[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-30 Thread pierrestz
I think the performance regression of intel driver is due to the lost of the 'INTEL_BATCH' variable. This variable can be set in Hardy to get a huge performance boost in 3D (can be seen in glxgears, but also openarena, compizeffects...) for example in Hardy, compare the output of : glxgears and I

[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-19 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn_intrepid.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18683256/lspci-vvnn_intrepid.txt -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-19 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn_hardy.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18683248/lspci-vvnn_hardy.txt -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-19 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log_intrepid.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18683230/Xorg.0.log_intrepid.txt -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-19 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf_intrepid.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18683223/xorg.conf_intrepid.txt -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-19 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log_hardy.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18683220/Xorg.0.log_hardy.txt -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-19 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf_hardy.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18683213/xorg.conf_hardy.txt -- INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 284082] [NEW] INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-10-15 Thread pierrestz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel The INTEL_BATCH=1 environment variable doesn't seem to work in Intrepid. This option is used by many users to improve 3D performance in compiz, games, etc... on intel chipsets (i915, i945...) For example, without this option, i

[Bug 177492] Re: EXA is balls-achingly slow

2008-03-02 Thread pierrestz
With Hardy alpha5 : On my laptop (i915GM) it seems that MigrationHeuristic="greedy" is not enabled by default. i changed xorg.conf to put the lines Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy" Option "ExaNoComposite" "false" and the results (glxgears fps) were the same as before : no performance incre

[Bug 195843] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 should be enabled per default for Intel graphic hardware

2008-03-01 Thread pierrestz
I tried the INTEL_BATCH=1 on my laptop (i915GM, pentium-M 1000MHz ULV) and it improves my performance. I have the same measures with EXA or XAA for acceleration. glxgears : +33% (655fps->871fps) openarena benchmark : +32% in 640x480 (22.8fps->30.2fps) +18% in 1024x768 (14.9fps->17.6fps) -- INT

[Bug 146695] Re: Drastic Framerate drop in Gutsy Beta Compared to Feisty in glxgears [i865]

2007-11-29 Thread pierrestz
I saw a terrible fps drop between feisty and gutsy, it was due to a irq conflict (see bug n°155985) I solved this by booting with options pnpbios=off irqpoll maybe it could help ? -- Drastic Framerate drop in Gutsy Beta Compared to Feisty in glxgears [i865] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146695

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-11-29 Thread pierrestz
Solved ! I changed the boot options to : pnpbios=off irqpoll and it solved the IRQ conflict Looks like it was a hardware problem, not related to the xserver-xorg-video-intel package Thanks Peter anyway, keep up the good work ! ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incom

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-11-29 Thread pierrestz
by tweaking a bit some config files, i managed to get accidentally the '550+' fps in glxgears (and a smooth compiz) ! when i boot without configuring the network (a RT2500 pcmcia wifi card) the performance is good then when i manually configure the network (iwconfig, ifconfig and route) i get th

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-26 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo-feisty-liveCD.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10177482/xdpyinfo-feisty-liveCD.txt -- [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155985 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-26 Thread pierrestz
Here's the xdpyinfo output, for gutsy liveCD (bad fps) and feisty liveCD (good fps) I don't have the knowledge to explain this, but i hope you can... thx $ diff xdpyinfo-feisty-liveCD.txt xdpyinfo-gutsy-liveCD .txt 4,5c4,5 < vendor release number:70101000 < X.Org version: 7.1.1 --- > vendor r

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-23 Thread pierrestz
The performance regression is seen without enabling compiz. All the files i sent (xorg.conf Xorg.0.log lspci and now glxinfo) come from a liveCD session when not using compiz and i have the exact same poor performance after HD install with or without compiz thank you for looking at this bug, i c

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-22 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "lspci -vvnn" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10124343/lspci-vvnn.txt -- [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-22 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "old Xorg.0.log (feisty liveCD)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10124294/Xorg.0.log-feisty -- [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155985 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-22 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "old xorg.conf (feisty liveCD)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10124240/xorg.conf-feisty -- [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155985 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-22 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log liveCD" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10124232/Xorg.0.log-gutsy -- [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155985 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 155985] [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-22 Thread pierrestz
Public bug reported: Hello, i used to have 550fps in glxgears with feisty liveCD (i810 driver) now i have only 125fps with gutsy (intel driver) liveCD (in both case glxinfo says direct rendering: Yes) i tried to load the i810 driver in my gutsy xorg.conf, after HD install and i have the same poor

[Bug 155985] Re: [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install)

2007-10-22 Thread pierrestz
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf liveCD" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10124231/xorg.conf-gutsy -- [gutsy] performance regression with i915 xorg driver (glxgears in liveCD or after HD install) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155985 You received this bug notification because you are a member