[Bug 475426] Re: atk_object_set_name: assertion `name != NULL' failed

2010-03-17 Thread patrix
After compliation & installation of Qt 4.6.1 on my system (Ubuntu Karmic), I am noting same bug with various Qt Developer GUI - Tools like assistant, linguist, designer. Eg : $ assistant ** (:24424): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion `name != NULL' failed -

[Bug 404428] Re: [karmic] no r600 DRI support in mesa

2010-01-23 Thread patrix
Why stuff that worked well in Jaunty , does not work with Karmic. Obviously is it regression whatever the reason. -- [karmic] no r600 DRI support in mesa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 301327] Re: Please Update/pack the jabref 2.4 branch in intrepid

2009-06-04 Thread patrix
** Attachment removed: "jabref_2.4.2-1_all.deb" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27166251/jabref_2.4.2-1_all.deb -- Please Update/pack the jabref 2.4 branch in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 382331] Re: Please update libcairo2-dev to match with installed version of libcairo2

2009-06-01 Thread patrix
I already new before your post that it might turn out to be invalid bug, but I really doubt if it problem with intrepid-release and intrepid- updates. I do not have anything like that in my sources.list, just have intrepid (main, universe, multiverse, restricted). May be following ubuntu forum thre

[Bug 382334] Re: libgtk2.0-dev : dependency version for libcairo2-dev not specified (intrepid)

2009-06-01 Thread patrix
Thats good. But to use Jaunty, I think, I still need compiz, ATI and Jaunty "Godmode" fix, lol -- libgtk2.0-dev : dependency version for libcairo2-dev not specified (intrepid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 382331] Re: Please update libcairo2-dev to match with installed version of libcairo2

2009-06-01 Thread patrix
Now, I doubt is libcairo (1.8.0-0ubuntu1.1 0) not an ubuntu version? based on policy output. -- Please update libcairo2-dev to match with installed version of libcairo2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 382334] [NEW] libgtk2.0-dev : dependency version for libcairo2-dev not specified (intrepid)

2009-06-01 Thread patrix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libgtk2.0-dev Ubuntu Release : 8.10 Package Policy : libgtk2.0-dev: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.14.4-0ubuntu1 Version table: 2.14.4-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages Package dependencies : Package:

[Bug 382331] [NEW] Please update libcairo2-dev to match with installed version of libcairo2

2009-06-01 Thread patrix
Public bug reported: Release : Ubuntu 8.10 Package Version : libcairo2-dev: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.8.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: 1.8.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages I am unable to install libcario2-dev ( & other developer packages de

[Bug 301327] Re: Please Update/pack the jabref 2.4 branch in intrepid

2009-05-28 Thread patrix
I had checked the src before making package it had all that was needed jgoodies & other libraries. I am not aware of policy process but this is as I said "Hack", for someone who wants to use it. I do understand packaging all those libraries with JabREf is not the right way to do it , as this libra

[Bug 301327] Re: Please Update/pack the jabref 2.4 branch in intrepid

2009-05-26 Thread patrix
JabRef Package Hack. I have not applied patches from SF for version 2.4.2. The package can be installed on Ubuntu Intrepid 8.10 (arch-i686). The MySQL export will not be functional, please check bug reports on SourceForge. It is a hack from 2.3.1-5 ubuntu-src package to 2.4.2-src package downl

[Bug 365716] Re: package texlive-base-bin 2007.dfsg.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-23 Thread Neo Patrix
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25902542/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25902543/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package texlive-base-bin 2007.dfsg.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-i

[Bug 365716] [NEW] package texlive-base-bin 2007.dfsg.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-23 Thread Neo Patrix
Public bug reported: I am currently using Ubuntu 8.10. I have certain upgrade problems due to version locked TexLive Packages 1) I am not updraging any of the TexLive packages from Ubuntu Repositories , since I want to keep using my current installation 2) For this prupose I have explicitly

[Bug 105191] Re: restarting xserver (or switching back to ctrl+alt+F7 from ctrl+alt+F1-6) hangs/crashes/freezes system with fglrx

2007-06-26 Thread Neo Patrix
All that I expect for peoples trust in Ubuntu is it should work best possible out of box. I am programmer, I can look around for solution and see what will work and what not. I am talking about people, who are not nerds and not programmer they like their upgrades to work normally , Ubuntu co

[Bug 105191] Re: restarting xserver (or switching back to ctrl+alt+F7 from ctrl+alt+F1-6) hangs/crashes/freezes system with fglrx

2007-06-26 Thread Neo Patrix
I wish I could give more insight on similar problem related to system- boot. I actually never trust linux distros though I like working on linux box because they are all peices joined together which somehow work and work well most of the time but not always. This is the only thing why I have to

[Bug 97096] Tomcat not working at all after few startups

2007-05-23 Thread Neo Patrix
I used the workaround and tomcat worked properly for few times. But now it does not work at all. When i start tomcat-5.5 using /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 start it doe show status as OK. But when I use , status command with /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 it displays status as serve not running!!! -- tomcat5.5