** Tags removed: patch-needswork -- add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 446216] Re: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list

2010-07-18 Thread mac9416
I tested the patch, and everything seems to work fine. I've submitted a merge request here: https://code.launchpad.net/~mac9416/software- properties/add-apt-repo-remove-opt/+merge/30094 I'm not sure if I should change the patch-needswork tag to patch- forwarded-upstream or not since,

[Bug 446216] Re: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list

2010-07-16 Thread mac9416
** Also affects: software-properties Importance: Undecided Status: New -- add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 446216] Re: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list

2010-07-15 Thread mac9416
Here is an updated patch for Software Properties 0.75.10. I haven't had a chance to test it thoroughly, but I will. ** Patch added: "add-remove-option-to-add-apt-repository.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52008245/add-remove-option-to-add-apt-repository.patch -- add-apt-repository shoul

[Bug 446216] Re: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list

2010-07-15 Thread mac9416
Hi, Bernd, When I run 'patch < diff.txt' in the python-software-properties source directory, patch throws this error: "patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input." Looking at your diff file, it doesn't look like others I've seen. What do you think the problem could be? ** Tags added:

[Bug 579669] Re: Creates sources.list.d file with illegal character in name

2010-07-14 Thread mac9416
Hi, Adam, What does your patch change the + in sources.list.d lists to? For me, "sevenmachines-release+1-lucid.list" became "sevenmachines-release- 2B1-lucid.list". Is this what should happen? -- Creates sources.list.d file with illegal character in name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579669 Yo

[Bug 602815] Re: Description for Liferea is geeky

2010-07-11 Thread mac9416
Yeah, I think it could be worded better. BTW, thank y'all for working on this. :-) -- Description for Liferea is geeky https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 602815] Re: Description for Liferea is geeky

2010-07-08 Thread mac9416
OK, that helps make some sense of it. Still, I think the "average user" wouldn't find that info helpful. /me sits back and waits patiently to see if the GNOME folks agree. -- Description for Liferea is geeky https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602815 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 602815] [NEW] Description for Liferea is geeky

2010-07-07 Thread mac9416
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center The Software Center description of Liferea is rather unhelpful and confusing. """ Liferea is a simple FeedReader clone for GNOME. It is a reader for RSS/RDF feeds which also supports CDF channels, Atom/Echo/PIE feeds and OCS directories.

[Bug 593182] Re: Keys fail to import

2010-06-12 Thread mac9416
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50235358/Dependencies.txt -- Keys fail to import https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing lis

[Bug 593182] [NEW] Keys fail to import

2010-06-12 Thread mac9416
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: seahorse Hello, Here's how the problem occurs: 1) I start Seahorse 2) I click File > Import 3) I navigate to my flash drive and select mac9416.asc which is a PGP key I exported from an Ubuntu 9.10 install on the same computer. 4) Nothing happ

[Bug 440608] Re: Gnome System Monitor displays only static

2009-11-09 Thread mac9416
I thought I could reassign it to xorg-xserver-video-ati, but perhaps I was wrong. I'll let smarter folks than me worry about that. -- Gnome System Monitor displays only static https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 440608] Re: Gnome System Monitor displays only static

2009-11-09 Thread mac9416
That worked like a charm! Thanks, foureyesboy! I'm reassigning this to xorg-xserver-video-ati. Let me summarize a bit. Folks running Ubuntu on laptops with Radeon Mobility 7500s starting with Ubuntu 9.10 have seen gnome-system-monitor, gnome-do, and notifications appear as black and white strip

[Bug 474526] [NEW] man page gives wrong location for config files

2009-11-04 Thread mac9416
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pcmanfm In the pcmanfm man page it shows config files being in the following locations: """ FILES ~/.pcmanfm/bookmarks : stores your bookmarks. ~/.pcmanfm/main : stores your preferences. ~/.pcmanfm/mime_info : stores your mime infoma

[Bug 440608] Re: Gnome System Monitor displays only static

2009-10-08 Thread mac9416
foureyesboy helped me find out that my video driver is also radeon. And I also have a Thinkpad, though I can't figure out which one. -- Gnome System Monitor displays only static https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 440608] Re: Gnome System Monitor displays only static

2009-10-02 Thread mac9416
Hey, Pedro. How would I find that out? I tried looking in my /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but it doesn't exist. -- Gnome System Monitor displays only static https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 440608] Re: Gnome System Monitor displays only static

2009-10-02 Thread mac9416
** Attachment added: "gnome-system-monitor screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32864701/Screenshot.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32864702/Dependencies.txt -- Gnome System Monitor displays only static https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440608

[Bug 440608] [NEW] Gnome System Monitor displays only static

2009-10-02 Thread mac9416
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor Gnome System Monitor displays as a window of static. The same occurs in gnome-do. Ubuntu version: karmic 9.10 (development branch) gnome-system-monitor version: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 2 09