[Bug 1245069] [NEW] Please update policyd-weight in precise

Public bug reported: Please update policyd-weight in precise so that new users won't get bitten by non-existing / malfunctioning rbl checks. Noteworthy changes from http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/p/policyd-weight /policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-5/changelog are listed below.

[Bug 1229643] Re: [ffffffffa070d1f3] ? fscache_object_work_func+0xb3/0x1f0 [fscache] / BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000002

** Attachment added: wc01_20130930_multiple_traces.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1229643/+attachment/3850842/+files/wc01_20130930_multiple_traces.txt ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1229643] Re: [ffffffffa070d1f3] ? fscache_object_work_func+0xb3/0x1f0 [fscache] / BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000002

Multiple traces while running kernel 3.12.0-031200rc2-generic #201309231935 from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.12-rc2-saucy/ . ** Attachment added: w1a_20130929_multiple_traces.txt

[Bug 1079605] Re: Please sync with the latest 0.113 from Debian testing

Will this update ship in saucy? I still see Version 0.103 on my system... Thanks, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079605 Title: Please sync with the latest 0.113 from Debian

[Bug 1194370] Re: intel_microcode: prepend_earlyinitramfs: not found

I'm also seeing this issue on my saucy system. Looks like initramfs-tools in saucy is still 0.103? Cheers, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194370 Title: intel_microcode:

[Bug 1229643] Re: [ffffffffa070d1f3] ? fscache_object_work_func+0xb3/0x1f0 [fscache] / BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000002

Upstream bug report https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62011 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229643 Title: [a070d1f3] ? fscache_object_work_func+0xb3/0x1f0 [fscache]

[Bug 1229643] [NEW] [ffffffffa070d1f3] ? fscache_object_work_func+0xb3/0x1f0 [fscache] / BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000002

Public bug reported: I encountered an kernel trace regarding Cachefilesd running 3.11.0-7-generic #13-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 10 20:55:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux under Debian Squeeze 6.0.7 amd64 on an Opteron barebone. This server is an NFS client using cachefilesd. The NFS server is Debian

[Bug 1229643] Re: [ffffffffa070d1f3] ? fscache_object_work_func+0xb3/0x1f0 [fscache] / BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000002

I'm running the Ubuntu kernel on Debian Squeeze where apport is not available. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62011 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug

[Bug 1225490] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000100000000

Public bug reported: I encountered an kernel oops running 3.11.0-7-generic #13-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 10 20:55:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux under Debian Squeeze 6.0.7 amd64 on an Opteron barebone. This server is an NFS client using cachefilesd. The NFS server is Debian Squeeze 6.0.7 amd64 running

[Bug 1225494] [NEW] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 24776 at /build/buildd/linux-3.11.0/fs/nfs/idmap.c:660 nfs_idmap_legacy_upcall+0x195/0x1b0 [nfsv4]()

Public bug reported: I encountered an kernel trace regarding NFS running 3.11.0-7-generic #13-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 10 20:55:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux under Debian Squeeze 6.0.7 amd64 on an Opteron barebone. This server is an NFS client using cachefilesd. The NFS server is Debian Squeeze 6.0.7

[Bug 1225490] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000100000000

Please let me know if i should forward this to the kernel mailinglist instead! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1225490 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at

[Bug 1225494] Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 24776 at /build/buildd/linux-3.11.0/fs/nfs/idmap.c:660 nfs_idmap_legacy_upcall+0x195/0x1b0 [nfsv4]()

Please let me know if i should forward this to the kernel mailinglist instead! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1225494 Title: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 24776 at

[Bug 1225494] Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 24776 at /build/buildd/linux-3.11.0/fs/nfs/idmap.c:660 nfs_idmap_legacy_upcall+0x195/0x1b0 [nfsv4]()

I'm running the Ubuntu kernel on Debian Squeeze where apport is not available. Might be related to Bug #1225490. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1225490] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000100000000

I'm running the Ubuntu kernel on Debian Squeeze where apport is not available. However, i can report that kernel 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 3.2.46-1~bpo60+1 from Debian Squeeze Backports does not generate this issue. (The above settings are applied there too). Might be related to Bug #1225494. **

[Bug 1225490] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000100000000

Another oops happened just now. Attaching the file. Another reason for incomplete traces might also be that this host is running as a node in a pacemaker cluster where it is stonithed once it becomes unresponsive (STONITH happened at Sep 14 21:36:01 to 21:36:04 though) ** Attachment added:

[Bug 1224029] [NEW] Please update postfix in saucy to 2.10.2

Public bug reported: Please update postfix in saucy to 2.10.2 [1]. It contains changes that seem important for SSL/TLS interoperability, e.g.: * TLS Interoperability workaround: turn on SHA-2 digests by force. This improves interoperability with clients and servers that deploy SHA-2 digests

[Bug 1224029] [NEW] Please update postfix in saucy to 2.10.2

Public bug reported: Please update postfix in saucy to 2.10.2 [1]. It contains changes that seem important for SSL/TLS interoperability, e.g.: * TLS Interoperability workaround: turn on SHA-2 digests by force. This improves interoperability with clients and servers that deploy SHA-2 digests

[Bug 1220616] Re: missing modules in linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic

thank you. comming from debian, i have missed this split. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1220616 Title: missing modules in linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic To manage notifications about

[Bug 1220616] [NEW] missing modules in linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic

Public bug reported: please compare the files that are shipped with the two 3.11 kernel packages: linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic [1] and linux-image-3.11.0-2-lowlatency [2]. linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic is missing 700+ modules which should be shipped, according to /boot/config-3.11.0-4-generic

[Bug 1220616] Re: missing modules in linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic

Unable to run apport-collect as the system does not boot due to a missing module for the installed RAID card (module: arcmsr). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1220616 Title: missing

[Bug 964429] Re: Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/sbin/fcheck line 1366.

as far as i can see, no update has been release to precise yet. will this happen anytime soon? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964429 Title: Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at

[Bug 964429] Re: Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/sbin/fcheck line 1366.

the corresponding patch from debian can be found at http://patch- tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/fcheck/2.7.59-18/10_fix_deprecation_warning.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 523896] Re: useradd: cannot lock /etc/passwd; try again later.

FYI: There is a typo on the changelog: * debian/passwd.upstart: Add an upstrat job to clear locks on [shadow-]passwd/group. (LP: #523896). upstrat vs. upstart Cheers, Raoul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 915870] Re: dig crashed with SIGABRT in raise() when using +trace +sigchase

hi! i tried to report the problem using the report bug app that pops up after the error but after clicking send there is no additional output / bug report to fill out. I'm seeing this error on dnsutils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS AMD64) as well as on 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze5

[Bug 915870] Re: dig crashed with SIGABRT in raise() when using +trace +sigchase

hi! i tried to report the problem using the report bug app that pops up after the error but after clicking send there is no additional output / bug report to fill out. I'm seeing this error on dnsutils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.1 (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS AMD64) as well as on 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze5

[Bug 915870] Re: dig crashed with SIGABRT in raise() when using +trace +sigchase

i'm not running 11.10 anymore. however, i receive a coredump when running the follwoing command on 12.04: dig +trace +sigchase +trusted-key=./root.keys bhatia.eu (report will follow) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 915870] Re: dig crashed with SIGABRT in raise() when using +trace +sigchase

i'm not running 11.10 anymore. however, i receive a coredump when running the follwoing command on 12.04: dig +trace +sigchase +trusted-key=./root.keys bhatia.eu (report will follow) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 962626] Re: remmina crashed with SIGSEGV in freerdp_channels_data()

the steps taras is outlining seem to be the correct ones for reproducing this crash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962626 Title: remmina crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Bug 905637] Re: gs crashed with SIGSEGV in gx_pattern_size_estimate()

i haven't encountered any such crash anymore. so i suppose it has been resolved or was a strange coincident. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905637 Title: gs crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Bug 879926] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in g_param_spec_pool_lookup()

i encountered this bug when i tried to open a .pdf attachment from thunderbird. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879926 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in g_param_spec_pool_lookup()

[Bug 890266] Re: pressing C for Copy in the context menu

any update on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890266 Title: pressing C for Copy in the context menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: